Rob Greenlee argues that human mistakes and authentic emotions are irreplaceable by AI. He points to a flawed snippet from the All In podcast as proof of trustworthiness, and questions whether audiences could tell the difference between a real host and an AI version of himself.
the human emotions part and experiences are really irreplaceable. They are not something that AI is going to easily replace. Like just an example of what happened here, I was playing that video and if it was AI, it would be perfect, right? It would not have played a snippet from the All In podcast. That's a human mistake that's authentic to humans, right? And that'll also be a sign that this is trustworthy content. It's real. Like I'm doing this real for you. Is AI, and this is a question I wanna pose to all of you, is AI going to do live programs like I just did or what I'm doing right now? I don't know that maybe it will get to that point where I could actually do this show as an AI virtual Rob Greenlee. Right? I could cover the same topics. I could tell it what to do. I could tell it to play a video at a certain point in the content and it wouldn't be me, but it would still be live, right? So how do we differentiate this? How do we work through these differences? And, but is the AI ever really gonna have that deep emotion, that nuance? That genuine empathy for all of you out there. And I don't know, I mean, I think it's maybe still a little bit up in the air about how this is going to turn out.
Future-proofing with Delphi AI/Human clones: your podcast as a personal LLM | New Media Show
How sports reveal what AI spectacle gets wrong #Technology #Sports #Commentary
