The paper proposes a unified theoretical framework for analyzing complex adaptive systems—ranging from social and economic systems to biological neural networks and large language model architectures—by focusing on two agent‑level variables: power (Ai), which quantifies an agent’s influence on collective outcomes, and response functions (Bi), which capture how agents react to observations. Starting from a feedback‑loop model linking external forces, agent actions, and observations, the author derives macroscopic system properties such as total power (W), useful energy (D = Σ Ai Bi), entropy (S = (W‑D)/W), synchronization, fragility, and a novel third dimension, mobility (inverse of viscosity, V = Σ|B_i|). A utility function u(W)=W^g, parameterized by a risk‑appetite coefficient g (linked to relative risk aversion), is introduced to formalize the trade‑off between growth, stability, and adaptability. By maximizing the expected utility (or a simplified objective G that combines growth, variance, and mobility), the analysis yields conditions for an “optimal order” where concentration of power and synchronization of responses are balanced against systemic risk and mobility. The paper argues that order, entropy, information, and useful energy are task‑dependent, system‑relative concepts, and demonstrates how the framework can be applied to AI multi‑agent architectures, neural systems, financial markets, public opinion dynamics, and macro‑economic policy. The work integrates and extends ideas from mean‑field games, stochastic games, dynamical systems, agent‑based modeling, and control theory, offering a common language for designing and diagnosing complex systems.

Topics

Feedback Loop Model: Power (A_i) and Response Functions (B_i) as Fundamental Agent Variables

Introduces the core mathematical structure where each agent’s influence (A_i) and its reaction coefficient (B_i) drive the evolution of observations through a feedback loop with external forces.

Deriving Macroscopic System Quantities from Micro‑Level Parameters

Shows how total power W, useful energy D, entropy S, and other aggregate measures emerge analytically from the distributions of A_i and B_i.

Optimal Order: Balancing Growth, Stability, and Mobility

Formulates the trade‑off problem, introduces objective G that combines growth, variance, and mobility, and identifies conditions where concentration and synchronization are neither too high nor too low.

Mobility and Viscosity: A Third Dimension of System Quality

Defines mobility as the inverse of viscosity (V = Σ|B_i|), argues that high productivity without mobility leads to rigidity, and incorporates mobility into the optimization objective.

Task‑Dependent Redefinition of Order, Entropy, Information, and Useful Energy

Argues that these concepts are relative to system goals and receivers, distinguishing information entropy from system entropy and linking useful energy to task‑specific order.

Cross‑Domain Applications: AI, Neural Systems, Markets, and Public Opinion

Maps the abstract framework onto concrete domains—LLM multi‑agent architectures, biological neural networks, financial markets, and social media—illustrating how power‑response distributions explain observed phenomena.

More from Jake

PDF

03_Model-Synchronization-Self-Organized-Crowding_2016.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

06_Patent-US5530359A-Borehole-Logging-Reflected-EM-Signals_1996.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

02_Emergence-Power-Law-Wealth-Distributions_2024.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

05_Patent-US5552786A-Logging-Underground-Formations-Radar_1996.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

04_Flexible-Indeterminate-Factor-Based-Asset-Allocation_2016.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

01_Optimal-Order-Multi-Agent-Many-Body-Systems_2026.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

mit18_642_f24_lec13.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

47611405.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

A_Model_of_Synchronization_for_Self-Organized_Crow.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

2024PaperV3.pdf

1mo ago
PDF

flexible indeterminate factor-based asset allocation 201606 jpm.pdf

1y ago
See all content