OpenAI’s ChatGPT is No Match For Humans...Or Is It?

10 Oct 2024 · 6 min
6:16

A Two Minute Papers video (creator: LARRUZ; speaker: Károly Zsolnai-Fehér) reviews recent papers that pit ChatGPT-based AI agents against human PhDs across many interactive tasks. The video highlights several vignettes: a proteomics anomaly-detection task where AIs identify an outlier protein, a planetary-colonist illness diagnosis traced to mold via simulated lab measurements, and very large-scale particle simulations (3M–10M+ particles). It reports that human PhDs solved an average of 66 tasks in a 120-game benchmark while the AIs solved under ~20% overall, and notes surprising cases where AIs improve on harder task variants. The piece closes by celebrating AlphaFold’s developers (Demis Hassabis and John Jumper) receiving a Nobel Prize.

Questions this video answers

LARRUZ

October 10, 2024

66 tasks (average)

Less than ~20% solved (overall)

More than 3 million particles; examples up to and over 10 million particles.

Chapters

More from LARRUZ

8:49
youtube.com

OpenAI’s New AI Is Doing Things We Barely Understand

3d ago
5:38
youtube.com

DeepSeek Solved AI’s Memory Problem

5d ago
33:17
youtube.com

DeepMind's New AI Just Cracked The Code Of Life

1w ago
3:43
youtube.com

The Billion Dollar AI Advantage Is Disappearing

1w ago
5:14
youtube.com

Claude Opus 5.5 AI: An Incredible Leap Forward

3w ago
5:16
youtube.com

Yes, Jev Is Insane, But There's A Catch

3w ago
5:11
youtube.com

DeepSeek’s Insane New Architecture

4w ago
4:16
youtube.com

Claude Is Now Leaving Invisible Fingerprints In Its Text

1mo ago
9:18
youtube.com

I Never Thought I’d See This Happen

1mo ago
5:22
youtube.com

GPT-6 Astra Changes Everything

1mo ago
4:55
youtube.com

Claude Fable AI Is Much Stranger Than The Headlines Suggest

1mo ago
See all content