The Secrets Behind Creating Scalable Products with Box CEO, Aaron Levie and SaaStr CEO, Jason Lemkin

Aaron Levie, CEO of Box, explains how the company scaled from a file-sharing service to $860 million in revenue by going multi-tenant and cloud-only, then bundling products to lift attach rates from 10% to 73%. Key moves: maintaining a single data model, building a robust API layer, and shifting to product-led growth.
Chapters
Well, everybody, well, let's welcome back Aaron Levy, who maybe not intentionally has had a great journey with Saastr. Aaron was the first speaker at the 2015 annual, one week after the, the Box IPO. You might not remember, but I remember.
Okay.
Yeah, you were tired.
I'm always tired. Tired. That makes sense. Yeah.
And, and I remember you all remember, but the—
I don't think I was like COVID tired though. Like, this is like pandemic tired. Tired is a whole different stage.
I think it was tired of talking to 100 analysts, of whom 3 understood what recurring revenue was. Right.
Makes sense. Yep. And NRR and all of these crazy metrics.
So we'll fast forward to today. The title, can you see it? Maybe down on the screen here. You see one down? We were, we were asked to talk about behind scalable products, so we'll at least come close. I do want to talk about multiple products at first. I— and so what I want to do is I grab just a few slides from Box's public company stuff and our, and our Five Interesting Learning Series. So maybe just to ground— everyone knows what Box is, but not everyone might know your metrics, where you are today. That's possible, right?
Yeah.
Yes. So we're coming up on that billion dollar in revenue we talked about on TechCrunch a few years ago, right?
Yep. So FY21 is last year for us. So we'll do about $855, $860 million in revenue. I forget the last guidance range, but, but in that kind of rough scale.
Yeah, and if you had, and we'll get into it, but if you had to summarize how Box is different on the other side of a billion, what is that other side of a billion?
I think actually it is, you know, it's so cliché because we all, like everybody here, and we wanted to always build a platform, but like that literally is the answer. You have to build a platform. And we, but I think the way you build a platform that now is hopefully doctrine at this point is you build it through initial use cases that actually find your product market fit, and then you're able to evolve those use cases till you have a full comprehensive platform. And so that was kind of our journey. Like, we started as a, I don't, I mean, probably nobody remembers like USB drives and FTP accounts and just like—
I can remember.
So maybe a couple people, like back in like 2005, we were on BlackBerrys and you're on Internet Explorer and you had USB thumb drives. And so we were just like, let's build a better way to share files and access data from anywhere. We started Box to, to have that vision. We did not know the word platform. There was no sort of conceptualization of what that would mean and, and, and that element of the vision. But literally within about a year, people started saying, hey, can we integrate Box into other applications? And they were like, okay, well, we'll create APIs. So then we had APIs, and then eventually customers came and said, hey, we need advanced data governance functionality. And so we said, okay, we'll build a governance module. And then eventually we stopped getting sort of like totally pulled into these reactively, we, we decided that was actually going to be the strategy. So we would build out a multi-product suite, and then eventually a full platform approach to, to go and address these use cases of how companies manage all of their, their content. And so I think the other side of a billion, Box looks much more like a platform, uh, and a, a suite of multiple sort of categories of products, all built on one architecture that can hopefully, you know, get procured by the customer in one simple package, And then they deploy us across their organization. And that's kind of the journey we've been on. So it was, you know, one product that was very more— I think most people would have just said, hey, we're a feature. And actually, we saw that as a badge of honor initially because end users don't want to buy platforms, they want to buy features. And so we got in through the feature and then we were able to ultimately turn that into a platform. And that kind of brings us to today.
Well, you know, it is interesting. Everyone needs a wedge. A 10x feature, right? And so that, that, that ism, that trite ism of a feature versus solution is pretty stupid if you've been out in the field, isn't it?
It's, it is because the, the, you know, your, your, your especially incumbent competition is always trying to de-position you as a feature. And, but, but the, what they don't realize is, you know, hopefully what you're building behind the scenes. And I think the thing that I look back on is, as maybe one of the biggest lessons of this, of that journey, is architecture matters more than almost anything else you can imagine, uh, in that journey. Because if your feature is then completely disconnected to the next feature, and then thus the next feature, then you really aren't on your way to building a platform. Uh, and so we, we made a bunch of, now in retrospect, kind of lucky fortuitous decisions in our platform architecture that were not intentional. We just, we just lucked out that we made them the right way. And then eventually they started to become much more intentional because we knew that we were building a platform. But, um, One of those small things that you really actually, it's worth paying attention to even when you're just 3 people in a garage.
Well, that's interesting. I hadn't thought about talking about that. When I— one reason I think you tweet a lot about this. One reason I think startups can always beat folks that come behind them is their platforms are always at least 10 years old.
Yep.
I mean, by the time, by the time, even with the pace we grow today, everything that you might want. And so there's always a place where that architecture or solution is just almost too dated that they're not even going to bother, right? What— and Box originally is— we're at whatever we want to call it, SaaS 1.0, 2.0.
We're in Web3 right now.
But we started so early. What were the— what was something that you actually got right that you're talking about? Because it was so easy to get things wrong in the early days from scalability. What's an example of what you're referring to?
There's a litany of things. So we— I mean, first of all, now again, it's kind of ridiculous to even talk about this now, but just we were multi-tenant from day one and we made no exceptions to that. So when customers said, hey, can I go run this inside my data center? We said, no, you can't. And we lost— I could probably add up maybe $100 million in revenue. I would bet in the easily—
maybe even today still, right?
Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. There's governments globally that we're not serving because of that requirement. But you can imagine when you only have like 15 sales reps and, you know, 3 of them are losing major deals because you're not on-prem. That's very painful. And like that, that becomes a major topic of, of, you know, challenge for the business. So, uh, we, we basically rejected all forms of, of any modification to the software, uh, any chance of having sort of fragmented architecture. It was a sort of, um, you know, the, the Henry Ford, you can have any color as long as it's black. Um, and, uh, and, and like the, like the, we have one piece of software and, and it's gonna be in our cloud and this is how you're gonna deploy it. And we had a lot of people say, well, that's not how, SharePoint works, or Documentum works, or some of our, you know, kind of incumbent competition. And that point of view and principled approach meant that we have, you know, filtered down to the customers that actually wanted exactly what we had. We could learn from them instead of being fractured in what we were doing, and that just continues to compound over time. So one multi-tenant architecture, all on the same data model, which ended up being another sort of important aspect of the, of the business, which is And this is just esoteric and, you know, inside baseball for what we do, which is you store one asset once and then you can do anything against that single asset as opposed to— again, there's lots of different places where your files might be and where your content might go. So that single data model, single multi-tenant architecture was really important. And then because that was all abstracted from infrastructure, this was the key point. We never, we never sustainably fell behind from what you could actually do with, with computing, with software. Um, because even though we started in our own data centers, because, uh, believe it or not, we literally launched the company before AWS existed. So we started in our own data centers and then we got to leverage the public cloud and then we did even more in our data centers, but then now we're doing even more in the public cloud. All the while, customers never had to do a single thing or even worry about it once. Um, so that's all happening in a, in, in a way that's fully abstracted from the customer. And now at this point, we're moving even more into the public cloud, leveraging, you know, every possible available service. And again, the magic is your customer is just going to get all of those tailwinds benefiting their deployment. And so I'm very religious. Like, there's like, I probably only have like one religion. It is, it's anti-on-prem. You have to be cloud. And it's because of this velocity of innovation that you get by being able to have a single architecture.
Have you— that makes complete sense to me, given where the world has gone. No temptation to do anything that's hybrid cloud or hybrid something. Even now, you have the scale, you're coming up on a billion, right? Yeah. You could probably put together a team now. There's just so much money if you're willing to do it. The money's more than ever, isn't it?
There is.
And you get a $100 million contract if you're willing to do some of these hybrid offerings.
There is. And I mean, clearly there's absolutely a way now at this point to not deal with the baggage that we had 15 years ago, where if you deploy something on-prem, you know, almost instantaneously you're on the wrong version and we can solve that. Out of date forever. Yeah. So we can now solve that. I would still posit, like, if you really just think about it in practice, though, think about, you know, every time that Amazon or Azure or others have launched these sort of on-prem versions of their clouds, these are all relatively subscale versus just the pure public cloud infrastructure benefits that customers are getting. So we're still, you know, staying the course on our strategy. I guess never say never, but in this case, we're big believers.
Follow-up question, then I want to make sure we have time for product, but I guess it is related. Platform, right? And I think one of the things that we've learned over time is as you approach $100 million, right, which is now an order of magnitude less than where you're going to be, you want to start being multi-product potentially, which we'll talk about in a minute, and you want to start being a platform for others. And Box was early. But it's interesting that your vision it's still evolving now for this platform, right? Are there one or two things— and we'll actually look at the platform on the next slide, and maybe I'll flip to it, except I can't go back, so I'm cautious. But are there one or two things you wish you'd done earlier on your platform, looking back, that you would have pulled them down earlier?
Yeah, I think there was— I think, yeah, I mean, every— I just say as a general statement, every feature that today is— or product that today is performing well, I wish I had done earlier. So there's like unlimited—
That's a given, right?
Yeah, so like, I wish I could do a lot of that Faster. You know, sometimes you have to find your way of which products are working. And, you know, I'd say every maybe year we have 2 or 3 bets going on in the business of new areas of innovation. And some years all of them work. Some years you look back and you say, okay, only one of those worked, or maybe we even skipped a year of actually kind of that type of value that we want to drive. But in general, you know, you're always sort of planting a few seeds And then, and then while you're working and incubating the ones that you planted the prior year. And so today, you know, data security is a big area. Workflow automation is a big area. We're now, thanks to your inventions, we're now doing a lot more in e-signature. So we appreciate all the, the wars that you had to fight before us on that front. But so we're going to have multiple pillars of, of, of, you know, new capabilities all on one platform. and then integrated together, and then offered as APIs to anybody else that wants to build on Box as well. So that's kind of the vision. But I wish I did all of the stuff that's working sooner.
Yep. And how much of your time now as CEO do you get to spend on these 2 to 3 big bets? How much of your 60 hours a week, how is it split up at scale?
Certainly when we're not in a proxy contest, I can spend more of my time—
I wasn't even going to bring that up, but congratulations. Thank you. I think you beat that by a higher margin than anyone in all time, right?
About 7 people were paying attention to that, so thank you for your vote of confidence.
I was there. I mean, literally, I think you beat the contest by more than like anybody else of any proxy contest.
We're happy about the win, yeah. So, but ultimately, the proxy contest is, we just believe shareholders agreeing with our strategy. So it's sort of not even that much more maybe celebratory than that. But ultimately, I spend as much time as I can on our new bets. But as again, everybody here knows, you've got to equally balance that with customers and investors and other dynamics that we all face as founders.
What about today? Customers versus prospects. How, how, what is— how much do they trick the CEO into spending his time with you? I actually balance that.
It's actually more that, yeah, I trick myself into it. So I am, I am willing to talk to anybody interested, remotely interested in moving their content to the cloud. So, so I, I, I like, you know, 90% of the time I'll leave some Zoom call with a prospect. I'm like, that deal is going to close next week. We got this. And it's like a year and a half later, it's like, okay, finally we're closing it. So there's a sort of optimism that, that refreshes on a daily basis as a, as a founder. But so a lot of time spent with, with, with customers. But, you know, we've definitely shifted. So we have 100,000 companies on the platform. So that means, you know, almost by definition, the vast majority of our bookings and revenue are going to be from our existing install.
That's why I asked the question. The majority of your new revenue will hit it is from the base. So as CEO, do you align your time with that or do you not align your time with that?
You align your time with where the ultimately the dollars are going to come from. And so in the base, we often will have lots of customers that have significant expansion opportunity, and that can look as important or be as important as a net new, you know, logo that we have to go get. Yeah.
So yeah, we'll get to that in a minute. One, one, one just niche question when I see this, just curious. So 96% subscription revenue as you go more solution and even more enterprise.
Yeah.
Have you thought about pushing that number lower of doing more services for these big deals?
It's actually crazy. I've, I've been trying to push that number lower for years. Lower. I can't. And, and the reason I can't is because there is this sort of dichotomy where the simpler the software is and the easier you make it, to implement, that number is— that recurring side is going to be higher. And, and so there's this inherent tension, which is hopefully if we're building good software for our customers, that the amount of extra services they need should be less. And the more you become a platform, probably the more that system integrators and other partners do it for you. So, so I actually think it'll probably remain this even though we do become more solution-oriented. It's because we'll have a bigger partner ecosystem. We still want to build very simple software that's easy to implement. But I think there's no magic number. There's plenty of amazing SaaS companies that have 15% of their revenue as consulting revenue, and those companies are doing unbelievably well.
So, I mean, even though Qualtrics is 20% services, you probably could do it if you wanted to, right?
But I've tried, like, to try— I've tried to get it to like 8% and I can't. So, yeah, but so I think, I think every company finds their natural spot for their product, for the market that they're in. Maybe this will— maybe, maybe the number will get higher over time. But I'd say right now, you know, if I were talking to an investor, I would say it's expected to hover around this range. Cool.
We could spend all our time on this slide. Let me make sure. Just a quickie. And I don't want to spend all of our time on the future of work that we talked about. Right. But while we have you, this is— this chart you have on NRR is interesting, right? So there was a little bit of a deceleration during, during the global pandemic. And we're back. So I think we know that firing on all cylinders. What— maybe more tactically or specifically, what's coming next in the next 2 years, right beyond the world being pulled ahead 2 years and e-signatures, the light going off. But what really is going to be different in the next 2 years?
Well, and I think, you know, generally for everybody in this room and beyond, what's going to be different is that is that every company is going to be a hybrid work organization. And even for the most sort of ardent fans of offices, every IT organization on the planet is going to have to implement hybrid work. So you've got, you know, basically the singular largest megatrend in enterprise software history is playing out right now.
And is it early? Is it just starting really?
It is, because if you literally look at people's vendor stack, And if you were to go interview any, any CIO of any top 10,000 enterprise, the majority of their dollars are going into brand names that, that existed a decade ago. So that kind of tells you we're still pretty early because it can't possibly be the case that for all of the world's largest organizations, all the software that they're using is still the same software as 10 years ago when we didn't have hybrid work as the main fixture of how we operate. So something still is yet to completely go and actually change. And make these markets, you know, continue to evolve. So you got hybrid work. You know, everybody knows everything's going to go digital. There's literally not going to be, you know, anything other than a digital transaction. And so think about all the software that's to get written to go and help every company in every industry and every size organization all around the world be able to process everything digitally. We're still in the very early innings of that. And then you've got the mega tailwind and just, you know, tectonic shift of security, privacy, you know, global data privacy challenges that every organization is facing. So you compound those three things and, and there just have never been more tailwinds in enterprise software than right now for, for this, this type of transformation. When you and I were in the early days, like at best we were like, like, you know, iPhone 3 and, and like, you know, AWS were like the tailwinds and that was it. Like that was the disruption. And, and today you have entire ways that we're shifting all of society and how we work. Plus every possible technology tailwind that you could, you could imagine. So, so that's the, that's the macro view for everybody. And then for us, we think the biggest impact for our business is that that just means there's going to be a wider generation of unstructured content and data. You know, every, every interaction that you do with a client, a partner, a supplier, there's going to be some amount of data and content that you're going to work with it, you know, financial data, contracts, invoices, marketing assets, media, research data, knowledge management. All of that has to be stored somewhere, managed workflows around it, and then integrated across applications. So that's what we're going to do. Yeah.
So one issue I want to follow up on, because maybe it's obvious, but I hadn't thought about it till you brought it up, is what's going to happen in the CEO's office, not now, but in the next couple of years? Because when COVID hit, there were certain categories. Zoom's the most obvious, but it's not just Zoom, right? It's, it's call center, right? I mean, good God, that space exploded. E-signatures that we didn't quite get. And that happened because it had to happen. Right. But now you're talking to CIOs and they've got 10-year-old software that they're going to replace because of these changes. But it's not all happening this week. Right. So is this, is this post-COVID buying cycle going to take 3 to 5 years actually to play out? It's not done. Right.
Well, that was the thing. So, so, you know, every, every company that, that, that was public, certainly, than anybody else sort of had this line last year of we saw, you know, 10 years of acceleration in the past year. And that was true. But it was usually with existing customers that we're seeing bursts of new use cases. We know maybe—
Yeah, it got all pulled in dramatically.
All got pulled in. But it was because just literally the demand of whatever the indirect relationship was, the B2B2C element was the pull-in. So Twilio obviously exploded because we're all buying DoorDash all day long. And so by definition, you know, Twilio explodes. Zoom obviously explodes because of the obvious reason. So But that was like, that was like the urgent sort of triage, sort of keep businesses afloat. That was not the, we're going to now automate our business processes. That was not the sort of, we're going to reimagine, you know, how we serve our customers over the long run. That was not the, you know, we're going to change the actual way that we work and collaborate and ideate and, you know, engineer things. That's, that's, those are things that do take 2 years and 3 years and 5 years because there's software to get built, there is culture to change. There's organizational behavior dynamics that have to evolve. That's, I think, the era that we're entering now. Last year was the sort of like, you could see rapid expansion because everybody was in this sort of crisis mode. Maybe the actual rate of change is going to be slower, but the size of the shift is as big as it ever has been.
Yeah, it's interesting. We might have hit this slide, "Expired for the next phase of growth." Yeah, I think all your—
You're just finding my most inane tweets.
Not all tweets.
I promise I tweet other things than just like, I'm so fired up right now. Like, okay, okay. I just, ah, I'm so pumped. Hold on, let me skip to another one.
Talk just a little bit, and maybe this is not any more interesting than data, but this is, talk a little bit about going out marketing, what you've learned. And what's interesting, we have a later slide, maybe we'll get to, we won't. I think about how everyone characterizes the lines between categories differently, but I think today you say you're about half enterprise, 50-something-ish, right? Maybe 8% still self-service, right? It's not gone forever.
What number did you say?
8%, I think. Do I have that wrong?
I guess maybe on revenue. I don't know the latest.
I'm just not allowed to go back or I would come and get it. And then 30 or 40% is sort of mid-market SMB, right? And what have you learned here in terms of— but, but the— you've got two big growth vectors quantitatively. One is selling more and more to the base, right? Driving up ACV, I think. I'm not sure. Right.
Yep.
But then more to bigger customers, outsized growth. Right. So what's changed at Box as you go more enterprise at $800 million?
Yeah. So, you know, it's interesting. I'm— I've, I've decided that, like, I don't need to get any points for the thing I'm about to say, but I do want to be remembered as, as still having this as a core part of the strategy. But I just don't care to talk about it that much. A lot of like, a lot of founders will come to me and they'll be like, how did you do enterprise sales at the beginning? And I'm like, I was like, I didn't. We didn't. Like, we have always been a freemium product-led growth company. We just stopped talking about it because it's just like, like it's just not that much to talk about at some point. So, so these numbers are super important, but they don't come just because we do these, you know, super big enterprise deals all the time. They come because we have instrumented every element of our product to be self-serve, freemium, and viral. And then we have an enterprise sales team that goes and works with customers to turn those deployments into much more strategic relationships. And that was the, that was the balance that, that we lucked into early that we made the bet on. And it just, that's a flywheel that if you can get humming, almost just, you know, takes care of itself. So, so our model is most of our upsells of customers are the customer has already deployed the software, they're already using it, and it's just spreading. And then we go in and then we help that become a much more strategic deal. So, so I'm the biggest believer you'll ever find in product-led growth, freemium, viral adoption. If you can, if you can nail that for whatever category you're in, that is, that is magic that, that, that makes, you know, SaaS so much more compelling than, than the prior era of on-prem software.
So I should know this, but I guess I didn't. So the majority, if you don't exactly know the number, we don't have to get into it, but the majority of these $100K, even million-dollar deals is the sales team hunting existing accounts and thoughtfully getting, presumably getting better and better over time at migrating them to bigger and bigger deals.
Yeah. And the way it works is literally it's idiosyncratic to every company in wherever they are in that journey. So sometimes it's going to a line of business and finding a couple of use cases and then rolling it to the CIO.
Sometimes it's going straight to— But even 2021 for Box, at Box's scale, that's still the predominant way you get get the bigger deals, right?
Yes.
As silos and land and expands and grows.
I don't know of another model that you can do in cloud. So I'm sure somebody out there, maybe, maybe Palantir or something is doing a completely different approach. But like for all of us mere mortals, like you just, you get adoption, you build a hopefully great product, you get lines of business and IT to sort of connect the dots at some point, and then hopefully you drive bigger and bigger deals.
No, it's— well, it's just interesting to me that, I mean, Every, every business is hard, right? It's not any easier being a CEO today than it was 1 year or 2 years pre-IPO, right? But the, but the brand gets bigger, right? And I would think in 2021 you'll have CIOs that have deployed Box now 3 or 4 times over their career. You would think they would come in and say, look, Aaron, I want to do a $500K deal. I want to do one because I've already done this. I don't want to spend 5 years. I'm ready to roll it out across my new gig, right?
And that does happen. But last quarter we did, I don't know, 74 deals over $100,000. So it That's a fraction of those deals.
But it's still a small fraction, right?
And you still have so many more that are just, they've adopted more of the product and we have an incredible, you know, account executive that goes in and connects the dots. And that's the majority of our revenue still.
So are you, do you think product-led growth is nothing new?
Well, I think there's ways that they've got, it's gotten way better. Better at it. Like, you know, now we'll have a Slack channel that will automatically ping the sales rep that says, hey, there's some usage pattern here. That you should go in and, you know, connect the dots for the client. So, so, I mean, the instrumentation we get, the automation we get is 10 times better. But I mean, if, if, if, you know, Martin Mikos was here, we'd be talking about MySQL. Yeah. And he'll be here later. Oh, okay.
Yeah.
I mean, he was doing product-led growth in 2003.
Yeah.
So like, literally, like, you, you download MySQL and then they sell you an enterprise version. So, you know, we haven't really changed that much in 18 years collectively.
The instrumentation maybe is a good summary.
You get a lot more telemetry now.
Yeah. So this slide, let's at least spend a couple of minutes on this. This is so interesting, right? So from 2020, if I have this right, to 2022, attach rates from 10% to 73% on multi-product, right?
What is this? I didn't, I didn't actually realize this was going to be an investor conference. This is great. So, you know, okay. All right. I need to alert my IR team about what I'm doing here.
I take, I take this stuff and I find 5 things that are interesting for founders, not for, not for Wall Street. I don't really care whether your stock prices are up or down, right? Yeah. I want to help founders.
Today's not a great day for anybody's stock price. Yeah.
So, you know, we're all going long, aren't we?
I hope so.
We're all going long.
Okay.
But this is pretty— I mean, I know that this is a way you're also sharing this with Wall Street, but this is, this is a big jump from 10 to 73%.
Yeah. So this is so, so this is maybe the ultimate financial maybe proxy for, for what's going on, which is, which is we have a multi-product platform. Yeah. We've bundled it now. That, I would argue, we took too long to do. So, um, so we, we had this, uh, sort of dynamic where you had to go to the customer and, and sell one product at a time. That was, I mean, it's like, duh, that's obviously a bad idea at some point. So, um, high calorie, highly inefficient sale. And then, and then the customer gets this invoice of like 9 line items and then they're just like, well, I don't want that line item for that many people. And then you're like, no, no, but you got that. That discount because you're buying the other stuff and it just gets confusing. So we did now these suite bundles and, and that's this, this stat is our 100K+ deals that have a suite or multi-product plan. And, and so that's been fortunately a big driver of our growth.
Well, that was interesting. What I didn't realize, a slightly older version of this I had on the web, on the SaaS website, had like 3 lines of all your different products, right? Yeah. And the new one has 1.
Yeah.
And that's because you learned selling 3 different products to the same base was not worth it, right?
Yeah, it's a lot, it's a lot better to just sell the whole thing.
Yeah, it's interesting. And then this, this, this last one on this one that I grabbed because this is telling 125% NRR with multi-product, 90% with no add-on. That's like not a small delta, is it?
No. And this is— I don't know that I don't know the date in which this stat was shared, but so I want to like beginning of the year.
So let's consider it not inaccurate today.
Okay. Well, I'll just say whenever it was, Whenever it was published, it was accurate. And so what I'll say is that, yes, if you can get customers to be more strategic. Yes. Think about your platform more strategically. In our case, that's— that can be approximated by customers that adopt multiple solutions. Then they stay with you longer. They grow faster. Yeah. And, and that's, that's the result we see in the net retention rate improvement.
Would you have done more of this multi-product stuff, leaning more on security compliance and everything earlier?
Yeah.
If you'd realize where the world would be today.
Yeah, yeah, totally.
Yeah, I think that's everyone's lesson.
Yep.
And one last one.
Okay.
Maybe we had that one. We will ignore this one.
Okay.
Quickly, interesting. Now that you're all this multi-product, everyone's TAMs are crazy today. Everyone has a $70 billion TAM or $120 billion. Now that you've been through this and actually the initial box category maybe is mature, right? The very early, you know, folder on the web is immature, but But is there any ceiling in TAM? Do you even worry about this or think about this? Do great teams find an infinity TAM?
Yeah, we've always been believers in bottom-up and top-down TAM analysis, and I don't know that that's, you know, industry, an industry-shared term or not, but we will look at top-down, i.e., where's all the, where are the dollars going in the categories we serve?
Yep.
And so this is an example of some of the categories that we serve, and now you could add e-signature as an example, But so top down, globally, people are spending $55 billion a year on things about storing data and files and working with those files and securing those files.
Okay.
So that's, that's sort of like the TAM you're going to go disrupt. And, uh, I'm sure half of this room has read Blue Ocean Strategy and the other half has read Innovator's Dilemma. I'm massive fans of both those books because the more you can be taking existing spend, existing categories, but just changing the variables a bit, So they, they favor your strategy. So what we do is we go to customers and say, what if you had one solution that did all of these things, as opposed to buying individual products that do parts of those things? That's our disruption play. So that's your top-down analysis. And then your bottom-up analysis, and this one, you know, you're now seeing in VC slides more and more, and so it's obviously losing its credibility, is you say, okay, well, there's a billion end users on the planet that need, that need some high, higher-end content management collaboration functionality. And so you could do various ways of discounting and squinting your eyes and saying, okay, well, if everybody paid X amount, or if you got this particular percentage, you'd also be able to get to a very similar TAM number. So we've always tried to triangulate using those two metrics, and I'm actually still a believer that that is a fair way to do it.
Cool. Well, Aaron, I got— I wanted more I wanted to ask you, but it'll be the next SaaStr Annual.
Thanks for your time.
All right, sorry. Thank you. See you.
More from Jason

Why Your Next Hire Should Report to an AI, Tragedy Apps, and Too Many AI SDRs? | The Agents #004

Our Agents Drove Our Salesforce Bill Up 80%, Marketo Hates Agents, and We Stealth-Churned Off Notion

Managing 20+ AI Agents: Lazy Agents, Our $500K AI Bill, Stealth Churn & the Death of 60% Solutions







