Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Aug. 19, 2025

Good afternoon, everybody. How are you? Good to see all of you. What we've witnessed President Trump accomplish over the last few days has been nothing short of remarkable. We are now three and a half years into the war between Russia and Ukraine, a brutal conflict that has claimed hundreds of thousands of Russian and Ukrainian lives and cost trillions of dollars. The weakness and incompetence of Joe Biden foolishly allowed the killing to start in the first place. Until President Trump returned to office in January, the bloody and broken Biden status quo was to endlessly force American taxpayers to fund Ukraine, no matter the cost, no matter how long it takes, and no matter how many lives were lost. There is no denying that Biden's America last foreign policy moved the world further away from peace. President Trump rejected that failed approach and instead, over the last seven months, has relentlessly pursued peace throughout his second term. And thanks to President Trump's efforts, we finally have movement after years of deadly gridlock. On Friday, as you all know, many of you were there. President Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska for a bilateral meeting. This was the first time President Putin has been to the United States since 2015, and the first time he has met with an American president in years. President Putin publicly confirmed what President Trump has said all along. The war between Russia and Ukraine never would have started in the first place if President Trump were in office. This was always obvious to any person with a shred of common sense. Just look at what took place during the last four administrations. Under George W. Bush, Russia invaded Georgia. Under Barack Obama, Russia took courage. Crimea. Under Joe Biden, Russia invaded Ukraine. But under President Trump, Russia did not invade nor take anything. President Trump is the only president this century, Republican or Democrat, who has held Russia in check and ensured peace in Europe. That's because Russia has always greatly respected President Trump and his peace through strength foreign policy approach. But overall, the bilateral talks in Alaska were very productive and multiple key points were agreed to between the two leaders. That truly opened up the door for phase two discussions which took place yesterday here at the White House within 48 hours of that meeting in Anchorage. I may add, as you all know, there were many European leaders here, as well as Ukrainian President Zelensky. They all traveled here to meet with President Trump to maintain the momentum and work toward a lasting peace. Across the board, every leader credited President Trump for his decisive leadership that has reignited the dialogue in hopes of finally bringing this war to to a peaceful conclusion. Two quotes in particular capture the progress that was made in the optimism moving forward. Finnish President Alexander Stubbs said, I think in the past two weeks we've probably had more progress in ending this war than we have had in the past two and three and a half years. Again, that is the President of Finland, a country that shares a border with Russia. That's what we call the President Trump, effectively. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also summed it up well. Without President Trump, this deadlock with Putin would not have been broken. He is the only one who could do this. Following the encouraging conversations yesterday, President Trump spoke with President Putin by phone and he agreed to begin the next phase of the peace process. A meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky, which would be followed, if necessary, by a trilateral meeting between President Putin, President Zelensky and President Trump. As the President said, Vice President Vance, Secretary Rubio and Special Envoy Witkoff will continue to coordinate with Russia and Ukraine to make this happen as soon as possible. It's very important to remember that before President Trump's landslide victory last November, there was no end in sight to this bloodshed. Now there may finally be light at the end of the tunnel and an opportunity for lasting peace. That's because President Trump is the peace president and American leadership is back on the world stage. It should not be lost on anyone in this room that world leaders are coming right here to Washington D.C. for help. While previous presidents have traveled halfway around the world to apologize for America, President Trump stands up for America and he has firmly restored America's status as the undisputed leader of the of the free world. However, one thing that has absolutely not changed is the media's negative and downright false coverage of President Trump and his foreign policy accomplishments. From the beginning of this entire process, much of the left wing media has been actively rooting against the President of the United States in the pursuit of peace. Initially, the media ridiculously claimed that President Trump was somehow beholden to Russia for even agreeing to have a face to face discussion with President Putin. Inside of the United States. The media said President Trump was making a grave mistake by quote, legitimizing Putin. They were aghast that President Trump would treat another world leader like a world leader. The media relentlessly attacked President Trump and claimed he suffered a, quote, major defeat for not immediately emerging with a final agreement, even though he said heading into that meeting this was a meeting to listen and to understand how to move the ball forward. All weekend, following those historic U. S. Russia bilateral talks, we listened to clueless pundits on television trying but failing to claim that the President had failed the so called experts in the foreign policy establishment whose record is nothing but endless wars, trillions of wasted taxpayer dollars and dead Americans have the nerve to try and lecture President Trump, who has solved seven global conflicts in seven months, about peace. This is the same President, by the way, who brokered the Abraham Accords in his first term on top of more than half a dozen other peace deals this year alone. As I just said, we also saw yesterday the President of Ukraine and all of the other major leaders of Europe fly across the Atlantic Ocean to meet President Trump at the White House because of the progress that was made and that if you ask the media failed meeting, but it was not, it was highly productive and it was successful. This is why Americans trust in the mass media is at a lowest point in more than five decades. Diplomacy is a delicate process and instead of reporting the facts about what is happening here at this White House and what is happening between this President and other leaders around the world, many outlets in this room continue to try to actively undermine the President and sabotage the efforts towards peace. That is why I felt the need to set the record straight. In other news on the home front, President Trump's efforts to make D.C. safe again are working. There have been a total of 465 arrests since the start of this operation on Thursday, August 7th. Last night there were a total of 52 arrests including the arrest of an illegal alien, Ms. 13 gang member with convictions for DWI and drug possession. Thanks to President Trump's leadership in the outstanding work of both federal and local law enforcement, dangerous gang members like the one picked up last night will not be allowed on the streets of our nation's capital. Other arrests last night included assault with a deadly weapon for stabbing, parole violation for robbery, murder, outstanding warrant for attempted murder, assault on federal law enforcement officer and felony assault. Four more homeless encampments were also removed during yesterday's reporting period. To date, A total of 48 homeless encampments have been cleared in Washington D.C. by multi agency teams. MPD patrol units are actively working with city officials to locate and clear additional encampments and and remove homeless residents off of Washington's streets. And despite fake narratives from the media, again, a significant number of the arrests have been in high crime areas of D.C. in fact, nearly half of all of the non illegal alien related arrests have occurred in Wards 7 and 8, the two wards that have the highest number of violent crime as well as homicides and assaults with dangerous weapons last year. So while Democrats continue to coddle violent criminals, President Trump and this administration are focused on putting them behind bars and unapologetically standing up for the safety of law abiding American citizens. And the White House will continue to provide all of you with the results of this operation in the days ahead. So with that, I will take your questions today. Here in our new media seat today we have Jack Posobec, who joined us in Anchorage, Alaska, last week. Jack, thanks for being here.

Why don't you kick us off, Caroline, thanks so much. So a couple questions regarding the status of these peace talks. Obviously, we saw the president and President Putin there in Anchorage. We saw the world leaders here yesterday with this summit. We've heard phrases like coalition of the willing. We've also heard Article 5 like guarantees. When it comes to the security guarantees. What is the current status of that? I know the president earlier today mentioned boots on the ground would be U.K. france, Germany, possibly, but unequivocally said no U.S. troops on the ground but U.S. coordination. Can you elaborate on that and what would the red lines be?

Ms. Sure. Well, you got to the heart of what I was going to say to all of you today on security guarantees, which is the president has definitively stated US Boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies. The President understands security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace, and he has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well.

Caroline, now, have the Russians responded at all? I know he spoke with President Putin last night. What has been their response? Because we've heard some reports from the Kremlin and others saying they're unequivocally against NATO troops on the ground.

Ms. Well, look, the President continues to have these conversations with both leaders. Those conversations took place in Anchorage, Alaska, again yesterday with the Europeans and President Zelensky, and he has directed his team to come up with a framework for these security guarantees that can be acceptable to help ensure a lasting peace and end this war.

And then just last question real quick on this regarding some of the funding. We're hearing questions about another round of weapons sales or possibly a round of U.S. purchases of Ukrainian drones. Will that money be funded by the US Taxpayers? Are we finally going to see an end to the US Taxpayer funded, seemingly endless mandate for these foreign wars?

Well, the president is very sensitive to to the needs of the American taxpayer, and immediately upon entering office back in January, he made it very clear that we're not going to continue writing blank checks to fund a war very far away, which is why he came up with a very creative solution to have NATO purchase American weaponry because it is the best in the world, and then to backfill the needs of the Ukrainian army and the Ukrainian people and their military. So that's the solution the president has came up with. We'll continue to see that forward. As for any additional sales, I'll have to defer you to the Department of Defense. Thanks, Jack.

Kelly, what has President Trump learned that tells him that Vladimir Putin would be willing to make a deal for him for President Trump?

Ms. Well, the president has learned a lot, which is part of the reason he opened up this dialogue. The previous administration who oversaw the beginning of this war refused to talk. And President Trump has always said in order to learn, in order to move the ball forward with diplomacy and towards peace, you have to have open dialogue. And so that's why the president has had several conversations by phone and, of course, an in person meeting last Friday with President Putin. He also has talked to President Zelensky dozens of times, had him here at the White House yesterday, and he's understanding what both sides want, what both sides are going to have to give up. And he has always said, in order to get a good deal, both sides are going to have to walk away a little bit unhappy. So he continues to learn a lot throughout these conversations, which is why we've seen progress from both sides. And I would also just add, when it comes to learning and moving the ball forward, look at how both Russia and Ukraine have actually talked directly for the first time in many years, thanks to the efforts of this president and this administration.

Specifically for President Trump, though, what do you think Putin's motivation is to try to do something for President Trump as opposed to just resolving the conflict?

Ms. I think, as I just spoke to in my opening remarks, Kelly, Russia and all countries around this world actually respect the United States again, and the president is using the might of American strength to demand that respect from our allies, our friends, our adversaries all around the world. And we've seen that not just lead to progress with Russia in Ukraine, but also we've seen it in the closing of seven global conflicts around the world as well. We've seen it with the release of hostages in Gaza. You've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war in if we had not had a president who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the president of the United States of America. Rachel. Thanks, Caroline. Heading into Alaska, a lot of the focus in the talk was on this trilateral meeting between these three leaders. Can you explain how this went from a trilateral meeting involving President Trump to now the focus being on this bilateral meeting without the President first? Ms. Well, look, the president has spoken to both leaders about this and both leaders have expressed a willingness to sit down with each other. And so our national security team will help both countries do that ultimately. The president has always said that there are areas of disagreement in this war that will have to be discussed and decided upon by these two countries. And so he wants these two countries to engage in direct diplomacy. He said that from the very beginning, which is why he's agreeable to the idea of having President Zelensky and President Putin get together. And, and I understand accommodations for that meeting are underway. As soon as we hear more details, we'll be sure to let all of you know. And just a quick follow up, we know as of right now there is no ceasefire in place. We've seen Russia continue its attacks on Ukraine. What indications is the president getting from Putin that he wants to have this meeting with Zelensky soon? Because he spoke to him directly yesterday and he expressed that rather than later. He spoke to that directly yesterday and the president put that in his statement that he gave to all of you, the news media, knowing you'd be asking, following that conversation in the effort of transparency. Haley, thanks, Caroline.

You made clear, no U.S. boots on the ground. Is the president considering U.S. boots in the air as a form of a security guarantee?

Look, that was something the president mentioned on his interview this morning. It is an option and a possibility. I won't certainly rule out anything as far as military options that the president has at his disposal. I'll let him do that. I can tell you he's definitively ruled out boots on the ground. Sure.

Thanks, Caroline. Just about the possible venue for the talks, can you confirm that Putin suggested Moscow as a venue for the bilateral talks? And if so, doesn't that indicate that Putin is perhaps not serious about this, that he's suggesting a venue that there's no way that Zelenskyy is going to go to?

Ms. Look, I'm not going to litigate the private conversations between the president and President Putin, aside from what the president himself has already spoken spoken on, but I can tell you there are many options that are being discussed by our national security team right now with both parties.

Can you give us an indication of Where?

I just told you, we'll provide you details as soon as we can. Thank you for trying, though, Libby.

Thank you, Caroline.

I wanted to ask about the National Guard troops. How is the White House coordinating with how they're being placed in D.C. what areas? And then also how long should people here in the District anticipate the National Guard to be on the ground that patrol determines? I don't have a timeline for you, Libby, but we will keep you posted on that. I think the President, as you know and this administration, he came to this briefing room with members of his cabinet to lay out the rationale and the reasoning for federalizing the National Guard here in Washington, D.C. and for our work with the Metropolitan Police Department to make our district safer. We've seen violent crime has taken the lives of far too many residents here in our nation's capital and the president wants to make it safe again. And as for the coordination efforts, this interagency team is meeting and talking daily. In fact, there's a meeting taking place right now in the West Wing with members of the interagency task force to continue to discuss not just the National Guard deployment, but also how we can continue to remove public safety threats off of the streets of Washington, which as the numbers I just showed you prove they are doing every single night. I will just reiterate, 465 total arrests and counting since the start of this operation, I believe 11 or 12 days ago. I'll have to check the calendar, but those are pretty remarkable results. If not for this task force and their high level of coordination and the leadership of this president, there would have been 465 more violent criminals on the streets of this Capitol that you all live in every day. So I think we should all be very grateful for that. Stephen.

Thank you. Caroline. Three questions about the D.C. crackdown.

Sure.

First, I was wondering if you could clarify something President Trump said. He mentioned getting rid of the slums where criminals live. Was he talking about taking tents are permanent residential buildings? And then the mayor has expressed an interest in clarifying how much of a focus illegal immigration enforcement is as part of this crackdown. Can you say anything about that? Are there any preview on the beautification?

Three questions. I'll try to answer all three of them pointedly for you. First, when it comes to what you said, and the President said the slums of Washington, D.C. he's referring to the most dangerous communities, neighborhoods and streets in the city where unfortunately, violence has ravaged these communities and taken the lives of, again, far too many law abiding D.C. residents we know on July 5th of this year, just more than a month ago, a three year old beautiful young girl was shot and killed in her car with her family in one of these communities, which is why there has been a surge, despite what many of you have been falsely reporting. And I believe it was the Washington Post who put out a map claiming it to be fact based when it was just based on, I don't know, accounts that they've heard on the street, not actual statistics and data. So we went and reconfigured the numbers and as I said, half, nearly half of all the non illegal alien related arrests have occurred in Ward 7 and 8 in the District of Columbia where we know, excuse me, there's the highest rate of crime. So we'll continue to do that. And what was your second question, Stephen?

Legal immigration, how much of a focus that is?

Yeah, look, I mean, the focus is to make D.C. safe and beautiful and to remove public safety threats and violent criminals from our streets. If federal law enforcement, with the help of the Metropolitan Police Department, come across illegal aliens, of course we are going to abide by this administration's policy of law and order and we are going to remove illegal criminals from our nation's capital. They will be detained and deported just like they are in every other community across the country. Kristin?

Thanks, Kaylee. First question is whose idea was it to change the next steps from a trilateral to a bilateral meeting?

Ms. It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday. And as you saw, Kristen, with all of those European leaders leaving the White House, including the NATO secretary general, they all agree that this is a great first step and it's a good thing that these two leaders are going to be sitting down together, and the president expects that to happen.

And how long is Trump willing to wait and operate in good faith for Putin to actually arrange a meeting before he intervenes?

Look, the president has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He's taken actions, as you've seen, sanctions on India and other actions as well. He's made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end and he has scoffed at the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meeting takes place. The president wants to move and he wants to bring this war to an end as quickly as possible.

Clarification on you said earlier about Putin agreeing to the meeting. The Kremlin seemed to indicate that Putin did not firmly agree to a bilateral? Did he agree to have a sit down with just Zelensky on the phone?

Ms. I can assure you that the United States government and the Trump administration is working with both Russia and Ukraine to make that bilateral happen as we speak.

Sean, if the point is to get everybody on the same page, why wouldn't Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room? He said it would be disrespectful to do that. But why is it disrespectful?

With all due respect, only a reporter from the New York Times would ask a question like that. Sean, the president met with all of these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil. In fact, there was so much progress in the readout that was given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America. And if I could just read for all of you some of the statements from those European leaders. Yesterday you had President Zelensky himself saying it was a very good conversation, it was really good. We spoke about very sensitive points. The secretary general, Mark Ruda, it was the president, only because of the president that this deadlock was broken with President Putin by starting a dialogue. So these leaders who this war is in their backyard are very grateful that the president took that call and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia's thinking on this, something that was not done by the previous administration at all. Catherine, thank you.

Is the White House looking at Budapest as a possible location?

Mr. I'm not going to confirm or deny locations. We'll provide you with details as soon as we can.

Just following up on Kristen's question, I understand that the White House is working.

And allies are working to make this.

Meeting happen, but did Putin promise to do a meeting with Zelenskyy, a direct meeting in the coming weeks?

He has, and I just answered that question for you, Franco, Thanks.

I just want to clarify. So you are saying that President Trump is considering US Pilots and US Aircraft potentially supporting European or Ukrainian forces?

The president spoke to that himself this morning when he called into Fox and Friends. And I would defer you to his answer. You can read it directly yourself.

In addition, can I ask no boots on the ground. Steve Witkoff's talking about Article 5 like security guarantees. Can you talk about what other Article 5 like security guarantees that are being considered if it's not boots on the ground.

Ms. These are very sensitive diplomatic discussions that are currently taking place literally as we speak. So I will leave it to the national security team and I'll leave it to the president to have those private discussions with these leaders as we try to bring this war to an end. And can I ask one more, Mary Margaret? Go ahead.

Thanks, Caroline. Two questions.

That's okay.

So on these meetings, I know you said that the trilateral will take place if necessary. Do you think that we might not need the trilateral and that Zelenskyy and Putin might come to this conclusion on their own? And then as a follow up, I know the president said on Fox News this morning that he's partially seeking peace in order to get to heaven. Was he joking or is there spiritual motivation behind his peace deals here?

I think the president was serious. I think president wants to get to heaven, as I hope we all do in this room as well. Annie.

Thanks, Caroline. I'm just shifting gears to the Department of Justice for a minute. Can you walk us through why a deputy, another deputy FBI director was named. Does Trump have any displeasure with how the FBI has been being run to date? And I have a question about the antitrust amendment. No.

Andrew Bailey is extremely qualified. As you know, he's been serving with honor as the attorney general of Missouri. And he's been brought on as another set of very credible and experienced hands to work alongside the current deputy director, Dan Bongino, under the leadership of the Director Kash Patel and the attorney General, Pam Bondi. And the FBI has been doing a tremendous job. We've seen their agents out on the streets as part of this interagency task force here in Washington. But the crime that they've been stopping here in Washington, they've been doing this for seven months all across the country. In fact, there's been 19,000 arrests by the FBI nationwide. That's more than double last year in the same time period. Of those same 1600 arrests were for violent crimes against children. 4000 child victims have been rescued by this FBI under this current leadership. 1000 arrests from investigations of foreign terrorist organizations. There's been 1500 kilos of fentanyl seized, 6300 kilos of meth have been seized, and three of the top ten most wanted have been arrested. So far, not a single one of the individuals on the top 10 most wanted list were arrested under the previous administration. We've arrested three in seven months. So when you're actually working and enforcing law and order, you need all hands on deck. And so we look forward to welcoming Andrew Bailey to this new post.

Jackie, I have a quick question about Roger Alfred, who is a former DOJ official. He gave a speech in Aspen yesterday where he said that senior DOJ aides are cutting deals with favored lobbyists. I'm wondering if the president has any concerns at all with the way the antitrust division is working.

I have no idea who that individual is. I don't know why he made those comments. I don't know what basis he's making those comments on. My instinct tells me it's not true. But we will definitely look into them and I'll get you a response. Jackie.

Thanks, Caroline. Since the president often says that this.

War would not have started if he were in office and Putin confirmed that, do you accept that as true? The European leaders do and President Putin himself said that, by the way. He did say that. The question I have, though is what is the president going to do to ensure that these security guarantees last beyond him into the time when he is no longer president, and does that have to involve Congress at all? Ms. Well, he understands the need for that, which he spoke to yesterday. And what's he going to do? It's why he's engaging in so many talks and so many conversations with both sides of this war with our European allies. It's why on the way home from Anchorage, Alaska, very late at night when I know many of you on the press plane were sleeping and many staff were sleeping, the president himself was still awake at 2 o' clock in the morning talking to European leaders and NATO about how we can ensure a lasting peace and bring this conflict to an end. He has expended incredible amount of time, energy and effort into bringing this war to an end and he remains determined.

To do that also. Go ahead, go ahead.

Thank you, Carol.

Sure, Jake.

And then thank you, Carolyn. Which of the half dozen peace deals that the president pulled off would you say he's the most proud of and then have another question?

Ms. That's a good question, Jake. I'll leave that to the President to answer. I think he's proud of all of the peace deals that he's been able to achieve. You saw the president of Armenia and the head of Azerbaijan both at the White House just a couple of weeks ago. The President, I know, very much enjoyed spending time with them and helping to bring that conflict to an end. He very much enjoyed his time with leaders of Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the Oval Office talking to them about bringing that decades long war to an end. India and Pakistan. He used trade in a very powerful way as leverage to bring that conflict to an end. So I know he's very proud of all of these achievements and I know he's very honored to serve as the president of the United States and to restore peace around this world. Go ahead.

You mentioned Armenian, Azerbaijan. That's a conflict that I spend time in. This Southern caucus is covering that. And, you know, a conflict of over 30 years and he resolved it in just a couple of months. Are there other conflicts that the president is working on right now that are off the radar screen that we should be tracking?

Ms. In fact, there are there are many. The State Department is always working around the clock under the leadership of Secretary Rubio and keeping the president apprised of conflicts that are bubbling up all over the world. But of course, as you all know, as we've talked a lot about in this briefing, he's spending a lot of time right now on ending this war in Russia, Ukraine and, of course, the conflict in Israel and Gaza, which he wants to see come to a close as well. Sure, go ahead.

So the president says that he's starting a movement to eliminate mail in voting, but states administer elections, not federal authorities. So can you provide any more details about how the White House plans to eliminate that?

Ms. The White House continues to work on this and when Congress comes back to Washington, I'm sure there will be many discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill and also our friends in state legislatures across the country and to ensure that we're protecting the integrity of the vote for the American people. And I think Republicans generally and the president generally wants to make it easier for Americans to vote and harder for people to cheat in our elections. And it's quite mind boggling that the Democrat Party could stand in opposition to common sense. He wants to ensure election integrity. There were great efforts that were made in 2024. I won't get ahead of myself for Hatch act reasons to get ahead for the next election, but I can assure you this is a priority for for the president. Go ahead.

If I could just follow up on your comments about Gaza. Sure. There was a cease fire proposal put forward by both Qatar and Egypt. Hamas accepted it on Monday. Israel has yet to officially weigh in. I'm wondering if the US Was at all involved in it, if it's supportive of it, and whether or not the president believes Israel should accept it.

I don't think it's a coincidence that Hamas accepted this proposal after the president of the United States posted a very strong statement about this conflict on truth Social yesterday. I would refer you back to that statement. As for this proposal that Hamas has now accepted, the United States continues to discuss it and I'll let the President weigh in on it definitively. You're welcome. Sure.

Caroline, can you describe the President's perspective on taking a stake in intel in exchange for federal grants? And is this, Are we expecting to.

See the White House make similar arrangements.

With other semiconductor companies and manufacturing companies?

Well, the president, he's been very clear about the need to reshore manufacturing. That's critical to our national and economic security. That is especially in regards to chips and semiconductors. Which is why the President has initiated the Commerce Department to conduct a study on semiconductors, a Section 232 investigation. So we can ultimately implement tariffs and it's why our export license requirements remain in place as well. As for this 10% government stake deal, the Department of Commerce is continues to work on it. I know Secretary Lutnick is working on it and ironing out the details. But the President wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective. And it's a creative idea that has never been done before to ensure that we're both reassuring these critical supply chains while also gaining something of it for the American taxpayer. You're welcome, Emily.

Thanks, Caroline. I wanted to ask about the three US warships that are being sent to Venezuela and there's 4,000 marines on board. Are you looking at the possibility of boots on the ground there?

Miss what I will say with respect to Venezuela, President Trump has been very clear and consistent. He's prepared to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding into our country and to bring those responsible to justice. The Maduro regime is not the legitimate government of Venezuela. It is a narco terror cartel in Maduro. It is the view of this administration is not a legitimate president. He is a fugitive head of this cartel who has been indicted in the United States for trafficking drugs into the country. And with that, I will leave you all and we will see you later, if not tomorrow. And I look forward to taking more of your questions. Thank you.