How to ensure your trading rules actually work

31 May 2024 · 4 min
3:59

Adrian Reid (Enlightened Stock Trading) warns that published trading rules often do not generalize across markets. He presents a case study: a long-running trading system that performed well on the Hong Kong market (≈17% CAGR, ~44% win rate, 20% avg win, ~7% avg loss, 18% max drawdown) but delivered poor results when applied unchanged to Taiwan (≈9% CAGR, 25% max drawdown, CAGR/MaxDD ≈0.36). Reid and his students then simplified and retuned the rules for Taiwan, achieving a final backtest around 18.8% annual return (including slippage and commissions).

Chapters

More from Adrian

9:25
youtube.com

Discretionary vs Systematic Trading: Which Actually Works?

3d ago
15:08
youtube.com

The Hidden Link Between 10‑Year Treasury and Gold – Proof Inside

3w ago
1:26
youtube.com

In-sample vs out-of-sample (which one matters?)

1mo ago
0:52
youtube.com

Trade List vs Reality

2mo ago
1:12
youtube.com

How AI Saves Traders Hours Every Week

2mo ago
0:50
youtube.com

How AI Models Evolved in 2 Years

2mo ago
0:56
youtube.com

The Memory Trap in ChatGPT

2mo ago
0:54
youtube.com

You've Been Using AI Wrong This Whole Time

2mo ago
1:07
youtube.com

The One Mistake Traders Make with AI

2mo ago
1:05
youtube.com

Your trading gaps revealed by AI

2mo ago
1:20
youtube.com

Claude runs my backtests while I sleep

2mo ago
See all content