Episode 351: Turning Crisis Into a $30M Transformation (Team SCG's Shayna Cohen)
24 Oct 2025 · 34 min
Shayna Cohen's Team SCG lost a major client and saw revenue plummet to $5M in 2020, but instead of shrinking, she cut unprofitable accounts, hired a new C-suite, and pivoted to fulfillment. Revenue hit $30M in four years.
Chapters
What happens when your biggest client walks away, the core industry you serve collapses, and the world shuts down? But instead of cutting back or sunsetting your business, you decide to hire and rebrand and rebuild. Well, on today's show, we're diving into how Shana Cohen, CEO of Team SCG, transformed a family-owned business into a $30 million powerhouse in just 4 years. Welcome to the SkewCast, the podcast for innovators and maverick thinkers in the promotional products space. My name is Bobby LeHew. I'm glad you're here. Shana and her team's story is one of bold moves and both fearful and fearless leadership. We talk about the 2020 turning point that nearly broke the business and how it became their launchpad. The tough decision to let go of 20% of their clients to make room for the right kind of clients., and then how redefining easy to do business with became a company-wide mantra for scaling culture and customer experience. Shayna's hands-on, ego-free approach has helped shape Team SEG into one of the most dynamic distributor firms in the industry. She's redefining what it means to lead with vision, grit, and purpose. Today's episode is brought to you courtesy of us at Commenscue. Over 900 distributors powering $1.8 billion in network volume rely on Commenscue's connected workflow. Process more orders, connect your team, and dramatically grow your sales. To learn how, visit commonsku.com. Now here's my chat with Shana. Shana, thank you for joining us on the Skucast.
My pleasure.
Hi. I'm so glad you're here. I'm so glad you're here. Your talk at Skucamp was amazing. You did one of those things that I always love when speakers, especially who are running really good businesses in our industry, they're vulnerable and they share their insights. We're going to actually jump right into the heart of this because I'm going to ask you a hard question right at the beginning. But I know you can handle this because this is part of your talk. I want to start with what might be the most pivotal year in your company's story. In 2020, something happened. Before we dive into that moment, help listeners understand what Team SCG looked like going into 2020.
Yeah. So first of all, thank you very much. Very excited to be here and super excited to talk about our story. It's one that I'm very passionate about. 2020 was a crazy year for the world, but for our business in specific, it was just one of the years that regardless of what was happening outside, we took, we took a lot of hits in many different places. Going into 2020, we were having our best year ever. I felt I was just getting my groove with our business and where we were trying to go and what we were trying to do. My brother and I were making a great team and we were coming off of our highest growth year that we had ever had. In 2019, so we were really excited to hit the ground running in 2020. And then everything, you know, really happened at once, not only just with the pandemic, but we lost one of our largest clients that we'd had for 30 years to an RFP that we had never gone through before. That was our first experience in the RFP world, and it was just a huge shot to the ego. Transparently speaking, it was a loss that was felt tremendously throughout our company and throughout my family specifically.
Yeah. At what level of revenue were you at this point?
So we end— we were— we finished 2019 just under $8 million, so $7.9 million.
Okay. And then this happens, right?
Then 2020 happens, and we also have a huge stake in the travel industry. So yeah, gosh, 2020 travel was just— yeah, relevant is the word I would use. No one was even thinking about it. So that turned off immediately as well. And we somehow figured out a way to scrape by with different opportunities that we were just finding out of the woodworks. And we finished at $5 million in 2020.
So we did take a step back.
Yeah. When you think about all the things that really happened in that year, we somehow figured out how to not— how to avoid layoffs and we kept the team together and we closed it at just over $5 million.
I am so impressed with that number. And this goes way back, but in 2008 when We were running our distributorship, we were at $10 million. The economic crisis hits and we dropped from $10 to somewhere between $2 and $3. And it was a massive drop. So kudos to you because you did something that also a lot of folks would lick their wounds over something like this and it might be a slow build, but you started investing again fairly quickly. Walk us through how you started to reinvest in your infrastructure to handle this new opportunity. Like, how did you approach this? Okay, now we're gonna rebuild. What did that look like?
So it was born from boredom. We were in a place that we had never been in before. And I was— I came in with thinking that I could build Rome in a day. So yeah, I had a lot of excitement coming out of 2019 and then 2020, just we got knocked to our knees in a way that I had never experienced in my young career and that my father, my uncle hadn't experienced at this level. We had a lot of time on our hands and we decided that the best way to spend that time was in a couple of different areas. First and foremost, we wanted to reinvent ourselves. We knew that this was going to be a snippet in time, a season that we were experiencing, and things would start to normalize. And what did we want to look like when that normalcy returned? So we decided to do our first rebrand at that point. That was one of the biggest pivotal steps of we're going to change essentially how we go to market. And once that was the first piece of that thought process that really started to turn how we approached our business specifically and who we were going to be to the rest of the world. So we decided to do the rebrand and at the same time during that year before the pandemic happened, we brought on Brian Cohen, who's also my husband, and he's one of our big power players that we'll talk about a little bit more. But that started in January. So he was also part of the momentum of us push forward in the sense of what we could be once things started to normalize.
Now, for context, when did you become CEO?
I became CEO in 2023.
Okay.
And I've been in for 2 years. Okay.
This is public record, but you became CEO at a relatively young age.
I did.
29. Yeah, that's amazing. You also did something pretty controversial in those days where you were shifting and going into fifth gear, rebranding the company, reinvesting in the company, because a lot of folks can go through something like this and sunset their business and just let it ride. Instead, you decide to reinvest. But you did something a little controversial, but almost everybody has to do, and it's painful. You referred out the bottom 20% of your client base. What did you learn about working with the right type of client? I know how hard that decision is. And who was the right kind of client for you?
Yeah. So just to put context behind everything. So 2020 happens. We hire two more huge players in 2020 to help us with the go-to-market strategy. And with those 3 additions plus the rest of our team and all the momentum that we were developing before all of that happened, we, we started to experience burnout and lack in an extremely quick timeline. It was that 2-year period of 2020 were slow. And then in 2021, things happened at a pace that I can't explain and that I can't comprehend now that I'm on the other side of it. But it was it just was not sustainable. So we have Brian, Justin, and Savannah who are taking off at a speed that we didn't anticipate, and the rest of our team that was already ready to take off. And all of this created what I call a perfect storm to the point where I had to make a really tough decision. And I am always been a fan of shaking things up, and I've always been a fan of choosing the path less traveled. But in this case, it was just considered crazy, specifically by my dad and my uncle, who just could not believe that I wanted to essentially wipe out 20% of our revenue. That made a large number. It made up a large number. And a lot of these clients we had been working with for a lot of years. So the decision came around a lot of reference with our team, some of our longest team members that have been here. I consulted on what their thoughts were, where they felt that our major constraints were happening. And essentially it was that there's just not enough time in the day. So when you take that approach of saying that there's not enough time in the day, you then have to decide, okay, everybody plays with the same 8-hour workday. Obviously we all work more hours than that. We want to use something that we can model off of. Yeah. Um, where do you spend those hours to make the biggest impact and to continuously drive towards your goals? And that's when we started to identify the clients that we felt were helping us drive towards where we want to go. And then the clients that maybe we were aligned with at one point, but we weren't necessarily aligned with any longer. And there was a couple of factors that came into it. First and foremost, we took into account what potential spend was going to be, where we were going to put our proactive time. So we weren't going to proactively hunt any clients or take on any new clients that couldn't spend at least six figures. That was one of the biggest.
Okay. Yeah, I was going to ask where the threshold.
So especially as we're hunting new business, right? $6K minimum spend was where we were going to focus on that front. And then we started to look at dollar value versus job numbers. So for instance, if we had a client that spent $100,000 across 10 jobs versus a client that spent $100,000 across 200 jobs, so smart, one's much more tedious than the other to be able to sustain. And also the number of people that were required to service an account, like resources are the number one thing that I knew we had to protect and our people. Our best resource. So really listening to them and leaning into what they felt was a good client and why. A lot of it stems from our ability to be true partners with our clients. And there's a push-pull relationship that happens in this industry. And if we don't feel like we have a voice in the relationship or that they're leaning into us from an expertise perspective, it was a lot less enticing for us from a working relationship perspective. So So that, that went into it. And then also we wanted to double down on our operations and logistics capabilities. And we wanted to make sure that all of our clients that we have needed that in some way. So we are a firm at this point that offers a large, I guess, service spread, you can call it. A lot of them are supplemental services, but they require a lot of investments, a lot of time, and a lot of people. We want to make sure that the clients that we are working with every single day needed us in our entirety, not just a small piece of us.
So if I understand you, you have certain service lines, whether it's fulfillment, kitting, packing, international, whatever, whatever yours are. If your client fit most of those, if not all of those service lines, then that was an ideal fit for you.
Yep. Program-related clients, contract-based clients, things that needed— and don't get me wrong, like if someone wants to come in and spend six figures that really only needs us to drop ship from our vendor to our—
Sure, happy to take it.
Yeah, take all day. But what we weren't going to do is take a referral from a friend of a friend who needed an order of 50 polos that, you know, just wasn't a good fit for us in terms of how we're going to choose to spend our time and identifying our strike zone of the types of clients that we wanted to serve and that we're going to work best with was one of the huge pivotal shifts as a company that we made and truly believing this is who we are, this is our go-to-market strategy, and this is what we do best.
It's massive. It's massive momentum. It creates an incredible opportunity in your organization on the side of since you had such a big hit, particularly in the travel industry, did that also change your focus in terms of diversifying that portfolio more?
We knew that we— that— so it's a double-edged sword on that front. We knew that diversifying was extremely important. Yeah, but the main shift of our large growth was the difference between when the pandemic ended and that faucet turned back on.
Yeah, I get that.
You know, we went from $5 million in 2020 to $15 million in 2021, and that's largely because the travel industry realized our partnership value. And that's when we became a logistics-oriented business. That happened almost overnight. We were not one. We had no idea what that looked like. And then suddenly, between travel industry, financial institutions, and different things that we had developed, it very quickly turned into the backbone of our company. And it's essentially one of the most important legs of what we do now.
So, wow. So the silver lining there is that when that happened, you were able to invest time and money in broadening your service lines and what you were able to do with customers. So when they came back also needing more of those services, and that was a lock for you. Like we had the same thing happen with oil and gas. I'm very familiar with this. Like oil and gas would be great and then the faucet would be off and then oil and gas would come back with a vengeance. And we were at that time stuck in a geographic landscape. And so at that time the world wasn't near as flat as it is now. But so I totally understand that.
It was tough. It was one of those that we just didn't— we had so many conversations as a group and as a leadership group of what do you want to do? Do we want to take this? And there was massive risks involved with laying out capital for inventory investments. And I remember very clearly the sitting down at a table as a group and deciding, do we want— you can't just dip a toe in the water in this sense. It's either do we dive in or do we want to say no thank you? And if we say no thank you, they're going to remember us for the no thank you. So that decision to dive in without any knowledge or understanding of what we were actually agreeing to, while it was terrifying, dying. That was a catalyst moment for us because great risk comes great reward. And I definitely aged tremendously during that time, was something that I can't even begin to portray to you correctly. But what it did was it put some hair on our chest and it really showed us how to make or break. And breaking wasn't an option, especially in a family business.
I want to get to that. I want to get to that and I want to get to the leadership part, a little more of the leadership part here toward the end of our conversation. But one of the things that was very important for you and for most distributors that hit this point in their journey where they're trying to scale at an exponential size is the technology. Now everyone knows our MO, that's what we're here to do is help people scale and grow. But you're scaling essentially from $6 to $30 million. Do I have the numbers right? Okay. And what time frame was that? $6 to $30?
4 years.
4 years. That's astounding. I know very few— I've had 300 interviews like this. I know very few people that can say they grew in that short amount of time that rapidly. What? Yeah, you have the scars to prove it. It's amazing. It's absolutely amazing. How did systems fit into this? And all kinds of systems. Common Skew, obviously, is— you came on board with Common Skew this year. Why was that important for you to do that?
A couple of things. My focus has always been first and foremost on client experience, and we moved into a teams model over the last 3 years specifically where we don't really have individual contributors anymore. Everybody is either part of a team or leading a team, and we felt like the Commons Cube platform was a great thing for our clients from the front-end experience perspective, as well as me specifically from a management perspective of managing teams versus individuals, which is a very hard and complex thing.
Yeah.
So whether it's about the reporting or just the way that the system works with creating teams, we felt that was a really good fit and we always want to be looking onward and upward in terms of how we can continue to enhance how we go to market. And we thought that this was in line with those goals.
I love that the fact that you realize that managing a team requires a different system, a different structure. This would be very helpful to other customers of your size and larger who are considering this. How do you get a whole team to adopt new technology when everybody's so overwhelmed and everything's moving so fast? You just do it. It's a tough—
it's a tough thing. And at the end of the day, all I can say is I don't know that I did it right. I can just say that I went into it very vulnerable and very transparent and basically let everyone know that we're going to get bloody together and it's going to be painful. And I will be right there with you, you know, leading the charge into this battle that we're all going to face in terms of what we're comfortable with and what we know versus what we're going to. And it's not perfect. And there are a lot of quirks that we have to work out as a team in terms of changing our behaviors and changing how we understand what we do every day. So on that front, it's messy. And the one thing that I would just say is don't avoid that conversation. Don't pretend like it's going to be rainbows and sunshine because that's when the disappointment happens and that's when everybody really starts to feel tricked in a way. Really going into it with this is going to be painful. This is going to be something that we all want to bang our head against a wall every now and again. But the main thing here is that the client clients don't feel a disruption. And that's what we all were focused on, is not the fact that we were in a lot of pain during the transition, which I think regardless of systems changing, any system, whether you're talking about a warehouse management system, a CRM, an ERP, whatever it's going to be, you're going to feel the pain. And yeah, just focusing on the client experience first and making sure that they don't feel a disruption and their experience is positive is where we put a lot of our energy.
Such great advice. The client-focused transition as you move through that we pride ourselves on being a customer-led platform too. You came in and you said, hey, there's some things we want to do. One of those was like the split-ship taxes. And I'd love to understand a few things first. What— how the client from your perspective has grown more complex. Is that right?
That's very accurate.
For our team, how can you explain that complexity? What does that look like in a day-to-day? When you— when we talk about complexity, a lot of folks might think you're in the promo business. That seems pretty easy. Right? But you and I both know it's incredibly hard, especially when you're offering the breadth of services that you do. Can you explain a little bit the complexity behind today's client?
Yeah, I think it depends on what your individual strike zone is. You know what I mean? It's not for everybody dealing with the complex clients, not for everybody. But what we realized is a lot of the things that would be loss leaders like programs and stores and fulfillment and all of this stuff that is not our core business model, But in order to get the spend from the client, you have to take the crap that comes with it. So we knew that we couldn't say yes to this and no to that. So that was— that understanding drove a lot of our decisions. So much so that I have a laser engraver in, in my warehouse to support a program that we didn't want to say no to. I think there's a lot of things that I do that are controversial in that front of is it worth it? Is are you losing? Are you profitable? And what I do is I look at the profitability of the company as a whole and of the individual relationship. So there might be certain things that I do where 100% we lose money. If we miss a shipment and I can save it, I'm sending someone on a plane with a suitcase. Right. Do I make money on that order? Absolutely not. Do I lose a client because we made a mistake? Also no.
Yeah.
So I think from our standpoint, the complexity and what we're trying to bring to the common SKU team specifically in the system buildout as you guys continue to progress and evolve is is understanding at a deep level of the intricacies that happen at the enterprise client. So Split Ship is a great example where very rarely do we have the opportunity to ship everything to one location. That is a luxury of the past, unfortunately. And the majority of what we do now is has something to do with gifting, whether it's employee gifting or their target audience gifting. A lot of what we do is centered around supporting that. Split ship and making sure that our taxes are pristine is something that is not only wanted by us, but that's audited by our clients. Like, we cannot have any discrepancies in what our sales tax and accuracy should be around that.
Yeah, I want to stay on the client and the complexity for a minute because as a distributor, our biggest store had something like— it was insane. It had 2,000 products on it. It was promo, it was digital ads, it was commercial print, it was print on demand. It had buyer approval levels, multiple checkout options. We did pick and pack and in fulfillment in-house like you do. International demand was surging. The ideation to completion was getting faster, faster all the time. Our corporate buyers were consolidating spend through fewer partners. If I had to ask you, in addition to those things, how else has the client grown in complexity? Or if you had to stack rank the challenges that you're looking at in an aggregate of your best customers, would that be international POD or just servicing them?
So international POD is tough because everybody is starting to outsource from a labor perspective. I don't think that there's anything that we could do from the promo industry to ease that pain except understanding customs and clearance and countries that have greater barriers to entry and things like that. So for me, international is in a parking lot of a pain in the butt no matter what you do, where I'm starting to see a lot more complexities come in is the staleness of our industry. And that's something that's always, right? So people don't want the same products. They don't want the same type of imprint. They want different. They want to be, to show something that hasn't been seen before. So you're seeing the product complexity start to increase and making something as simple as a t-shirt turn into not that simple anymore. Like now they want to see what a laser engraved t-shirt looks like or all of different transfers or all of like ways to make something standard, not standard. You have experience merch bars happening now and they want you to be able to support it. They want— we have clients who want us to send staff to pop-up events. So we have a delicate way to say, here's what we can support in this capacity and we'll help you regulate the rest of it. But being really specific about making sure that you understand their vision and the why behind their ask is what's led to a lot of our success. And I think a lot of people would just say, no, this isn't what we do. Found a way to say, hey, this is a great idea. I think this is awesome. Here's the parts that we can support you with, and I can give you contacts in other areas that we don't necessarily support.
I'm so glad you talked about this, the complexity of the product itself and what's the expectations from the buyer, because we've seen this happen in culture. We no longer have the battle that merch isn't important anymore. Now merch is very important. Comes with that, this tension around building everything that needs to be unique and special. And even the product selection itself has gotten to where they can't accept limitations. I think maybe that's what you're trying to say, is that there are now higher demands on the product and the experiences we're creating for clients.
Yeah, I agree.
Let's talk about leadership and vision for a second. You said— this was really fantastic— make decisions based on your goals, not your circumstances. Can you share a concrete example of that, like where you've done this?
Yeah. So the biggest and scariest one I would say was with our move in 2020 and 2021. We're sitting in a 6,000 square foot warehouse where our rent is maybe $7,000 a month, and then we move into a 30,000 square foot warehouse where our rent is $28,000. And now we're in a 45,000 square foot warehouse where our rent is tremendously higher than that. It's one of those things where we didn't need— I don't know that we needed to go from from 6,000 square feet to 30,000 square feet. But when I truly buy into what I'm saying and believe, I know we can do, we didn't need it today, but we would need it soon. And taking that leap of faith and saying, let's just do it. If you put my back up against a wall, I know we can make this happen. And it was a really scary jump for us to go that drastically different in space. But within 2 years, we were busting at the seams in a 3,000-square-foot warehouse. And it was one of those things that I am a true believer of. Manifestation is a very loose word, but the idea behind manifestation is that you're focused on a goal and you make decisions based on achieving that goal. So my goal was that we were going to grow tremendously and that we were going to continue to need logistical and operational space. So we made that decision. Based on that goal, and that goes in line with how we were going to market and making sure that people knew we had the ability to do this, we were ready to do this, and we can execute it. And the opportunities came and we executed them.
That was one of my favorite takeaways from your talk at SKU Camp where you talked about investing— invest in the company you are going to be, not the company that you are now. And that's huge for us. It's a very hard thing. You mentioned it's scary for leaders because growth-oriented leaders have to deal with frightening aspect many times over.
Yep. And I would say that fear is something that I spent a lot of time at home at the end of the day questioning myself. And did I make the right decision? Especially tough months, right? Like you have a bad month in sales and you're like, what am I going to do? I have so much space. Who's going to fill it up? And you map out worst-case scenarios. You have contingency plans. I'll never jump out of a plane without making sure I have at least one parachute. Right.. So I always do recommend that. But at the end of the day, I think it's all based on belief in what you're doing and feeling very secure in the fact that you have something that people need. And I knew that from a resource perspective, we had something that people needed and maybe we weren't presenting ourselves well, or maybe our message wasn't getting across, but those are very easily fixable things. And when you take that approach, it's a no-brainer to sign the lease for the 30,000 square feet.
Yeah. Yep. Your dad came to you with interesting phrase, if you will, ETDBW, which has become your entire company ethos. I thought this was so cool. Can you unpack that?
Yeah, I can. One of our largest clients— my dad was a sales guy, breathe and eat sales. One of our largest clients, he went down there one day and he saw it everywhere. ETDBW on the wall, ETDBW on the elevator, ETDBW ETDBW way in the hallways. And he got annoyed at one point and he's, what does this mean? Why is this everywhere? And they said, it means that we want to be easy to do business with. And my dad is huge on taking things at work and running with them. So he came back with an epiphany and it was, and I was so intrigued. He said, I figured it out. I know what we have to do. And I'm like, tell me what we have to do. And he said, we have to be ETDBW. And it just, it stuck in the sense of simplifying something that truly changes who you are because I've seen it, I've been around it, and I've been, I've been guilty of it, of saying that this isn't how we operate or this isn't how we do things. You have to do it this way. And as soon as I really grasped onto what is ETDBW, it's about figuring out what the client needs. If this client is in your strike zone, if they are who you want to work with, modify yourself to who they need you to be rather than trying to put all of your clients into a standard template. So becoming easy to do business with essentially just means that you're changing a standard practice to best fit your client. Is it easy? No. Is it sustainable? No. Is it something that works for everybody? Absolutely not. But in its most simple example that I think a lot of people can resonate with is a client sends you a low-resolution logo. And a lot of times you would say, I can't use this. Can you please send me back an AI file or an EPS file? And maybe they send you something that's a PNG saved as an EPS and it's still not high resolution enough. Um, it's very easy to say this still doesn't work, but from the get-go that a good client sends me something that might not be usable, but I know I have the resources to make it usable. They're not going to hear about it. To them, it's going to be taken care of. I'm going to figure out how to make this work and to achieve what you guys are looking to achieve as simple as humanly possible for you.
That's gold. What I love about that is it's something you can bake across the organization. Everyone can grasp that.
It can. And you see the light bulb turn on. And it's something as simple as a client sends you an email with 3 questions and you only have the answer to one of them right now. If you can get the answer to the other 2 very quickly, let's hold on a minute. Let's send the client one email so that way they have everything answered as quickly as humanly possible and just making it easy for them to reference. You see the light bulb turn on for people and understanding this makes my life harder, but their life easier. And that means I'm on the right page.
Yeah, I also love that keeps the revolving door in your office from happening all the time where people don't have to come to you for everything to get permission. It's what is going to be easy for this client? What can we do to make this easy with the client? I love that you, you accepted the reins of the company at a young age, moved fast, went through a lot of client heartbreak and hard decisions. If you were to encourage Shayna back then, because my gosh, that kind of education in $5 to $30 million in such a short amount of time, if you had to advise Shayna back then, what would you tell her to double down on and what would you tell her to slow down on?
Slow down is easier than the double down. I would say that when I first came in, I was so eager that I was the standard. You can't build Rome in a day. And I wanted to do it all. I wanted everything to be right and perfect and we need to fix this and we need to fix that and we need to fix that. And I would tell myself to slow down a little bit and focus on prioritize what's going to make the biggest impact. Because since I wanted to do everything at once, I think that led to a lot of burnout, not just for me, but for a lot of people. It's everything I think was the right move, but it was too quick. And part of that has its glory and has its consequences. So I would definitely tell myself that you need to just prioritize and make sure that you're finishing something in completion before trying to jump off the ledge to the next break. That's good. I'm extremely guilty of that, and sometimes I still have to remind myself. Yeah. From a double down perspective, I think I would just say to double down on the vision because like I mentioned to you, a lot of times where I'm sitting at home at night questioning myself and wondering if if I made the right decision and is the risk worth the consequence? Because a lot of people would have said no. If you really understood what we had to do and the risks that we had to take to, to support the business that came in the short period of time, I think a lot of people would have said no because the risk might not be worth the consequence of what it meant if we failed. But where I'm sitting now, I think a lot of brainpower and anguish was wasted in questioning what I knew from an intuition perspective, which was to press the gas and press it hard.
Yeah. One of the things that you did was you built an entire C-suite from scratch. You invested in your upper management team, which was a big part of getting you out of burnout. A lot of leaders who are in this space that I would say are in the $5 to $10 at least, and then in the probably $20 to $50 million range, deal with getting out of getting their own position right in the organization, being able to lift above, which is this really hard client management or whatever it might be, biz dev, whatever that role may be. What advice should we have for folks that are, they're leaders like you, they're maybe juggling too many things? And now that you've done that by investing in upper, in leadership.
Yeah, it's a great question. And I think the first time I realized that it was a problem was when there was a line out of my office. And if somebody's waiting in line, it means important enough that they're going to wait however long it takes. But there was a line of 5 to 6 people that were just— and I remember looking up and saying, this is not good. This is not good that I'm the only person who can answer this. And I think that realization and that epiphany of trying to figure out what to do from here is one of the biggest things that led me to some of the decision-making that I made after that point. So what I would say is to focus on where you feel the most constrained. I also mentioned in my talk about giving up something that you love for something that you need, and this is where I felt that the most. I loved being the sales leader of our— I wanted to follow in my dad's footsteps. I loved creating the relationships with the clients, and I loved being able to give my input on the specific projects. But when I needed to step into the CEO chair, I had to create leaders that people could depend on if we were going to continue to grow. When I joined the company, we were 20 people. Now we're sitting at 55 people and It's not— it's again, it's all about focusing on sustainability. And even though something's working right now, most of the leaders or owners of the company know which branches are soon to break. When I realized that I had to ascend in my role, then the first thing that I needed to do was cover the plate that I was leaving, which Brian stepped into my chair from the sales leadership perspective. We created leaders to start heading up teams, which is when we went from all these individual contributors to small groups of people that were able depend on each other rather than just depending on me. And then of course I was able to elevate some of our team that was already really knew the ropes and very heavily responsible for a lot of our growth. Savannah stepped up, we had Justin step up, and then we had to hire someone to really run our backend operations. And that's where we were lucky enough to find Isabel, who this community has not had a chance to meet yet. But when you find somebody that's competent enough to run a wing of your business that you're not as confident in, it's a game changer for your company. And a lot of people told me that, but I just didn't believe it. I've never seen it before. I didn't know that there could be such a difference maker, especially when it's something that you're not as confident in. And operational logistics and supply chain and delivery on that front is not— was not my strong suit. I was a fake it till you make it. Kind of girl. And we did. We faked it for as long as we could. But having her come in and understand it in a way that was all about how to scale— yeah, that changed the game entirely. Not just for our company, but for our leadership team. We now had someone that we could depend on for what has now become 50%, maybe more of what we do on the day to day.
Yeah. Wow. I love how your entire mantra is: be the— become the leader you need to be. Become the organization you need to be. There's a very forward, fast-forward momentum with the energy with TeamSG.
You have to evolve. And if you don't feel like you're evolving, someone else is going to evolve and come for your business. And you don't want that. A lot of it's fear of being left behind. And I'm not saying to ever let fear drive you, but at the same time, I think I always had a fear of not the lack of evolution. And anytime something feels stagnant or like it just stale in a way, it drove me to focus on how the company needs to evolve. And, um, it's been quite a ride over the last 5 years.
Obviously, fear transforms into fuel that becomes energy, and you have really done it, Shayna. Your story is amazing. Your team is amazing. Everyone we encounter with your team is amazing. Thank you for sharing your story here today, because a lot of folks need to hear a lot of the things you had to say because of where they're at in their business. But thanks for joining us on the SKU Cast. Thanks for speaking at SKU Camp. You guys run an amazing company.
It's my absolute pleasure. Thank you so much for thinking of me, and I'm happy to help in any way that I can.






