Matthew Hussey says Delphi's dating advice matches how he'd coach someone: specific to where they are in a relationship, not generic platitudes. When a user reported already sending a suggested text, Delphi adapted with new guidance instead of repeating itself.
I mean, it's, it's the answer I would have given. That's what's crazy about it, is the answer I would have given. It's, it's not telling people what they want to hear, because, you know, if you take that scenario, if it wasn't as intelligent, it would have said, you know, authenticity and good communication is everything in dating. So if it's hurt your feelings that after a date someone hasn't reached out very much, you should send that, you should text them that. And that would be bad advice. Instead, what it knows is, "Oh, Matthew's real answer would be far more nuanced than that. He would point out that it's way too early for you to be this invested anyway, that you do need to wait and see what this is. Not only should you not be offended that they're not sold on you, you shouldn't be sold on them yet." you're still getting to know each other. So then it went on to actually recommend a text that re-engaged but without communicating any of the wrong things. So it's very— that's a very advanced and nuanced answer. And that's, I think, what's blowing people away, is that it's not— this is not gimmicky. This is not like, oh, it gives an answer and it's kind of fun. And it's like, no, no, this is really, really good advice. And if I kept speaking to it and going, but I already texted them this message and now I regret it because now your advice has made me realize I should never have sent that, it will then continue to give advice based on that. So this is pretty— it's pretty mind-blowing.
