Corinne Riley | Funding the Cloud Challengers
31 Aug 2021 · 17 min
Corinne Riley breaks down where venture money is flowing in cloud infrastructure since 2019. AI and ML services exploded, analytics startups like Snowflake boomed, and security companies like Wiz raised heavily. But API tooling remains surprisingly small, leaving room for challengers to compete with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.
Chapters
Hi, this is Heather Mack, Head of Editorial at Greylock. The following podcast is from our new project Castles in the Cloud. You can find more@greylock.com castles hi everyone. Welcome to Grey Matter, the podcast from Greylock, where we share stories from company builders and business leaders. I'm Corinne Riley, an investor at Greylock. This is an audio version of the essay I wrote with fellow investor Jerry Chen entitled Funding the Cloud Top VC financing trends since 2019. This is part three of our essay series based on our Castles in the Clouds project. Part one in this series provides an introduction to the project, which is a comprehensive interactive data compilation and analysis map to the clouds ecosystem, identifying trends and finding new opportunities for startups to compete with the big cloud providers. Part two explores strategies to break up big cloud's dominance. Check out the Gray Matter podcast to hear Aliza Schreiber read the first essay and Greylock's head of editorial, Heather Mack read the second as the Big three cloud providers have expanded their services over the years, each category has spawned new opportunities for challenger startups to compete with them. Venture capital dollars have followed closely behind, as evidenced by success stories such as Snowflake's triumph. In spite of Redshift, winning against a major cloud vendor is possible. This is why, although aws, GCP and Microsoft Azure collectively offer hundreds of services, there have been billions of VC dollars backing a growing cadre of challenger startups with increasingly specialized and sophisticated products. This is represented in our accompanying chart, with each bubble representing a standalone opportunity. In reviewing the funding data, five trends have stood out in particular as areas of interest to one an unsurprising increase in the number of AI and ML services and funding 2 growth in funding into and the creation of data and analytics startups 3 increased funding into security services 4amaturation of startups operating in the observability sector, which we predict will lead to more funding and five an unexpectedly small API tooling market. What's driving these trends? AI and ML the Whales of the Cloud the promise of the potential impact of artificial intelligence and machine learning has prompted everyone from the largest cloud providers to the tiniest challengers to chase after the sector in both the number of services and number of VC dollars invested. This category greatly outweighs the others tracked in our database. Between the big three cloud providers, there are 74 AI and ML services offered. This is the highest number of services provided in a market and is almost double the size of the second largest category of developer tools, which has 44 services. In spite of the strong focus from the Cloud vendors Venture capital firms have put $4 billion over 2019 and 2020 into startup challengers in the sector. Given the surface area covered by the cloud providers in this sector, it's particularly impressive to see challengers go up against the incumbents here. The Big three possess seemingly impenetrable moats proprietary data sets. For example, AWS can offer pre trained fraud detection models based on their retail fraud data sets they've accrued, combined with seamless interoperability and economies of scope. In AWS's case, those three advantages allow for interoperability between services fraud from getting the data from S3 all the way to model training in SageMaker. While their sheer scale makes them impossible to replicate, almost every cloud service is nonetheless facing a VC backed competitor. Challenger startups can go down two routes from end to end or point specific ML infrastructure for example to applied AI ML in enterprise specific applications like abnormal security. Challengers have been able to command large market shares against the cloud such as DataRobot. Competing directly with household ML name AWS SageMaker. The cloud providers have also made significant effort in services around text, speech and image recognition conducive to AI applied applications. Startup challengers have likewise stepped up with practical applications such as tools in a variety of formats, from improving writing with Grammarly to unlocking information with instabase. Investors have shown a particular excitement around these AI enabled workflows which are bringing long needed efficiencies to areas with historically poor optimization. Cresta, for example, provides a real time AI platform to large enterprises that leverages expertise to all employees regardless of skill level. While there are a myriad of standalone AI leveraged SaaS opportunities that the cloud providers might not focus on, we do wonder if where we will see a battle between cloud and challengers is in the end to end model creation and deployment infrastructure. In these markets, the biggest advantage a cloud provider will have is easily interacting with and moving data across services in their ecosystem and the volume of proprietary datasets available to pre trained models. That said, we still think cloud providers will have to go up against a number of highly capable and fast moving startups. Analytics on Fire analytics has long been a market that has captured the attention of both the big cloud providers and VC backed challengers. But the pace at which new companies are being founded and funded in recent years is unprecedented. Between 2019 and 2020, venture capital investors poured around $3 billion into around 35 challenger startup over 500 million in the analytics sector which are competing with a similar number of services offered by the big cloud providers the move from storage to databases to analytics over the past years has led to outsized outcomes in modern data warehousing and data lakes. The aforementioned success story of Snowflake provides a great case study for how challengers do sometimes win against the existing cloud products thanks to innovative product architecture, customer centricity and speed of execution. And the opportunity for challengers doesn't stop there. The modern data stack is still a work in progress, but already data scientists and analysts have no shortage of tools. Thanks to the innovation of a growing number of challengers, a myriad of analytics applications are being built around the data warehouse, Data quality, data governance, data privacy, data cataloging, all currently present standalone solutions an enterprise can implement. For example, data scientists and developers can use products from the emerging class of cloud only startups like Rockset as an analytics engine to build data driven applications as simply as possible. There is a common theme between all these categories. The amount of data being collected is untenable, unclean, and as the organization grows, inconsistently tagged. At the same time, data science teams are overburdened with requests for bespoke analysis and questions about data from business users. Challengers in this category are ushering us into an era where the ability for employees to ingest and perform analytics on their data and in a secure and compliant way is available to all. Of course we can envision the cloud vendors doubling down on these capabilities within their own warehouses, but overall we believe the private sector is at an inflection point in regards to spending and talent, to the point where we would question whether it is in the cloud vendors best interest to devote substantial resources required to catch up security, the Gift that keeps on Giving Security is an ever present and ever evolving problem for all industries, so it's no surprise that venture capital investment into startups operating in the sector grew considerably between 2019 and 2020. For that period, investment was over $3 billion into around 30 challenger startups that are each valued above 500 million. They are competing with 25 services from the big cloud providers. At the beginning of the COVID 19 pandemic, most industry reports forecasted a decrease in overall IT spend, but enterprise organizations actually spent more on security tools during that time due to widespread shifts to virtual work and school. Moreover, this was happening alongside an acceleration of migration to the cloud by nearly all industries. VC spending in 2020 was characterized by uncommonly large raises in valuations at the earliest stages of a company's existence. Hundreds of millions of dollars have gone into CNSPS cloud native security platforms that focus on CSPM, cloud security posture management like Jupyter1 and sometimes also CWPP cloud workload protection platforms like Wiz and Orca. The increase in work from home affected endpoint platforms such as CrowdStrike and Zero Trust Network access platforms such as Twingate and Tailscale. The well funded cloud security posture management companies like Wiz, Orca and OpenRaven were the main beneficiaries during this time as regulated industries relied heavily on their services in the rush to migrate to the cloud. This adoption of more technology brings an additional problem to solve as organizations modernize in response to COVID 19 and its subsequent acceleration of cloud migration, they are utilizing more diverse tech stacks. This means they are leveraging an increasing number of platforms to service customers which results in a proliferation of customer data across multiple locations. As a result, these organizations have increased focus on compliance and privacy and an enhanced need for visibility and tracking of all customer data. This is why we are seeing more companies offering privacy management solutions like OneTrust and centralized access control with compliance workflows like Privacera. Within the security vein, the identity and authentication sector has also matured to the point where we are starting to see consolidation such as Okta's acquisition of Auth0. We expect to see further consolidation down the road as companies within the various security submarkets go after similar customers and use cases such as the way CSPM and CWPP functions are starting to overlap. Complex and risky as these undertakings are for the challenger startups that attempt to take on these problems, we have seen a lot of funding go into these solutions. We expect further investor excitement for startups finding even better solutions. Observability the Underserved Market There have been some great historical outcomes in observability from traditional approaches in appdynamics and new relic to modern platforms like Datadog. Now we are seeing the industry evolve from the three elements of metrics, traces and logs to a more jobs to be done approach of know, triage, understand and then fix. With the evolution of the hyperscale era of cloud comes the need to monitor cloud native apps and make precise data driven decisions. Querying and storing one dimension of a company's data is simple, but the cost and complexity to query and store all the metrics within all the dimensions quickly becomes not only cost prohibitive but also slow and impossible to use. That's where a company like Chronosphere comes in with a hosted cloud service, allowing enterprises to ascertain deep insights from their metrics. We at Greylock believe that the cloud monitoring space is large and growing, reflected by our current investment in Chronosphere and our earlier investment in Sumo Logic, which went public in 2020. Recent activity like Datadog's acquisition of timber Technologies, the creators of Vector and of screen, or of ServiceNow's acquisition of Lightstep has demonstrated that marquee companies see the value in this market. That said, the investor dollars spent in this market are significantly lower than others, just above 300 million in the last two years. One could argue that the lack of VC investment is because of strong competition from cloud vendors. Azure and AWS both have solutions in this category and GCP is leading in the number of observability services. Moreover, the incumbent's deep technological moats and the significant lift a challenger must make to get a new observability product off the ground means fewer startups have been willing to get into the sector. Chronosphere is an outlier because founders Martin Mao and Rob Skillington had built the M3 platform at Uber, which provided a solid jumping off point for their startup. However, we are bullish that opportunities exist for more challengers to get into the sector. While all of the large cloud providers have observability products available, none of them is a truly strong product that can compete with the level of complexity a datadog can handle a service like AWS. CloudWatch may have the advantage of raw processing power and ease of integration with other AWS services, but once a customer needs observability for larger and more complex data environments, they will be best served by a product from a challenger. Additionally, we are still a few years away from a strong cloud provided multi cloud observability product, meaning there is ample white space for challengers to go after API. Small footprint, big opportunity APIs have arguably enabled single products to become platforms. Without the Google Maps API we never would have had Uber. The skyscanner API allows companies to find and aggregate flights. The Clearbit API allows a multitude of sales companies to pull in prospect data. The evolution of the API ecosystem could mirror the evolution of the SaaS market wherein the explosion of SaaS companies has in turn created a market for enterprise SaaS management. Over the past two decades we saw the creation of numerous SaaS businesses from horizontal apps like Salesforce and CRM and Workday in HR Financials to vertical apps like Viva in Life Sciences and Blend in financial services. Similarly, some of the largest tech companies in the past decade are API based businesses from Twilio in the public markets to Stripe in private along with many new challengers. As a consequence of this explosion of API based businesses, large markets are being created around finding, connecting and managing the thousands of APIs a company uses. It's very surprising then that the market for API management and development has not grown to command more of a sizable share of the overall cloud ecosystem. This is particularly notable in the low VC dollar spend in 2019 and 2020. Financing was a mere 400 million and there were fewer than five large challengers competing with the big cloud providers. We haven't seen many challengers attempting to compete with the big cloud provider API gateways, from Google's Apigee to AWS's API Gateway as the large incumbents have a strong foothold and enable easy integration with all existing services. One of the few remaining gateway challengers is Kong, known for its open source gateway. That said, we have seen challengers making a name for themselves with tools that bring visibility into a company's API consumption. Promising startups in API management and tracking include Rapid API, Solo IO, while other challengers are focused squarely on API security like SALT and Cloud Vector. These solutions are still in their infancy and we believe there's a green space opportunity for new, high quality entrants. Conclusion despite the cloud castles having massive moats, there are certain markets like AI, ML and Analytics where the pie is so large that challengers and VCs are willing to go toe to toe in attempt to claim their slice. Similarly, there are markets like Security that move at such a fast pace and are predicated on larger economic macro trends that we expect VC spend to be effectively evergreen. Lastly, in the Observability and API markets, we see signs of opportunities for Act 2 companies in areas where the three cloud vendors haven't been able to focus as strongly. As we continue to add companies to the database, we are eager to see how the above trends play out and which other trends are revealed. We invite participants to weigh in on our analysis and predictions and to share any insights they may have as we work to identify more opportunities for founders. This concludes this episode of Gray Matter. Stay tuned for future episodes in our Castles in the Cloud series. You can find all past episodes on SoundCloud, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Corinne Riley and thanks for listening.
More from Jerry
"Ship Pricing as Fast as Product" - CEO Alvaro Morales on Orb's Mission to Revolutionize Billing Infrastructure