Navigating Your Business with the Clarity Compass: A Guide to Success Roland Frasier and Ryan Deiss
2 Feb 2026 · 34 min
Podcast episode (Business Lunch) featuring Roland Frasier and Ryan Deiss discussing how founders can preserve company vision through succession by scaling and codifying decision-making. They introduce the "Clarity Compass" — a one-page decision filter with four checks (business case / three-year target, customer/purpose case, company values, and strategic anchors) — and show how to apply it (e.g., Blockbuster vs. Netflix). They recommend quarterly sprint planning, handing the compass to a leadership team, monitoring results via board/90-day reviews, and either building or acquiring missing capabilities. The episode closes with a promotional pitch for an acquisition program (Epic Deal Fast Track).
Chapters
If we do this thing, is it actually going to move us closer to our stated goal and objective? What is the business case for doing it? That's the first question you got to ask. That's the North Star. Now a lot of people will say, oh no, your North Star really should be, you know, your company purpose and the vision and your reason why. And I'm not saying that that isn't important, but if something could align perfectly to like your, your company purpose and mission, but if there's no business case for it, then you shouldn't do it.
How much more successful would you be if you had lunch once a week with insanely successful EntrePR who share their biggest secrets on how they think and achieve success? Grab your seat at the table because this is Business Lunch with Roland Frazier and Ryan Deiss. Welcome to another episode of Business Lunch. And today's a snackable episode with Roland where he's going to get into some more tactical strategies that you can start using to live a rich and happy life. If this is the first snackable episode you're hearing, I'd encourage you to go back and listen to some of the other episodes that Roland has put out. And if you want to get notified every time we release a new episode, go to the new businesslunchpodcast.com website and we'll send you detailed notes along with every episode. That's businesslunchpodcast.com www.businesslunchpodcast.com and you can sign up for the free email newsletter where you'll be able to get all the highlights and resources from the episodes.
Hey everybody. Roland Frazier and Ryan Deiss here with another episode of Business Lunch. And we're back from the new year. This is our first one that we are recording after the New Year. Ryan, how's your new year starting out for you?
It was great. It is great to be back. It's always nice to take extended breaks. I don't know about you though. The holidays for me are fricking exhausting. They're so exhausting. It's like waves of family crashing on my home and it just, I love them all. It is so nice when everybody's gone and I can just get back to normal. So it is great. Exhausting. What about you?
I am. I have less family because because of the non4kids part. So that like that alone to me like just your home front without any extra family is probably pretty chaotic. But Dagon, it's fun to watch kids that, especially younger kids around the holidays. It's just it is kind of a. A special magical time. I really like that. And I saw a documentary that captured it very well that was created by Will Ferrell and Ryan Reynolds called Spirited. And it was, it was quite good. It was a documentary done in a bit of a musical format. They may have taken some artistic license.
Yeah.
With the, you know, reality. But I thought it was pretty accurate.
Good day, sir. Yes, good afternoon. I'm sorry. Good afternoon.
Good afternoon.
Good afternoon. Yeah, it was good.
If you guys haven't watched that Spirited, it was actually pretty cool. I would, I would check it out.
I'm.
God, I gotta believe it's like super discounted right now. Right. Just like Christmas trees and Christmas ornaments and things like that. It's like Christmas specials.
It's probably just like on Netflix and you can just watch it. Yeah, watch it for free. But yeah, my guess is you'll be like the one person watching it if you watch it around the time this episode drops. Speaking of Netflix, everybody's over being Spirited.
Speaking of Netflix, I was shocked to read this morning that Reed Hastings has stepped down as the co CEO after 20 years plus of shaping the vision of Netflix. That was kind of interesting to see.
Did you see? Yeah, I saw it. I didn't get to read any of the details about it. I mean, it kind of makes sense, right? I mean, he's been there for a while. I think you've got to acknowledge that Netflix is entering, you know, a different season, as a lot of companies do, where it's no longer about kind of establishing what's the business model going to be and you know, the vision of the company. I mean, it's pretty now set. It kind of, this happens with a lot of companies and you sort of at this point need to bring in the bankers a little bit and just say, we're going to be a very profitable company. We saw it happen at Microsoft. Google is going through that right now. I'm kind of surprised. Amazon, I'm sorry, Facebook isn't, but same deal with Amazon. Right. And so I'm not surprised. Is Zuckerberg 30 yet?
I mean, you know.
Yeah, I don't know. He's just cruising for a bruising either way. I mean, he just seems like, um, he can just take all the, the, the beatings that come his way. I don't, I don't know if that makes him, if he's going to go down in history as like the greatest CEO of all time or like just someone who is a, just an utter masochist. But you got to respect it. But no, I'm not surprised that, that Reed Hastings, you know, would step down, especially as just the climate and the environment. Like, if you've been doing this for a while, do you really want to go and into another economic cycle like the one we're going through? I don't know. I'm not surprised.
I would love. I know we didn't schedule to talk about this today, but I would love to take a minute to talk about it. So if you think about some of the things that you mentioned and I mentioned, so you've got Netflix, one of the top tech companies, quite the visionary running that. Reed Hastings stepping down. You had Gates stepped out years ago from Microsoft and, and some of the other folks that we mentioned as well. But you've also, you know Bezos, right? You've also got people that are still in, like Warren Buffett and that are big, big, big personalities and Elon Musk, big personality. You mentioned Zuckerberg as well. And I think what people who are watching or listening might really enjoy is kind of thinking about how do you take the vision that you've got and transfer that into the culture of the company so that hopefully the culture survives because you have people like Sarah Blakely at Spanx, that was founder, CEO, tried to find somebody, brought somebody in, didn't work out, came back in. You've got Apple with Jobs, let's professionalize and bring in Scully long ago, right? And then things didn't work out and he came back and rescued. Or is it Howard Schultz from Starbucks who handed over the reins for a few years and then had to come back and rescue the company? What do you think the difference is? Or the essential qualities that the people that do this successfully to transfer kind of the reins over and not have to come back in and rescue. Have you ever thought about that? Because I think it'd be kind of interesting to talk about. I think that like everybody who's an entrepreneur, I think, has a dream of some future point where they've hit that number that they want or whatever and they can, they can get their life back effectively. But how do you set that up to happen? And we know that if you're going to sell your company, it's going to be worth a whole lot more if you can do that. But you also see, we had a friend that we talked about that sold to a private equity company. The private equity company paid a ton of money for the company, and then he came back in just basically two or three years later and bought it for I Think a little over $200,000. And that help happens frequently. I've seen that a lot lately. What do you think is the thing that everybody who is here in the audience or the things that they should be thinking about to maintain a true legacy of the vision that's created, the success in their company?
I think it comes down to really scaling decision making, if you're going to sum it up. And it's kind of. And I want to make sure that we simplify this without being overly simplistic to the. The point that it's no longer accurate or helpful. Because there's. Obviously the answer is a lot, right? There's a lot that goes into it. But I think that what we're really trying to pass down as founders, entrepreneurial leaders, what we would really like to have happen is for kind of the framework that we pass ideas and opportunities through our own framework, our own way of thinking, we would sort of like to leave that as an asset, that others would also kind of pass it through this same framework and these same filters for as long as it really becomes helpful. And I think very often we will leave values and we might even leave some semblance of what somebody might call a culture, whatever that really means. And there's lots of definitions of that. But what isn't left behind is a framework for decision making. And so I know when we're working with founders, board members, one of the last things that we do, because I think it's one of the most important things to automate, is how do you automate and scale decision making? Because I think at, you know, at the end of the day, companies are going to scale at the rate of good decisions. Like, period, that's companies going to scale at the rate of good decision making. And so the question that I think to ask is, well, how do good. How are good decisions made? And if as a leader, an entrepreneur, a founder, you have a company that's grown, it's probably because you've made pretty consistently good decisions. And when you've been wrong, you saw that it was wrong, ran it back through a decision filter and. And found that, yeah, it wasn't. Here's where I was off a little bit. And so I believe we teach it comes down to four areas, and I can kind of talk through all four of those if you want to, and maybe it'll help some folks out. You think that's good?
Yeah, let's do it. In the context of launching a new product that we think will help us be competitive against some of the upstarts that are coming up that might be a little bit of a threat to us that we've identified that we also want to be careful not to become a me too product. Like I just, you know, hey, everybody's doing it, let's do it. So we end up in a race to the bottom. Let's do it in that framework so that maybe people can say, you know, okay, well maybe I'm not launching a new product but I'm thinking about selling or I'm thinking about a key hire or I'm thinking about an investment in this or a redirect or something like that. Then we can give some context around the model and say how we would approach each of the aspects of it. Is that sound good?
Yeah, I love it. Because I mean all these things, I mean you're right. Whether it's making a key hire or should we pursue the strategic partnership, should we launch this new division or product line, all of these are the kinds of decisions that make and break companies. You know, should we update our branding even? Like there's some things like that. So yeah. So in my experience. And if you're. Oh, sorry, go ahead.
Before we start, I'd just like to say because this is being recorded, you know, relatively soon into the new year, we're coming up on February as we record this of 23. The like, one thing that, that I look at as a pre decision filter so that I know what I'm even going to focus on at all is what are the things that I no longer want to do? What are the things that worked well that I'm excited about and I think hold the biggest prospect for getting me closer to my ultimate things? I want my goals and I double down on those and then what are the things that I don't want to let go of because they are supporting me in moving towards the things I'm doubling down on and I generally dial those back by 50%. So it's kind of a, in. In the pre decision sorting hat kind of way. It's like this. These things I don't enjoy and they don't take me towards my goal or I enjoy and they don't and they don't take me towards my goal, they're gone. The things that I enjoy that are moving me towards my goals I'm doubling down on and then to free more time up, I'm also going to cut in half. The things that I don't want to let go, but I would otherwise probably let go that are helping me support Fund have the relationships, whatever to support the doubling down. And so I think that can be a helpful starting point to just say, you know, where like I can take all these things and just move them out of the way. These things I'm going to shrink down a little bit and these things I'm going to expand on and then apply that filter to that. What are your thoughts about that?
Yeah, I mean, so when we're again working with founders, board members, other clients to, to kind of map, we call it a clarity compass. And so if you want to visualize a compass with a north, a south and east and a west, for us, the North Star, the north point is just, is it going to get us closer to our three year target? So what is our goal? What is our business objective? And I think this is so important and it aligns with everything you just said, right? If we do this thing, is it actually going to move us closer to our stated goal and objective? What is the business case for doing it? So that's the first question you got to ask. That's the North Star. Now a lot of people will say, oh no, your North Star really should be, you know, your company purpose and the vision and your reason why. And I'm not saying that that isn't important. But if something could align perfectly to like your, your company purpose and mission, but if there's no business case for it, then you shouldn't do it.
Right.
There's enough opportunities out there. So the first thing kind of the north is just what's our, you know, what's our three? For us, a three year target. But just what's your business goal that you want to achieve? That's kind of the first filter. Is it going to get us closer to that? If the answer is yes, then we're going to say, okay, does this align to our company purpose? And company purpose. I think that speaks a bit to what you were alluding to as well. So the company purpose could just be what really gets us excited in the morning, what makes us want to jump out of bed. What is the kind of that galvanizing force that, that thing that draws, you know, talent to us, that, that excites our customer base, that gets us excited. That is more the customer case. So what we're balancing there is the business case and the customer case. And that's where it begins. And that's kind of that, that north, south and you know, really your purpose should be pushing you towards your goal. But I think anytime we're evaluating just about anything, those are the two initial filters, does it get us closer to what we want? Which incidentally assumes that you know what you want. So you have to do that. You've got to do the work of that.
Yeah, totally different thing.
And it also needs to assume that you've in some way codified your, your, your company purpose. You know, your. Simon Sinek calls it your why. So let's assume that's there. Those are the first two filters. Now, that's pretty table stakes, right? That's pretty basic level stuff. Where companies get off the mark, especially when the visionary founder leaves, is they either begin behaving in a way that no longer aligns with the company's core values. And look, core values, everybody's heard about them. Most companies have them, but most of us don't use it as a framework for decision making. And so a simple question to ask is, okay, great. Yep, we believe this is going to get us close to our company goals. Yep, it aligns with our company purpose. But is this going to cause us to behave in a way that is, you know, outside of our values? And that doesn't necessarily have to mean that. That doesn't have to mean that you're like violating law or doing anything immoral. But like, I know there's plenty of companies, like take Southwest Airlines, which, they've had their own fair share of issues as of this recording, but they had one of their values is fun. Right. So if they were going to take on a project, a key initiative, a new product line that wasn't fun at all, and there was no way to inject fun into it, there could be nothing immoral or unethical about it. But if it's not fun or if it's not, you know, low cost, then it would be a violation of their values. And so that's kind of the third filter. That's. We kind of plot that on the, you know, on the east side and then west. And this is the part that everybody forgets about, us included. And when I think about when we've really screwed up, right? When we've, you know, taken on a project that was like, that was a bad call, it's when it violated one of our strategic anchors. And strategic anchors are just kind of a fancy pants word for what are your competitive advantages? Right? What is that set, that collection of actions and activities and resources that when combined, reinforce some true competitive advantage. These are the things that you're truly better at than your competition. And I think it's also important to know, what do you suck at? What Are your anti anchors. And so when businesses get off track, it's when they violate. And I've seen this happen more times than not, they're like, yep, it gets close to our goals. Yep. It aligns with our company purpose. We're excited, we're juiced. No issues with the values, let's do it. And they don't ask the question. Yeah, but are we playing to a known strength or are we potentially playing to a known weakness? That's the part that they don't consider. And you see this, especially when founders leave and there's nobody there to say, hey, we don't actually know how to do that. That's not actually baked into the DNA of what we do. And so it doesn't mean that you can't do that. It just means that you need to acknowledge that anchor doesn't exist. So we either need to develop it, which can happen through training, through hiring the right consultants, it can happen through hiring the right people, or we can acquire it. Maybe we need to do an aqua hire. Maybe we just need to go out and buy it and acquire that component. But in my experience personally and watching our clients, when bad decisions get made and when companies start to kind of, you know, go down a little bit, it's because they violate one of those four areas. They either over index to the business case and forget the customer case. They over index to values and forget strategic anchors or something in between. So we have, anytime there's a meeting, these are all plotted for us on a worksheet, a single, like one page worksheet. We call it a Clarity compass. And at any meeting, anytime a question comes up, if somebody's like, should we do this? My question is always, have we run it through our clarity compass yet? And we have a discussion about it. And when you have a team who is using that in making decisions as you would or better, because they've got your way of thinking and they also have their context, that's when I think it's safe to step away. And you can do it with context. Without that, I think it's really dangerous.
Yeah, I think it's, it's. I remember the interviews with Steve Jobs talking about when he was stepping down and Tim Cook was coming in and he, he did it interestingly. Is it Eve's. I forget his last name. That was the designer guy that he worked with so much, but it was basically Johnny.
I've, I think it's, it's, I think it's, I've. But I've also heard it pronounced Eves.
So Steve had really been the driving vision for the company and then passed it down to two people that he had been with for years and years and years who he had helped them to completely understand his Clarity Compass for Apple and participate in it to the extent that he would allow that because he was pretty, pretty direct guy and knew what he wanted. But I thought it was, I think that's a good example that we can use because when you have a tool like Clarity Compass and that is helping to document the process and really pull together some disparate things like values and goals and such, that then having the ability to transfer the documented process to the key people who are going to be the successors is so critical. And I thought it was his example to me is really interesting because there wasn't one person that could do that because Apple was is a combination of amazing style and design, which is a completely different set of personality traits than the person who is like I got the numbers and I've got the, the, you know, I guess the more of the qu. It's kind of a qualitative and quantitative side in that case. And so for you guys that are thinking about how do I potentially step away from the company and hopefully not have to come back to it to rescue it like so many people have, how do I make investments that are good and don't make the mistakes that private equity makes pretty regularly where they make a big investment and then it's worth a fraction later and the founders come back and buy it back again. That having the process of a documenting it like we do in the scalable operating system for our founders, board people and such through Clarity Compass and some of the other tools there and pick the people who are aligned with the skills that you feel are going to be necessary and complementary to your Clarity Compass. Because if you don't have buy in on your vision there, then from the people who are going to take over, they're going to get off course. And keep in mind that like it's the little tiny initial off courses that can have over time a significant variance from the place that you ultimately wanted to go. And so the buy in, the documentation followed by the careful selection of the people who have the character traits that will be complementary to the process and values, followed by time investing in those people to bring them along and merge the Clarity Compass that you have created for the company with the values and experience of those other people. And then a monitoring system to be sure that you stay on course. Because a compass keep in mind is Always pointing in the direction of north, ideally. Right. So what is it, tools wise, process wise, Ryan, that you think is best for helping people once they've got all those three things that we just talked about in place to stay on track?
Well, so from a practical thing, what we do, we're still doing quarterly Sprint planning, you know, quarterly strategic planning. And so once a quarter, I'm going to get, you know, have a really good look at what are the things and the decisions that are being made. Even if, because it's at the quarterly Sprint planning meetings where the key initiatives, those main projects for that quarter are going to be selected, the theme is going to be selected. So it's pretty easy even if I don't attend that meeting and I'm not sitting in the quarterly Sprint plans of all of the businesses that are in our portfolio. But it's easy enough if I've got the Clarity Compass to know, did they actually use the Clarity Compass to inform these key initiatives, or am I looking at and saying, like, this key initiative does not align with the strategic anchor? This key initiative, I'm really worried about it. So that's an easy way to do it. Every 90 days. It's really, though, where it's going to show up over time is in performance. It is going to show up over time in performance. Now, you don't want it to get that bad, but at some point when you step away, you're not checking in every 90 days. You know, you're just not. But if you can see that the company is not growing as fast as it should, if it's no longer hitting its goals, that's almost always going to have something to do with the decisions that are being made. And so to look at what decisions are being made, what are we doing and why, and then to just remind everybody, are we going through this? That's where it's going to show up. It's going to show up in results. If you want to be more proactive in the beginning while you're doing the handoff, because I love what you said, you don't hand this off to one person. You're going to hand this off to a leadership team. And then what needs to happen is you're there leading the team, you're driving that in. And eventually you might replace yourself with an operator or bring in another CEO. You take what we call exit number three, you're exiting the org chart, you're sitting on the board. And so perhaps once a quarter, when you're doing your board meeting, you can evaluate Results. And if you see that the results are off, ask what decisions were made or not made. And then if you find that they're actively referring to the Clarity Compass, you know they're using it. If they're not, they're like, oh, we, we felt like we needed to do it because the competition did it. That's, that's not how we make decisions here. We don't make decisions to keep up competition. Yeah. And it is the reason that a lot of companies get off track. That's, it's why they're in reactive mode, not strategic mode. The Clarity Compass keeps it strategic.
So let's run. Now, you can assume the Clarity Compass of your choice, but let's look at the process now of the two people who are key members of the team have come to us and said, hey, there's a couple of people, there's a couple of companies that are doing some things that we think are going to be where the future is for our product or service. And we feel that it's a threat that we should address. We believe that we should launch some new products to compete with that. Now, in that fact pattern, what do we do to actually be sure that that's the right decision?
Yes, I think step one is great. Love it. Is this going to get us closer to our company goals? Because our goal is not simply to just chase the competition or do what they do. You know, we've established our own goals and our goals are going to be stated in terms of revenue, profitability and total enterprise value. Right. So from a numbers perspective, does doing this get us close to our goals? Yes or no. And the answer could be, you know, yeah, it's certainly. Yeah, okay, great. Amazing. Does it align with our company's stated purpose? So, you know, we've got, you know, our company purpose is to, you know, have this, you know, to produce this result on behalf of our customers. And so the company purpose is always stated in a customer centric type way. So by implementing this, is it going to be good for our customers? Is it something they want?
So let's see how this would have worked for the Blockbuster board when Netflix was upstarting and doing this direct mail DVD rental business. But we're in the retail store. Video cassette and DVDs aren't really a thing yet. But, but my goodness, there's a ton of demand for our, our VHS tape rentals. We look at that and we say, well, these guys came maybe, you know, it's like this upstart Reid came to us, you know, who Works within our Blockbuster company and said that there's these other people doing this, this DVD thing and we should, we should do it too. If we do, could make us some money, way less money than we're making from our retail stores. How would we know or could we that that might be the right move?
So again there's the business case. Do we feel this will drive growth? You know, let's assume the answer is yes, we did before. Now we're going to go to the customer case. And there lies, I think the problem that most businesses have and make the mistake they make is they define themselves by the way they sell their product or service, not the people they sell. They either define themselves by the thing they sell or the way they sell it, not the who they serve. So if Blockbuster defines themselves as we are a retailer like we are a retail brick and mortar renter of entertainment, like that is what we do. We're not defining ourselves by the people we serve. We're defining, Yep, our business model is we're retail. So they might say well no, it doesn't align with our model. Right. Well wait, wait, that's not the question we're asking. We're asking what's the customer case? And let's say that at Blockbuster what we want to provide is the best entertainment at the fairest price as conveniently as possible. I'm not saying that that was theirs, I don't know. But you could argue at one point in time that if you've got this multi location model, I can be anywhere, you know, it's a safe clean environment then. And if that's what it is, I'd say this checks all those boxes at an even better level.
Right.
Not only like should we do, I would argue we must do this because it aligns with our company purpose. It's the next phase of our company purpose. It's going to be hard. I don't know what this means for a retail but again we don't define our business by what we sell or the way we sell it. We define it by the by who we serve. And this is what they're going to want because this is the same, this is all those things but better. So we got to talk about yes, it passes the second test, right? It passes the yes test.
I'm sorry, we got the financial goal test, then we have the values test. And then what else?
Well we got the purpose test. So the business case and the customer case. Now we've got the values test. So is there any deviation from our core values Again, I don't know blockbusters, what their core values were. Let's say one of them was innovation, which a lot of companies are. They'd be like, yep, this is innovating. I don't know if it is maybe the value a lot of them say.
A few of them consumer.
I know, right? And so. And I also believe that value should. Should speak to behavior, but that's a different kind of animal. So let's say it passes the values test. Then we go over to strategic anchors, right? And it's like, what is Blockbuster strategic anchors? Well, let's say one of them is they've got deals with all the movie studios. Because they did, right? They had direct deals with the movie studios. They got access first, so that's one of them. The second one is their retail presence and footprint. The third might be brand go. All in all, and one thing that you won't find likely is, is rental by mail or any type of online streaming wasn't really a factor at this point. So let's keep it simple. So they might look at it and go, we got a real problem here, right? Because we don't know how to do this. It's not one of our strategic anchors. But if you're a good leader, saying it doesn't fit does not mean an immediate no. Then you must ask. You need to ask the question, okay, what would need to be true for this to be a yes? Because it fits the other three. So it's a worthy endeavor, but we don't enter into it blindly. You're stupid to ignore it because you don't know how to do it, but you're also foolish to just dive into it headfirst because you think you should, and you're just that noble and good, right? No, it passed the first three. It didn't pass the fourth. It's something we should do now. Can we. What must be true so that we're able to do that? And I think looking back on it, the obvious answer was buy Netflix, right?
Which they had the opportunity to do and said no.
It was probably the obvious answer.
Yeah, yeah, buy it. That question, to me is one of the most powerful questions that you can ask. What would have to be true for this thing to be a go? I think that's really, really powerful. And it goes to one of the things that we'll talk about in another episode, which is, how can I increase my business 400%? What would have to be true for me to be able to do that? And those exercises and those hypotheticals can be very, very powerful. And a question that could have saved potentially Blockbuster from being relegated to I think they have a single store in Alaska. It may have even closed now, but.
I think they still do. That's pretty cool.
I love this line of thought around how do you create succession in your business that will be true to the legacy that you've created but also be adaptive to the future? And so I like the framework of the Clarity Compass and the things we talked about today. Love to hear what you guys think about this stuff too. So if you want, you can throw us a comment or you can even Ryan, what is it? Is it businesslunch.com businesslunchpodcast.com Ask okay, we do. We do own businesslunch.com, but for some reason we don't use that. So we'll have to work on that for you guys. But businesslunchpodcast.com ask and we'd love to hear any questions you've got about this and we will answer those on another episode. And I hope that this was helpful for you guys. If you found this helpful, would love for you to share it with a friend and say, you know, hey, I know that you own a business, or you've been talking about these challenges potentially of succession, or you're thinking about maybe you'd like to have a higher quality of life and get more time with the family or to pursue other goals, or another shiny object that you want to chase, which is probably the most likely for an entrepreneur.
And.
I listened to this really cool podcast where they talked about it. So if that's something that you found was helpful for you, let us know. Tell a friend and we appreciate you sharing this time with us on Business Lunch and we'll see you next time.
Ever wondered how some people build real wealth through acquisitions while others just sit on the sidelines? Well, I'm here to tell you it's not about luck. It's about having the right system, the right deals, and the right guidance. And that's exactly what we give you in the Epic Deal Fast Track. If you've been thinking about buying a business, but you keep getting stuck, whether it's finding the right deal, structuring the financing, or negotiating with sellers, you are not alone. Too many people waste months, even years just thinking about acquiring a business while the real opportunities pass them by. The Epic Deal Fast Track is not another course. It's actually an implementation program, and it's designed to get you from the idea to the acquisition in just 16 weeks or less. We work with you one on one to help you find, fund and close your first or next deal. And once you do, we're going to plug you into our elite EPIC board community so that you can keep scaling through acquisitions. We install three powerful systems in your business. The first is the deal flow engine.
So you always have high quality off.
Market deals coming to you. Number two, we give you our offer and funding system so that you can structure offers that get accepted and fund them creatively many times with no money out of your own pocket. And number three, our closing and integration system so that you don't just buy a business, you actually successfully run and scale it once you have acquired it. Plus you'll have direct one on one support from an EPIC deal advisor every step of the way. And that's people that have actually come up through this system and done these deals themselves. That's the only way to become an EPIC deal advisor. And if you're serious about acquiring a business this year, don't just sit on the sidelines. Just text I'm in to 334-458-9034 and we'll get you in. So text I'm in to 334-458-9034 will get you in. No fluff, no wasted time, just real deal making from people that are actually out there doing deals right now.
I'll see you there.
More from Ryan


The Estate Planning Mistake That Tears Families Apart (Jimmy Buffett's $275M Lesson)