Enterprise AI Has Changed... (and nobody realized)

Marc Chabot argues enterprise AI has shifted from static task automation to self-improving agent ecosystems. Most deployments stall because agents generate valuable signals about edge cases and gaps that get logged and forgotten. His product Force Equals captures these signals, prioritizes them, builds fixes, and redeploys enhanced agents automatically while maintaining compliance.
Chapters
Enterprise AI has changed and nobody realized. After putting AI to work across hundreds of enterprise projects, I've seen enterprise AI completely change over just the last few months in a way almost nobody has noticed yet. For years, an AI agent just meant automating one task in one part of the business in one workflow, saving you a little time, and you run that same agent forever is the goal. But a small group of companies are figuring out how to build AI that keeps getting better on its own, taking over more and more of their work every month, providing more capabilities until huge parts of their operations are fully automated, all while being in control and operating in safe, compliant ways. That's why today I'm gonna show you exactly how enterprise AI has changed and how the most successful companies are now using it to get way more done without hiring more people. Let's get into it. At an enterprise, you've got dozens or even hundreds of AI agents running across every team, and almost every one of them follows the same path once it goes live. You drop one into a workflow, it starts handling the work, and you see solid returns. Fewer hours spent, faster turnaround, and money saved. But that's about as far as it goes because the agents keep doing the same job and never takes on any more work. So a year later it's working, but is it optimized? Is it missing something? Has something else changed that's impacting the performance? Does it need maintenance? What could be improved? The agent is giving you the signals, but it's not changing. And the reason it's not improving has nothing to do with the agent doing a bad job. It's that it can't change itself. But still, every day it's live, it comes across things nobody planned for, like a situation it doesn't have a rule for, a step in a process that clearly isn't working, or a whole new task you never even realized you could automate. And those are some of the most valuable things the agent gives you. Those are the signals that can deliver incremental impact for your business. More valuable potentially than the work that you originally built it to do because each agent shows you exactly where your next improvement could and should be. But at almost every enterprise, all that just gets lost. The agent finds something useful, it shows up in an audit log, those signals appear in runtime so they don't get logged in a dashboard somewhere. Maybe it comes up once in a monthly review after an escalation, and then everybody forgets about it. So the agent keeps running, it keeps finding these same useful things, and they all fall out of focus, which is exactly why you don't get more and more value out of your agents over time. So with that said, the teams whose AI agents keep improving are the ones that stop letting everything their agents find get logged and just forgotten. They catch everything their agents run into and put that straight into a process to build the next improvement. Let's take one example of how that actually plays out. Say one of your agents handles vendor approvals, and while it's running, it keeps running into the same situation it doesn't have a rule for, like a type of vendor it isn't sure how to deal with. Should they be treated the same or should they be treated differently? But this time, instead of getting logged and forgotten, that problem gets captured. Full context is captured. What happened, how it was resolved, if it created an escalation, to whom it got escalated, and what their decision and subsequent actions were to resolve this situation. And the system checks whether it's important enough to fix right now. Is addressing this in alignment with company strategy? Is doing it worth the effort? Is there already a current project that is already addressing this issue? Should it be prioritized in favor of other ideas that are also being considered right now? If it is a priority, it becomes a project your team plans out and then builds. It could be a small change to a guardrail rule, fix to one of your agents, or it could be building multiple agents for a whole new workflow category. When the plan is developed and approved, you deploy it. Then that improvement goes live and now the agent guardrail or process is better. Now what is the next signal? The next thing your agents run into that's even a more advanced problem than the last one. And every time that feedback loop runs, it moves faster and the incremental improvements stack up and the impact gets bigger. A better agent runs into better problems to solve. Better problems turn into bigger improvements. So your AI estate gets better and more valuable each time it runs. Now, running a feedback loop like this across hundreds of agents manually is basically impossible, which is why I built Force Equals. It connects to every one of your agents no matter what platform they run on and catches the signals for every problem they run into. Then it runs that entire feedback loop in one place. So each problem gets turned into a potential project, the fix gets built, and it goes right back to improve the workflow. So let me show you what happens to one of those findings from the moment the agent catches it to the fix going back out to improve the agent ecosystem. All right, this screen shows everything my agents have run into across every part of our platform, across all of the custom agents, all in one place. And here are the associated opportunities for improvement. So here Force Equals is looking at how important this problem actually is right now based on your unique business strategy and the expected impact and costs of this particular change or deployment. Force Equals agents automatically expand context build business cases, risk analysis, stakeholder mapping, requirements recommendations. And because it's high enough on the priority list, it gets a go signal from the AI agents in the Planning solution versus a no-go recommendation if it doesn't rise to level of high priority. And with a go signal, it turns into a project right next to everything else your team's already working on. So you can shift resources and address this in relation to all the other work that your team's doing to improve improve your systems. And from there, it gets planned and built, and the fix goes straight back to update the agent or to add a new process, agent capability, or improve the workflow. The next time that situation comes up, the improved system handles it. By the way, if you want to run the same process for your own AI agents, you can try Force Equals for free by clicking the first link in the description. Anyway, let's keep going. Now, the part that makes this more than just a nice process is the memory. Every time one of your agents runs into a problem and it gets solved, all of it gets saved. What the problem was, how it got fixed, who signed off on it. So the system slowly builds up a memory of how your specific business actually solves its problems, and the system helps you get more and more efficient in that process every time it runs. The memory makes you faster the longer you run it. The first time a new kind of problem shows up might take you and your team 3 days to figure it out. By the 10th time, the system already knows exactly where it needs to go, how to handle it. So the same scale of a problem that took 3 days in month 1 takes maybe 3 minutes, 30 minutes by month 6. Your competitive differentiator is your ability to adapt and change faster than your competition. In the area of agents and AI, the faster you can change is your competitive advantage. If you're able to capture signals, prioritize them, act against them, and deploy better systems and more capabilities faster than your competition, you win. If you have the architecture to enable you to do this with your AI agent investment, you deliver results and impact, and you can dominate your industry. So the companies that beat their competition aren't the ones with the most AI agents deployed. They're ones who have the infrastructure that learns how their business actually works, and they have a system to continuously learn and improve their agent. So if you want your agents running like this, where everything they flag gets built back in and your AI keeps improving on its own, you can try Force Equals for free by clicking the first link in the description. Once it's running, you stop losing all the important data and signals your agents get for you, and every month you'll get a little better. Your agents will get a little better. Your guardrails will get a little better, be a little more efficient every month. You'll add new capabilities every month. You'll gain more and more control, visibility of your Agentek estate. So again, you can try this out with Force Equals for free by clicking the first link in this video. If you want to make sure you're keeping all your agents under control as you're adding more of them, then watch this video.










