Episode 148: Another New Reading Program — Why?
23 Sept 2025 · 17 min
Dr. Kim J. Fields examines multisensory reading programs versus structured phonics. Research shows explicit, systematic phonics has stronger evidence, while multisensory techniques help some struggling readers and those with dyslexia but aren't a universal fix.
Chapters
Are you doing these critical things to help your child succeed academically? Take the quiz now to find out the important actions you can take to enhance your child's education. Go to my website, liberationthrougheducation.com quiz and.
Take the quiz today. Foreign welcome to another episode of K12 Public Education Insights empowering Parents of Color Podcast, the podcast that converges at the intersection of educational research and parental actions. It's about making the trends, topics and theories in public education understandable so that you can implement them into practical, actionable strategies that work for your children. My name is Dr. Kim J. Fields, former corporate manager turned education researcher and advocate, and I'm the host of this podcast. I got into this space after dealing with some frustrating interactions with school educators and administrators, as well as experiencing the microaggressions that I faced as an African American mom raising my two kids who were in the public school system. I really wanted to understand how teachers were trained and and what the research provided about the challenges of the public education system. Once I gained the information and the insights that I needed, I was then equipped to be able to successfully support my children in their educational progress. This battle tested experience is what I provide as action steps for you to take. It's like enjoying a bowl of educational research with a sprinkling of motherwit wisdom on top. If you're looking to find out more about the current information and issues in education that could affect you or your children, and the action steps you can take to give your children the advantages they need, then you're in the right place. Thanks for tuning in today. I know that staying informed about K12 public education trends and topics is important to you. So keep listening. Give me 30 minutes or less and I'll shine a light on the latest trends, tactics and topics pertaining to the constantly evolving K K12 public education environment. Does your child know how to read? Would you consider him or her a good reader? With the ability to read comes knowledge and knowledge is power. Literacy is an invaluable, lifelong tool. There's such a thing now called multisensory reading instruction, where students learn how to map letters to the sounds by tracing A's and B's in sand or doing the same thing using shaving cream on their desk. Students also trace letters in the air or stand up and form the shapes of letters with their bodies. But does this help the child learn to read? In this episode I'll be discussing multi sensory reading instruction, what works and what doesn't, as well as whether it will replace traditional foundational reading instruction. Let's gain some insights from on this. In several reading programs, students incorporate sight, hearing, touch, and movement as they learn to read and spell, but research doesn't conclusively find that this helps students better process and retain information. Some states, including Alabama, California, Florida, Mississippi, and North Dakota, recommend or require it by law for students with dyslexia. The fact is that legislative mandates requiring this type of instruction go beyond what the evidence suggests. The question is, does it really help students learn more or learn to read better? The research on this method is inconclusive. Not surprisingly, as multisensory reading instruction has become a hallmark of the science of reading movement, some teachers and advocates have started to question its necessity, raising questions about programs that feature the techniques, laws that prescribe it, and training that includes it, among other early reading elements. Doing multi sensory things is not necessarily harmful, but relying on those methods and expecting them to make a difference is where the problem lies. The idea is based on theory that adding tactile and moving movement based activities would help students store information better in their memories. However, research suggests that adding in multisensory components doesn't provide a definitive age in reading ability or other forms of explicit systematic instruction compared to foundational skills like phonics. Look at why some researchers felt that the senses of sight, hearing, and touch should be emphasized in the reading and learning process. These researchers felt that blending the activities applied in learning environments with various senses would increase the student's recollection of a subject area to some degree. Therefore, learning environments should be prepared in a way that appeals to many senses. This theoretical approach presumes that it is essential for the census to actively find a place in the educational environment and that the educational process should take into account the student's learning styles. It also presumes that using modern educational approaches in the teaching process for reading would be enhanced by using multi sensory reading activities. Now this sounds good on the surface, but does it apply to students when just using foundational reading instruction would suffice? It's true that multisensory learning is a teaching strategy used to find a place for more than one sense in the educational environments in order to carry out the educational processes of learners. Multisensory learning emphasizes how students will receive information more easily. Focusing on the memory system Having sensory memory allows the reader to remember the beginning of the sentence when it comes to the end of that sentence, as well as enabling the reader to make sense of the entire sentence. Trying to improve a student's reading comprehension with the wrong educational approach and remember, the jury is still out on multisensory reading instruction may negatively affect the learning process. Several researchers indicate that identifying a student's learning style helps to support multi sensory reading instruction. And just so you know, learning style is still a controversial topic in the education research community. In one camp, researchers negate the idea of learning styles, while in the other camp, other researchers indicate that learning styles help the teacher identify how best to present classroom lessons. This second camp believes that success in the reading process, which begins when students enter formal education, will be possible using modern educational approaches and teaching processes. Planning the learning process by considering learning learning styles of students and enriching the learning environments with multi sensory reading activities A study was conducted this year that critiques the use of Alphabetic Phonics, a program that relies on multi sensory reading techniques, because the program contradicts the principles of the structured literacy framework and explicit reading instruction. The fact of the matter is that decades of research confirm that explicit systematic instruction in phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and reading comprehension is essential for developing proficient readers. These are the foundational skills that young learners need to build strong reading skills. Schools should reject market driven programs like multi sensory reading instruction, in particular in this case the alphabetic phonics program that lack scientific validation, and instead invest in practices proving to improve outcomes for all learners, especially those with significant reading difficulties. And let me make something clear. Evidence based interventions are specific instructional programs, curricula, or treatment protocols that are designed to address particular skill deficits or learning needs. Strategies, on the other hand, are individual instructional techniques that can be incorporated within both interventions and practices. Instructional strategies are narrower in scope and are more effective when embedded within an overall instructional approach. So the hierarchy is that strategies operate within interventions which are delivered as part of broader instructional practices. Further, the research based practice refers to an instructional or intervention method that's grounded in theory and potentially supported by studies but has not necessarily undergone the type of rigorous testing required to demonstrate consistent, measurable outcomes in real world settings. Evidence based practices, on the other hand, are broad, well established instructional approaches that have been validated through multiple high quality studies across various settings, populations, and research teams. These practices are grounded in a strong base of scientific evidence demonstrating consistent positive outcomes. Explicit instruction is necessary for effective reading interventions. Explicit instruction is a systematic, direct and structured approach that provides clear guidance in mastering essential skills like reading. Research consistently supports explicit instruction as one of the most effective methods for teaching reading, particularly for students with learning difficulties. Explicit instruction ensures that students receive timely, constructive guidance which accelerates their progress in reading as well as other academic skills. The structured literacy framework utilizes explicit instruction which provides clear modeling, guided practice, and immediate feedback. Explicit instruction ensures that students receive direct guidance and the necessary support they need before before moving to independent practice. Alphabetic phonics, which is a multisensory reading instruction program, falls short in several areas including a lack of timely corrective feedback, a lack of emphasis on direct explicit instruction, and insufficient attention to a focus on phonics. Another issue with alphabetic phonics program is that it assumes students will self correct errors over time rather than receiving immediate corrective feedback. It emphasizes preserving students self esteem over instructional precision. This is not the best way for timely error correction which is critical for struggling readers. The bottom line is is this ensuring that all students have access to effective reading instruction is a matter of educational equity. The continued use of programs lacking scientific support like alphabetic phonics perpetuates achievement gaps and disproportionately affects students with disabilities, English language learners, and those from from historically marginalized communities. The multisensory reading instructional programs may appear student centered in theory but have failed to provide the structured support needed to close literacy gaps in practice. Our children don't need another reading program. They need teachers who are committed to teaching the foundational skill of reading phonics, not whole words or multisensory reading instruction. Without a sustained commitment to evidence based instruction, the reading crisis that has been persistent over the last 20 years will continue to persist and this will leave far too many students without the tools they need for academic achievement, economic opportunity, and full participation in society. Have you had a chance to check.
Out my interactive expert on my website? There are some great conversations and questions going on there. You can check it out at liberation through education.com forward/ask me Anything. Again, check out the questions and conversations happening there at liberation through education.com askmenything.
Multi sensory reading instruction does seem to offer benefits for struggling readers, especially those in the fifth and sixth grades. Students typically learn to read from kindergarten through second grade and read to learn beginning in third grade. When students experience reading difficulties, it can significantly impact their educational experiences in all subjects. As students grow older and continue to struggle, they can get stuck at a certain reading level. To overcome these struggles, students need consistent and engaging word work to build accuracy and fluency. Phonics instruction that is most effective with struggling readers is instruction that is explicit, multi sensory and systematic. Systematic phonics interventions that use visuals and symbolic cues to simplify letter sound correspondence, are less taxing on memory, and try to help struggling readers make more efficient reading gains. Reading success can spur motivation and engagement in phonics activity can foster an enjoyment of reading. The use of word cards and tactile manipulation, as well as word building games and memory gains seem effective for the struggling reading student. In this study that I just discussed, multi sensory reading and phonics instruction also seem to benefit students with dyslexia. The Orton Gillingham approach to reading instruction is a direct, explicit, multisensory, structured, sequential, diagnostic, and prescriptive approach to reading for students with dyslexia. The findings from another research study suggested that the Ordon Gillingham reading intervention did not statistically significantly improve foundational skill outcomes, in other words, phonic awareness, phonics fluency, and spelling. Neither were there significant differences for vocabulary and comprehension outcomes. It seems that more research is needed when looking at the outcomes of multisensory phonics instruction for students with dyslexia. Approximately 85% of public school students in this country identified with a specific learning disability have a primary disability like dyslexia in the area of reading. The National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP reading data demonstrate that students with disabilities persistently perform far below their non disabled peers in reading, with only 32% performing at a basic level and 30% performing above a basic level. The majority of students reading below grade level after second grade require remediation in phonics and reading fluency. The Ordon Gillingham multisensory reading intervention involves the use of sight, hearing, touch, and movement to help students connect and learn the concepts of reading, and it identifies these as the most effective strategy for children with difficulties in learning to read. It employs the use of flashcards, lists, visual cues, and pictures as well as rhymes, songs, finger tracing, writing letters in sand, and finger tapping. What makes the Orden Gillingham reading intervention different is that it simultaneously utilizes visual, auditory, and kinesthetic experiences. The efficacy, however, of the Orden Gillingham instruction remains un unclear based on results of earlier studies. Despite the continued widespread acceptance, use, and support for Ordon Gillingham instruction, there is little evidence to date that these interventions significantly improve reading outcomes for students with dyslexia. Current research does not suggest a high level of confidence that this approach is the only approach to remediating word reading difficulties for dyslexic students. So what can you do with the information I just shared? Here are the action steps you can take regarding multisensory reading instruction. Recently, practitioners, parents, and policymakers have adopted the term open quote science of reading to describe a national movement that advocates for reading instruction that aligns with extensive scientific research that's been conducted over several decades and disciplines. As a parent, it's important that you know that there is little consensus in in education, practice and research around multisensory reading instruction. The fact of the matter is that there is no universal definition of this type of instruction beyond the simultaneous use of visual, auditory, and tactile learning experiences during reading and spelling instruction. The main idea for you to keep in mind is that the integration of phonics and spelling instruction improves student reading. Effective literacy instruction in general involves all of the reader's senses anyway, the visual and auditory experiences of seeing and reading words aloud and the tactile experiences of writing letters and words. What you can do is to keep reading to your child every day and when they are old enough to read by themselves, provide the resources and the designated space for them to practice their reading skills daily. And because reading requires a lot of coordination mentally and physically, the optimal allotted time to practice reading is only 20 minutes per day, every day. This episode was mostly about making you aware of a new reading program, the multisensory reading instruction Program. You can check at your child's school as to whether your child's teacher is implementing this, but I want you to keep this main that in mind. Learning to read is based on phonics. Simply put, here are this episode's takeaways. The reading process is both the sensory process that depends on certain visual skills, such as such as the identification of symbols and the perceptual process that involves interpretation of what is sensed. Reading instruction that has overwhelmingly proven effective uses the teaching of phonics. This method is effective for all students. However, students who struggle to read may need the intervention of multisensory reading reading instruction. Multi sensory reading instruction is a way of teaching reading that requires students to activate all of their senses seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, moving, touching, thinking. In the process of learning to read, researchers documented some benefits of multisensory reading instruction for struggling students, especially those in the fifth and sixth grades, and for students with dyslexia. Although some parent advocate groups have led the charge for state legislators to require multisensory reading instruction in all schools, the research doesn't supply ample evidence that multi sensory reading instruction is appropriate for every student. What has worked and what will continue to work is phonics instruction. For a deeper dive on my discussion about the importance of phonics in learning to read, check out episode 60, reading and early childhood literacy, and episode 112, why teaching kids how to Read Is still being debated. What are your thoughts on using multisensory reading instruction to teach kids how to read? Let me know what you're thinking about this by leaving me a text comment on my podcast website, k12education insights.buzzroute.com here's how you can leave a text comment. Go to the episode description page and click on the Send me a text message link. Again, it's k12educationinsights.buzzsprout.com if you enjoyed this episode, why not listen to another episode from my library? It could take as little as 15 minutes of your day. And remember, new episodes come out every Tuesday. And before I forget, would you do me a favor? Go online right now and share this episode with one friend who you think will love it. Thanks for listening today. Be sure to come back for more insights on K12 educational topics that impact you and your children. Until next time, aim to learn something new every day.
Love my show. Consider being a regular subscriber. You can subscribe for as little as $3 per month. Just go to HTTPs://forward/tinyurl.com forward/podcast support there's no contractual obligation. You can cancel at any time. If you choose to subscribe, I'll give you a special shout out thanking you in an upcoming episode. Remember, that's 8ttps://forward/tinyurl.com podcast support to subscribe.
More from Dr.
Episode 151: From Storytime to Science — How Kids’ Podcasts Boost Listening, Curiosity, and Family Learning