In this brief commentary, the speaker evaluates a range of occupations for their vulnerability to AI automation, assigning each a numeric safety rating from 1 (most at risk) to 9 (least at risk). Doctors receive a 4, with the speaker arguing that failing to use AI for diagnosis could be malpractice. Personal trainers get a 2, emphasizing that AI cannot provide the physical push needed at the gym. Lawyers score an 8, noting that much of their work has already been automated. Politicians are rated a 1, described as a necessary evil with little protection from AI. Graphic designers receive the highest rating of 9, highlighted as the primary use case for AI image‑generation tools like Manus and Perplexity. Teachers are placed at a 6, indicating moderate impact. Nurses also get a 2, praised for their hands‑on care. Finally, electricians are given a 1, but the speaker points out that those willing to relocate can earn $300k‑$500k by working in data centers, suggesting a lucrative AI‑related niche.
