Open AI's New Statement Is CONCERNING! (The WORLD Isnt Ready For GPT-5)

So there was a statement made by an OpenAI employee that truly shocked me to my core. Because of the ramifications of the statement, and once I explained to you where this statement comes from and what it means, you're going to understand why we are clearly not ready for GPT5 and why OpenAI are basically saying that, look, we're really not ready for any advanced AI system just yet. So if you didn't know, OpenAI the other day, two days ago, released this. It was their state of the art text to video model. Now, it's pretty crazy, okay? But here's the thing about this. Many of us in the AI space have been super excited about this. Many of us have been like, wow, this is so cool. This is so amazing. However, there has been a different reception in the wider community. However, in the wider community, in terms of reception, this thing is getting absolutely hammered. You can see here that this is moist, critical. A famous YouTuber with over 14 million subscribers states, I'm struggling to think of a single positive thing making realistic AI generated videos like this will bring. It's all just net negative and dystopian. And his tweet, even though he's a pretty popular YouTuber, his Twitter account isn't that popular for him to be getting this much likes. He actually got 153,000 likes, 11,000 retweets, and that tweet got 8 million views. And many people were clearly supportive. And if you think it's just one big YouTuber getting some quick fame, take a look at some other initial reactions. Okay, someone stated, why do you guys think that this is a good thing? That is 20,000 people liking that tweet. And this is after OpenAI release something and they usually get a positive reception. Take a look at these tweets. Okay? This is disgusting. You're literally hurting jobs with this. This is terrifying. And going to steal jobs. Not to mention the amount of terrible things this could be used for. And I'm doing a quick recap so you guys can really understand the gravity of the situation. Because once I get to the OpenAI statement from an employee, you're going to understand why this is so crazy. So you, you can clearly see here that the comments, the social opinion right now is that this technology that was just released is absolutely on one side. People think that it's incredible, but it is definitely someone. And even if you're in the AI space, it's definitely something that did shock you as well. Because people, including myself, were like, whoa, I can't believe that this is real. And then of course, you can see comments like this where you can see that this is disgusting. You're hurting jobs with this. You can see that so many people actually don't like this. Like, people aren't even excited anymore. They just have existential dread. And if you think this is just, you know, one or two tweets, we've got more tweets, okay? Someone is stating that we need to destroy OpenAI. And I'm dead serious when I say that. And that tweet got over nearly 2000 likes and 250 retweets. So it's pretty crazy on how much hate this is getting, but it's all for a very good reason. And I'm going to tell you guys why this shows us how crazy things are going to go. I also picked out another comment here on another YouTube video that was stating the next 5 to 20 years are going to be insanely horrifying. So it's clear here that people are not looking forward to the future of AI technology. And what's crazy is that you're about to see a statement in around two minutes once I wrap this point up. Why? You know, it's clear that these next level AI systems, OpenAI, are basically saying we just aren't ready for them. Here is the kicker, ladies and gentlemen, let's get to this tweet, because this is a tweet that I saw that I was like, whoa, this is insane. This tweet right here is by an OpenAI employee, okay? And he said, we very intentionally are not sharing it widely yet. The hope is that a mini public demo kicks a social response into gear. Guys, I'm going to state it one more time. We are intentionally not sharing it widely yet. The hope is that a mini public demo kicks a social response into gear. And you guys have to think about this, right? If they are not sharing this technology widely, what else are they holding onto? If they are hiding text to video, they're definitely hiding much more advanced systems somewhere else. You know, you've already seen the video I made recently about that and why it's so crazy. But take a look at this further breakdown from AI safety memes. And essentially, you know, he says that OpenAI employee explains that they released the SORA demo today to kick a social response into gear. This is a wild sentence. Imagine any other industry saying, we're about to unleash something so dangerous, society might must urgently start prepping. And essentially what they're saying is that, look, okay, we know that we've got some crazy AI systems up our sleeves, and we're trying to show you sora, to show you guys what's truly capable with AI, so that, you know, people can essentially brace themselves for the kind of systems that are going to come. I think that kind of statement, guys, is pretty crazy. And once I even break it down further to show you guys why this is really, really crazy, you guys are going to start to realize the level of AI systems that are out there probably at OpenAI and the rate at which some other companies are going to be chasing OpenAI in this unfortunate race to the bottom. Now, the tweet goes on to continue to state that a rumor is that Jimmy Apples claims that they've had this since last March. And if this is true, what other crazy advances are they sitting on? And how far has AI advanced without our knowledge? And here is the true, true point. Okay, Jimmy Apples did respond. And if you don't know who Jimmy Apples is, and you're wondering, who is Jimmy Apples? This is someone who has inside information that some of the top AI companies. I have no idea how he does it, but he tweets about the stuff and then it comes out later and it's usually spot on. So essentially he was stating that they had this since last March and they've improved the model since then. But the point is, guys, is that if they've had this since last March, which is nearly a year ago, okay, that means that we can truly understand that this kind of system. And the crazy thing about this, guys, okay, is that with Sora, what's crazy about Sora, the most insane thing is that it wasn't like we went from Sora 1 to Sora 2. We instantly went to boom, text to video. There wasn't like text to video one that was kind of bad. We saw a bunch of different industry ones that weren't that good. But OpenAI just came out the gate with this one, and this was pretty crazy. So the statement, how far has AI advanced without our knowledge? Is a riveting one because it poses the question that AI is much far ahead in the inside of these labs than outside in the world. And that is a statement that is very true. You have to remember that GPT4 was released on the 14th of March, 2023, but they actually finished training the model in 2022, and they spent a couple of months aligning the model. So the point is, is that they usually have models way before their initial release date, which essentially means that usually they have these models way before they Announce them now. I believe that this tweet is rather, rather fascinating. And I'm going to break it down even more to tell you guys why this is even a little bit concerning. Because if these guys are sitting on some really advanced AI systems, which we know they definitely are because it's been so long since we've had another AI system and it seems that Google recently caught up, it does mean some clear things. Let's get into that now. So in addition, there have been some cryptic tweets from some of the OpenAI leakers. And this tweet by Sam Altman, and he basically said, here, sure, 10x engineers are cool, but damn those 10,000x engineer researchers. And essentially, if you don't understand this cryptic tweet, he's basically stating that AI can do a lot more work than one person. And what's crazy about this is that this was at the time of September. Now, if you aren't understanding what September was and why that month is, I wouldn't say a pivotal month, but why it is quite strange in the timing is because that is around the time that Sam Altman, you know, just a little bit before the time that Sam Altman was fired due to a massive breakthrough at OpenAI. Okay? And that was the time that many people were memeing that AGI had been achieved internally. And they updated all their, you know, like things on their web page secretly to state that we had just focused on AGI as if they had made some kind of breakthrough. And I made a video on this about these secret changes on their web page. Now remember, Sam Altman wants to raise 7 trillion for a new AI chip project, okay? And that's a lot of money. And think about it like this. In the video I recently made, I talked about how on earth are you going to raise 7 trillion for some kind of project, okay, that you're going to make money back on? Okay, if it's not AGI that you're raising $7 trillion for, what on earth are people going to invest in that is going to get you that amount of capital that we've literally never seen? It has to be some kind of world changing technology that will impact everyone. And the technology that is, that is of course ag. So many people, including myself, are speculating that they are definitely sitting on AGI. And of course that's not an official statement, but that is of course the rumor theory at the moment. Because if you are pitching saying, Look, I need $7 trillion to build something and you guys are literally building the best AI system in the world. I would definitely bet that that breakthrough that you guys made is clearly onto something huge. And of course, there were some crazy, crazy leaks that went under the radar that were stating that OpenAI is in possession of a powerful model named Arrakis, stating that it could do this, it could do that, it can pretty much do everything. And it's absolutely incredible. And of course, this is something that we don't know if it is true. So the reason this is so crazy is because they're clearly stating that, look, we need to change your worldview so you guys can update your timelines on what you can expect from future AI so that when we do release the next level of technology that is truly advanced, you. You guys don't completely lose your hats because you don't think that things are moving too quickly. And that is something that I think does make sense because of how OpenAI has recently started to operate. Now what's also crazy is that this becomes even more concerning considering that they did recently make a powerful AI discovery that certain people said could threaten humanity. And that is what led apparently to the outstart of Sam Altman from OpenAI's CEO position. And remember, a comment here shows you guys why they needed us to update our worldview. This is a comment from Reddit that states aged like milk, okay? And this is a comment from someone that's three years ago. And pay attention. Someone three years ago said, imagine in a few years when we can make photorealistic videos from just a few sentences. AI is crazy. The crazy thing about that comment, not that it's three years ago, is that it got downvoted with two downvotes, okay? And some people were saying a few years ago, laughing my ass off. Try text to video isn't going to happen in our lifetime, buddy. And especially not photorealistic. Maybe our great grandkids might have it. Lol. And you can see that comment got upvoted. So like 3 years ago people were stating that there's no way that this is possible. And today we know that it is. Which goes to show that your timelines for artificial intelligence, maybe artificial superintelligence, artificial general intelligence, are completely likely to be wrong because we truly don't know what these companies have and how fast they are. And in addition, you can see right here, Sora shattered my AI timeline. The kind of video generation we're seeing now, I didn't expect for at least three to five years. And when people said that video generation was going to progress as fast as image generation, I just didn't believe them. And of course, like they state, you don't believe them because of course, the world model, it's much harder to think of things in the 3D space and understand exactly how things move. This is definitely some really, really advanced technology. And a great comment and arguably one of the best comments that I did saw is, was stating that I can't wait to see how this hits people who haven't been keeping pace with developments. So far I've only observed people in spaces like this one. If we're flawed, imagine how everyone else is going to react once this really gets going. And guys, honestly, like, the reaction I've seen is absolutely incredible. Okay? And the thing is, okay, imagine if people like us who are invested in the AI space, who pay attention to the news, who watch the updates, who subscribe to every channel, who look at every tweet, who look at every OpenAI post, if we are surprised by what's going on, imagine how the average person who doesn't pay attention to AI news actually is going to think when they kind of see this. And this is why I'm guessing that they released this so that they can update the timelines and people can kind of prepare themselves and mentally understand how quickly technology is about to evolve. So from this statement, and what's crazy about this statement is that the OpenAI employee actually deleted the statement because they know that. Okay, that's a bit crazy. And I guess maybe we didn't want everyone to realize that it's clear that we're not ready for these next level systems. And if you think we are ready for these next level systems, guys, you have to understand exactly what's going on here. And I'm about to show you guys some more information to show you that society is about to change in a big, big way if we aren't careful and if we don't pay attention. And there are some things that need to happen right now. So what happens next? Okay, when GPT 5 gets released, when GPT 4.5 gets released, what are these AI companies going to do? Because right now, okay, literally right now it's like people are getting like death threats, okay? People are stating that like, you know, this is horrible. This is yada, yada, yada. So what is going to happen now? What is the next stage of AI? Okay, so let's take a look at some things that are really, really important. Okay? Now here's something I wanted to show you all because this didn't get enough attention. There was actually a small Indie website, okay? That is a video AI generator, okay? And this website, this guy is the CEO Benjamin, right? And this guy essentially has his platform. And since OpenAI released Sora, his platform has been getting ridiculous hate. Okay? It says, I have been receiving hateful messages and posts since Sora went viral. Final Frame, a small project that involves two people, is now being targeted. You can see that they were under a DDoS attack. Now here's some of the messages that he received. And remember, this is just the guy who owns a video generation AI platform. This is not a guy who's even any kind of way related to OpenAI Sora. So I can't imagine some of the messages that some of the people who created this technology we're getting. You can see here that people were stating, AI will bring a dystopian nightmare. You are. I'm not gonna, you know, even say what that is. And then someone's stating that you have ruined the world. So this is just a guy who owns something that's quite similar to Sora. Okay? And then, of course. And then, of course, we have this tweet right here and he says, people are going to get scared and then they will get angry. I didn't realize the extent of this until the last 24 hours. And this is over AI puppies. Wait until there are job layoffs and optimus robots. And he has a very, very important point that is so true now. Now there are even more tweets showcasing just how crazy the public sentiment is regarding generative AI. You can see here that someone said generative AI is an absolute insult to humanity. Image and video are no longer historical documents. And with AI, images will become nothing more than our entire visual history shoved into a meat grinder and served to us meaninglessly for a profit. A craft I've dedicated my entire life to is being replaced by an image predictor slot machine Image. Video will no longer be about sharing stories, sharing our point of view, connecting or documenting what we spend our time creating. And I can't believe one of the most fundamental parts of being a person and making and consuming art is being taken away from us. And for what? Why does this technology need to exist? How does this help anyone? And you can see the reason I'm showing you guys these ones is because these ones have a lot of actual support. You can see that this one has 71,000 likes and 12,000 retweets, which are essentially endorsements. You can also see that this tweet right here says, okay, but is there genuinely any benefit to this technology. Existing takes away jobs, old people and a lot of younger folks will be easily scammed. More garbage. AI generated content on social media devalues human art. And I can't see any positive on this at all. And this one actually had a lot of support as well. Had around a million views, around 50,000 retweets and likes. There was this one as well. You can see that this one literally had 1.9 million views, 149,000 likes, 16,000 retweets, and it says, Screw your AI trash. Only people like or use it. I sat by an hour near a stream and painted this. I don't care how tech bro tantrum you get. AI theft is not art. And you can see that this is a hugely negative sentiment. People really don't like the technology at the moment. And you can see someone also said making image video with generative AI needs to be outlawed in an instant. It has 21,000 likes, 3,000 retweets. In addition, there was this. AI should be doing all the useless corporate job nobody wants to do. Not the creative work humans have been crafting since the dawn of intelligent thought. Come on now. This one has 33,000 likes and 6,000 likes. And in addition to that, there was also this, which states, I think AI should be banned in its entirety at this point, because right now we just hit the point of no return. This is the worst it's going to ever look and I'm horrified where it will go from here on. Now this one. 7 million views, 150,000 likes, and 19,000 retweets. Guys, the public sentiment regarding this technology is rather negative. And I'm going to tell you guys why this is a huge deal. Recently there was a attack on a autonomous driverless car. Okay. And the reason I'm showing you guys this is because social unrest is going to be the next stage of this AI development and it's going to be an unfortunate one. But I do predict that, and I'm going to show you guys a lot of evidence to support this claim that there will be a lot more social unrest due to AI systems if we aren't careful with how they are integrated into society. So a driverless taxi was vandalized and set on fire in San Francisco's Chinatown. Californian authorities are investigating if an attack on Google's Waymo car is the latest in a series of protests targeting autonomous vehicles. You can see that people are literally targeting autonomous vehicles due to the fear of AI. That is absolutely incredible, because I was surprised. I thought that a lot of people were going to be like, okay, this is good. We've got autonomous drive, autonomous cars, yada, yada, yada. But of course, you can see that they're working to see if the destruction of a driverless taxi and an arson attack by a mob of Lunar New Year revelers was the latest in a series of protests targeting autonomous vehicles in the state. And you can see that the Guardian reported last summer on a group called the Safe Street Rebels, which has operated a campaign of disrupting and disabling driverless vehicles in San Francisco since they first appeared. So, guys, this has been happening, okay? And things are about to get crazy with the next AI models. And what I'm about to show you, what OpenAI said about the next models goes to show us that they're not going to be telling us everything that they have. And they've even stated that they're going to be, you know, doing that in a very specific way. So OpenAI have said this, okay? So I'm going to show you guys what they've essentially said. And this is something that most people didn't pay attention to. So with the next model, which is of course GPT5, OpenAI basically stated that they are going to delay this model. Okay, And I don't think delay is the right word, but essentially they stated that they are going to incrementally update this model because GPT5 is going to be too much for people to handle. Like, people wouldn't be able to comprehend the things that you could do with this model if they suddenly released it. So don't listen to me. Take this statement from Greg Brockman on GPT5. He stated on future models, this was when GPT4 was released. This is part of his tweet. He stated ideas people don't often discuss, which can improve the safety landscape in surprising ways. It's easy to create a continuum of incrementally better AIs, such as by deploying subsequent checkpoints of a given training, one which present a safety opportunity very unlike our historical approach of infrequent major model upgrades. So they basically stated here that it's much easier to incrementally update the model and because it's easier to not only safety test the model, but I'm pretty sure that it's easier to integrate into society. And there was a clip from Sam Altman stating this, but I really can't find it now. If I do find it and add it to the video, and if you do know where it is, please just Leave a comment basically stating that, look, we cannot release the model in its full fledged state because that is something that society just is not ready for. And that does make sense. We've already seen that people are literally getting death threats at the moment. And of course, we do know that AI backlash is going to bring social unrest. You can also see here that governments need to start taking action, because there are several articles coming out saying that AI backlash may bring social unrest. And this is because, of course, jobs are going to be gone by the end of the decade, like by 2030. Can you imagine the society that we're going to be living in with how good these AI systems are going to get and just how crazy things already go? Now, the reason this is so bad is because inequality is already bad, guys. We are living in a society where people literally tweet, eat the rich. And if you don't know what that tweet means, that basically means that, you know, people are saying that, you know, certain people that are rich, they shouldn't have that money. We should just eat the rich. We should go over their walls, into their homes and just eat them. It's a crazy, crazy statement, but the fact that I've been hearing it more and more and more, it's due to the inequality. Okay? Of course we do live in a capitalist society, but I think the problem isn't the capitalist society. The problem is that people are starting to realize that, wait, this guy has how much money? Wait, this guy is how much money? And I can't even pay my rent and I'm behind on this, and I'm behind on that, and this guy, like, has more money. The, like he'll have in 500 lifetimes. Like, what is going on? And of course people feel terrible. So there are a few things that we do need to, of course, take a look at. Okay, remember, this is in most scenarios, going to get worse. Okay? In most scenarios, AI will likely worsen overall inequality, a troubling trend that policymakers must proactively address. To prevent the technology from further stoking social tensions. It is crucial for countries to establish comprehensive social safety nets and offer retraining programs for vulnerable workers. In doing so, we can make the AI transition more inclusive, protecting livelihoods and curbing inequality. Guys, this is something the governments are going to have to start doing now, from today, okay? If SORA got that backlash, and if people are starting to realize that yo, like this technology is insane and they're starting to put death threats already, that is something that needs to start the Policymakers need to start doing this now because, guys, these AI systems are only going to get better and, and the social cohesion is going to be eroded. Like this is something that isn't going to be good. Okay? The inequality that is already there can erode the social cohen, lead to political polarization and of course lower economic growth. And these are things from the imf. Now what's crazy about all of this, guys, is of course the fact that people have actually talked about destroying OpenAI. Guys, there was a tweet that literally said, we need to destroy OpenAI. And I'm dead serious when I say that. Which means, you know, it's led me to believe that, you know, are OpenAI going to have to start implementing security measures? Because as a company that of course is developing really good technology, I mean, some people have been helped. You can't help but think that there are a large majority of people who have just been, you know, given, I guess you could say the boot, so to speak, by AI technology. And of course it's an inadvertent effect, but it is something that, you know, people are just clearly not happy about. Now if you're wondering, the picture is of course AI generated, but this is a giant problem, guys. Like, this is something that we're gonna have to, you know, go on in the future. Now, right now of there are people that stating, you know, that this is disgusting, this is awful, yada yada, yada. But think about it. In the future, okay, when we have Optimus, we have a bunch of AI companies, what is going to happen to society? What is going to happen to people when they start to look at these companies as less of an amazing tool that they can use on a day to day basis, but they start to shift their social perception that this is a company that is literally stealing their future for them. And that is what we're seeing in real time. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, we're getting statements like, you need to update your social response into gear so that you can really prepare yourself for what's to come. And that is why I made this video, because I was going to make a different one. And there are so many in the chamber. But this is important because this is something that we need to look forward to and realize that, look, if policymakers don't act and they don't change things so that people are more included and people aren't sending death threats to these companies and people aren't losing their jobs, then things are definitely going to, to get worse. And of Course you can see changes in the way work is done is going to unleash the potential for social unrest. And I could continually pull up thousands and thousands of tweets, but you can see that someone quoted this OpenAI tweet and essentially there was another tweet here, and this one had like around 30,000 likes and around like a million views. It was pretty crazy. And this one essentially is a meme referring to a book in which they destroyed sentient machines because they got too powerful. And of course I don't think that people are going to run in and start destroying data centers. But you have to understand that, you know, right now, when it was just writers, it was easy, but as soon as people saw video, the kind of backlash where, you know, people are getting death threats, I mean, it's kind of crazy. And we're entering an era that is truly new in terms of what we're going to see in terms of the good and of course, in terms of the bad. And another giant reason that isn't widely talked about enough is the fact that many people do believe that what OpenAI is doing and what many of these other companies doing, and we can't single out OpenAI, they are just a leader in the space, but many people are thinking, okay, and let me know your opinion on this as well is that, you know, with other proprietary AI systems and other large language models and generative AI systems, people are stating that this is just blatant theft. And you have to understand that creating an AI system that is really good is one thing, but then using an AI system to train on the existing data of hard working people and then using that same model to take those same people's jobs is absolutely insane if you think about it as a concept. And this person here said it's getting harder and harder to hold back my abject rage at all the flagrant, joyous theft going on right in front of our faces. How are these generative AI companies not considered criminal enterprises? Just think about for a second. It's insane what they are doing. And this is a comment that was met with again, a lot of support by people. Because if you are an artist and you had your work that's been put into a art generator like midjourney, and then people can literally just use your name and get your style for abstract. Absolutely. Three. And then of course, you're getting less clients because of that, that is going to be something that hurts you to your core. And I can completely empathize with anyone who's been through that experience. And of course, there is the argument that some people have stated that, you know, OpenAI Sora was something that did use synthetic data, like Unreal Engine 5. But of course, it is something that isn't widely discussed because OpenAI doesn't really release all of the details. They do release a technical paper, but the technical paper doesn't always discuss the training methods in terms of the data that they used. So we don't know if they used public video done by people or if they used entirely synthetic data. So it will be interesting to see. And there is a big problem about GPT5 and future models. Okay? And let's state, right, of course, because people are like, okay, the social response is awful. People aren't ready for GPT5. Let's say OpenAI says, Look, we're not going to release this. We are just done. We cannot release this. There is no point. Okay, here's what's going to happen. Okay? The problem is that if you delay GPT5, let's say OpenAI say, you know what, we're not going to release it, okay? The problem is, is that there is a race to the bottom. Okay, I'm not sure if you guys know about this, but this is Gemini 1.5 Pro, okay? And Google recently released this model, which, as you guys can see right here is pretty, pretty crazy. Okay? You can see that you can take up to one hour of video, 11 hours of audio, 30,000 lines of code, or 700,000 words, and that just like, exceeds any AI system that we've ever seen. And the benchmarks improve on a system that already beat GPT4 in several capabilities. So even if OpenAI didn't want to release this AI system, let's say they wanted to be like, you know what? GPT4 is good enough. We don't want to erode social cohesion anymore. We don't want too many people to lose their jobs. We're just going to leave things where they are. The problem is that there is a race to the bottom because other AI companies are going to do it anyway. So we are in a very bad position. And of course, this is what they call an AI Moloch, which is essentially just a race to the bottom, because if you don't do it, someone else is going to do it. I think that this is going to be something that we do need to have a discussion on because the successor System, which is GPT5, will present a lot of ramifications. So with that being stated, let me know what you think about this statement, of course, the statement is now deleted by the OpenAI employee. And of course many people are stating that this model, this OpenAI, Sora and future models are only going to bring damage to the future of our work. What do you guys think? I think there will be a half and half. I think that whilst yes, AI is going to replace a lot of people, I think that there is going to be so much social unrest due to these AI systems and so much people realizing that, look, my job doesn't matter anymore, that we are going to have a situation where policies are going to change, there's going to be company incentives and things don't actually go as bad as people think they do because essentially governments, legislations, policies and companies and just the social stigma of using AI in your company is going to become so bad that maybe, just maybe, there might be a future where AI isn't actually on top. And of course there was one thing that I did forget, okay? And this is if you're going to take away one thing from this video, and I know this video is likely, but there are a lot of concepts to discuss that do tie in together and this is the point you need to take in. Okay? I promise you guys this tweet, okay? And I, I did make.