SBIR grant vs contract

24 Oct 2026 · 1 min

Watch on YouTube

0:49

In this brief talk, Stacy L. Chin warns founders that confusing SBIR grants with SBIR contracts can cost them more than $2 million in non‑dilutive funding. She explains that a grant is based on the applicant’s own research idea, whereas a contract is issued when the government defines the problem to be solved. Because the vehicle determines how the application must be written, she urges founders to pause before investing time and to ask three critical questions: Who defined the problem? Who defines success? Who will buy or use the technology? Getting these basics right prevents losing substantial SBIR funding despite a strong proposal.

Chapters

I'm seeing a lot of founders are getting this confused, and it's completely screwing up the chances to get over $2 million of non-dilutive funding. And get this: you can write a perfect proposal, but if you get this wrong, you can just completely lose it all. But here's what a lot of first-time founders miss: SBIR grants are not the same as SBIR contracts, because with a grant, you're actually typically bringing the government your research idea. But with a contract, the government is bringing you the problem they want to solve. And depending whether you go under grant or contract, this is going to change the way you completely write your SBIR application. Before you spend 50 hours writing, ask yourself these 3 questions: Who defined the problem? Who defines success? And who's actually going to buy or use technology? Because you can have a hot, fancy innovation, but still lose over $2 million of SBIR funding if you choose the wrong vehicle.