Embracing Hybrid Pen Testing for Modern Cybersecurity

7 Oct 2024 · 2 min
1:52

Speaker argues for a hybrid penetration-testing model that pairs automation with manual testing. Automation provides scalability, repeatability, and continuous coverage, while human testers handle complex or non-automatable techniques. Pen tests produce useful byproducts—attack-surface discovery (dynamic hosts), adversary simulation, purple teaming, and control-detection validation—that help prioritize resources. The speaker also emphasizes including bleeding-edge testing (recent vulnerabilities/exploits) promptly in a continuous testing program.

Chapters

More from Ahead

youtube.com

How to Build an Offensive Security Program from Scratch

2y ago
youtube.com

Definition of Offensive Security

2y ago
youtube.com

Building an Effective Modern Pen Testing Program

2y ago
youtube.com

Debunking Myths About Continuous Pen Testing

2y ago
youtube.com

What Makes a Pen Test Effective?

2y ago
youtube.com

Is Your Pen Testing Solution Truly Modern?

2y ago
youtube.com

How Can Continuous Pen Testing Transform Our Cybersecurity Strategy?

2y ago
youtube.com

How To Prepare for the Future of Pen Testing?

2y ago
youtube.com

What Will Pen Testing Look Like in 5 Years?

2y ago
youtube.com

What’s Broken About Legacy Pen Testing?

2y ago
youtube.com

How has Pen Testing Evolved?

2y ago
See all content