Charles Cormier and a colleague argue that excluding China from advanced technology is impossible given its economic strength and talent. They cite Jensen's point that the US should engage diplomatically rather than try to shut China out, calling cooperation the only viable path.
I think, I think what, what Jensen was saying and what I, I believe in is that eventually it's impossible to cut China off from this race. Like, it's, it's impossible, right? You need to recognize this as a, as a fact first.
I mean, China's intelligent, they're moving fast, they're breaking things. They're just like the US. They're— I mean, they're humans, they're smart, they're economically capable. So yeah, no way we can't— we, we can put them out of the race. It's not They're not in North Korea, for fuck's sakes.
And, and, and the only way to kind of make sure that the, the interest of the US is protected is to have a conversation and make, make sure that, make sure that we are, we are aligned. And I, I think it's a more diplomatic approach, and I think that that is probably the only approach available. Uh, I, I don't believe like shutting out access to chip will, will, will slow down.
It's And also, yeah, China is too big to fail, right? It's just too big to fail. It's not stoppable. At the same time, the boulder is rolling and it will never pretty much stop. So it's like competition mindset again, right? Compete and both cooperate with them to an extent, as long as it's win-win.