The document outlines the New Civil Liberties Alliance’s (NCLA) prolonged legal battle against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) "Gag Rule," a policy that bars individuals and media outlets from speaking about the terms of SEC enforcement settlements. It lists the NCLA clients affected—including Thomas Powell and several others—who have been prohibited from sharing truthful speech about their settlements. The piece chronicles NCLA’s actions since its initial petition to the SEC in October 2018, subsequent lawsuits, a prior Supreme Court petition, a denied petition in January 2024, a Ninth Circuit appeal, and the latest Supreme Court cert petition filed in March 2024 (Powell v. SEC). It notes the SEC’s recent indication that it may abandon the Gag Rule, but raises uncertainty about whether existing gag orders will be lifted or only future ones prevented. The document also includes a brief NCLA statement expressing cautious optimism that the SEC is correcting a 54‑year practice, while questioning whether the agency is merely trying to avoid a binding Supreme Court ruling. The article is presented as a news‑style report hosted on Yahoo, with standard site navigation elements appended.

Topics

SEC Gag Rule vs. First Amendment Rights

Explanation of the SEC’s settlement gag provisions that restrict speech by individuals and media, and the constitutional conflict with the First Amendment’s protection of free speech and press.

NCLA’s Eight‑Year Legal Campaign Timeline

Chronological overview of NCLA’s actions from the 2018 petition to the SEC, multiple lawsuits, a prior Supreme Court petition, the 2024 denied petition, Ninth Circuit appeal, and the current Supreme Court cert petition (Powell v. SEC).

Potential Outcomes of the SEC’s Policy Shift

Discussion of the uncertainty surrounding whether the SEC’s move to drop the Gag Rule will retroactively lift existing gag orders or only prevent future ones, and the implications for affected clients.

NCLA’s Public Statement on the SEC’s Recent Move

The organization’s brief comment expressing surprise and encouragement that the SEC may be correcting a long‑standing practice, while questioning the agency’s motives.

More from Dr.

PDF

httpslnkd.pdf

3w ago
PDF

WSJ_TJP_How the SEC Enforced a Gag Rule on Me and Others .pdf

1mo ago
PDF

Where AI Is Headed_Post _ LinkedIn_TJP-7.11.2026.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

Wealth Is Not the Legacy. Stewardship Is_.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

Truths About family Officeds_Post _ LinkedIn_7.13.2026.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

The Greatest Risk of Legal AI Isn't AI_.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

Freedom Is Not Just a Right. It's a Responsibility._.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

Communities Are Sustained by People, Not Property._.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

NCLA_Thomas J. Powell, et al. v. SEC - New Civil Liberties Alliance.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

PRESS-RELEASE_Powell-v.-SEC_SEC-Rescinds-Gag-Rule.pdf

3mo ago
PDF

Gesmer Updegove_Powell v. SEC_ _No-Admit_No-Deny_ Policy.pdf

3mo ago
See all content