A buyer facing job loss and personal hardship asks for 30 to 60 days to close. The seller explains they'd need to evict the current tenant, clean the animal-damaged house, and re-rent it before selling, which creates a timeline conflict between what the buyer needs and what the property requires.
Chapters
So if I understood, if I understand, if we were to buy this, something works out, you would want— just kind of best case scenario, what the hell would you be looking for? Because obviously we have to work together. I lost my job, lost my wife, lost everything. So 30 days, it's gonna be difficult. Yeah, I get it. You don't have to be upset with me. Like, I'm not upset, but you don't have to— like, like, I totally get that you're in a tough situation. It's not, um, something I'll do what I can, and I will work. However I can, and I will work with whoever, however, whatever. 30, 60 days at tops, I would say, that would be good.
If I were to buy this property and not flip it but keep it as a rental, I definitely would have to evict the tenant. Not even evict the tenant because he seems like he'd be cool to go out, but I'd give him like 30 to 60 days to move out and clean it up and then rent to someone else. I would not keep him as a tenant because obviously the condition of the home is in the way it is because of the way— how many animals he has. It's just not in good shape.