Find Joy in Any Job: Why Am I Unhappy at Work?

Legal teams face more data and more scrutiny than ever. They need AI built for both. Relativity is the AI platform for legal work, delivering defensible AI that handles the tedious tasks so judgment stays where it belongs with you. Learn more at relativity.com/ideacast. Marketers know how it feels to invest in something that seemed incredible but didn't live up to the hype. We optimize for impressions, but then don't see any revenue. Instead, get the highest ROAS of all major ad networks with LinkedIn Ads. Spend $250 and get a $250 credit. Just go to linkedin.com/ideacast. Terms and conditions apply.

What I really dislike about my job is really things like paperwork. Filling out insurance forms, talking on the phone to schedule appointments, going to meetings. Probably my biggest frustration is when the work that I do, which I'm so passionate about, doesn't connect well to larger strategic initiatives, or there is a gap in helping the organizational leadership see that. What I dislike or what I avoid is creating reports. I think some of that is that I'm afraid the reports are going to reveal that I'm not doing my job well. There are definitely parts that I, I dislike and kind of reserve for special days when I'm in a particular mood. Those parts are, are really the challenges that come with developing marketing ecosystems through different softwares that don't speak well together. Work activities that I dislike, typically things about dealing with hard conversations with some of our team. We are a growing team and we are experiencing growing pains at times. I think I dislike that I don't have as many opportunities to work with companies or organizations where social impact is at the core of who they are.

I'm Alison Beard, and this is Find Joy in Any Job, a special series of the HBR IdeaCast looking at how to find more to love in your work and help other people do the same. Those were a few HBR listeners sharing the frustrations they have with their jobs, and I'm sure many of you have similar issues—office politics, unclear paths to advancement, boring assignments, stress, burnout. When things like this build up, it can make you want to quit. But that's not the only way to solve the problem. Often, it's not the best way. In fact, for a lot of people, it's not even possible. So each Thursday for the next 4 weeks, we're going to take you in a different, and we hope more viable and positive, direction. We'll help everyone figure out how to make their existing work situations better for themselves and their teams. Our guide is Marcus Buckingham. He's a researcher, consultant, and author. And his latest book is called Love and Work. It's about digging down to unearth what actually makes us happy and then finding a way to make sure those things are part of our jobs. But first, let's understand the problem in a little more detail. Markus, so glad to have you here. Hey, Allison, lovely to be here.

Big picture, how unhappy are workers right now?

Well, as part of this institute work, we have a chance to do these global studies of sentiment about work. Prior to the pandemic, engagement levels around the world were hovering around 18% of people fully engaged, and resilience levels were about 17% feeling highly resilient. Engagement and resilience are slightly different. Engagement's about your proactive frame of mind to deliver of your best, and resilience, as you would expect, is really how well do you respond to challenges and obstacles that you face. And then the pandemic hit, affected us all differently, but basically now The most recent data that came out of a 27-country study is both of those things have sunk 2 points, 2 points lower in engagement, 2 points lower in resilience. And we didn't start at a very high level. So the bottom line for many of us, for all sorts of different reasons, work just isn't working. And did you find any differences across industries, geographies, or age or demographic groups? Well, funnily enough, age, no, not really. I mean, I know we talk about the fact that boomers are sort of more resilient than, say, the Gen Zs or Gen Ys, and we talk about the millennial generation being the teacup generation and they're superficially confident, but you drop them and they shatter. But our data didn't actually reveal that at all. And this is 3 years of now north of 75,000 people around the world. So it's not really an age thing. Gender, there's really not much difference in gender. What we did find is difference by country, which is sort of interesting. The least resilient country in the world right now is Sweden. The most resilient country in the world right now is the United Arab Emirates. I don't entirely know why, but Sweden's at 8% and the UAE is at 25%. We did find some countries that were more resilient than they were engaged and vice versa. So China is highly resilient, but not very engaged. And Israel is very engaged, but weirdly not very, in terms of sentiment, resilient. The biggest discovery of late is that the two least engaged and least resilient populations are number one, healthcare workers.

Not surprising given the pandemic.

Yes, although, Alison, that number was also true before the pandemic. Even before the pandemic, 73% of doctors say that they wouldn't tell their kids to be doctors. And you had nurses having higher levels of, twice as high levels of PTSD than veterans returning from war zones. And that was before the pandemic. The second least resilient, least engaged, work group, sadly, is teachers. So healthcare and education are the two least engaged, least resilient professions.

And that's surprising because you do think of those roles, jobs, as having some intrinsic rewards, you know, being fulfilling in lots of ways. So that's really depressing.

It is. I mean, we put our sick people in there and then we put our kids in there and You're right. There's so much written, isn't there, about find your purpose and that the why is what you need to find. And of course, it's good to have a purpose, but boy, if there were two professions where your why, your purpose was really vivid and you could really go to work every day feeling meaningful about what you're doing, it would be healthcare and education. And yet the work itself drains the living daylights out of them, at least according to them. And you're right, the pandemic's just In a sense, it's just turned the screw on what was a preexisting problem.

And so what's your sense as to why this is happening? Why do people feel so disengaged in their jobs both before the pandemic and now as we hopefully emerge from it?

Firstly, obviously, as you said, it does vary by person. It varies by country. It'll vary a wee bit by industry. But in general, if you were to point to 3 things that were causing this gross alienation and dissatisfaction at work, work, the first thing you'd point to is an erosion of trust. Only 14% of us strongly agree that we trust our team leader or senior leaders. 14% of us. And again, it varies a little bit by industry, but, but 14% of us is not a very high number. And of course, it's very difficult for you to grow, for you to develop, for you to feel agency if you aren't in an environment that's filled with trust. The second thing is what I would call the demise of teams. Since human beings started working together 50,000 years ago, we do most of our best work on teams. I mean, that's how humans work. We aren't by ourselves in a shed at the bottom of the garden. Most of us feel most productive when we're working on teams. And 65-odd, 66% of us say we do our work on more than one team, actually. So teams is the natural human state. Of working healthily. And in many, many industries, we've just forgotten that humans work best when we thrive. I mean, the relationships between engagement and team membership are really strong. It's almost impossible for you to feel engaged at work if you are not part of a team. I think the last part of it is most work is just a really strong emphasis on conformity. We've got competency models and attributes and job descriptions that basically say, in order to do this job well, you've got to meet all these requirements. And then we've got feedback tools and 360s and grades and ratings that rate you against the model. And so in the end, it means that for many of us at work, we aren't seen. We aren't seen for who we are as individuals. So those three things amongst a lot of other variation, those three big ones, trust, teaming, and conformity are causing a lot of us to feel ticked off, frankly.

And it sounds like that's an organizational problem, right? The employers, the workplaces need to be fixed.

Yes. Now there is stuff that the individual can do. Certainly as a result of the pandemic, obviously we've, for many of us, we've gone down pretty deep. We've looked at ourselves in the mirror and sometimes it was pretty scary, but at other times we came to realize some things about ourselves in terms of our routines and our rituals and our self-mastery. And when are we most productive? When are we least productive? What routines should we put into our lives? But you're right. I mean, the basic challenge for us all is that we've designed work. I mean, look at nurses. You've got nurse supervisor to nurse ratios of 1 nurse supervisor to 60 nurses. And then you wonder why the nurses burn out when that poor nurse supervisor can't know anything about these 60 people. It's too many people. And so as humans, we're coming back into the world of work going, You previously, dear company, has set me up as just a cog in a machine. And yes, we talk a lot about people are our greatest asset. And yes, we've advanced so far since Henry Ford's assembly line mentality. And yes, there's been advances, no question. But for many of us, work was an inhuman, unseeing, conformity-focused place. And the pandemic probably has enabled us to have a more serious conversation about what work should be like for humans.

You know, how much do external rewards matter? Promotions, raises, acknowledgement, you know, can you get engaged by having those things put in your lap?

Well, certainly in terms of one of the things that you mentioned, yes. So recognition, attention, there's no question that human beings thrive when there is somebody who is paying attention to what they do. So yes, that is a very important part of our life. We develop in response to another human being. But the pay stuff, the promotion stuff is interesting. And this is a meta-analytic study, but basically that means many different studies coming together and looking what the relationships are. If you look at the relationship between satisfaction with pay and engagement, satisfaction with pay explains just about 2%, 2% of the variance in your level of engagement. Whereas if you say you have a chance to do something you love every day, you are almost 6 times more likely to be highly engaged at work. So that doesn't mean that we don't like to be paid well. It means it's not enough. And in fact, the more we try to use extrinsic motivations like that, goal-oriented motivations like that, it does appear as though those begin to actually diminish your intrinsic motivations. It's almost like they start throwing you off and confusing you. I mean, Amazon's just jumped their base pay from $160 to $320, and that might be good for keeping people from leaving. Target's just upped their per-hour pay. I'm not suggesting you don't do that. I'm suggesting that's like a sugar high. I think Daniel Kahneman's work says you get north of $75,000 as a joint household income, and there's really very, very little commensurate increase in well-being or satisfaction or engagement or resilience. By the more money that you get. So of course, one isn't suggesting that people don't like getting more money. They do. But in terms of all the things we've just been talking about—engagement, resilience, thriving, innovation, creativity, collaboration—all the things that companies really want, money doesn't get you any of that. It's more like a gateway drug. Get me in, ticket to the ballpark. But I won't win the game. It's not nothing, but it's not a lot.

The solution is not to quit your current job to do the same job somewhere else for more money because it won't make you any more engaged.

No. In fact, the problem, of course, is that if you do that, by the time you get 5 years in, you're damaged. You're psychologically damaged because all of us as unique humans, if we've got things that we love to do, that love is a force. It needs to be expressed. And if you don't get to express it, it doesn't just not go anywhere, it starts burning you up from the inside out. It harms you. So anybody saying to someone else, "Hey, suck it up, pay your dues, and then you'll be able to make money later," is really, really dangerous advice.

But who's going to do the boring work, Marcus? It's okay to do the boring work. You just can't be doing it all the time.

Well, yes. So we'll have to dive into that, right? But first of all, just remember, because of the variation, imagine the huge variation, in 5,000 Milky Ways of stars in your brain versus my brain. What you consider boring work is not what I consider boring work. It really depends upon which person's perspective as to what's boring, what's not. What's boring, sorry, but boring's in the eye of the beholder.

Some people actually like doing Excel spreadsheets. Oh my word.

Some people love the books balancing. It's like a dopamine rush. Not me, but there are people clearly, there's so much. I mean, that's why the whole thing here is variation. Human variation is we just haven't built human variation in as the fundamental design principle for work. And that's a shame.

Ever invest in something that seemed incredible at first but didn't live up to the hype? Marketers know that feeling, optimizing for impressions and then not seeing revenue. Instead, invest in what looks good to your CFO. LinkedIn Ads generates the highest ROAS of all major ad networks. Spend $250 and get a $250 credit. Just go to linkedin.com/ideacast. Terms and conditions apply.

Are we asking too much of work though to find love, to find joy, to be so fulfilled? Is there an argument that, well, it's work, you go in 9 to 5 and then you find those things outside of it?

If you study people that are burning out, it does sure look as though work is awful and work's just alienating and depressing. And of course, therefore, the solution should be that rather rather than a 5-day week, we should have a 4-day week. And there's a lot of talk about that at the moment that, hey, look, work's just work, man. It's a transaction. You sell your time and your talent, take your money, go home and be there for the people you love. There's an argument to be made for that, I suppose. But you look at highly successful people, you don't look at the burnouts, you look at the people that are thriving, and you can see that the 2 most powerful questions that relate to engagement, resilience, productivity, retention are, Do I feel as though someone cares about me at work? And do I have a chance to do something that I love every day at work? Those two questions explain most of the variance of engagement and resilience and performance and turnover. So for people that are really contributing a lot at work, their work is clearly some sort of manifestation of them. It's an expression of the best parts of them, no matter what job they're in, from housekeepers to miners to lawyers to doctors to salespeople. Work can be not necessarily a place where you do all that you love. There's actually no data that suggests that the most successful people do all that they love. But you can find work in which what you're being paid to do every day has chunks of it that are expressions of the best of you. And we do know that when you're doing something that you love, when you vanish into what Mike Csikszentmihalyi called flow, many of us are familiar with that concept, the idea that you get Some of us just get so hooked into an activity that time flies by and we think that 5 minutes has gone by and it's an hour. And when you look at the chemical cocktail in your brain when you're doing that, whether you're balancing a book or whether you're trying to fix a machine or whether you're trying to turn around an angry customer, whatever the activity is where you're in flow, you have this cocktail in your brain of dopamine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, oxytocin, some anandamide, which brings feelings of wonder and awe. That cocktail seems to dysregulate your neocortex and it opens your mind up to be more creative, more innovative, more resilient. As Barbara Fredrickson said, it broadens and builds you. And when we have that cocktail in our brains, we're just better measurably. We remember details better. We perform cognitive tasks faster, we're more attractive, people rate us as more attractive. So yes, you're right, some people can have terrible work and it alienates them and breaks them down. But you study highly successful thriving people and they clearly are not all day every day, but for chunks of the day, they're in their zone. And when they're in their zone, they're better. It's like loveless excellence is an oxymoron. What workplaces in general have a hard time with is variation. We have a hard time with human variation. You look at what we do in terms of performance management and basic human capital management at work, the underlying premise is, I wish everyone was the same, and I wish everyone in the same job was the same. But you look at what we know about the human brain and every single human brain, by the time you get to be 19, 20, you got 100 trillion synaptic connections in your brain. And no one will ever have that same pattern as you do. And of course, what that means is that some people get a kick out of things that you don't. The very first group of people that I had a chance to study when I first joined Gallup, Allison, like 25 years ago, I had a chance to do focus groups with the 8 best housekeepers at Walt Disney World. They didn't know each other. They were speaking different languages. But you start asking them about their job. Through the lens of people who clearly loved it. They actually loved it so much that when some of them had been often given chances to get promoted, they turned it down. They wanted to stay doing that job. And to hear them talk about their job was like a completely undiscovered country of what that job is. Like one of them said that the thing that she loved is making, taking the little fluffy toys that the kids leave on the bed every day and arrange them in a different scene every day. So one day the kids come back and Goofy and Donald are hanging out on the bed. One's got his arm on a remote control. One's got his arm on an empty French fry container. And the kids think, ah, you know, Goofy and Donald. And that's one of them. And then the other one's like, I sit on the toilet and I lie on the tub. And the last thing I'll do is I'll lie on the bed and turn on the ceiling fan. And I can even 25 years later still remember going, why? And she was like, well, because, like, looking at me like I was an idiot. Well, that's the first thing that a guest does after a long day out in the theme parks. They come and they flop down, they turn on the fan, and you know what? If dust comes off the top of the fan, they're gonna think the rest of the room is as dirty as the top of the fan. I love seeing the room the way the guest sees the room. There were so many different, such vivid little moments, activities, situations that weren't in the job description. In fact, there were some parts of the job description that said, don't touch any more of the guest possessions than you need to to clean the room, and don't lie on the bed. So the job description, like, was just formulaic. But you actually talk to people through the lens of their love of it, and it's like, holy moly, that's, that's an amazing source of energy and joy for you. And not the same— not every— everyone didn't love the same bits about it. But looking through the lens of people who love their work is so I mean, you just design different work if you were to do that.

But so those are the people who are engaged. Have you seen people move themselves from disengaged to feeling those things without changing professions or quitting their jobs? Yeah.

So one of the questions that we ask around the world is this question: do you think you have the freedom to modify your job to fit yourself better? Actually, the average, the rolling average of the last 7 years on that question around the world is 73% agree and strongly agree that I've got the freedom to modify my job to fit myself better. But 18% of us say that we do. So in psychology, we call that an attitude-behavior consistency problem. We actually think we can. We just don't. And for many of us, one of the reasons I think for this podcast is to go, hey, now look, you may be one of the 27% of people that are in the wrong job. Okay, okay. You could be one of the 27 and we should talk about those folks too. But for 73% of us, we tell ourselves we've got the freedom to maneuver to fit this job better. We just don't manage to do it. So the place where we begin is first of all, understanding that we have the agency and maybe the pandemic has sort of opened our eyes to that. The second thing is some data from the Mayo Clinic studying doctors and nurses. Now this was pre-pandemic, so, but at the time the Mayo Clinic studied doctors and nurses that were super resilient. And it turns out that 20% is a really useful threshold. You don't have to do all that you love, but if you could find every day 20% of your activities are things that you love, things where you vanish into doing them, things where, as Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi would say, you find flow, just 20%. If you do that, you are far less likely to burn out. And if you get below that threshold, 19, 18, 17, 16%. There's almost a perfect, so perfect it looks like the data's fake, a perfect relationship to burnout increase. Now, if you get double that, funnily enough, 40% of your job is what you love or 60%, your resilience doesn't go up double or triple. It's almost like you don't need to have 60% of your job be what you love. 20%, I mean, 25 might be good, 30 might be good, but 20 is the threshold. So for many of us, we don't, we know we've swallowed the cliché of do what you love and you'll never have to work a day in your life again, or the cliché of find your calling and you never work a day in your life. It's like, no, no, no, no. If you really look at the way that the most successful and thriving people act, they take the freedom, which 73% of us say that we have, They take the freedom and then they deliberately try to ensure that every day there is at least 20% of the activities in their day, things that they vanish into. That's not out of the realm of possibility for many of us. In fact, it's right there for many of us.

That's Marcus Buckingham, author of Love and Work. All month we'll be diving deeper into finding more joy in your job. Up. Come back next Thursday when we'll look at how to start identifying what you love so you can redirect your energies there. This episode was produced by Mary Dooe. We get technical help from Rob Eckhardt. Hannah Bates is our audio production assistant, and Ian Fox is our audio product manager. If you enjoyed this episode, check out the rest of HBR's podcasts at hbr.org/podcasts. Thanks for listening to Find Enjoying Any Job, a special 4-part series from the HBR IdeaCast. I'm Alison Beard.