This empirical study (Rosete & Ciarrochi) tests whether an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence (MSCEIT V2.0) predicts leadership effectiveness among 41 senior executives in an Australian Public Service organization. Participants completed MSCEIT, 16PF personality inventory and WASI (IQ); leadership was assessed via objective performance-management ratings ("what" and "how") and a 360° multi-rater (PELC). Main findings: higher EI — specifically the perceiving-emotion branch — correlated with and incrementally predicted the “how” (leadership behaviour) ratings over personality and IQ; MSCEIT scores were largely distinct from 16PF personality factors and modestly correlated with IQ.

Questions this document answers

41 executives

149 raters (approximately 3.6 subordinates per executive on average)

Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) Version 2.0

Personality: 16PF (16 Personality Factor Questionnaire); Cognitive ability: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI)

Received February 2004; Revised September 2004; Accepted February 2005

More from Dr

PDF

Strengths Development Inventory SDI Overview.pdf

2mo ago
PDF

SDI and ECR Full Critical Comparison.pdf

2mo ago
PDF

EDUCATION _ SOCIETY_FULL VERSIONEmotional Intelligence and Emotional Labour- A Comparison Study Usin.pdf

2y ago
PDF

A_critical_evaluation_of_the_role_of_emo.pdf

2y ago
PDF

A_meta_analysis_of_emotional_intelligenc.pdf

2y ago
PDF

Case Study Sky.pdf

2y ago
PDF

Clinical_Perspectives_in_Emotional_Intel-2.pdf

3y ago
See all content