Angelina YangFounder and Host, TwoSetAI · AI builder for visibility and discoverability

95% of Science Never Gets Published — And That's Exactly the Problem

19 May 2026 · 0 min

Watch on YouTube

0:20

In this excerpt, the speaker contrasts typical material‑science lab practices with the reality of what gets published. While a conventional lab records every experimental iteration, scientific papers only present the successful outcomes. The speaker claims that roughly 95% of experimental attempts fail and that these negative results are never shared, remaining solely in the scientist’s memory. This omission creates a massive hidden body of data that never reaches the broader community.

More from Angelina

0:27

Engineers won’t be replaced — they’ll become directors 🎬

3d ago

0:27

CAPTCHA Was Built to Block Bots. Now We Want Them In 🤖

4d ago

1:00:26

How Fast AI Learned Math | Phillip Kerger, Professor @ UC Berkeley, ex-NASA

4d ago

0:31

1 in 100 Trillion — Beating Face ID With Your Palm

1w ago

0:28

Stop Overbuilding Your Data Stack Before You Start

1w ago

1:02:02

The MrBeast Rule That Quietly Decides Who Wins on YouTube | Rox Codes, CEO @ Flightcast

1w ago

0:21

When Your AI Knows but Can't Tell You

1w ago

0:17

Why Facebook Has One of the Biggest Face Databases

1w ago

0:22

AI Is Great at Exploring, Not So Great on Rails

1w ago

52:59

Ask Any C-Suite This One Question About Their AI Agents | Hector Hernandez, COO @ Speakeasy

1w ago

1:05:30

How Enterprises Are Actually Adopting AI: From the Boardroom to Bare Metal

1w ago

See all content