Successful Scaling Across Markets, From a Founder Turned VC | OMERS Ventures MP Harry Briggs

In this talk, Harry Briggs – former founder of the drinks brand Firefly and current VC at OMERS Ventures – shares hard‑won lessons on scaling businesses across countries. He begins with his own experience of rapid, unplanned expansion of Firefly into 20‑plus markets, highlighting the operational and strategic pitfalls of expanding before achieving solid product‑market fit. Briggs then outlines a decision framework for international growth, stressing the need to ask whether a company’s core business is truly repeatable, whether the acquisition model scales, and whether unit economics are positive. He contrasts Uber’s disciplined city‑by‑city playbook (developed by his colleague Jambu) with the more ad‑hoc approaches of other firms, illustrating how dedicated market teams, autonomy, and a documented launch playbook accelerate expansion. Throughout, he references portfolio companies – Revolut, GoCardless, Paddle, SeedLegals, The Hut Group, Plum Guide – to show how regulatory environments, localization (e.g., label translation, legal differences), and market‑specific advantages shape expansion strategy. Briggs discusses how to select the first market (structural advantage, regulatory climate, competitive intensity) and compares aggressive, capital‑intensive roll‑outs to sustainable, cash‑flow‑driven growth models. He stresses hiring A‑players for market leadership, especially sales directors, and warns against confirmation bias in hiring. The session ends with a Q&A where Briggs advises founders to start market research by identifying organic demand signals and directly interviewing early adopters, using the Hut Group’s China entry as an example. The talk provides a practical checklist, metrics, and real‑world anecdotes for founders and investors contemplating international scaling.
Questions this video answers
Start by looking for organic demand signals – customers from that market already buying your product or showing interest. Talk directly to those early adopters to understand why they choose you, what alternatives they have, and what local pain points you solve. Use those conversations to build a hypothesis about market size and product fit, then validate with deeper research (regulatory, distribution, competition). The Hut Group’s China entry is a concrete example: they saw strong demand for a specific product, used that as a foothold, and then built a focused research effort around those customers.
Chapters
Morning everyone, uh, hope everyone's feeling reasonably recovered from all the parties last night, and lovely to be here in Barcelona. Uh, my name is Harry Briggs. I'm going to be talking about scaling across markets, and, um, uh, I think originally, by the way, I should confess, this talk was going to be given by my colleague Jambu, who scaled Uber across multiple markets. I'll talk a bit more about him in a session in a second, but, um, but I am, um, uh, his obviously partner and, uh, and had my own much more modest story. Um, so a little bit about me. Uh, so I started my career— sorry, some of these haven't quite come through— McKinsey. Then I started a drinks company called Firefly, which you may have seen. It's still around. We started it way back. I'll talk a bit more about it. And, uh, and scaled it across 30 markets and eventually sold it to private equity around 2012. Um, then I became a VC at Bolderton, um, and, uh, now I'm a VC at Omer Ventures, a global Canadian, uh, venture investor, early-stage investor. Uh, and, uh, I should probably mention, as it's kind of Pride Month I've done quite a bit for the sort of pushing diversity in the venture world, obviously limited success, but a little perhaps. And this is our team today. As you can see, we like hanging out in woodlands in Buckinghamshire, and we seem to have a propensity for wearing yellow. And the guy in the middle there is Jambu, who, as I say, might have been on stage, but his wife gave birth to a baby girl on Friday, which is why He is— you've got me instead. So over the course of now nearly 12 years in venture, I've been lucky enough to work with some pretty amazing founders. I'm sorry, some of these logos seem to have got a little bit corrupted in the transfer just now. But yes, companies like Revolut, the Hut Group, Gusto, Paddle. And as you can see, a lot of these companies have scaled to multiple markets and, and built global businesses. And I've been lucky enough to see something of their journeys along the way. But I thought I'd start a little bit— I realized that my company was not a SaaS company, but my— the company that I founded, mainly because I think it taught me a few lessons about some of the things not to do when scaling internationally. So Firefly was an— as you can see, we started it in 2003, we launched, and the idea was it was a healthy natural energy drink, a sort of healthier alternative to the Red Bulls that were huge at the time, still are pretty huge. And then a weird thing happened, which is that within about 3 months of us launching, we launched in Harvey Nichols and Selfridges and some very upmarket London stores. We got a call from this very cool shop in Paris called Colette, and they said, "Hey, we've seen your drink in Selfridges. Can we order some for Paris?" And we had this weird dilemma of like, you know, we were thinking our plan was stay in the UK for 2 or 3 years, figure out, you know, what we're doing, and then scale internationally, maybe next market after that. But before we knew it, you know, we couldn't really say no to Colette. They were a very trendy store. They said, "Look, we'll handle all the customs. Don't worry." Then we got a call from Denmark and then a call from Japan, and before we knew it, we were in 20 countries. Um, and that seemed great at the time. We were like, well, look, where our sales are growing, we're selling pallets and pallets of drinks and containers of drinks to across the world. It's very exciting. We feel cool. Um, but then you start to realize some of the downsides of that, like the distraction like the fact that, you know, some of our labels had to be in multiple languages, which meant that when we changed a product, we had to sort of change a whole lot of different labels. Meant that our inventory became more complicated. All the sort of stuff that you would expect as a former management consultant to have thought about, but you, you know, can easily overlook. Anyway, I'm gonna skip forward because clearly this was not a SaaS company and you want to focus on some of the bigger learnings here, but We hit the global financial crisis in 2009, 2008. We needed to scale back. That gave me an opportunity to move into VC at Bulletin, which was great. And in 2012, we sold the business to private equity, made some money for our investors, sadly not a lot for ourselves. But as I say, learned quite a few things along the way. So I am going to talk a bit about some lessons learned from that experience. Some lessons learned from Jambu's Uber experience, and some lessons learned from some of the companies I've been lucky enough to work with over the last decade. So the first rule of international expansion— anybody want to guess? That's a very good one, but mine was don't do it. But yeah, that's kind of the same. Keep it simple. So why do I say that? Well, first look at Uber. I'm sorry if you can't read all the names here, but look at how big they were able to get just scaling across more cities in the US and how much simpler it is to scale to another US city versus scaling to Bangalore or Lyon or Melbourne, for example. And so I think the question that you should be asking when you're thinking about going international is, are you expanding to escape your problems, or do you actually have something worth scaling? And look, I, I've confession— Firefly, you know, we had a really good launch, sales were growing really fast, and then they were beginning to kind of plateau a little. When these international sales came through, it was like, "Great, we can hit our targets by selling pallets to the Middle East and obscure Caribbean islands." But it didn't necessarily solve our problems, and it probably was distracting us from figuring out how to scale properly. Let's look back at this Uber expansion. Again, the jambu part of the story. They were only in San Francisco for more than a year when they started. They didn't go international. You can't quite see the bottom here, but that's 2010, 2012, Paris. And— but look at what happens here in 2013. Incidentally, a few months after Jambu joins the business to run international expansion in EMEA. They're suddenly able to scale to multiple cities in a very short space of time. At one point, they were opening a new city every 3 days. And that's because they finally, you know, figured out a playbook. They figured out how to scale properly, and I'll come back to some of the ways that they did that. So assuming that we're going to ignore the "don't do it," what questions should we be asking before expanding. First question: have we got it right? And I'm gonna go into these in a few more— in a bit more detail, but, you know, have we got the business right? Is this working? Have we got it repeatable? So it might be working in this market, but have we just been lucky? Have we had great PR? Have we had something that isn't necessarily easy to replicate in new markets? Do we understand what is different about the next market? Again, I'll come back to more of this. Do we have the team for expansion? And for Uber, that was probably the most important thing. And is it worth it? Is it going to give us a good ROI? So here are some questions to perhaps assess, you know, have we got it right, that first question. So do customers love our product. In Firefly's case, we actually had very good NPS score. You know, we were pretty confident on that front. Are the customers staying? Now, in Uber's case, as you probably know, they built their business a lot around referrals and giving people free rides, and then they found that once people had had a couple of free rides, they tended to stay. And, you know, in Firefly's case, We had very little data. We knew how much the stores were selling, but we didn't know whether it was the same people buying multiple times or lots of people trying it once and never coming back. So the joy of software businesses, clearly. Do we have a scalable acquisition model? I'll give you some measures on this as well. And do we feel good about the unit economics? So, um, There's a lot on this slide now, sorry, but obviously measures for this— Net Promoter Score, are they staying? We can look at the retention, we can look at the cohort. Ideally, particularly in marketplace businesses, cohorts should be improving as you scale. So Uber, as you probably know, they would start in a very small part of the city. They'd get really good supply in that small area, and so that the customer got a great first experience. And then once they had evidence that, you know, people were coming back and ordering more Ubers, then they could gradually expand the area that Uber covered until they covered the whole city. And that should improve because obviously that product experience is improving as you have more drivers. And so you should see an improvement. Do we have a scalable acquisition model? So, you know, you can look at What percentage of your customers are coming through organic? You can look at how many customers are referring more customers. Obviously, CAC, LTV, we all know about in the SaaS world. And gross margin and contribution margin. Clearly, you only want to be scaling if you've got at least visibility of positive contribution margins, right? You don't want to be scaling and losing more money with every extra customer, which there are a few examples of recently. Again, my learnings at Firefly here, you know, we had the NPS, but we didn't necessarily have the data. I just wanted to highlight a couple of— one other example. So Paddle, how many people saw Christian present here yesterday? Brilliant. And I can't see him here, but no, I was I was lucky enough to be one of his first backers as a VC. And I think for Paddle, they had amazing retention and fantastic unit economics. But I would say they took a while to find their expansion playbook. And it wasn't really until they hired a dedicated US team. So they were UK-based and selling globally from the UK. For a long time. It wasn't until they had a team completely dedicated to the US that the US really, really started to take off. And I suppose one other learning there in terms of the repeatable was, you know, they had one huge whale customer called MacPaw, and MacPaw kept growing themselves. So it was flattering their growth numbers. But it's easy to sort of convince yourself, hey, it's great, we're growing, everything's good. But actually, you still might not have a scalable acquisition model because you might just be growing the customers you already have, which is obviously a great thing in SaaS, but may not be enough. Second big question: is our success repeatable? So do we know what levers to pull? So if you're, if you're Uber and you're scaling, what are your levers? You can try and have more drivers on the platform. You can change the referral bonuses. You can obviously, you know, do more marketing, can do more PR. Secondly, do we know how to be more efficient now than we were back then? So ideally, every new country you go into, you know, every country is going to have issues. We'll talk about that in a second, but you You want to know that you're learning something, you're improving the playbook each time. And lastly, back to that scalable acquisition model. So some of the measures here, from the playbook, you can obviously look at, you know, what's the CAC, which is obviously going to vary by market, and therefore, how much are you prepared to invest in each new market depending on how those first few months go. As I say, you should be improving the playbook and a lot of the same referral rate, organic acquisition that we mentioned in the previous one. I'm going to skip over this because I think I've covered it, but a couple of more relevant examples to you perhaps. GoCardless, I was fortunate enough to also invest when I was at Balderton. I think the— in that kind of company where you have a regulated entity, you've got some additional questions around that. You know, the key thing for them was they needed to be— to get a sort of pan-European license, and that allowed them to scale across Europe rapidly. But they were also waiting for a lot of European countries to implement the sort of direct debit, the common— it's called SEPA direct debit platform— before they could really scale. And so they were kind of dependent on external forces. Plum Guide, actually, just sorry, one other thing on GoCardless was they were scaling nicely in the UK, but perhaps they were going after the wrong customer initially. So they were particularly going after companies that sold a lot of consumer direct debits. But shortly after I stepped off the board there, they, they figured out that actually the biggest market they could go after was B2B invoice payments. And the moment that they figured that out, that was suddenly a much, much more scalable business that they could roll out way faster. And again, perhaps if they had been trying to manage too many markets too soon, they wouldn't have figured that out. So, um, and The Plum Guide is a kind of premium Airbnb that I've been close to for a few years. And I think for them this is a different proposition because obviously travelers don't want to only go to one city. So you can launch in London, but it's very, very hard to market only to people coming to London. So it was very key for them that they rolled out to a lot of cities quite quickly. The trouble was that they had— because they're a very premium proposition where they were testing every, every home and making sure it lived up to their standard, and they were only approving 10% of homes— that's hard to scale. But the pandemic actually helped them because, you know, it forced them to be way more efficient. It forced them to conserve cash. And they managed to automate a lot of those tests and they changed the model slightly so that— I hope I'm not betraying confidences here— but they don't actually do the test until the first booking comes in. And then obviously if it isn't up to scratch, they find an alternative home. But their biggest problem was they were having to test all these homes before they knew whether they were actually going to be profitable good homes that people wanted to book. And once they figured that out, they were way more able to scale. Thirdly, do we understand what is different? This is a very, very old article, Carrefour exiting Japan and Mexico. And another one, this is from 10 years ago, Tesco's American dream over. Do you remember? They— the Brits in the room may know or the Americans in obscure parts of California might know that they launched a new retail concept in California. They invested well over a billion in it. And despite the fact that Carrefour had failed in multiple markets, despite the fact that the endless roadkill of retailers going internationally, you know, Tesco did acres and acres of research and focus groups and consumer testing, and they were absolutely convinced that Fresh and Easy was going to solve every consumer's problems in California, but, you know, it failed. And, you know, it's hard. So I guess really, really understanding what's different about the market. Now these are the questions that Uber tended to ask when they entered new markets. Firstly, what are our non-negotiables? And secondly, where do we have to adapt? So As you know, Uber played a little bit fast and loose when they were expanding. They definitely asked for forgiveness rather than permission. And that worked in some markets. Somewhere like Cape Town, it's probably the right strategy. But maybe not in Berlin or Copenhagen, where I think, you know, they've really struggled because they've fallen out with the regulators so much. And then where do we have to adapt? Clearly, every market, particularly in financial services or fintech, every market has its nuances. And some of those are worth investing in, solving for, and sometimes it's just not worth it. My learnings from the Firefly days, I mentioned obviously we had to translate all our labels into multiple languages. And I mean, I do remember this sort of hilarious moment when our Japanese distributor was having to stick, manually stick a label on every single one of, I think, 2,500 bottles. She said she organized a kind of party for her friends to come and help. It doesn't sound much of a party. But, you know, we also had some ingredients because we were using various herbal medicinal products. The regulations were different in every market, and they were allowed in some markets and not in others. So then we found ourselves more and more constrained because obviously we didn't want to make a drink that could only be sold in some of our markets. But ultimately, that kind of meant the product got a bit watered down, you know, it wasn't quite as powerful as it might have been. It obviously slowed our product development because we had to, you know, verify everything in multiple markets each time we changed the product. And as I say, it took away our focus from having a scalable, repeatable model. And I think if we had really, really focused on, okay, what is our playbook in the UK to, you know, reach true product-market fit and really, really figure that out, I think it would have been better. Um, the, um, that black logo was supposed to be Revolut. Sorry, I don't know what happened. Um, And it must be Mac to PC conversion. But Revolut, as you probably know, is in about— it was in the whole of Europe and Australia, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland. I was lucky enough to be part of Revolut's seed round. And they, you know, they've rolled out rapidly. Obviously, they've had a number of, you know, regulatory challenges as they've grown. And one of the, one of the key ones has been obviously their crypto trading, which is a big revenue driver for them. They're allowed to do that in some markets but not in others. Likewise, their share trading regulated differently in different markets. And obviously them, you know, being, being able to offer full banking services as opposed to just deposit services is something they're still working on in many markets. But, but clearly they were, you know, keen to be international from day one. But compare that to SeedLegals, where I'm an angel investor. That is— that allows— how many people know SeedLegals? Cool. SeedLegals allows you to do all of your legal setup of your company and raise money in a sort of automated way. They're only in the UK and France because the legal system is so different in every country that to replicate that in every market is possible but requires huge investment. Then, do we have the right team? I'm going to speed up a little here, but clearly this was a massive part of Uber's success. They gave a lot of autonomy to teams in each city. Jambu at one point was, as I say, hiring a team in, or at least a leader for a new city every week. And, um, uh, and then I guess looking at how well they execute compared to other cities and making the changes rapidly when they're not working out. Um, but also, do we have the talent centrally? Um, clearly, you know, you need a reporting structure, you need someone like a Jambu who's able to motivate the team, uh, and, you know, check how it's going. And, you know, Firefly-wise, by the way, you know, we operate in a different way which was that we had a whole lot of distributors come to us and say, "Hey, can we distribute your product in Denmark or Sweden or wherever it was?" And our management, you know, we eventually hired someone who just made sure that everyone was sharing best practice between those markets. So, you know, here are the latest marketing materials "Here are the latest things that we're finding are working." You know, "This is how to do a sampling well. This is the kinds of stores that you should be in. This is the best shelf space to be in, the products you want to be near," all that kind of thing. That was my Firefly team when we were in 30 countries. It wasn't a very big team. And I think that was probably part of the problem. And— but obviously awesome people. Is it worth it? What's the upside of the expansion? Can we reach a large TAM with our home market, as mentioned? And do we have the cash? Clearly, we've seen a lot of companies fail because they splash out a lot of money to expand internationally and then find actually the new market just isn't as good as the previous one. And in the current climate where it's a little bit harder to raise money, particularly if the unit economics aren't there, You know, it's a big risk. So do you want to test, you know, that second city a little bit more gradually first and prove yourself? And look, you don't have to go international. Gusto, again, I've been an investor while I was an investor in a previous fund, and Gusto is the sort of more premium HelloFresh in the UK, if you like. And they've become the market leader in the UK. And by relentlessly focusing on executing in the UK, you know, they've built a really valuable business. They recently got valued at well over a billion. And they made the call early on, look, we just want to be the winner in this market. And because they're able to bring a whole lot of automation into their, into their, you know, factories, because they're able to really optimize distribution, you know, they're able to build a more profitable business than perhaps if they tried to do multiple markets at once. Um, oh dear, sorry, these, uh, these logos didn't come through, but this was supposed to be some of the more successful companies I've worked with, uh, like Revolut, like GoCardless, um, that, um, obviously did, uh, go international and are all now, you know, billion-plus valuation companies. So Just a reminder that, you know, you don't have to, but obviously it's great if you can. And there are alternatives. You can go deeper in your home market. You can go vertically versus horizontally. I guess Firefly-wise, you know, we tried to expand in terms of the range. You know, we brought out a water range. We looked at doing shots. We looked at more occasions for the drinks. But ultimately, I think, you know, the right strategy there would probably have been more of the kind of Red Bull-like strategy, which is have one really kind of ownable proposition. Revolut, as I said, you know, they've expanded into crypto trading, share trading, business banking. Whereas someone like Stripe has just been, you know, very, very horizontal and global. In terms of expansion models, a few things to think about: the role of technology, clearly. How centralized are you going to be? Are you going to give autonomy to markets like as Uber did, or are you just going to have the same product everywhere, more like Paddle, for example? Are there partners you can work with? That was our strategy at Firefly. How capital-intensive are you going to be about it? And who can help? Who's done it before? Who, you know, hopefully your investors have done this. Obviously, Oma Ventures has people in Toronto, in New York, in Palo Alto. So, you know, we'd like to think we can certainly help with expansion that way. Plug over. And then obviously, which country first? So where do you have a structural advantage today? If it's a law company, you're— and you're in the UK, you've probably got a structural advantage in other companies that use English law or that certainly look to English law. What's the regulatory climate? Clearly some are more similar than others. And when do you take on the most competitive market? This is a big question that often comes up on the boards that I'm on, which is that, um, uh, clearly taking on the most competitive market is going to be really expensive and really risky. But the downside of not taking on the most competitive market is that maybe you don't have to kind of force yourself to get up to the standard of the very best. And what we have seen in Europe quite a bit is companies that became, you know, regional winners, but then the global winner came in at some point and kind of steamrolled— not completely, but, you know, eroded their market and stopped them from growing. And so, look, I think if you do believe that you've got a superior product that can win internationally, I would embrace it. But clearly there's a lot of roadkill of companies that probably could have become regional winners but tried, you know, too hard to compete against someone better funded with perhaps a better product. So, just coming back to Uber, back to Jambu, the guy in the woods in our team, and here are sort of his key lessons from that experience. So, they were very good I'm just gonna change hands, sorry. They're very good at building a playbook and constantly iterating it and improving it with every market they went into. And, you know, this playbook came, you know, literally every detail of how to launch a market. It was basically an Asana, but it was a full project plan, and you could give it to someone and say, go. And, you know, obviously there were plenty of questions, but they went. Clearly you need to understand what's different, and I think Uber would say that, you know, they probably didn't do a good enough job of this in some markets. But in Uber's case, it might be, you know, how much drivers are paid, or how good is the existing taxi competitive infrastructure. Or, you know, how aggressive are the regulators in the city. Build culture carriers. Again, Uber got a lot of bad press as they were growing for some of their cultural errors. I think at the same time though, they did have an incredible culture where— a culture of performance where people were incredibly motivated and, you know, worked incredibly hard. And And I think you're always going to have things that go wrong in that climate. I think perhaps what they could have done a little more is have a few more examples from senior leadership of, you know, making the right call rather than always the most aggressive call. And I think, you know, they might have ended up in a better place today if they had. And keeping the hiring bar high. I learn every day from my colleague, Jambu, on this, that we all know that one B player in a team can lead to a lot of C players quite rapidly, and making those calls early and keeping the bar high and only entering a market once you found that A player, I think, is probably key to their expansion. A few final thoughts. So clearly when you're expanding internationally, the second market is usually the hardest because you don't have a playbook yet, and you're going to be hit with a whole lot of surprises. Write the playbook once you've done it because you're going to be busy. You're going to be, you know, running around solving issues. Every time one of these things comes up, note it down. Put it in the plan for the next one. Try and avoid it happening again. Clearly, lesson for me particularly, you know, you're unlikely to find product-market fit in country 2 if you haven't found it in country 1. And sustainable scale models— clearly there are, you know, there are the models of let's go to 50 markets and let's raise hundreds of millions and even if we get massively diluted, hopefully we'll win. There are also models where you grow sustainably. I mean, in the UK, Pizza Express, for example, for many years rolled out by taking the cash flow from the successful restaurants they had and deploying that into the next restaurant. It allowed them to open, you know, 2 a year and then maybe 3 a year and then maybe 4 a year, and they built an amazing business, you know, worth hundreds of millions. In that approach and retained a lot of the equity. And so, you know, don't rule that out. And just to reiterate, the team, the team, the team, you know, getting the right people to lead this. You probably heard Jason M. Lemkin yesterday talking about sales directors. You know, probably the hardest role that I see in the companies I work with is, you know, a European team hiring their first US sales director, and they always seem to get it wrong. And they probably always give that person a bit too long before they realize they've got it wrong. But, you know, take advice from the good founders you know who've managed to get it right. Do all those referrals. Don't fall into that kind of optimistic trap of, "We found someone. I want them to be right." So That's just, you know, that's confirmation bias our way into hiring them. Sadly, we've only got 2 minutes left, so I might have time for like one question if anybody had a question. I'll have to probably give you the mic if so. Oh, there's a mic, a raving mic. Somebody be brave. And if not— ah, there we go. Hi.
Hi. Thanks for a great talk. So as a founder who is considering international expansion, you talk a lot about doing research and even big companies like Uber getting it wrong. So How do you, for example, let's, we are a Spanish company, let's assume just for the sake of discussion that we want to expand to China, right? Worst idea in the world, but let's assume that. There are so many unknown unknowns that we wouldn't even know how to start. So how to start doing research for a new market when you know nothing about it? And I mean, China is an extreme example, but let's say France, Italy, the UK? Even within Europe, there are many things that you wouldn't know unless you are an expert or you have lived there for many years.
It's a great question. So how do you get into a market that you know nothing about? I mean, look, the only company I've been involved with that has expanded to China successfully was the Hut Group out of which is an e-commerce player. And the reason that they expanded was that they started to get demand there. They happened to be selling, for example, a whole lot of protein that a lot of Chinese consumers were nervous of buying the local protein. And when they saw that start to happen, they started to explore it more. And I mean, obviously, I don't know what your business is, but I think when you start to see organic demand from a market, that's often a good way to start because then you can go to those customers and say, you know, why are you buying this? You know, what are the local alternatives? What's the difference in your market? And certainly we found with my drinks company, you know, we learned more from talking to the people that loved us than anything else, really. You know, you're trying to find more of those people.
More from Jason

Why Your Next Hire Should Report to an AI, Tragedy Apps, and Too Many AI SDRs? | The Agents #004

Our Agents Drove Our Salesforce Bill Up 80%, Marketo Hates Agents, and We Stealth-Churned Off Notion

Managing 20+ AI Agents: Lazy Agents, Our $500K AI Bill, Stealth Churn & the Death of 60% Solutions







