Stacy L ChinFounder, KeepYourEquity · I get the government to write you checks

$2 million NIH SBIR funding - This one page will make all of the difference

8 Oct 2026 · 2 min

Watch on YouTube

2:25

In this concise tutorial, Stacy L. Chin walks viewers through the exact structure of a winning NIH SBIR Specific Aims page, emphasizing that the one‑page document must answer five core questions: (1) the problem and its scale, (2) why the problem matters, (3) the innovative solution and its value proposition, (4) why the team can succeed (preliminary data, prototype, expertise), and (5) the concrete work to be done with SBIR funds. She details how to quantify the problem with patient numbers, costs, and clinical consequences, how to articulate the gap in current standards of care, and how to present the innovation in a few clear sentences. She then explains how to provide a “reason to believe” through data, prototypes, or team credentials. The specific aims section is broken down by Phase I (feasibility and risk reduction), Phase II (commercialization pathway), and Fast‑Track (linking Phase I outcomes to Phase II goals), each with measurable milestones. Finally, she stresses ending with impact statements that describe the technical, commercial, and patient benefits that reviewers should walk away with. The tutorial is delivered in an instructional, upbeat tone, aiming to enable viewers to draft a complete Specific Aims page in under three minutes.

Chapters

I'm going to teach you how to write a killer NIH SBIR Specifics Aim page in less than 3 minutes. So what is a Specifics Aim page? This is your one-page roadmap of your entire SBIR application. It has to answer 5 things: the problem you're solving, why does it matter, what did you build, why I should believe you, and what are you going to do with the money. So first, start with the problem. Don't just tell me it's a big problem out there. Show it to me. How many patients are affected? What does it cost in healthcare system? And what are the clinical consequences? Tell me what exists today. What are the current standards of care? What are the competitors doing? And most importantly, why are they falling short? That establishes the gap. Next up, introduce your innovation. That's your solution. What did you build? How does it work? What's the value proposition? And why is it meaningfully better than everything else out there? I, as a reviewer, should understand your innovation just in a couple of sentences. Then give me a reason to believe you. Show me the preliminary data, the prototype, the feasibility work, the customer discovery, or the team expertise. Basically, Prove that you're just not starting from zero. And then we get to the fun part, the actual specific aims. In other words, what are you going to do with the SBIR money? For Phase I, your aim should establish feasibility and reduce your biggest technical risks. For Phase II, show how you're moving technology towards a commercially viable product. And then for a Fast-Track application, Make the progression obvious. What does Phase 1 prove? How do you get to Phase 2, and what does Phase 2 accomplish? And that's because every aim should have a measurable outcome. Finally, end with impact. If you complete these specific aims, what does this unlock technically and commercially? What will it do for patients? Because the reviewers should finish that specific aim page thinking, I understand the problem, I understand why it's different. I believe the team can do it, and I know exactly what they want to accomplish. And yes, that is how you fit it all in one page, and you can have a beautiful specific aims draft. Stop timer.