From $500 Startup To $100m Exit w/ Moiz Ali
11 Dec 2025 · 48 min
Podcast interview (recorded April 13, 2020) between Ryan Daniel Moran and Moiz (Moises) Ali covering Ali’s entrepreneurial journey: founding Caskers (flash-sales for craft spirits), selling it (Oct 2013, left ~Oct 2014), then founding Native Deodorant (launched July 2015) after years of ideation. Native grew rapidly (Jan 2016 ~$50k monthly revenue → Nov 2016 ~$1M monthly; within two years scaled to ~20,000 units/day and >2% of U.S. deodorant market), kept a very lean, cost-conscious team (solo first year; 8 people at time of sale; 19 when Ali left), and ran thin per-unit margins (initial out-the-door cost ≈ $10.25 vs. $12 retail). By sale, Native was profitable (reported ≈ $1M EBITDA/month and ~$10M cash on balance sheet). Episode discusses hiring philosophy (slow hires, high ownership), growth tactics (Facebook/Pinterest ads, referral program, cheeky PR stunts), differences after acquisition by Procter & Gamble (more meetings, layered decision-making, structure and ops scale), and Ali’s new podcast “Exit Strategy” (interviews with Nick Green, Hims & Hers CEO, Hint Water founder, etc.).
Questions this episode answers
April 13, 2020
About $500
Caskers sold October 2013; Moiz left ~October 2014
July 2015
January 2016 ≈ $50,000; November 2016 ≈ $1,000,000 (monthly)
Chapters
Foreign.
Hey, friends and neighbors. Ryan, Daniel Moran here. Welcome back to the show. Today I'm excited to be joined by my friend, Moises Ali. If you're not familiar with Moyes, he's been on our stage at our events in the past. And Moyes is the founder and former CEO of Native Deodorant. Native Deodorant was a company that he started with about $500. He grew it to a $100 million exit to Proctor and Gamble, which he sold a couple of years ago. Moyes has several mentions in my upcoming book which is called 12 months to 1 million. You can pre order it on Amazon right now. And Moyes is kind of the case study that a lot of us e commerce folks look at as the pinnacle of success. He built a business in two years that had a nine figure exit and it changed the industry that he was a part of. He started with just a few hundred bucks and it was a really exciting business that propelled his entire career forward. Obviously you go from zero to a hundred million dollars in two years. Now Moyes has shared his journey and his story on the state on our stage and on the podcast before. So today I wanted to go under the hood a little bit deeper. I asked him about transitions between projects. I asked him about what the difference between running the business himself and after he ran it when it was owned by Procter and Gamble. I asked him about his philosophy on hiring. I asked him how the heck he was able to take a business to $100 million valuation in two years. And we talk a lot about what Moyes is doing next. Moyes just launched a podcast. It's called Exit Strategy. I have always thought that Moyes should talk more publicly about business because he is the guy in E commerce that has achieved what most of us hope to achieve. I think he is the example that a lot of people turn to when they think about the type of success that they want. So I would encourage you to go subscribe to his podcast. It's called Exit Strategy and I hope you enjoy this interview with Moise Ali. It takes one free person to create change. This is the show for them. We are the creators of the free world. This is capitalism.com and we are the 1%.
Hey moyes, welcome to capitalism.com. excited to hang out with you again.
Super excited to be here. Thanks for having me.
Yeah, Moise, I mean, I've told you privately several times, I'm a big Moise Ali fan. You're one of my favorite people that we've ever had at our events. And, and you know, I saw on Instagram that you were starting a podcast and I. First of all, I wanted to ask why you have had a nine figure exit. You've been the CEO of a nine figure business. You network with the boys and gals over at Procter and Gamble. Why start a podcast?
For a couple reasons. One, I really want to give back to the community that I've been a part of. I really love E commerce. I love the people that are in it. I think I mentioned to you both on Twitter and when we had breakfast a few months ago that capitalism.com was actually my favorite conference that I've ever been to.
Thank you.
Felt like I was really with the tribe that I belong with. And so I feel like this is a way to give back to that tribe and to say thank you for all the support they've given me the last five years that I've been running Native. And then two, I really want to have interesting conversations with other people. Like, as I grew Native, I realized that there were so many different paths that people were taking growing their businesses. And I took the path that I thought was best for me. And it's very clear to me that other people have taken different paths and it's worked out phenomenally well for them. So one of the guys that we're going to interview is the CEO of Hims and Hers. His name's Andrew. And you know, one of the things that he tells me, one of the things that he said is that he really shuns auction based marketing. So he shuns Facebook advertising and Instagram advertising and Pinterest advertising and is looking to create his own type of marketing strategy that's proprietary to his business. And that's crazy. Like, that's the exact opposite strategy that I took at Native. And so I'm really curious as to. I mean, it's obviously working out for him. I'm really curious as to the details of that strategy. And you know, I've tried to listen to him and to other people that we're going to be interviewing on other podcasts or read their interviews on Business Insider. And like, I feel like people aren't asking tough questions or detailed questions and I want to get into that.
Well, I can't wait. Moyes. So I'm excited for this. I'm interested to watch your own transformation right now because I feel like I'm at the tail end of one of my own transitions. And I know that you're famous for growing and selling Native, which was in a great company I'm actually wearing it right now. I smell great. But I know that if we turn back the clock a little bit.
It wasn't your first company that you built and exited, so this is a track record of yours. And also, you have navigated this kind of transition before, of having a big win and then figuring out what do I do in the interim. And so I was wondering if we could go back in time a little bit and talk a little bit about the first company you built and sold and how you navigated that transition of having a big exit and then having the space to. To come up with the next great thing which then became native. Could we talk about that?
Yeah, sure. That's a great question. And one that's like. You know, I think whenever you sell a company and sort of exit leave yourself from that company, I mean, whenever you sell a company, it's a major milestone in your life and an incredible achievement. And so there's a lot of. You know, I'm certainly proud and happy and confident about my abilities, but whenever you leave a company, and that's what I did when I sold my first business, it was called Caskers. You know, there's this period where you go from having all these people email you and rely on you and ask you about what they should be doing with their time and, you know, if you can be helpful to. All of a sudden, the only person emailing you is J. Crew with a 40% off coupon every single day. And that really, like, you realize that, you know, your success and pride emanated from being an important person in this company. And when that's taken away from you, it's kind of. It's kind of sad. I think Peter Thiel has this thing where he's like. When he exited from PayPal, he was depressed for a couple of months because he's just like, what am I supposed to be doing with my life now? And so I felt like I was a little bit lost. And I think, like, you know, for me personally, I think I've realized that it takes being lost and being bored and sort of being frustrated with not doing anything productive before I can start something new. And so, like, today, I'm a little bit more comfortable and I'm a little bit more okay with being lost. But back then, I think I was like, oh, my God, I had this great exit. But, like, you know, I was. You know, I think I was 29 years old. I was like, what am I supposed to do for the next 60 years of my life? I have no idea. And today I'm a little bit more like, okay, well, maybe I'm a little bit older. So I'm like, okay, I probably only have 35 more years. I'm a little bit more comfortable. And two, I'm just more like, okay, I'm used to this space. I've been here before, and something will happen that'll be done.
Yeah. So the first business was. Remind me. I know it was something in, like, in the liquor space. Would you mind me? That first business.
Yeah, sure. It was a flash sales site where we sold hard alcohol online. So we curated all of these, like, craft spirits that small distilleries were making across the United States and sold them online. And this was back in 2012, which really makes me, you know, a dinosaur in the e commerce industry. But back then, like, you know, craft spirits weren't available at your local liquor store like they are today.
Got it. So you built that up for I don't know how long, and then you had an exit. How long was the gap between that exit and when you started native?
So we sold the business in October 2013. I stayed on probably for one more year. So October 2014ish is when I left and then started native July 2015. So a year and a half from exit, maybe eight months, nine months from sale of last business or from exit of me leaving last business.
Yeah, that makes sense. And I'm wondering for you, you mentioned how you had to kind of take some downtime and get bored for that next great idea. At what point did the seed of native enter in your brain during that downtime?
I think the seed of native entered well before I even left or sold my first business. I think entered when I was buying deodorant and unhappy with what I was purchasing, even, you know, in 2010, 2011, when I was still an attorney. So even before I started my first business, I think the seed of actually starting a business, I was like, okay, I'm bored. This is a business that, like, I understand e commerce. Let me start this business. If it fails, it fails. It'll take me 60 days to figure it out, and then I'll move on from there. So I think the original seed started back in probably 2010, 2011, and then the first effort started in, you know, like, me actually being like, okay, let's start this as a business was like, July, you know, three weeks before we launched the business. It was a very short period of time between let's launch this as a business to actually starting the business that.
Actually Gives me some peace of mind. Because the way the route I'm leading us down right now is, is I think we often fall into the fallacy that great ideas or great progress comes out of a lot of busyness. And right now, as we're recording this, we're in the middle of quarantine where there's not a whole lot going on. And I think that this is great opportunity for those seeds to start to sprout. Because you and I both know that great ideas often come on the other side of boredom, come on the other side of taking time to relax and let those seeds start to start to plant. But, but, but I also really appreciate what you said about the fact that you had the idea for a good three years or so before Native ever sprouted any legs here. Because I have so many ideas that are floating around in my brain that I feel like I have to take action on right now. But the truth is sometimes they take some time to mature, gestate before they become reality. Has that been your experience?
Absolutely. Everyone thinks that Native was an overnight success story. It took 10 years to become the overnight success story. It was none of these things. Very few people are like, I have an idea for a company, I'm going to start it in the next 30 days, it's going to be successful, and I'm going to exit in a very short period of time as well. That rarely happens. Most of the time you need something percolating, you need some sort of epiphany, or you need some sort of life changing moment to happen before you can do something. The guys who started WhatsApp, tried to apply for jobs at Facebook, got rejected, and they're like, okay, let's just do our own thing.
That worked out for them. Yeah.
And that worked out phenomenally well for them.
No, help me understand something, because what you just said was that native took 10 years to be an overnight success story. But I also know you just said you started it within like 60 days of actually moving forward on it. And I know that you sold the thing in like two years after starting it. So, so, so help me understand that the, the difference there.
Sure, I guess, like, you know, when, when I had the idea, you know, at the beginning of like in 2010, 2011. Right. Didn't do anything for a couple of reasons. One, I didn't think the time was like, one, didn't have the time in my own life to do it. I was an attorney, I had another business going on, and then finally I started it. And two, I just didn't think the time was right. Like, marketing wasn't the way that it was that it is today. Like, you know, Facebook ads and Google Ads and Instagram ads and Pinterest ads just didn't exist the same way that they do today. And two, I didn't think that the, like, the community or society was at the place where it wanted a natural deodorant and would allow that to become a successful company. I think today, if you started Foursquare, it'd be far more successful than if you started it in 2010, because people are more addicted to their phones, they have better battery life, they're more interested in communicating with their friends as to where they are in a certain location. I think the timing of a business certainly needs to be right as well. And I think the timing was right, actually. 2016, 2017 for a business like Native. And I didn't think it was right in 2010, even though the idea came back then.
Okay, so this makes sense. So sometimes eight of those 10 years of becoming an overnight success story are preparation or they are the market getting right, or they're other opportunities starting to sprout. When you say it took 10 years to be an overnight success story, it doesn't mean that you were actively pressing against something. You were doing other things. That's correct. Is that what you're saying?
Absolutely. That's absolutely right. Yeah, you're right. I think a lot like, you know, there has to be a confluence of events. The market has to be ready. You have to be ready in terms of your life, and you sort of have to have the right start to give you some motivation to do it. And so, like, all of those things have to come together in order to build a successful business.
From the outside, it does look like a lot of things came together for Native. It looks like a lot of things sprouted very quickly. So I'm wondering, in your mind, did it feel as quick as much of a meteoric rise, an exponential growth curve up, as it looked like from the outside once you started the business?
Great. That's a great question. I think. Yes, looking back on it, it certainly does look like that. Like, when I look at our revenue trajectory in 2016, January 2016, we had 50k in revenue. November 2016, we had a million dollars in revenue. Within another year, we had tripled or quadrupled or quintupled that. So it was like a lot of growth.
I think looking back on it, it looks like that. But when you're operating the business on a day to Day basis. You're so in the weeds of making sure that your customers are happy, that your team is happy, that you're hiring the right people, that you have a pipeline of things that you want to build. And that pipeline is to going, you know, being operated on successfully, that I think you, you're, you know, you sort of don't appreciate the uniqueness of the moment. You know, like there's this great line in the final episode of the Office where Andy Bernard says, I wish I knew someone had told me best of times. Yeah, yeah, exactly.
I wish somebody told me it was the good old days when I was still in them. Yes, love that line.
That's exactly. Line. Yeah, that is the line. And like, you know, when you're running a business that's growing that quickly, you wish you realize how unique and special a moment it is. But in reality, you're just so heads down in your own business that you don't really get the chance to do that. That said, when you look when we were trying to fundraise or when we were trying to do M and A, and when we were talking to acquirers or VC funds, it was really clear to me that like we had something special. I would show people a revenue chart and they'd be like, is this cumulative? Basically saying, is the December revenue the, you know, the revenue for your entire, the entire life of your business built into one? Like built into one graph built into one char? And I was like, no, this is our monthly revenue. It's not cumulative revenue. And that happened multiple times. And I was like, wow, this must be a good business if that's what you think.
Yeah, it's so much fun to hear, hear you talk through it because I mean, I've had an eight figure exit. I've never had a nine figure exit, but it was, it was similar where you know, when we went to market, the private equity companies were like, how old are you guys? 28, 29. Like, and it felt so slow as of a process to us and to the outside it felt like such a, like such a crazy growth trajectory. I have, I have one more.
Business felt slow for you. Like you're saying the business growth felt slow or like the M and a long process?
And I remember I was talking with Tom Bilyeu here on the podcast once where I was like, you know, you built a billion dollar company in four years. How did you do that basically? And he's like, oh, it felt like it was so long. So it's just interesting that the difference in perception when we're in it versus what happens on the outside. Which leads me to my last philosophical question. And then I'm going to get into a few more tactical things with you, Moise. In the E commerce world, you are the pinnacle. Like, everybody wants to have their nine figure exit in two years or what, you know, whatever the timeline was, it sounds great. Makes for a great headline sales page. Moist.
Sure.
So that often puts you in a position where people are trying to reverse engineer whatever you did or whatever you figured out, which in my interpretation is the exact wrong thing for people to do if they want to have similar results. So my, my philosophical question for you is how does someone who is a budding entrepreneur prepare themselves to have the idea or the breakthrough that gets them the big success that they're craving?
I think there's two parts to that question. One is from an idea or breakthrough perspective, it's really like about. For me with Native, it was personal need. It was what is missing in my life that I wish existed. That is a problem that I think is scalable and that other people have as well. And so for me, it was, okay, I'm buying Axe deodorant. And this is a deodorant that has a bunch of terrible ingredients on the back of it. I don't want to be putting this on my body for 24 hours a day, seven days a week for the rest of my life. That doesn't sound good. It sounds like it's harmful to me. And so I like, you know, I think I'm going to make a product that is better, like, that uses safer ingredients or better ingredients or ingredients. I understand. And so, you know, for me it was a personal need. And then from a growth perspective, I think you're right. A lot of people are like, okay, great. How do we build this business? Like Moyes did? Or People have asked me that and in reality that's like a. That's a bad question or I don't really love that question. And I'll tell you why. It's because, you know, the way I built Native was right for me. It made it so that, like, it was a business that I wanted to run. Made me excited about the business. I wanted a really lean team. I didn't want to answer to third parties. I didn't want to do board meetings. And I wanted like, the business was really like, you know, under the radar until we sold the business. Like, I didn't want a lot of publicity when we were trying to grow the business. And I think, like, you know, that's, that's very different from other types of entrepreneurs. You know, like, like Nick Thrive and Andrew and hims and Hurst have both raised hundreds of millions of dollars of VC funding. Their businesses are, their teams are much larger. You know, Nick has mentioned that he's growing, that he has an 800,000 square foot fulfillment facility or multiple facilities that accumulate to 800,000 square feet. Like, they're just very different businesses. And like, you should grow the business the way you want to grow the business in the way that you think is best for you, leveraging your abilities and leveraging your, you know, insecurities. And for me, I was afraid to fail like I imagine most other people are. I didn't want a very public failure. And so Native was under the radar until we sold the business. And so I think that, like, you know, like whenever people like, okay, how did you do it? I'm like, this is how I did it. But you should do whatever is best for you. And don't listen to me. Like, I don't know how to run your business. I don't know the type of person you are. I don't know if you have financial obligations because you've got a big family or if you were, you know, if you're Jeff Bezos son. And like, you know, money doesn't matter to you. Like, all of those things matter based on how you want to run your business. And so go run it the way you think you should run it. Have like, confidence in yourself.
Yeah. Amen to that. Thank you for saying that. Because it is so tempting to want to see exactly how someone got a result and then follow that same thing. But the truth is you were following what felt right and best to you and your skill set and your people and your opportunity and your lifestyle and your desires. And that is a complete mismatch to everyone else, which is what made it unique. And so I tell people the same thing. And I am always very hesitant to invest in or back an entrepreneur who has like, the foolproof plan that is based on other people's models and other people's business. Sure. Because then I know that they don't have anything unique to the marketplace that is and is gonna have a hard time growing.
Sure. And they're not like, tenacious. You need to accept the fact that people, look, your ideas will. Some of your ideas will not work out. You'll fail. And you have to sort of regroup and come back and live on to fight another day. And if you're just sort of copying other people's businesses. I feel like you're going to lack that tenacity.
Moyes, I want to ask you about hiring and team building because I know that Native never had, at least before you went to market, would you have like a team of six?
When we, the first year of the business was just me. Then we, when we sold, we had eight people. I left at the end of January. We had 19 people.
Okay, so, so when you exit, you had eight people and you had, you know, this, this great exit, this amazingly healthy business with eight people. How the heck did you do that? What, what, what is your approach to hiring?
Yeah, that's like asking why is the sky blue?
How do you approach finding the right people for the right roles? Maybe that's a little more specific.
Yeah, that's a great question. I think that, like, for us, we were slow to hire and I'm not sure that was the best decision because we all had like so much work on our plate and we could have probably grown the business more had we had more people. That said, I was constantly afraid of running out of money. And so I was like, look, we don't have, we haven't raised $25 million from Andreessen Horowitz. We could run out of money any day. And if that happens, I'm going to have to fire a bunch of people. And that doesn't sound like fun to me. And so I'm not going to hire a bunch of people unless I'm certain I can afford them. And so before we hired someone, I'm like, okay, will we be able to pay this person's salary for the next year assuming the business collapses today? And that was sort of the way that I was thinking about it.
And then we went out and we were like, you know, we gave people a lot of responsibility. And, you know, I'll give you an example. We hired that person who runs our customer service team. Used to work at customer service at like Fitbit. You know, she was like a temporary worker. They weren't promoting her to becoming like a full time employee or something to that effect. So she joined Native because she wanted to be a full time employee. She's absolutely fantastic. Runs our customer service team. You know, more than a dozen people on that team. Is incredibly devoted to the business. You know, people are slacking her at like 3am and she's responding even today. And like, it's really spectacular. And the way that like, we just gave her a lot of ownership. We're like, look, if you want this to be your career and you want to take charge, go take charge of this. And if you take charge of it and you're good and you're responsible and you have good judgment, we're going to give you more and more responsibility. And she never shied away from that. Like, every time we gave her more responsibility, she's like, great, I'm going to do this. Or every time we had a new problem, she's like, moise, I'm going to solve this problem. You don't have to worry about this. And like, that was the case. And she was phenomenal, like, just fantastic. And so, like, here was this person that like, Fitbit wasn't appreciating, who we appreciated a ton, and she just took on more and more responsibility and became this amazing member of the Native team. And so, like, you know, I think that's the, that's the way I thought about growing people. I was like, give them a ton of responsibility and let them do their thing. Like, my bet is on this person and if they can't, if they need help, I'm here. And if they can't do it, I have to step in. But otherwise my bet is that this person can do it and doesn't need to be babysat. And more often than not, more often than not, it really worked out.
You said something really interesting in there, which was that you were often worried about running out of money, which is a concern or a thought loop in a lot of entrepreneurs mind when they are not backed by a pile of money. Can you tell me a little about navigating that? Because I never knew that about you because obviously from the outside looked like you had this great meteoric growth. Would you tell me a little bit about managing that fear?
Sure. I mean, like, I think with E commerce businesses, you know, cash flow is always an issue. You're buying inventory, it depends. Like, you know, sometimes you get terms, sometimes you don't. Sometimes you're sending it to Amazon, sometimes you're sending it to retailers, sometimes they want terms. And all of a sudden you have all like, you have a great business, but you have cash flow issues. Yeah, Native didn't generally have cash flow issues. Like, we were profitable and significantly profitable by the time we sold the business, we were generating a million dollars in EBITDA a month. We had $10 million on the balance sheet. So at some point it did look like we had raised our own round of knows actually through operating a good business. I think early on though, and part of the reason that we didn't hire our first employee for an entire year is. I was like, look, I have no idea where this business is going. This. It does seem like there's a lot of growth here, but like, that growth is young. And just like those M and A guys or those private equity guys were like, how old are you? How old is this business? It seemed like, like, you know, the business was old to you. Like, you know, it was actually really young. And so I was like, this business could fail at any time. Seals could fall off of a cliff. And if that happens, I don't want to fire the person that just quit their job to work at Native. I want to make sure that I can pay their salary for a really long time in case we have a downturn. And so, you know, the way that we thought, that's the way I thought about it. So one was really cost conscious. I was like, constantly fighting costs. If anybody wanted to buy anything, that my first question would be, how much were they asking for the product? And then my second question would be, how much did you actually pay? Because you should negotiate that price down. I'd look over credit card statements and I'd be like, where is the $7 charge coming from every month? We need to get rid of it. I mean, we're doing $3 million in revenue a month. And I'd be like, this $7 charge, I'm going to call this person today and I'm going to make sure that they don't charge us next month for it. So we were really cost conscious and that was great. I think that was the right thing to do. And like, you know, my first company, I thought being that cheap or frugal was really shameful because all these other people had beautiful offices and like all these. And all this team swag. And we didn't have any of that. And now I wear that as like a badge of pride. I'm like, yeah, we don't have swag because I didn't spend our money on swag. How do you think, what do you think of that?
Was really cost conscious. And then I think otherwise was really just focused on the right things, which are our customers. Coming back to Native, what's our NPS score? Do people love the product and how do we, like, how do we continue this rocket ship growth? Like, we weren't focused on vanity metrics. We weren't focused on like, you know, how many people do we have that work at this team? We were focused on do people love our product and how do we keep our costs low?
Yeah. My next question was about the the profit margin on each individual unit is obviously very low. So how do you turn that into a business that scales so much? And it sounds like the answer to that is you kept costs as low as possible and you created a great frickin product that people wanted to talk to, talk about. And so at some point there was enough meat on the bone for you to start to scale that. That's my interpretation in 30 seconds. How would you answer that question?
Yeah, I think that's right. Sam Walton has this great book, I think it's called Made in America. And he's like, look, every dollar in savings that we have at Walmart hq, we can pass along to consumers in the form of lower prices. And that's why when we go travel and we're staying at hotels, we have to double up. Like, you know, even executives will double up on rooms. I read this obituary from the founder of autozone who forced his executives, including himself, to double up in rooms in Motel 6 in order to save costs. And when they were out to dinner at like, you know, when they were, when a bunch of executives were traveling and they were out to dinner, he suggested that we all go to Wendy's for dinner. And then he handed out coupons for Wendy's when he got there. Like, that was. I was like, this guy's on another level. I really appreciate that.
I'm sorry, what was the question? I feel like all I'm doing is talking about Costco.
Well, it was, it was. How do you turn such a, such a low margin product into such a scalable business? And it sounds like we kept cost.
As low as possible. That's right, yeah. Kept cost as low as possible. And then scale. When we, like in December 2015, we were making 500 units of deodorant a week. Within two years we had, you know, we were making about 20,000 units of deodorant every day. Actually north of 20,000 units of deodoran every day. So an incredible amount of scale. Like, you know, it's not like we weren't selling any deodorants. We were like, we were more than 2% of the entire US deodorant market by the time we sold the business. Like, we were on people's radars. And then two, you're right. Like, the margins were incredibly low. Like when we launched the business, it cost us about $5 to make a deodorant. It cost us another $3 or $350 to like pick and pack and ship the deodorant between postage and Picking and packing fees cost us about another dollar for boxes and, like, our insert card and things to that effect. The actual cost of the deodorant once it was out the door was like $10.25. And we were selling the deodorant for $12. So there was not a lot of meat on the bones, but, like, one scale helped and two, you know, very, very cost conscious management helped as well.
Yeah, you would have to be. Those are razor thin margins right there. To get 2% of such a big market in two years is pretty darn impressive. You obviously had a great product and you've shared. I tell the story in my book about you testing different types of deodorant on yourself and seeing which ones. Like, rubbing it on your shirt to see which ones lead definitely at Marks. I tell that story in my book. But I'm curious from beyond just having a great product. Did you do anything from a marketing perspective in order to hit that type of exposure?
I think, yeah. The answer is yes. I think we did ordinary things that everyone does or that most companies do, like Facebook ads and Pinterest ads. We had a refer a friend program. The great thing about deodorant is that women were actually talking about the product. I thought it would be a product that nobody chatted about, but women were telling their moms or their daughters or their sisters and saying, hey, check out this deodorant. It's better for you. But I think we also did more interesting things that were, like, outrageous, that were sort of meant to be gags, but draw attention to our brand. So, for instance, on the first day of summer in 2016.
We launched. What was. I'm sorry, it was 2017. We launched a scented deodorant. And we're like, yes, this is ridiculous. Like, who wants to smell drunk all day? But that's what we did. And all of a sudden, we got all this crazy pr. Like, we'd been reaching out to try and get free PR for a while for our business, and all of a sudden Good Morning America was talking about our product. So was the Today Show. So is Vogue. So was Refinery 29, and hello, Giggles. All of these publications that we've been reaching out to for the last two years were now reaching out to us to try and write about our product. And that was fantastic. We launched a pumpkin spice latte scented deodorant. We did, like, you know, we tried to do, like, funny April Fool's Day jokes. Like, we tried to launch, you know, a deodorant that smelled like the subway in New York City, which is, you know, if you've ever been in that subway, you know that it's not the best of smells. And so. And we launched a poison ivy scented deodorant. Like, we tried to be funny and relevant to the. To the times. And we tried to not take ourselves too seriously with our marketing. We were like, here we are. We understand that, like, using a better for you deodorant is probably a pretty serious thing, but this is still deodorant. And we realized that this is, like, we can be cheeky and funny without being offensive. And so I think that's the type of marketing that we did. And people really appreciated that.
Yeah, that's beautiful, Moises. So.
The crux of the business was a great product, a small team that was very cost conscious, unique marketing that didn't follow any specific plan, but you had strategic things that you did that everybody does, like Facebook ads and Pinterest ads. And you got enough of a dedicated, loyal following that came back to the product over and over again that there was enough profit for you to have a business that was scalable and sellable. Am I missing anything? From a macro perspective, that's worth adding in?
I think that's right. I think there are two things that I would add. One is that we had phenomenal customer service. Like, it was based in the United States. I did a ton of customer service. In fact, I'm pretty sure I was the top customer service agent until we sold the business like I was on. But we were all on top of that. And we made it a priority because we thought, hey, this is how we're going to learn from consumers. The PNGs of the world are divorced from consumers because there's a middleman between P and G and the actual user of the product. There is no middleman. And we don't want like a. Like a layers of bureaucracy between our customer service team and executives. And so I think that we made that a priority. And two, I think our team was actually, like, really invested in the success of the business. Like, they were really motivated. They appreciated the autonomy they have. They appreciated the judgment and the abilities that they. They had. Like, they were. They wanted to make. They were like, they were. They wanted to do the right thing. Like, even we'd have these customer service meetings and the customer service team would ask these amazing questions. And I was like, jesus Christ, you guys care way more than I expected. Like, and that was really phenomenal. Like, getting employees who were invested in the success of the Business made it feel like I had a team that would, like, you know, where a rising tide would lift all boats, and we could celebrate wins together. And they would be sweeter because we won together. And our losses would be mitigated because we were all in it together.
Yeah, that's beautiful. Moyce, you mentioned that the companies like P and G are removed from the customer experience. I wanted to ask you, when you exited and P and G took over, what was the biggest difference that you saw between running a business yourself and then being part of a big publicly traded company?
Yeah, we had to get a lot more conference rooms, and in all the conference rooms, we had to install speakerphone so that we could have conference calls. We never needed that in the history of the business. In the history of the business. Like, we're just like, you have an iPhone. Great, this is enough. And now we're like, there's going to be 30 people on this conference call, so we better get, you know.
Conference room with, like, a nice, you know, speakerphone and center. Look, there were a ton of meetings, and by the time I left my. The business, like, I was involved in meetings all day, every day. And, you know, it was a lot more like, it was less decision making. Like, in order to make a certain decision, you had to run it by a bunch of people, and they would have their input, and then you'd have to run it by a bunch of other people, and they would have their input. And it created like, you know, we were trying to make a horse, and we created a camel by committee, and. And I thought that was the biggest difference.
Okay, I need you to explain that analogy. You were trying to make a horse anyway.
Yeah, they say, like, like.
A horse, a camel is a horse made by committee. Everyone wants to add their own two cents into something, and all of a sudden you went from this idea of creating a certain object, and everyone's added their own 2 cents. And sometimes you can say no to those things and sometimes you can't. And as a result, you have a very different product at the end than when you started out with.
When you were taken over or acquired by a big company like that. They've obviously got a whole lot of operations going on, and I'm sure that some of them are positive and some of them you would like to never be a part of. So would you give me some insight into some of the things that were really beneficial from being part of one of the biggest companies in the world? And then I want to switch and ask, okay, what do you think that big companies could learn from scrappy startups like us.
Yeah, great question. So I think there were a lot of great things about working at P&G.1 you understand structure a lot more in terms of like, you know, when we sold the business, we had eight people. Like, we had different teams, but almost everyone wore multiple hats. And like P and G is like, hey, this is how you structure teams and how you build larger institutions. And that was like something I'd never learned before. I'd never been a part of a big company and gotten to sort of create those structures. And so that was really beneficial. I also think from like an operation perspective, but P and G is cost conscious, understands the cost at much larger scale, has economies of scale, understands manufacturing of CPG products, particularly deodorant. They make Old Spice, they make Secret, they make Gillette. And so like understanding what we should be doing from an operations perspective, how to improve those operations and how to reduce costs were really helpful. Like, I don't think we would be as large as we are today without P&G's backing. I think we would have gotten there. I think it would have taken us a couple more years, but, but I do think that they accelerated our growth and so that was super helpful. And so it was the idea that like, you know, when we hire somebody, I'm not afraid that we're going to have to fire them right away because we're going to be running out of money. There is like, you know, we're backed by the largest CPG company in the world. We're probably not going to run out of money in the next like, you know, six months.
And so that was fantastic as well. And then I think, what can large CPG companies learn from us? A couple of things and I'm not sure they can learn this. Like when people ask, people ask me, why didn't PNG just start their own native? And I'm like, why is it when you see a bird, you're not like, let me jump off a building and start flying? Like, it's absolutely not in your DNA. Like you don't have hollow bones, you don't have wings. You would, you would crash and die instantly. And you know, the people that work in P and G are the stewards of multibillion dollar brand, you know, Pampers and Tide and Charmin and Bounty. Like, you know, these are multibillion dollar brands that have existed for generations. And the person who's running that brand today did not start. It has a playbook of what things should look like and it's trying to, you know, marginally improve performance, you know, 6 to 10%, and that's a really successful employee. At P and G. The people who are, you know, who are starting these brands are trying to improve performance by thousands of percent or hundreds of percent per year. And so it's a very different mindset. And I think that, like, the first thing that they can try and adopt is a lot of passion. Like, I think that that was missing when I was a P and G is passion for the business or passion for the, like, you know, the heritage of the business they were more focused on, okay, how do we increase the business here 2% and not, what does this business stand for? And how do we, like, how do we, like, leverage its strengths? And I think that was surprising to me, but I think that that's something that they're lacking and so is, like, risk taking. Like, you know, PNG's growth has generally been just beyond inflation over the last few years. And that's not surprising. Like, they're an amazing institution. You know, Tide controls something like 80% of the laundry detergent sold in the United States. You're not going to be able to grow that thing 30% year over year. Right. There's not that much market share left. But I do think that, like, risk taking needs to be more embedded in people's DNA. And like, you know, risk taking at startups is part. It's table stakes. It's what you need to do in order to start the business. At a company like P and G, you're expected to grow that brand. You know, people want you to grow that brand 6 to 10%. You grow at 3 to 4, that's not bad. But if you take a risk and things go south now, you're in a ton of trouble.
Yeah.
And I think that there should be consequences for risk, but there also should be the appetite for risk. Like, you know, Amazon launched the Kindle phone, which was an absolute disaster. You know, I think they ended up selling that thing for 99 cents and they couldn't get rid of it. But when it stopped working, they weren't like, great, we're gonna bet, you know, Amazon is fucked. We're gonna stop Kindle everything. They're like, okay, that didn't work. You know, we're still gonna do Kindle for books, Kindle, you know, iPads or Kindle tablets, like, all of these things. Like, there's still an appetite for risk taking there. And I think there isn't a png and, you know, it's really hard to reform that at PNG because you to need. Need a very long term oriented shareholder base or you need a founder in charge of like the company. And like I think it lacks both those things. Like you know, it's not going to have a founder in charge of the company was created in the 1800s and it's got a retail shareholder base. And so I'm not sure how invested they are in the long term focus of the business as opposed to the short term.
What about from a marketing perspective? Because you know, a lot of the brands that you're mentioning that are owned by P and G are, are running TV ads and doing really old school marketing. Whereas Native was scrappy pr, fun pr, Facebook ads and Pinterest ads. And you don't see a lot of the opposite happening. I know natives on TV now that they've been acquired, but you don't see a lot of small brands doing TV ads. You don't see a lot of big brands doing the marketing that you and I are familiar with. So where do you think that Puck is going? And has your, has your, has your analysis of advertising changed at all after being a part of a huge company?
That's a great question. Would love to hear your thoughts about it as well. My thoughts are they're doing like, in many cases they're doing the right thing, like TV ads. You don't see a lot of startups on TV ads because TV ads require a lot of capital. Like we couldn't afford them early on. And capital can be a moat. Like cash can be a moat. And once you have enough cash to be able to buy TV ads, they can be really successful for you. And as a result you're like that cash becomes more and more remote because you can afford more and more TV ads and sort of blow away the competition. I do think that they're starting to do a lot more digital advertising, which is right for them. I think one of the hard parts that they have is like their brands are often.
Fragmented into so many different types of.
When I think about Crest toothpaste, Crest has 3D whitening, total whitening and then 3D complete. And I'm like, what the hell are anything these things? How do you advertise 3D whitening? Because when I'm buying Crest, I'm not like, oh Yeah, I need 3D whitening. It's better than total whitening. I have no idea what any of those things mean and so I just buy any of them. So I think that there is a problem of fragmentation from the brands. But I think from an advertising perspective, you know, TV is not wrong. They're focused on digital. They're focused on, like, often their ads are really clever and like, you know, they're also focused on, like, you know, when they, when they created something like Tide Pods. Tide Pods was such a revolution, they spent an absolute fortune advertising it. And I think in the first, within two years of launching Tide Pods, there was like an 80% awareness of Tide Pods in the United States. Like, a crazy percentage of people knew that they existed. And that's because they had a large marketing budget and sort of know how to deploy it. The other thing is that, like, you know, if you gave me, if you gave Native $500 million to spend on advertising, I'd have no idea how to spend it. $500 million is just way too much money. But the guys at Tide and the guys at Charman and the guys at Bounty and Pampers have spent that kind of money before. And so I think they're going to have a better idea of how to manage such a large budget than I will, having spent a much smaller budget. And I think, look, you're going to get inefficiencies. When we went from spending a million dollars a year to spending $10 million a year to spending $40 million a year a year, there were inefficiencies in our marketing budget as well, the way we grew. And so I'm not like, look, I think that they're doing a good job. I think that, like, yeah, I do think that digital is amazing and can be really fantastic, but it really works well for E commerce companies and it can work for brick and mortar companies. I think they still haven't figured it out yet, or like there isn't good attribution just yet.
But.
Seeing these brands that are so entrenched in TV and mass advertising and you coming from the more startup scrappy mentality there, there's. That's like such a clash of philosophy, I would think anyway. And so I'm curious if you see the ball moving in any specific direction. After playing in both worlds.
I feel like, like, you know, the way I feel is that omnichannel marketing is going to be going to be the future. You're not like, you're going to be able to win if you're just on Facebook and you're going to be able to win if you're just on tv. That'll still be the case, but there will be a ceiling to those wins. And in order to raise that ceiling. You're going to be, you're going to have to do omnichannel marketing. You're going to have to be where consumers want to see you. You're going to have to adopt a new tactics. Yeah, Facebook was Great, but it's TikTok. Great. Is TikTok the new Facebook? Maybe. And who's going to adopt like, who's going to adopt that as quickly as possible? Who's going to find the inefficiencies in TikTok? It's going to be the people who are early adopter because there isn't a rush of marketers there just yet and who understand the platform really well. And those are the types of people that can win.
Moise, tell me a little bit about the podcast and where people can find it. I mean I'm a huge Moyes Ali fan. I can't wait to hear you analyze these companies that you're going to be talking to. So tell us a little about where we can find it.
Really appreciate it. It's going to drop probably at the end of next week or early the week after. So it'll probably drop in the middle of like, you know, early to mid April. It's called exit strategy. You'll be able to find it on Apple and we're creating a website right now which we don't have up just yet. You're going to be able to find it there as well. And yeah, so the first person we're interviewing is one of the investors of Native. His name's Nick Green who's the CEO of Thrive Market. We've got the CEO of Hims and hers coming up that interviews tomorrow. We've got a CEO with Dan Leviton who's the founder or co founder of Mavron, which is a consumer only VC fund based in San Francisco that he founded with Howard Schultz, the founder of Starbucks. We've got the founder of Hint Water coming up next week. What I'm trying to do is interview a bunch of. Yeah, Kara, exactly. I'm trying to interview a bunch of great CEOs and great companies to understand exactly the questions that you were asking. How did you, how did you get to where you are? How did you start? Like how did you start. How did you get to where you are, what's working and what's not? What are the challenges that you faced? Native almost failed five times in the growth of its company. In the growth of its history or in its history of growth. What are the five times that Nick almost failed? What are the five times that Andrew almost failed. I'd love to hear that because I think that people are inspired by that and when they're running businesses and sometimes struggling, which native was often. It's really great to hear those stories because it sounds like everyone else is human. Not everyone is. Jeff Bezos and has created a trillion dollar company. People have struggled along the way and that struggle is very human and inspirational.
Yeah. If you're an e commerce entrepreneur, if you're an entrepreneur of any kind, if you sell on Amazon, if you're an Internet marketer, this is a podcast I'm going to be glued to. Especially while we've got a little bit of downtime right now. Moyes, I think is the, I've said, I've said several times, Moises, the smartest person in E commerce who does not have a podcast. So all right, I'm glad that he finally does. So it's called Exit Strategy.
Thanks for the support. Really appreciate it.
Ryan, what's that?
Thanks so much for the support. I really appreciate it.
Of course, we're glad to have you. Moyes. Thanks so much for hanging out with us@capitalism.com thanks.
Talk to you soon.
Hey, I hope you enjoyed this episode with Moyes as much as I enjoyed recording it. Remember, if you're an entrepreneur and you're building towards an exit, I help entrepreneurs build seven figure businesses that they can sell. Whether you are an experienced entrepreneur and you've hit a plateau or you're starting something new and you want something scalable that you can grow and sell, that's my sweet spot. So you can apply to work with my team and I inside of the tribe. That's where our trainings, our coaching and our in person workshops all happen. It's all within one group and we're there to help you navigate to the ups and downs and decisions of building a seven figure business that you can sell so you can apply to work with myself and my team over@capitalism.com tribe. I hope to see you inside. As always, thanks so much for listening to the show. It really is a privilege to invade your brain to talk about business and investing and I really enjoy hearing from you. So if you've got any feedback about today's show, feel free to hit me up. I'm RyanDaniel Moran on Instagram. Thanks for listening and I'll see you on the next episode.


