Prebiotics, Probiotics and the Gut Microbiome with Dr. Jason Hawrelak

If you have any type of hyperthyroid condition, whether it's Graves disease, toxic multinodul Goiter or subclinical Hyperthyroidism and you want to learn how to use food to heal your hyperthyroidism, then you might be interested in my upcoming five day hyperthyroid healing diet challenge on Saturday, January 17 through Wednesday, January 21. Every day I will release a pre recorded video lesson and there will also be a daily assignment to help you use food to heal your hyperthyroid condition so you can access the daily lesson at your convenience. I will also go live daily, Saturday through Wednesday to present some content and answer questions. I will rotate the times of the live call to accommodate those in different time zones. Best of all, this challenge is free if you have purchased my book the Hyperthyroid Healing Diet. If you haven't yet purchased my book and you want to do so, you can buy it on Amazon and then take advantage of the special offer. For more information Please please visit savemythyroid.comchallenge2026 thank you for joining me on the Save My Thyroid Podcast where I help people save their thyroid and regain their health. My name is Dr. Eric Osansky and if you have hyperthyroidism then you will.

Especially benefit from these episodes.

If you have hypothyroidism or Hashimoto's thyroiditis. You will also find many of the episodes to be valuable, including this one where I interview Dr. Jason Horolak as we are going to chat about prebiotics, probiotics and some other things related to the gut microbiome. Dr. Horlock was actually my instructor when I went through my Master's in Nutrition.

Degree at the University of Western States.

And I didn't even realize he was still an instructor for them as it.

Wasn'T in the bio he gave me.

And I know he is very busy with other projects. In any case, I think you'll find this episode to be extremely valuable. As usual, make sure you listen to the post episode chat after the outro music as I'll expand on fermented foods, berberine pepper parasites and H. Pylori as well as diversifying your diet and you can access the show notes of this episode by visiting savemythyroid.com 95 Anyway, here is my interview with Dr. Jason Horlack.

Welcome to the Save My Thyroid podcast hosted by Dr. Eric Osanski. To stay up to date on the latest thyroid health related topics, visit savemythyroid.com the following discussion is for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose or treat any disease. Please do not apply any of this information without first speaking with your doctor. Now let's head to the show.

All right, so I am very excited.

To chat with Dr. Jason Horolak, as he was actually my instructor when I went through my master's in nutrition and at the University of Western States. And I'm not sure why I haven't invited him to the podcast sooner because I've been following him for so long and again, I just keep on mentioning his name when I'm doing my own, like, courses and talking to patients. So it's an Honor to have Dr. Jason here and we're going to be chatting about prebiotics, probiotics, and just the gut microbiome as a whole. And I'm going to dive into Dr. Jason's bio and then we're going to just dive into the gut microbiome.

So.

Dr. Jason Horlack is a researcher, educator, Western herbalist and naturopathic physician with over 20 years of clinical experience. He did his PhD examining the capacity of probiotics, prebiotics, and herbal medicines to modify the gastrointestinal tract microbiota, and teaches worldwide on the topics of microbiota modification and and gastrointestinal health. He has published extensively in these areas, including 20 textbook chapters. And Dr. Harlock is on the Medical Nutrition Council of the American Society for Nutrition and he is a fellow of both the American College of Nutrition and the Naturopaths and Herbalists association of Australia. And Dr. Horlock maintains a busy clinical practice in Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, where he consults with patients from all over the world.

And then additionally, Dr. Harlak is Chief.

Research Officer at ProbioticAdvisor.com, which I must say is amazing. And that offers a searchable database that enables easy evidence based prescribing of probiotic products and online resources for clinicians to learn more about the human microbiome and how they can positively influence these ecosystems. And thank you so much for joining us, Dr. Jason.

Welcome. Eric. I'm trying to remember how long ago it was that you were a student of mine at tws. How many years ago?

Yeah, quite a while.

So I believe I specifically took your course. I think it was in the fall of 2013.

Goodness. Okay. You were definitely one of the early ones, weren't you?

Yeah. And you no longer teach at Western States, do you?

Yeah, yeah, no, I'm still there.

Oh, you are still. Okay.

Yeah.

Did I go over the bio? Maybe that was in the Bio and.

I just wasn't paying attention. But okay, so you do still teach. I should know this. But again, I've attended your courses, your online courses and you know, again, listen to your podcast. But yeah, that's cool. So you're still teaching for them?

Yeah, no, that's one of my passions is actually I thoroughly love, love teaching and I'd love nothing more than teaching gut stuff to practitioners because I just love the ripple effects that go out when you can actually improve the way that practitioners are engaging with their patients, improving outcomes. You have the capacity of changing the lives of tens of thousands of people, which I think is just incredible honor and privilege, but also great joy to teach. And coming onto podcasts like this is like that too because you have a chance of actually reaching so many people that you otherwise wouldn't do and hopefully improving their lives by giving them information that they may have been waiting for. And just that now is the right time to hear it changes the direction of their health. That's where I'm hoping.

Exactly.

So why don't you give a little bit of your background as far as how did you start becoming an expert when it comes to gut microbiome and probiotics and what motivated to create the website probiotic advisor.com well, some of it.

Was probably almost chance in that my final year of naturopathic training there was a lecture around dysbiosis and leaky gut and it's, you know, how it drove so many other chronic diseases. This is back in 1999. That lecture just really stirred something in me. It was like, this stuff is amazing. I really want to delve into the topic and really dig into it. So I've essentially finished off my naturopathy training in Australia. We've got Cassie doing an honors degree and honors degree is a research based project and then you flow on for that to do a PhD. So that's what I did. So I did a clinical trial for honors degree of looking at prebiotics and probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome to change the gut microbiome. So that was back in 2000 and then I followed that with my PhD. So just one of those things that maybe if I had not showed up to class that day and missed that lecture, my life would have taken a different tact, who knows. But it was just such an exciting area and I still find it immensely exciting. So I sort of float on from doing my honors degree to my PhD in the same topic of okay, how do we change the microbiome in Patients with irritable bowel syndrome using her own medicines, prebiotics and probiotics. And then I started teaching clinical applications of pre and probiotics essentially back in probably the latter week, my honors degree. So back in 2000 to initially naturopathic students to share kind of what I learned from spending a year devoted solely to that topic because I learned a lot more in that than I was what I was certainly taught in my training, which is, you know, we did fair bit of stuff in traditional naturopathic training, but it just was really scratching the surface. And I think there are certain things that around things like strange specificity that we'll be dig into soon that was not talked upon touched upon. My trainings like probiotics can be used for this, this and this. Versus when you start looking into the research and really delving in there, you realize that, okay, well, yes, some probiotics are good for certain applications and some strains are good for other applications. And it really, you know, blows your mind and changes the way that you look at using probiotics. From what I tend to call the old paradigm, which was you do a stool test. Oh, you're low in bifidobacteria. Here, take some bifidobacteria. And that was the old paradigm versus the new paradigm is okay, There are human clinical trials showing that, you know, bifacteria strain HN019 speeds up colon transit time and softens stools. Therefore, you use it for people who are constipated who have slow transit time. But you wouldn't use that strain for someone who has diarrhea, for example. Or you can go back to pylori infection strain is not going to help with that. You know, as the research has really built up around probiotics, we really get to see how much differences there are between different strains, even within the same species. But how important that is in terms of our choices around what we use therapeutically as tools and trying to make sure we're using the ones that actually have the actions required to treat the condition or the patient. We're trying to help.

Yeah, I found it fascinating because that's where I learned it from you and before that, I didn't know about that. You should use probiotic supplements with specific strains just like a lot of other practitioners still do. I was just recommending probiotics. Just really didn't know anything about probiotics until I learned. Also, we'll talk about prebiotics. Prebiotics are important because a lot of practitioners neglect the prebiotics as well.

Yeah.

So definitely want to look at the strain. So if like you're looking at a probiotic supplement and it has just like Lactobacillus acidophilus or Lactobacillus rhamnosis, but it's not actually giving the strain, then you just don't really know the therapeutic benefits that it has.

No, exactly, exactly. You don't. And I think in this day and age, I think it's unforgivable. I think it's the right term for supplement companies to be only providing species level information. I think 20 years ago when I first started it was a bit more forgivable because the concept around strain was newer and yes, it had been known for a while, but it was like a newish idea that, that we can actually have market differences within the same species just by what are the strain designations. But I think now if there's any company that doesn't list the strain and just has species name, I will not use it as a tool because you just don't know what it's useful for. You don't know until you do research. That's the thing. We don't know whether it survives stomach acid. We don't know if it survives bile salt exposure, whether it adheres to the gut, whether it produces an antimicrobial compound that's helpful in the gut or detrimental in the gut, whether it has any therapeutic effect at all. Unless we do research on that specific strain to see what it does in reality. I can't help but think a relatively new psychobiotic, which is a probiotic that has been shown to help with mental illness essentially is kind of the definition. It's at the marketplace in the last couple of years. Lactopilis plantarum P.S. 128 now, now that was originally isolated from a traditional Taiwanese ferment, cabbage, mustard green ferment, you know, which is like 500 different types of lactic lactic acid producing bacteria in those kind of naturally found in those ferments. But through like a lot of testing, they isolated that one strain that had, they called psychobotic effects that was able to actually change when you give it to animals. It actually changed the amount of serotonin dopamine in their brain when you gave it to them, you know, and they took that and said, okay, we'll do the animal studies, it's pretty consistent now let's test it in humans. And they gave it to kids on with all sorts of Spectru disorder and lo and behold, a decreased defiance, a decreased sort of repetitive behaviors and decreased anxiety, you know, and they're using the same strain in Parkinson's disease and other Tourette's syndrome and other conditions like that. I just think it's phenomenal, but that you just can't expect any random strain in that fermented food to have the same effect. It's like they isolated that one strain that had the characteristics thereafter and a bunch of strains did not. You know, so I think it really puts that in perspective of that. When scientists do this well and companies do this well, we end up with having this well researched, well characterized agent that has a definitive efficacy in these conditions versus you can go, okay, well let's get some random L plant harm and hope it has some impact. Which is kind of where I think some practitioners practice because they're unaware of the strain stuff. They're just like, oh, let's give some probiotics and see if they help. It's all hit and miss and I think they're going to be missing a lot more. And the patients can be essentially suffering as a consequence of not prescribing things based on the best scientific evidence and then with the way that the information has evolved over the last 20, 30 years.

Yeah.

So arguably, or maybe not arguably, I mean according to what you mentioned, that having specific strains is more important than having a higher potency like the colony forming unit. And not to say it doesn't make a difference. You want to have, I think you said at least 1 billion CFU for most of the probiotic strains, but just because something has like a hundred billion CFUs, it doesn't make a difference. Again, if it doesn't have like specific well researched strains.

No, no. And I think I like giving this example of antibiotic associated diarrhea. There's one study that gave lateral retrie DSM17938 which is sold around the world as Biogaia. And to these elderly people taking antibiotics and they gave, gave, I think it was 200 million. 200 million CFU, not billion 200 million CFU per day. Another study looking at elderly people taking antibiotics in hospital settings. The Same population gave 60 billion two different lactobacilli and two different bifid bacteria strains. Fast forward the results. The 60 billion preparation did nothing, didn't stop endoxidation diarrhea at all. Yet 200 million of that one specific strain worked amazingly well. And I always think that's such a clear example of choosing the right strain with the right actions versus just going, let's give Billions of this stuff and we don't know works or not. And it turns out it didn't work. Now, that same strain combination that didn't work for end blood position diarrhea has got some positive research for improving quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome patients. So it's not as useful for any condition. It's not useful definitively for antibiotic associated diarrhea. Whereas the reuterized strain that we use in that study is clearly, even if it was given at like 300 times less daily dosage.

Now also so when it comes to specific strains, because a question I get from people time to time is fermented foods, can't I just take fermented foods instead of taking a probiotic supplement? I guess if it's for therapeutic purposes, it might be more also hit or miss since you don't know what strains are in the fermented foods or.

Yeah, because they're generally wild ferments. Now you can be very directive with your ferments and you could, you know, use a probiotic strain with well defined characteristics as your starter. And if there's a way of guaranteeing that's what's there at the end product, sometimes you can do with different microbiome analysis labs, you can send your ferment there, you can see what's actually there. It is possible you could make a ferment based on the right strain to make sure you're getting that strain in a food base.

Sure.

But in terms of what most people are having, they're wild ferments, you know, like sauerkraut, kimchi, where we're just kind of just letting the natural bugs that are found on there ferment. That cabbage, you just don't know what you're going to get. You're going to get, you know, the species stuff, fine. It's like most likely lactose of plantarum, some sort of strain within that species. But it doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to have any therapeutic quality to it doesn't mean it's going to survive transit to the stomach or bile acid exposure or attach to the gut or produce any selectively acting antimicrobial compound or whether my produce antimicrobial compound that kills off your beneficial bacteria. Like you just don't know any of those things in a wild ferment. Now I drink kombucha, I eat kimchi and sauerkraut daily. But for me they're just ways, one, I think they taste great and two, I think it's a way of enhancing your immune reactivity, I would say by interacting with different microbes from the environment, which I think is always part of what humans have done. I think it should be part of what we're still doing and I think improving diversity of our ecosystem by having these microbes that are generally temporary visitors, but while you're eating them, you're going to get another 15, 20, 30 different species depending on how diverse that ferment is that are in your gap for those temporary time periods. But I think there's no way I would rely on it in the same way that I would. Okay, someone who. A kid on the spectrum. I want to give the PS128 strain that we know actually changes neurotransmitters in the brain because other strains of Alplant harm cannot, we know clearly from that data do not have that capacity. So you don't know whether you're like on the sauerkraut lottery and you might end up having what we call a psychobotic strain that randomly happened to be in your sauerkraut. But there's a decent chance you have not. If you take a sauerkraut and you feel really happy afterwards, maybe you've won the sauerkraut lottery and then you can keep using it as a starter culture. But I think it's with wild ferments. They're just that they're wild and they're diverse. And I think there's a strength to that and there's a place for that in Healing Journeys. But I think it's not really trying to target specific issues.

Okay, thanks for sharing that. And I think one thing you also mentioned is with fermented foods and the species or strains that come with them, you're not sure if it's going to survive like for example, the stomach acid. So when it comes to commercial probiotics are typically all of them resistant to stomach acid because that's a concern also with some people. If I take it, will it actually reach the desired.

Yeah. And I think this area has been probably over focused on by companies selling other probiotic preparations to try to make you wary about using lacto cilobacteria based ones going oh, they don't survive stomach acid anyway, so there's no point. I think it's been kind of a selling point for some other types of probiotics in the market and it's taken hold sadly. I mean, I think again, if you went back 40 years ago or 30 years ago, you'd probably say that There's a decent chance that a number on the market would not meet that criteria of survival to the upper gut. You fast forward to now any preparation that has well characterized strains like L rhamnosis, GG or DSM 17938, or laxoplantarum 299B, we know that they survive stomach acid and bile salt exposure, and they can show up in your poo. After they did those studies, before they brought them to the marketplace. And these days, scientists are generally doing these preliminary studies of going, okay, we'll take our 500 strains of lactose to life from this fermented Taiwanese traditional food and we'll put it through an obstacle course. Does it survive bile acid exposure? Stomach acid exposure? Does it adhere to the gut? You know, looking at all these different characteristics, and they might find, you know, five or 10 out of that, 500 that do. And those ones will then take into animal models and then eventually in human studies, because we get to see what they actually do beyond just survival. So I think the ones that are actually well defined strains, yes, they will survive transistors, the stomach and small bowel, very easily. I think, again, there's a risk if you're using probiotics that do not define the strain and that you have no idea what you're getting. And I think the reality is that a supplement company can buy well characterized, well researched strains that have got all that background data done on them at a high price point, or they can buy at a low price point where some microbiologist said, I want to isolate 500 strains from a couple strains from the sauerkraut and start selling it. And we have no idea whether it actually has those basic characteristics required. So I think there's always a risk in numerous ways for buying supplements that do not define the strain characteristics. But I think we buy the ones that do have the strains and have positive clinical trials showing that they work. And we don't need to worry about whether they survive in the upper gut or not because they know they work. And we have clinical trials showing that they work.

And then I think it was almost sure it was from you where I learned that you're supposed to take probiotics with four food just because some sources will say not to take it with food.

Yeah, I know. That's one of those myths I've been trying to bust for 23 years now, Eric, because I think the data was relatively clear back then. And it's still, it's even more clear now that we have better survival with a Meal. The bacteria survive better with a meal and this matters far more. So for Lactobacilli or Bifidobacteria based probiotics, Saccharomyces doesn't really matter. Bacillus doesn't really matter. And I would say with the new generation probiotics like those based on Akkermansia or Eubacterium or Faecalobacterium, I reckon they'll be better with food too because they're often more impacted by, by a really low ph. And when your stomach is empty, the ph is around two, two and a half. So when you're putting bacteria in there, it's really acidic, it's designed to kill bacteria and it does that pretty well. But when you have food, the ph actually goes to four, four and a half. So it's obviously closer towards neutral, still acidic, but it's certainly quite a far cry from a ph of two, two and a half. And we have survival of the bacteria that go through at a ph of four, four and a half. And the bigger the meal generally the more buffer the ph is. And there's even research showing that dairy food actually works as a better media to transport bacteria through because I think it buffers the ph even more so, so it provides a more, you know, neutral ish environment for microbes to pass through the stomach intact.

Okay, so Lactobacillus bifido based probiotics take with food the newer probiotics as well. But then you mentioned Saccharomyces boulardii. Not necessary. And then you said not. Also, if you're taking Bacillus based, like spore based probiotic.

Yeah, the spore based ones don't matter. I mean, I think that's one of the strength of the spore based ones. I mean, you can buy some spore based stuff that's mixed into baking, baking kits that you buy and you bake in the oven and other ones you add hot boiling water to a herbal tea and that doesn't kill them, like they're quite resilient and then they sort of release when they're in the human gut. So that I think is one of the strengths of those, the bacillus ones particularly is their environmental, the capacity to survive in a wide variety of environmental conditions that would otherwise kill. You know, you pour boiling water on your bifida bacteria, they're not going to survive. You put boiling water on your Saccharomyces, they're not going to survive. But the bacillus spores, they'll survive and they will come out, release into your gut at a later time.

Now sticking to the topic of Bacillus spore based probiotics. I know a few years ago, not that you aren't in favor of them, but just the research it sounded like was still behind like the Lactobacillus bifidobacterium. Do you still feel that way where there's still a lot of research to be done?

Yes. And that have clinical trials showing that they do something. So for me that's the indicator. There's evidence showing that something is safe and efficacious and we have clinical trials showing bacillus type probiotic works for this condition. I'll definitely use it and we're certainly seeing that evidence grow. I mean there are some Entero germina strain of Bacillus clausea, I think been on the Italian market since the 1950s, has a fair bit of research on it, you know, over that time, mostly for immune stuff, but other, other conditions. Antibiotic associated issues too. That's been one of the exceptions that had a higher sort of research base. But I think in other areas the products were being overhyped before the research was there. And I think that's the thing that triggered me a bit of going, you know, if we have these bifid bacteria and lactosili based ones with clinical trials showing that they work and then somebody who's selling the products saying don't use them, here's mine where I've got no data for it. I was like, this just doesn't feel right to me. But I have been happy to see that the evidence base has been growing on those. And you know, you get ones like The Bacillus coagulans GBI, I think 6086, I think from memory that's got a, you know, interesting research repertoire that's useful for rheumatoid arthritis, for example, and you know, functional abdominal pain. So a couple conditions of which there's probably less research data on other probiotic strains for the lactoxilar bifidobacteria camp. But still, if you were to compare the total amount of research on Lactobacilli bifidobacteria versus, you know, some bacilli, the research on the traditional ones far, far, far exceeds what we currently have on B.

All right, let's dive into prebiotics. So can you discuss why prebiotics are so important and perhaps some of the best food and supplement sources of prebiotics?

Yeah. So I mean, I think prebiotics, as you kind of alluded to before are an underutilized tool in most people's clinical toolkit. Not for me. I was enamored by prebiotics when I started doing my honors degree back in 2000 because I don't think I was taught really anything about them in my naturopathic training. And then I started reading the studies or even up to that point, I'm like, oh wow. There are these things that dramatically change the microbiota in this in selective ways far, far beyond what we're going to get with taking a probiotic or eating some fermented food. You know, far, far beyond that. You get really dramatic impact and very selective. So I think it's good looking at what is a prebiotic. It's a selectively fermented compound that encourages the growth of one or more beneficial species of bacteria in the gut to produce health benefits. That's how it's defined. So we only have a limited number of compounds that currently meet that criteria. And that would be inulin type fructans, which we typically would call fruct oligosaccharides. And then we have galactooligosaccharides. Then we have lactulose, which will probably surprise many North Americans because lactulose is one of those things that has now been, you know, I think earmarked as like a breath test substrate more than anything else versus been used as a prebiotic since the 1960s. It used to be added to infant formula as a way of making it more like breast milk. You know, so things it's very pigeonholed in the US I think in a kind of negative connotation versus when you look at the science behind it. In fact, its capacity to alter the ecosystem is fantastic. Its capacity to decrease levels of proteobacteria like E. Coli or Klebsiella in the gut is unparalleled as a pre body. It works amazingly well that overgrowth of Bacteroides populations it'll bring down very well. And there was a study published in 1997 which was one that really blew my mind. It was recent when I first started my honors degree a couple years ago that showed that we had a thousand fold decrease in bacteroides populations and 100 fold decrease in E. Coli populations in the gut when people took lactulosis of prelotic. So that means for every 100 there was, there's one. Every thousand Bacteroides there was, there was one. You know, it's like dramatic impact and you know, a hundredfold increase in bifidobacteria and you know, tenfold increase in lactoid sali, these massive sort of shifts. And that got me excited. And then clinically you see results like that with patients where we're actually paying dyspartic picture, we see we can give them lactulose and you see these dramatic huge shifts in ecosystem composition as a result, which we can get in supplemental form for sure. And I tend to use them primarily that way. However, we can also get food sources that contain galactooligosaccharides, which is primarily legumes. So we do get some galact oligosaccharides found in things like beets, for example, a little bit in trying to get anything else, it's scattered around a few things and other sort of vegetables, but the amount is tiny versus legumes, all legumes, you'll get a good amount of galactosaccharides. And that's what makes legumes give you gas. You get gas because of this indigestible compound called galactooligosaccharides which reach the colon, feed specific beneficial members of your gut, but you do get some flatus that comes with that. And inulin type fruit hands we find more broadly across different foods. Onions, garlic are, you know, really rich sources that we have commonly, but also, you know, wheat, rye, barley are decent sources as well. Particularly when your people eat a lot of it, which they often do with, you know, wheat products. You can get a decent dose of inland high fructans from that, for example. But there'll be some foods that are probably less commonly eaten by us as westerners now than our ancestors would have eaten that were quite high. Like burdock root for example. It's like 10% inland phos, jicama root, yacon tubers, I think like 15% which is a South American vegetable. And there's a number of actually traditionally consumed vegetable crops throughout north and Central and South America that are really high in England type fruitlands. So they were always relatively high part of many people's diets who were traditionally from those areas. Chicory roots, dandelion roots were things where, you know, people from a European background, our ancestors used to go and collect those things and consume no longer because they taste bitter. You know, we've lost our capacity to dealing with bitter flavors as a culture. But there are large amounts of healing type fruitans within those foods and even dandelion leaves have large amounts as well.

Do you personally take prebiotics and supplement form or do you rely more on.

The food sources I do both, but I definitely take my inulin type fruitans daily and often partially hydrolyzed guar gum, which is a pre product we haven't talked about so much that is somewhat unique because it's very good at feeding butyrate producing species in the gut. So you know lactulose galactoligosaccharides or they say gauss and fos for fruit oligosaccharides, they tend to feed bifidobacteria pretty consistently across the board. They also will increase. Another beneficial group of bacteria called the calabacterium will often increase too as well as having decrease in potentially pathogenic bacteria as well. Now, partially hydrolyzed guar gum tends to feed a range of beet ray producing species in the gut. It doesn't really lower the levels of potentially pathogenic microbes so much. So that's not a strong point. But feeding B producers is. And bead rate is just such an amazing substance that, you know, I certainly choose my diet to nurture my microbiome and I choose my foods to feed my bead rate producers in my gut. That's a core thing of what I do. But I also supplement that. You know, as I said that inulin phos and then the partially hydroblastic organ will be part of my daily regime.

So you mentioned that prebiotics, I think you mentioned that it could lower opportunistic or potentially pathogenic microbes. Is there concern that it could do the opposite? Because some are also expressed concern. Well, prebiotics, maybe it would feed some of the different opportunistic bacteria or some pathogens.

Yeah, and I think some of this comes from. I think there was a study published in the early 2000s that suggested let's look at fructooligosaccharides. All right. In this particular study, if you took fructoseaccharides or you took klebsiella out of the ecosystem context and just put klebsiella in a petri dish and put some phos in there, it could grow on that phos. All right. And people got really freaked out by this and oh my God. Phosphates, klebsiella. What they didn't do is look at the other components of that study that Klebsiella in the ecosystem of poo, when phosph was added to the poo, fecal slurry clubsilla went down. It didn't go up, it went down. And there's no human studies showing that Cloudyla goes up when we actually give F. So it's like taking, I think, research out of context, going, oh my God, this is an in vitro study. But we'll ignore all the human studies that show it does the opposite, you know, which I always find a bit strange. And I think it's because FOS can cause gas and it can cause bloating and distension. So people are like, oh my God, it's feeding the bad bacteria because I'm farting more when I take it, or I get bloating and distension. Now, bloating and distension is a sign that your gut's not working well, that you need to do something to work out what's going on there, whether it's slow transit time, a dyspotic environment, sibo, you know, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth that's driving that, that you need to address. But it's not that the fossil is feeding the bad bacteria. I think that's where people sometimes go is, okay, we've got this in vitro study and then I eat this and I get bloated and I'm in pain. Therefore it must be feeding Klebsiella. That's why I'm in pain. That is kind of, I think, spurious logic. And it's ignoring the human studies don't show that. And I can say from giving fos to thousands of patients and doing pre and post sampling microbiome analysis, you do not see these things go up on FOS supplementation. It's not reality.

Hey, this is Dr. Eric and if.

You are looking to do everything you can to save your thyroid gland, in addition to listening to this podcast, there.

Are a few different ways we can help you.

First of all, I've written a book on hyperthyroidism called Natural Treatment Solutions for Hyperthyroidism and Graves Disease, as well as a book called Hashimoto's Triggers, which of.

Course is on Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.

And you can find both of these on Amazon as well as other websites.

Where books are sold.

Second, you could also join my Graves Disease and Hashimoto's healing community by visiting autoimmune thyroidgroup.com and finally, if you want to get paid personal help from me.

You could visit the website work with.

Dr. Eric.com just to let you know, I only see a limited number of new patients each month and I do.

Require anyone interested to complete a brief online application before work with me.

And now back to the show.

So let's say if someone, a practitioner, was to do stool tests and it showed a few opportunistic bacteria, which is common. Let's say there was like some streptococcus, staphylococcus klebsiella. So some practitioners might say, oh, let's give him some antimicrobials such as oregano or, you know, there's so many different ones out there. But would a better approach maybe to give him some prebiotics, maybe even some probiotics do things to increase stomach acid or is there justification like the antimicrobials, even if they're just opportunistic and not necessarily pathogenic?

Good question. I think it depends on what's there and how far off of normal it is too. Because I do see some people that look at the result and like, oh, the streptococcus in the red, but it's like tiny, a bit above like the normal range. I'm like, that's not problematic, you know, really? Whereas sometimes you might have E. Coli that's, you know, tenfold higher than the normal range. Yeah, that's problematic. And I might decide to use a combination effect. I might use probiotic, like I think this is Saccharomyces cerevacea variety boulardii, or lactose rutoride DSM17938 that produces a compound called reuterin that can target E. Coli. And I'll use lactulose, which will bring down E. Coli. And then I might use a herb too. But I'm very selective. And I think this is something that came out of my research with my PhD is that we were curious what impact different herbal antimicrobials might have on the gut ecosystem. And this is back in 2001, 2002. So we did some in vitro research at that time going, okay, well let's see, let's grab some bacteria that were like usual representatives of the keystone species that we knew about at that time that we grow in petri dishes, and then we will expose them to different herbal antimicrobials and we'll get to see whether do they only kill pathogens and leave good guys intact, or do they kill everything or do they kill good guys at lower concentrations than bad guys? We were really curious and it turns out that some of those ones did do that, that some things like citrus seed extract just killed everything. And if anything was more effective at killing the good bacteria than it was the pathogens. Like we use clindamycin as our positive control, which is a pretty full on antibiotic. This wiped out clindamycin in terms of the concentration in which it worked and just killed everything across the board. But then we had things like garlic that actually only targeted things like candida, E. Coli, but left lactobecilli and bifidobacteria alone. And we had oregano essential oil that was good at killing bifidobacteria, sadly. But lactobacilli were fine. And it did kill some pathogens too, a wide number of pathogens. And then we had berberine containing herbs that were also good at killing bifidobacteria. Lactose, a bit more tolerable to it and could kill some of the pathogens. It was an interesting project because it kind of really changed the way for me. It became integral to how I viewed the way, even the choice of herbs. So rather than going, okay, antibiotics cause collateral damage, but herbs are fine. They won't kill any of the good guys, was like, hold on, that's not true. You know, depending on what herb we use, what form we give it, in, what concentration we're giving, what dose, we can kill lots of beneficial bacteria with our herbs. And that really changed the way that I practiced from that point onwards. I want to choose things that work selectively as much as I can, which, thankfully is most of the time. We can choose something that will target the E. Coli, but leave bifidobacteria and butyrate producers alone or lacto cili alone. And I think there's been more research that's come out along that vein the last 20 years since I did mine, around how there's certain herbs that we know that are more selective in how they work and certain ones that are not, you know. So I think it shouldn't be underestimate the impact of the right prebiotic and the right probiotic for shifting things in the gut too. Yeah. And if it's only a minor imbalance, I'll often just use dietary changes pre and probiotic to shape shift things. Now, you do get situations like I had some patients with Crohn's disease and 50% of their ecosystem was E. Coli. 50%. And some context here. Normal levels of E. Coli are like 0.01% or 0.1%. That's the normal range of E. Coli. And in this kids had two people. It's like 50% of the ecosystem. So in that case, I'm not just using prebiotics and probiotics. I am too, But I'm also using herbal medicines like pomegranate husk. And what I love about pomegranate husk is that capacity to target Klebsiella, streptococci, E. Coli, but leave butyrate producers alone, a bifactory alone, in fact they go up when we utilize it. It's like, you know, there are some herbs that are just amazing in their selectivity and they really, when you get on board about, you know, really targeting things and trying to do things in a selective way and putting the microbiome first, I think we end up with better results long term for our patients. You can look at things like berberine which we know has got that, yeah, it does kill a range of different pathogens. But there's some interesting research that's come out about longer term use of berberine actually causes decreases in diversity of the ecosystem. It reduces Beatrice producing species with longer term use, reduces bifidobacteria populations with longer term use, but importantly actually increase levels of E. Coli and Klebsiella and a bunch of nasty Proteobacteria with long term use. Which I think is one of those things that should be on our clinicians radars when we're talking about because berberine has become one of the new that's used for everything type supplements. But when we're starting to do research about impact on the microbiome there are some definite negative impacts with long term use of berberine that really should be on our radar. Particularly if you're starting to think about using it for cholesterol or metabolic health where you're giving it daily for long periods of time, need to be aware of the significant dysphotic effects that it actually has in the gut.

Hmm, that's interesting because I know oregano oil could be kind of harsh and the citrus seed extract like you mentioned, but there is a lot and maybe I need to just dive deeper into the berberine because even in the like PubMed research if you do a search with berberine and gut microbiome, a lot of it seems to be positive. But again I guess you can't argue with the research as far as you know if it does affect some of the good bacteria like the bifidobacteria and.

Possibly the diversity in beta ray producers. But what I think was more surprising with this research and look at the research that in humans on long term use of berberine because I think there's a short term things which might be one thing and I don't mind using berberine for short periods of time, a couple weeks, no issue. But you start giving it daily for months. I Think this is where you see the more substantive negative impacts from its use. And I think also to me it's important we respect traditional wisdom and that berberine containing herbs were never given to people long term in any traditional medicine system. They're always seen as short term use. Like Coptis tenensis using traditional Chinese medicine, really high in berberine. It was always seen as short term use, short term use, don't use long term. You know, goldenseal was always seen as a short term use, don't use it long term, which is, you know, more from North American Western medicine tradition. So I think that this wisdom that was there around these things and then we've like pulled out this, this really potent antimicrobial compound and go, oh look, it improves blood sugar control. Let's give it to everybody long term for years. Let's fix the diet or lifestyle, don't do that. Let's just give them this one magic pill. But I think we'll see that there are negative consequences to that magic pill, whether it comes from the herb or comes from a pharmaceutical lab if we're not treating the underlying diet and lifestyle factors that actually led to that occur. And again, I think Berben short term is fine, but, but I think the data is clearly showing that there are long term negative consequences from microbiotic perspective unexpected like the growth of E. Coli, Klebsiella strains and other sort of insectobacter bloomed with long term berberine use. And I can't help but think that maybe you get this initial suppression and then the bacteria become resistant to it and then they end up growing up as a consequence with continued use.

All right, well, very interesting and thanks for sharing that, Dr. Jason. And what are your thoughts about speaking of just randomly killing? Not that well, just antimicrobials. What do you think about like practitioners who treat everybody for parasites? And as you know, I interviewed Dr. Nerolgia Kobe, I asked her the same question. I'm sure I know what your answer will be as well. But if you could talk about just like randomly treating, putting everybody on anti parasitic protocol, even if it's without berberine, let's take berberine out of the equation and other antimicrobials. And also if you could expand even with like blastocystis, blastocystis hominis, is it more commensal, is it pathogenic? Because there's also some controversy on that as well.

There definitely is controversy around it. And I think there's also how the evidence has changed over 20 years. If you would have asked me this 20 years ago as a clinician. If I had someone who had presented with gut symptoms and the stool test that said blastocystis, I would have gone, okay, well, let's treat the blastocystis. You fast forward 20 years. No, I will work this patient out really thoroughly. And seriously, 95, even higher percentage of the time, we find something else that's causing their symptoms. Generally, it's sibo. I would say mostly patients, they haven't been adequately breath tested for sibo. They just have gut symptoms. They have someone does a stool test going, oh, look, you've got blasto. This is the cause. And they stop their diagnostic work up there. I think this is the biggest mistake because it's like then we're. And all that focus is on this with microbe, that if you start looking at recent data, you'll start seeing that it's being viewed in a different light. It's being seen to be associated with better, higher quality, more diverse gut ecosystems. People are now arguing it has a apex predator role in the gut. So just like, you know, the wolves in Yellowstone national park or great white sharks out in the ocean, they actually have the apex predator. And their job is to keep other populations in check. And if we wipe out that population, there are consequences to the broader ecosystem, allowing other species, bacterial species, in this case, to become dominant, because blastocyst is a bacteria eater. So, and some people argue it helps keep bacteroides from becoming overwhelming, which is what we tend to see in western cultures, is overabundance of bacteroides, for example. And the lack of blastocystis may be one of those reasons why I think the crappy western diet is probably the core reason. But I would say that it's also the connection with the lack of the species. Many people in North America take enough antibiotics, it's not there anymore. Whereas there's, I think, a billion people worldwide with blastocystis in their gut. And there's a lot of super duper healthy people with blasts in their gut. And I'm putting my hand up here as someone that I was doing stool test experiments, and it turns out I've got blastocystis iodine amoeba in my gut. Do I ever have gut symptoms? No. You know, do I have fatigue?

No.

Do you have brain fog? All these things that people attribute to that I don't have. And then you'll find that it's not just me, there's a lot of healthy people end up having this in their gut. And it's not a problem. And I think sometimes the issue is, is if we stop our diagnostic workup at, okay, you've got this stool test at this, and you've got symptoms, therefore that must be the cause. That I think is the issue. Now, I do think that there is enough data out there to suggest to me that there'll be in rare cases, the potential that blastocystis is a problem for this patient. And I think we just have to rule out everything else first. And then I still think we focus on, you have to do that and go, okay, rule everything else. You don't have sibo, you don't have this, don't have that, but you do have this bug. And maybe it came from a case of travelers diarrhea. You didn't have the bug before, now you got symptoms. Like, there'll be some stuff in the history that might make us think that this is more likely cause. I would still focus on microbiome optimization, improving the. Just the health of the gut and then seeing how symptoms go from that point over just trying to kill this thing. And if it was as simple as we get these magic tweezers that went out and pulled it out, you know, it wouldn't really be this discussion. But, you know, like here in Australia, there's people that. There's centers that do triple antibiotic cocktails, three different antibiotics orally, sometimes at the same time that they do three antibiotics, you know, sprayed by colonoscopy as a way of trying to get rid of this, this. This bug, because it's been blamed as the cause of this person's fatigue or brain fog or gut symptoms. And then I'm often stuck with trying to mop up, you know, these people, yeah, the blaster's gone. But, geez, they're a hell of a lot worse than what they were before because they've completely decimated their ecosystem trying to get rid of this thing. Decimated, and that massive loss of diversity, you know, So I think it's always weighing up the potential risk versus benefit with treatments. And I think when there's lack of definitive evidence showing this is a problem, then I think we've got to be very cautious about using really big guns to target it. Whereas I think if you go, okay, well, let's make your system healthier, let's make you healthier, and let's see how you feel as a consequence. It's a different way of looking at it. If you can go, can we potentially induce better behavior? Like, we know, with certain microbes? And it hasn't been shown with blastocyst, but we do with certain microbes that if we make the environment more acidic. Yeah. By essentially having them have more fiber or prebiotics, we actually bring out the better behavior. In potentially pathogenic microbes. We can turn different genes off and on. They're really to produce beta glucuronidase or toxic metabolites. Goes down, you know, candida. We know we can change the ph. It makes it not grow a little hyphae that can burrow into your tissue, but it stays in that bud form, you know. So we've got enough data showing that if we can change the environment to a healthier one, we can bring out the best behavior in certain microbes and the suppress the negative behavior. So that way the bug might still be there, but it's not a problem in terms of the context of the environment.

Do you take a similar approach with H. Pylori? If someone has H. Pylori in the absence of symptoms, would you also say to leave it alone?

I think it would depend on the test that I did, yeah. And I think when I'm testing for H. Pylori, I'm specifically doing it because I think it's causing symptoms in that patient. But I think there are a couple of stool tests out there that test it and everybody that find it in I reckon like 80% of the stool tests and I can think of one lab that finds H. Polarizing to be present which isn't correlated. When I do any other sort of follow up analysis in most of those cases that I'm more cautious around those things of going, okay, well if you have H. Polar that shows up on a random stool test that isn't backed up by other testing technologies like rear breath testing or scoping and looking around or blood tests for antibodies or normal fecal antigen, those show up clear, then no, I would not treat it based on that, that. But if I do have patients who show up with positive year breath test, generally I would because they'd be doing that because they had symptoms consistent with H. Pylori causing a problem. So I would treat it. But I think you bring up a point in that there are people out there who argue, and I agree, that there are likely benign strains of H. Pylori that are completely not problematic. And then there are some that are definitely are problematic. And there are certain things we can test for like you know, CAG or a few other those sort of things we go, okay, these are virulence factors that we know about now. You know but we don't know about all virulence factors, so I don't think we could necessarily go, okay, well it doesn't have these two virulence factors, therefore it must be benign. I don't think we're there at that point yet. I think another 15, 20 years we'll have a better picture of this about when it's appropriate to treat it and when it's not. But I do think when people have upper gut symptoms consistent with this and it's present, then I will treat. But I'm also able to use selectively acting herbal medicines and dietary interventions to target it without causing major microbiome damage. So I think again, to me that puts in a different perspective. If every patients had to take triple cocktail of antibiotics or quadruple therapy to get rid of it, then I would really want much more distinctive evidence that was harmful versus, okay, you take this whole medicine for six weeks, eat some broccoli sprouts and drink some cranberry juice and take this probiotic and we get like 90% efficacy rate doing that. Then I've got let qualms about actually going, well, let's take out the hplr, leaving everything else intact. That to me is close to that selective tweezering out and pulling up the micro, but leaving everything else in a good state that we can kind of get with some things like H. Pyri.

All right, well, thank you for sharing that. And the final question I have for you is leaky gut testing. I attended one of your online courses where you discussed some of the different testing. And I think you mentioned, again, I don't want to put words in your mouth, but zonulin I think you said, is still not. I'll let you talk about zonulin and some of the leaky guts. Again, I don't want to put words in your mouth, but I think you said zonulin is not completely accurate as a marker.

No. Well, I think it's been interesting watching the research in this area and some people will poo the lashless manitol test because all technology, it's accurate technology. We've been using it for a long time. It's still considered the gold standard by people who specialize in this area who don't work for a lab trying to promote something else. And I think when you start looking around the data around, okay, things like blood, zonulin, like taking a blood sampling for zonulin, does that correlate with the gold standard? And it looks like most research suggests it does not. You know, and then more importantly, there's researchers now in the last handful of years that have looked at what is the test even looking for. And it turns out the tests that are looking for zonulin aren't even finding zonulin, they're finding something else. Some studies show it might be haptoglobulin or complement C3 or another zonulin like compound, but it's not actually finding zonulin anyway, you know, so it brings up like the correlation between that and the gold standard is pretty consistently poor. And two, it's not even finding what it's purported to find, which is zonulin. And some people think that we should really be tossing out every single study that's done using bloodstream zon. And it's associated with leaky gut because of its poor accuracy and because I'm telling us that and never mind the fact, I think maybe 10% of people don't produce zonulin at all. So they will always show up as, you know, having really bad leaky gut, but they won't have any zoning to show up. So I think it's a problematic thing. Fecal zonulin also similar situations. Are we actually finding zonulin or some other compound that may be similar enough to zoning to make an assumption with, but it doesn't seem to correlate with bloodstream zonulin in most studies. It doesn't correlate with lactulose. Manitol simply do sugar probes, which we see is the gold standard, although the occasional study with fecal zoning suggested it may correlate. So it's really mixed, but mostly negative with fecal zonulin. But blood zonulin I think is really questionable as a marker and I would rely on it as a way of assessing leaky gut. And I think it's probably pushed more so in the States because lactulose is a prescription item. So it means that nutritionists, dietitians, et cetera, can't prescribe a lactulose manitol test because it's got a drug in it, you know, from their regulatory potential. Whereas here and pretty much every other country in the world, relaxer dose is just a common over the counter thing that everyone has access to that we can all prescribe this test really easily, whereas over there you can't. We'll listen over. You can if you're a medical practitioner or naturopathic in certain states, etc, but I think it means that there's more of a push to go, okay, well, we can't use this test, let's see if we can find something else. But I think people have jumped on that one way, way before the data was actually supported being accurate. And I think the tests were developed then they can't even see the without even finding Z. I think that's a major issue. It has course to find it. It's not, it's finding something else.

All right, now that's really good to know. So thank you. I'm glad I asked you that question. I know I said that was my last one. Do you have time for one more? In 2018 when I took one of your courses, I think you mentioned that you used to use ubiome for microbiome testing, but since then they've gone out of business. Do you currently use any companies for gut microbiome testing?

Yeah, my patient base is pretty much spread around the world, which means I have different labs, different continents that I work with and utilizing different technologies. And I would say there's broadly speaking there's probably two types of tests that I would use in practice tests that use 16s RRNA technology to look at the microbiome. You biome did that and the states ombre does that. Now that we're called thrive there are limits, limitations with it. But you do get a beautiful snapshot of the entirety of the ecosystem at a low price point, around the $100 mark, which I think is fantastic. And you can track changes in the key species. You know Bifidobacteria lactobacilli, the Calibacterium acromans, you have butyrate producing species will all get targeted there that we can see and we can see the impact of our dietary changes and prebiotics really relatively quickly and inexpensively. For follow up, there's a test in the UK called Biomesite which also uses 16s which has a better microbe library and fills in some of the gaps that we currently have. The thrive because Thrive ombre isn't particularly good at telling us about prote bacteria populations. So each of those tests has got its strong and weak points. So hombre knocked with Proteobacteria, for example, can't see Bilophila which is a bio loving organism that produces hydrogen sulfide gas. But if we take their data and we put it through the biome site library, we can see protobacteria and we can see Bilopyla. So there's ways of trying to work around some of that issue. And then there are labs that use shotgun metadompic sequencing, which is really cool. Because it can go down to the species level accurately and even down to the strain level. You can tell people are taking lactose rhamnosis. GG is a probiotic because I can see it show up in their poo when they take it very clearly, which I think is pretty cool. Again, you can look at the entirety. But the cool thing about shotgun genomics is we get to see fungi and protozoa, bugs and bacteria, and even genetic pathways, too, for the production of certain compounds like hydrogen sulfide gas or methane. There's a lab here in Australia called Microba that uses shotgun that I do a lot of. I'd say that the major downside is the cost point. It's, you know, 300, 350 per test, which is a lot more than the 100 for the hombre, for example. And then I also use Nirvana Biome or Cosmos ID in the States, who also does shotgun as well. But again, the price point's a bit higher. But we do get more data to work with down to this, because I think one of the biggest issues with 16s, which is like new biome and ombre and biome site is their species level differentiation is not so good that we can't go, okay, what bifidobacteria species are in there, but we can, we're using shotgun techniques so we can get that species level detail and find nuanced ways.

Does Viome use 16s?

Viome uses shotgun managernomics, so they use arguably the best technology to look at the ecosystem. But as a clinician, I don't get much out of the reports. So, you know, they're more designed for the general public. You order this, it tells you to eat this food, less of that food, but in terms of telling you what the ecosystem looks like. So I could advise that patient how to modify it. I don't get the data that I need from a biome, but the technology they're using is good.

All right, well, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge, Dr. Jason. I'm sure there's a lot more you could talk about, but is there anything that I didn't ask you that you have a burning desire to share? Or if not, can you just like, give kind of just a brief summary of where people could, you know, what direction they should go as far as, you know, just looking more into taking care of the gut microbiome?

Yeah, no, I think we've covered a lot of some controversial topics and a lot of good topics, which has been great. Yeah. I can't overestimate the Importance of looking after your microbiome and essentially changing the way you look at it as being a custodian. You've got to be the custodian of this ecosystem for even if yourself, but for future generations too, particularly if you haven't had kids yet, going to be passing on those microbes to your next generation. You want the ecosystem to be as diverse as possible. And I think to me that involved eating, you know, some general tips that have to be. It's not always that straightforward to eat the way that I'm going to mention here because sometimes we've got sibo or irritable bowel syndrome or family bowel disease, other things that may complicate things. But in general we're wanting to eat probably plants and not completely plants necessarily. You can if you want, but predominantly plants. Whole foods, high fiber, avoiding all processed foods, anything with weird food chemicals, emulsifiers. Completely avoid olive oil, bright colors, purple potatoes, purple sweet potatoes, choosing lots of bright colored berries. Having as wide variety of rainbow of colors as you can in your diet. The widest diversity of different plant foods in your diet. Lots of spices in your plant foods like cumin and coriander. Get a whole mixture of different things. I think that's the key is diversity of foodstuffs, diversity of plant foods, whole plant foods, I think and not to neglect. Be poor, to neglect lifestyle stuff too. So get out in nature, you know, go bushwalking, hiking out in natural environments, garden. We know that actually people who are out there, garden, organic gardening, actually pick up more microbes, have diverse ecosystems. People that have the more diverse, the widest variety of plants growing in the garden have more diverse ecosystems in their gut. Which I think is also fascinating correlation. Since I've read that study, I've been planting on my garden like mad with this wide variety of different species as possible. So I can actually make sure. Interacting with different plants and getting different Microsoft groups on a regular basis as well.

Yeah.

Do you still recommend.

I forgot if it was when I.

Went through the master's in nutrition, your class or the online course where I think you said 40 different types of plant based foods per week.

Yes. Yeah, I still recommend that because I think to me that's not that 40 is a magic number, but because the 50 is arguably better. But I think that 40 is achievable for most people in terms of. Okay, how many different types of plant foods are you having over that week? And to make us easier too is like you know, a Granny Smith apple, Red Delicious apple, Fuji apple are three different foods. Red quinoa, black quinoa, white quinoa would be three different foods. So when you look at it that way, it becomes easier to achieve that. 40 but by doing so we do see a improvement of diversity of the ecosystem. The richness of the ecosystem will improve when we're able to eat that way.

Yeah.

So not just vegetables and fruits, nuts and seeds with those also seeds.

Legumes. Yeah. Because I think legumes have been demonized more recently, yet they are absolutely fantastic for feeding the microbiome. They really are. They contain galactooligosaccharides. You eat adzuki beans or black beans, you're getting the beautiful polyphenols which feed other beneficial bacteria, soluble fibers which feed butyrate producing species. So as a food group, that actually provides a lot of nurture and nourishment for your gut mic beneficial members of your gut microbiome. Those are the ones. Legumes are fantastic. I think they've just been unfairly demonized in the last 10 years, sadly.

All right, well, where can people find out more about you? Obviously there's Probiotic Advisor.com Yep.

And that's where like my probiotic database is, which is really trying to make evidence based prescribing a probiotic easy for busy, busy clinicians and probably people in the general public can access the data too. And then I've got a range of courses on there too, mostly geared for practitioners because I might probably main passion is actually educating clinicians to then, you know, reach more patients. But there are some courses there for the general public that are very, you know, up on health, which is a decent proportion of people these days. That's one thing that's changed a lot in the last 20 years is people's general knowledge who have a health interest is just way beyond where it was 20 years ago. So we do have courses for those people too.

All right, well, thank you again, Dr. Jason for your time. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with regards to prebiotics, probiotics in the gut microbiome.

You're very welcome. Nice chatting with you, Eric.

Thank you for listening to the Save My Thyroid podcast. If you haven't done so already, make sure you hit subscribe to stay up to date on the latest thyroid health related topics. And to get your free thyroid and immune health restoration action points checklist, visit savemythyroidchecklist.com thanks so much for tuning in.

So that was an awesome interview with Dr. Dr. Jason Horlec. Again, I've been wanting to interview him for a while and not sure why I didn't reach out to him sooner. I've been talking about him in my workshops or other live events like Challenges, just for quite a while, probably mainly since I took not just his class in 2014 or 2013. It was 2014 is when I graduated and got my degree, my master's degree, but 2013 is when I actually took the class. And so he was the one that taught me when you're taking a probiotic supplement, you want to get one that has specific strains. So really, since 2013, I've been talking about strains versus species of probiotics. But then in 2018, I took one of his online courses and really he dove deep into prebiotics and just a gut microbiome. So, but when it comes to prebiotics, I've really been preaching the prebiotics since 2018, even though I'm sure he spoke about it in 2013 when I took his class. But to me, it just the main takeaway I got was strains of probiotics. And really not until 2018 that I start looking more into the prebiotics. But he mentioned fermented foods. So when I work with patients, I do encourage them to eat fermented foods, especially if they want to. If they enjoy eating fermented foods, they don't have to. But I don't want them to think that it's all about probiotic supplements. But I do recommend both. I recommend fermented foods and I recommend probiotic supplements because you're going to get different species, different strains from the probiotic supplement compared to the fermented foods. And it was interesting that he mentioned the probiotic supplements, like when taken for therapeutic purposes. So if someone's going to take a probiotic for a specific reason, to modulate the immune system or for, for diarrhea, I mean, it's fine to eat fermented foods, but then you definitely want to rely on supplementation. And then we had a conversation on berberine. So I think it was him years ago, where I learned that berberine and oregano could be potentially harsh on the gut microbiome. And then just more recently, there's been a lot of positive information in journal articles, again in the research about berberine's beneficial effects on the gut microbiome. So I've made the shift to telling people that berberine is a good thing. I mean, it's not that everybody should take berberine. I can't say I take berberine, like on a wellness basis, but in the past, I would recommend berberine for blood sugar. But then some recent studies came out showing that berberine, as well as alpha lipoic acid, could benefit those people with thyroid eye disease. And so I've been recommending berberine in that purpose. So, yeah, we had a little bit of a conversation that extended until after. After the interview was over, we chat about a little bit more. I did reread some of the research.

And I'm not sure. I mean, there is some older research.

Saying that the berberine, I think it's Lactobacillus, where it can negatively affect. But then there are more recent studies that shown that it has benefits to the gut microbiome. So what Dr. Horlock was saying after I chatted with him, I mean, he definitely stood his stance and he said that he wouldn't recommend berberine for long periods of time. But he did say that if someone does take berberine, that they might want to take prebiotics along with berberine, maybe even a probiotic and maybe not take the probiotic. Right. With berberine, potentially. So that's something to consider to take berberine and then someone's taking berberine, let's say two or three times a day. Usually I recommend taking a probiotic with food, which was another question I asked him, and he reinforced that. But maybe in this situation, if someone's taking berberine and if you can't take it two hours away from the berberine, maybe take the probiotic before going to bed. I mean, it'd still work without food. It's not like it won't work, but it just works better with food. So, yeah, it was just interesting because I was a little bit surprised that he targeted berberine. And then like I said, it was probably him that I Learned from in 2013. I don't remember specifically if it was him, but wouldn't be a surprise if he was talking about the natural herbs potentially being, I don't want to say harmful, but I guess you could say that just not as harsh as an antibiotic, but it's not all good. And so that's very well might have been where I learned that, because I have been saying for years that not all herbs are safe, but really targeting more oregano and even oregano, I will recommend. It's not like I never recommend oregano oil. It's just that it's not something where someone wants to take continuously or take for six months. I mean, Dr. Jason Horlick might say you don't even want to take it for three months. But, you know, it's Risk versus benefit. So if someone has active thyroid eye disease, I think the benefits of berberine might be greater than the risk of not taking berberine. But I have been asked about I have a thyroid eye disease bundle, which you could find out more by visiting Ted bundle.com, but I've had some people ask, well, can I take the thyroid eye disease bundle as a way of preventing thyroid eye disease? And my response would be, well, you probably could, but that's not why I created it for. That's not why I put it together. But now, based on Dr. Horlack's conversation, on my conversation with Dr. Jason, maybe it's something you wouldn't want to take like on a maintenance basis because, you know, someone might then take it for like six months or longer. But I still have no problem recommending it for, let's say, three months. And again, if you take for three months, usually I do recommend taking a probiotic anyway. But you might want to take it away from the berberine instead of with the berberine. The prebiotics, fine if you take it with the berberine because again, the probiotics has the bacteria that berberine potentially can affect, whereas the prebiotic is just feeding the bacteria. So it's not going to hurt to take the prebiotic with the berberine. And then we spoke about parasites. H. Pylori I feel like I've been asking a lot of practitioners the question about would you just randomly treat everybody for parasites? Or with him, it was his thoughts on Blastocystis hominis. Previously, I interviewed Dr. Nirala Jacoby, who coincidentally is only 15 minutes away from Dr. Jason, which I didn't know until. Until I spoke with Dr. Jason through email. And then I told him I was interviewing Dr. Noralo just because I knew they were both in Australia, but I didn't know they were so close together. I didn't know that Dr. Horlick was on Dr. Jacoby's podcast, her SIBO SIBO Dr. Podcast, not a surprise that he was less aggressive with the parasites. But after speaking specifically to Dr. Jacoby about Blastocystis and Dr. Horlock about Blastocystis, and again, they don't think that should always be eradicated. Again, the recent research suggests that blastocystis might be more harmful rather than commensal. But Dr. Horlik is an expert, so make me think as far as if someone comes up with blastocystis on a test, really just talk to the person about it. Don't automatically put everybody on a Protocol. Anyway, just something to think about. Definitely want to do more research on Blastocystis hominis and maybe bring it up in a future episode. And then H. Pylori. So he's not against H. Pylori treatment, but it just. It depends on the person and depends. Now, I will say one thing I would mention because he, he brought it up is. And I didn't put him on the spot as far as naming the test, at least not during the interview, but he mentioned that there's a test out there where a lot of people, I think he might have said, like, like 80% of people test positive for H. Pylori or show H. Pylori. And I asked him after the interview just. And he did confirm was a GI map, which I've been recommending for a long time. And a lot of practitioners recommend GI map. It's one of the most popular, if not the most popular, comprehensive stool test out there. And my thoughts, if it's positive, if the H. Pylori test comes out positive on the GI map, then it's.

It's probably positive.

But what happens with the GI map? It's quantitative pcr. So unlike urea breath test or stool antigen test, where those say positive or negative, this will give a number. Ideally you want it to be less than DL, less than detectable limits. But if it's detectable. I've spoken with some people on from Diagnostic Solutions and they can't say yes treat, yes, no treat, but they kind of suggested that if, if it's present, you don't want it there. So kind of suggested that you want to treat it. But I think I'm going to change my approach because the last conversation I had with someone at Diagnostic Solutions is that if, well, maybe if it's still within, like, if it's within range but on a higher end that you might want to consider. And then others will say it depends on the symptoms. Like if someone has symptoms. But challenge is you can't always go by symptoms. And the literature does show that it's H Pillar can be a trigger of Graves and Hashimoto's. So something else to think about. But my approach, when it comes to blastocystis, it might change, but I need to dive into the research and you know, definitely there are practitioners like Elizabeth Yarnell I always bring up because she's someone that I interviewed a couple of times and then there's. But there's other practitioners too. She's not the only one who treats everybody for parasites. But I do lean more towards what Dr. Jacoby and Dr. Horlick say about not treating everybody for parasites.

And that's the approach I've taken.

I treat parasites if I see them and even if I don't see them and if someone's symptomatic and I'll look into other things, but if we don't find anything, maybe treat someone, maybe assume they have parasites. But I would agree that you don't want to treat everybody for parasites. And then I need to kind of rethink. If someone tests positive for parasites, do we always need to treat them? So it's just again something to think about. More research needs to be done. Same thing with H. Pylori. If someone has the definitely, if they have symptoms like reflux and heartburn and if H. Pylori is positive, you definitely want to treat it. If they're not experiencing symptoms, then something to think about. My approach has been to treat it just because it could be a trigger. And I've had people get in the into remission after treating H. Pylori. But if someone has a detectable value on the GI map, maybe it's best not to treat, especially if they're not experiencing those symptoms. And then finally I just wanted to expand a little bit on diversity. So what Dr. Horlack, he mentioned this was 2018, that I learned it, that he wants someone to eat 40 different plant based foods. And it's not just vegetables. Initially I thought it was vegetables, which would be really difficult. But he mentions it's, you know, includes nuts, it includes grains, it includes legumes, fruit, of course. But if someone is following AIP diet then of course they can't eat grains. They're not supposed to eat legumes. Same thing with nuts. If someone's more paleo, they're still supposed to avoid grains and legumes, but they can eat nuts and along with the veggies and the fruits. So it still might be challenging when it comes to that. And then there'll be another episode coming out on oxalates that actually probably will be out as I'm recording this. It's not out, but by the time this episode is out, there will be some information out there on oxalates and then it might drive you even further crazy when it comes to the nuts because certain nuts are higher in oxalates and that's something that some people don't mention. But let's save that for the other episode which again, by the time you listen to this, it's should be out and there's actually A book, Toxic Superfoods, and the author is Sally Norton. By the time this comes out, there'll be probably multiple episodes on my podcast, one that I'm doing solo like a Q and A, and then hopefully an interview with Sally Norden. So I won't get into oxalates here. I did want to bring it up because someone might listen to this and say, wait, I already listened to the oxalate episode and you're saying nuts and same thing with grains and legumes. There are also higher sources of oxalate. So, so tune into that. I mean, you want to be diverse. And when you listen to some of these episodes, like histamine and oxalates and all these things, and then you think to yourself, well, is there anything I could eat? I mean, I'm listening to one source that says don't eat lectins, don't eat, including nightshades, which have other compounds, not just lectins. Don't eat eggs, don't eat foods with oxalates. So again, but before you know it, you might be left with nothing to eat. So, yeah, just. Just wanted to briefly bring that up here. But diversity is the key. If you're only eating five different vegetables per week, I would work on increasing that. Even if you're eating 10 to 15. Like increasing it to 10, 15, not now. If you're doing that now, that's great. But if you're only at five different vegetables and the goal, let's say, I mean, if we talk about 40 different plant based foods, maybe the goal ultimately is like 20, 25 different vegetables per week. And I'll be honest, I don't eat 25 different vegetables per week. Usually it is somewhere maybe around the 12 to 15 range. Not just me, I don't eat a lot of fruit, but even the fruit, I diversify as well. And I guess that's all I'll chat about here. Just wanted to make sure that someone's not eating the same exact salad every day or all they're eating is steamed broccoli on a daily basis. So definitely you want to have a diverse diet because that also leads to a diverse gut microbiome. And that being said, I hope you found the episode to be valuable. Yeah, it wouldn't be a surprise if in the Future I asked Dr. Jason back again, maybe sometime in 2024. Just really enjoyed this conversation, but I'm sure there's a lot more to discuss. And you know, when it comes to the gut microbiome and future probiotics, that's one thing I didn't talk to him about just for the sake of time. There are definitely going to be different types of probiotics in the future, and so maybe in a future episode dive deeper into some of the future probiotics or something like that. Anyway, I'll let you go now. Thanks for tuning in and again, look forward to catching you in the next episode.

I want to let you know about a product called Hepato Immune supreme, which is a unique supplement that has a rare combination of N acetylcysteine, also known as Nac, milk Thistle and Schisandra to support the liver. And it also has a few mushrooms.

That can help support the immune system.

Including Cordyceps, which has both immune modulating and adaptogenic properties and is great for those with Graves Disease and Hashimoto's. To learn more about HepatoImmune supreme, visit savemythyroid.com LiverSupport.