Make Peace with Your Inner Critic
14 Jan 2016 · 14 min
Sarah Green Carmichael talks with Tara Moore about silencing self-doubt and the inner critic. Moore, author of Playing Big, explains how men and women experience self-doubt differently and offers concrete strategies for moving past it.
Chapters
AI is transforming the world. And it starts with the right compute. ARM is the AI compute platform trusted by global leaders. Proudly NASDAQ listed, Built for the future. Visit arm.com discover. Welcome to the HBR IdeaCast. From Harvard Business Review, I'm Sarah Green Carmichael. Today I'm talking with Tara Moore, author of Playing Big Tara, thank you so much for talking with us today.
Oh, thanks for having me.
So you argue in the book that too many of us are playing small when we actually have the capacity to do bigger things. Is it just fear that holds us back? What's sort of the thing that really is getting in our way?
Absolutely. At the core, fear. Fear of failure, fear of rejection, fear of doing something so innovative that maybe it's controversial or makes you feel alone in what you're doing. All of those are really big fears. But another huge block for people is simply self doubt, having that inner critic voice and not having any tools to manage it.
So before we get too far down the rabbit hole of the inner critic, I do want to just pause here and ask you about something you wrote in the book about dealing with praise. In the book, you mentioned that you have to unhook from both criticism and from praise. So why is it so important to reevaluate your relationship with praise as well as how you about criticism?
Well, certainly none of this is a have to, but it is a question of is my relationship to praise really serving my biggest goals? And what I find is that for many people, they come to a juncture in their careers where to move forward, they need to evolve their relationship to praise. And what I mean by that in practical terms is particularly if you've been a high achiever, right? And that could start early in your life or early in school, or it might start when you really found your groove in your career. And you're used to getting gold stars and you're used to getting awesome performance reviews and you're used to wowing the client and you're used to getting the job that you apply for. You know, all those kinds of things I would say, are different forms of praise. And we can become reliant on that and addicted to that. And, and then what that will prevent us from doing is maybe making a really important lateral career move into a new area that we need to delve into to ultimately get to the next step we want to go to. Or it might prevent us from applying for the thing that feels like a huge stretch because we've gotten so used to getting that positive feedback. Right. That we don't want to have a different kind of experience. Or it might prevent us from doing our most innovative work, which is probably going to be more polarizing in the feedback that it brings. So those are some of the ways that being attached to praise can limit us. And that's why we might want to unhook so that we can go for greater challenge, be more innovative, express more of our unique point of view and our voice, which ultimately I think is. Most of us know that's what's needed to get us to our long term goals and for us to simply feel more free and fulfilled in our work.
That's a good point. So what I'm hearing you say here is that in a way, it's all about reevaluating your relationship with risk and sort of how you evaluate risks and how you take risks and decide to go for something or decide to play it safe.
That's a really interesting lens to put on it.
Yeah, well, so I'm wondering if you're like sort of learning to question these voices in your head, for lack of a better term, and you're evaluating a leap and whether you should risk something or not, how do you then know kind of how to, to weight these familiar voice when you're starting to question what they have to say, how do you then decide, okay, yes, this is a time I should definitely listen to my inner critic because this is a bad decision, or, you know, no, I'm, I'm gonna just go for it.
So your inner critic is very different from your voice of critical thinking or realistic thinking. I would say you never want to listen to your inner critic as if it's telling the truth, because the inner critic voice is not telling the truth. You, you might hear something similar coming from your critical thinking or your realistic thinking, but it'll sound really different. And the way that we can tell apart the inner critic voice in us from the voice of realistic thinking or positive critical thinking really has to do with the tone of the thoughts in our head. So the inner critic will tend to be very repetitive and like a broken record saying the same thing over again. It might be, you know, there's no way this is going to work. There's no way this is going to work. There's no way this is going to work. Let's say if you're starting a new venture or, you know, you don't have what it takes to manage this team well, and just repeating that, it will be very black and white in its thinking. The inner critic voice is quite binary. If it's talking to you in a way that is harsher and meaner then you would want to speak, speak to someone you love. You're hearing the inner critic. So all of those are some clues. The voice of realistic thinking, in contrast, will not be repetitive. It's forward moving. So it might sound like, you know, I'm getting some clues that I am really not managing this team that well. But then realistic thinking will move you to the next place. Like what might I be able to do to address that? How? What kind of support can I get? Is this the right move for me? And it'll have more of a curious generative tone and much kinder to you and actually be seeking solutions and be forward moving. It's also able to see the gray, whereas the inner critic is not. That's how you want to distinguish.
So I'm wondering, you know, if some people are listening to this who are like some kind of Zen master and don't have this complicated relationship with their inner critic, but maybe manage someone who does. Or what's some advice for people out there who may be managing someone with an overactive inner critic or just a little too much self doubt.
So the common mistake that we make, and we do this as managers, when we're dealing with people with self doubt, we also do it with friends. We do it often as parents if our child is feeling self doubt, that we think our job is to argue with that person's inner critic. So their inner critic might be saying, I'm just terrible with numbers. And you as a manager, seeing that this person has some potential there, or you think they're good at it, might think your job is to say, no, you're really not, you're really not. And occasionally that arguing with a person's inner critic occasionally rarely will be effective. Like it could be the right moment, that person has a special relationship with you. And in that moment they suddenly hear that this person believes in them and it causes them to see something different about themselves. But that is like one in a thousand times does that happen. Because again, the inner critic, if you think about what it is for that person, there's something in the risk of going for that thing that they're feeling very, very afraid of. And the inner critic has made up one argument to try and prevent them from doing that thing. And so if you, if you convince them out of that one argument, the fear will just produce the next argument in them. And probably as a manager, people have recognized this, you might notice that you finally convinced that person they are qualified. But then they came back the next week and said that they don't want to do it because actually they want to focus on this other project. Or then they came back and said it doesn't fit with their priorities or their long term goals right now. So arguing with the inner critic really usually doesn't work. And it also doesn't work to argue with our own inner critic. Instead, what we want to do, if you're managing, managing someone, is you can start to have that conversation about, I hear that you don't feel you're capable. I see you as really capable. I'm wondering if there's some self doubt at play that's not grounded in the facts here. And you can share with them. Here are some of the irrational things my inner critic says to me. Here's how I've learned to not listen to it and how I think of what that voice is. And the idea here is that instead of waiting for them to have confidence or thinking that that person on your team needs confidence, you can actually start to recognize a skill. It's not the quality of confidence, but the skill of managing one's inner critic as something that you want to develop in your people and talk about and have an open conversation about. Because it really is what will prevent the people you work with from fulfilling their highest potential. It's also probably what's going to prevent them from saying the things to you that you need to know about what's really going on in the business or what the new possibilities are. Because those things we feel self doubt when we raise our hand to say something that maybe only we're noticing or that isn't being discussed yet.
It's interesting, I noticed there that you also said that we don't want to argue with our own inner critic. So what should we say to that little voice?
So the very first thing to do when you hear your inner critic is to name it for what it is and simply notice. So I'll give you an example. When my book was coming out last year, I had an opportunity to write an essay about it for the New York Times. And when I first got that opportunity, the first thought I had in my head was, there's no way that the New York Times op Ed page is going to publish one of my essays. I'm just simply not that fluid and articulate of a writer. There's no way. And I had that thought for about five days before the first time I had the thought, wait a second, maybe that's not true. Maybe that's My inner critic. And that's that act of noticing which doesn't always come immediately because when it's our own inner critic, it feels so true. Right. But then in that act of noticing, it's like, wait, well, okay. And then I asked myself, and this is step two, why would my safety instinct not want me to do this thing? And when I asked myself that question, I could suddenly say, yeah, of course the part of me that's super scared about anything that feels a little bit emotionally unsafe doesn't want me to write an op ed for the New York Times. Like it's going to get all kinds of feedback and people are going to like it or not. And. Right. So of course there's a reason my safety instincts are trying to talk me out of doing it. So now I have some awareness about why that inner critic voice is coming up. And then the only other thing I need to do is allow it to be present but not run the show. And so I wrote that entire article with the inner critic still chattering that there's no way this is going to be published and it's going to be horrible. And it was published and it did great. So it's that act of knowing it for what it is, being able to recognize it in the moment and then allowing it to be present, saying basically, thank you for your input, but we've got this covered other parts of us. And you're allowed to be here, but you're not allowed to make the decision about what we do or don't do.
I'm glad that you brought it back to your book there because that kind of leads into something. I didn't want to let you go without asking you about this. The subtitle explicitly mentions women and sort of the book is sort of skewed towards women as the target audience. But a lot of your writing, including a lot of your writing for hbr, has been targeted at both men and women. So I'm just wondering, do you think that there is a sort of different way that we relate to our inner critic if we're men versus if we're women? I mean, with the understanding that we're generalizing here and you know, individual results may vary.
Right. So I'm really glad you asked this question. It's such an important one. A lot of people assume that women have more self doubt than men. And when you actually look at the academic research on this topic, which I think there is not enough of, but there is a small body of research, the different studies come out with very different outcomes. Some suggest that women have more self doubt. A lot suggests that there's no gender difference. What is fairly consistently shown is that women feel more self doubt around the things that are associated with masculinity stereotypically in our culture. So women feel more inner critic around as a whole population, not each individual, but as a whole. We tend to feel more self doubt around tasks that are quantitative in nature, negotiation, leadership. In a traditional hierarchical sense. Women will simply not see themselves as that because stereotypically that's not how they've been conditioned to see themselves. And then interestingly, on the other side, there's some research that suggests men feel more self doubt around things that are stereotypically associated with femininity in our culture, such as listening skills and communication and relational skills. The other thing is that women and men, I think, get very different kinds of encouragement in how they deal with self doubt. And I think of it a little bit like fight or flight, that when we encounter something challenging as a whole, girls still get more encouragement to kind of go into a flight response and withdraw a little bit from that risk. Whereas men and boys are much more celebrated for sort of charging into battle. And so it looks like men don't have as much self doubt, but I think it's more about what kind of response to our self doubt is encouraged and rewarded by the collective.
That's really interesting because I have seen some studies that suggest that men may compensate by appearing overconfident.
Right.
Which has its own dangers, for sure.
For the men and for all of us. Right. Who are affected by those overconfident decisions.
Well, Tara, it's a fascinating book and obviously a problem for many people of all genders. So thank you for taking some time to talk with us today.
Thanks so much for having me. And thanks to those who are listening.
That was author Tara Moore talking about her book Playing Big. For more visit HBR.
More from GHION.AI
20VC: Is Chamath Right: Is DPI The Only Thing That Matters | Does OpenAI Even Matter | Mary Meekers AI Report: The Analysis| IPO Breakdown: Chime, Circle & Thoma Bravo's New Fund