In this YouTube short, Jason M. Lemkin argues that AI is rapidly eliminating junior, entry‑level positions across multiple business functions—support, sales, marketing, and legal. He contends that companies no longer want junior staff who need time to learn; instead they demand experienced humans who can immediately handle complex tasks, freeing up budget that is being redirected toward AI‑driven data center infrastructure. Lemkin cites recent large AI fundraises—Intercom’s $250 million and Lagora’s $500 million—as evidence that the market is investing heavily in technologies that replace junior roles. Harry acknowledges the societal concerns of this shift but agrees it reflects a broader reality. Lemkin also critiques the traditional hiring model that subsidizes junior talent for years before they become senior, questioning its relevance in an AI‑augmented world.
Chapters
when we're just a world of the middle of the bell curve in terms of experience. We don't want folks that don't wanna pick up the tools and we don't want folks that aren't experts. And it's gonna ripple. This is my big worry for 2027 is it happens, it's gonna be true in sales. It's already true in support. Like you want humans in support, but you don't want juniors. My God, I don't want a junior. Like I want a human that knows CodeRabbit cold that can handle the escalations. I don't need junior marketers. I don't need junior nothings. And Harry, not to get us off track, but I think that's— I think getting rid of juniors is where we get budget for these data centers in part. We're just getting— they're just dying faster than we ever thought. It's happening in front of us, the death of the junior.
I think it's bad for society, but it's a reality. I think it ties to two fundraisers that we saw. Rory, you may disagree as an investor in one of them. I would agree as an investor in another. But we saw Intercom raising $250 million and we saw Lagora raising $500 million. And I think both tied to your point there of the replacement of juniors and lower ranking—
Death of the juniors. Why would I want— I mean, God, I mean, I know I'm not a Lagora or Harvey expert, but I do know this, the dated space. I mean, who the hell wants to wait for an associate to scale up for 2 years? Like, that was the classic legal hiring. You hire someone real from a top school, ideally that was top 10% of their class. They have the IQ and you basically subsidize them for 2 years until they cross the line and become senior enough that you can give them a, a, you know, they can work with a top client or take a case. Who, God, who wants to do those 2 years now unless you have to?
Unless you have to. This has been one of our long-running discussions, and it's good that I'm evolving my position, Jason.