Your Golden Dataset Isn't Golden

20 Oct 2026 · 1 min
0:39

In this brief monologue, Hamel Husain argues that labeling a dataset as "golden" is misleading. He explains that once an evaluation dataset has helped a team overcome specific failure modes and achieve its performance goals—much like reaching a personal fitness target—it can be retired or run only rarely. He contrasts these heavyweight, infrequently‑run evaluations with cheap, fast unit tests that can be executed continuously. The overall message is to treat evaluation datasets as temporary milestones rather than permanent, sacrosanct benchmarks.

Chapters

More from Hamel

0:53
youtube.com

Why You Shouldn't Write 500 Evals First

17h ago
0:46
youtube.com

How Should AI Evals Be Used In Performance Reviews?

18h ago
0:52
youtube.com

This Support Bot Recommended A Competitor In The Exec Demo

1d ago
0:29
youtube.com

Overnight Agent Demos Are Vanity Metrics

1d ago
0:53
youtube.com

A 100% Eval Pass Rate Is A Bad Sign

2d ago
0:37
youtube.com

Why You Shouldn't Simulate Your Users

3d ago
24:25
youtube.com

How to Evaluate Coding Agents

3d ago
4:19
youtube.com

How To Get Your Team To Invest In Evals

5d ago
0:47
youtube.com

Stop Splitting One Task Across Multiple Agents

6d ago
3:23
youtube.com

How To Decide Who Owns AI Evals

6d ago
0:41
youtube.com

The Two Biggest Mistakes Teams Make With Evals

1w ago
See all content