7:15

In this instructional video, Dr. Steve Tippins, an experienced dissertation committee member, presents a concise three‑step process for identifying a defensible research gap for a dissertation. He begins by defining a literature gap as an unstudied yet meaningful area that adds incremental knowledge to the existing “knowledge pile.” He then outlines where to look for gaps: future‑research sections, discussion sections, contradictory findings, and repeated calls for further work, while warning against self‑serving or outdated suggestions. Tippins emphasizes that gaps often emerge organically when readers encounter “I wonder…” moments while reading strategically. He advises validating potential gaps with advisors, committee members, peers, and research librarians, and cautions against pursuing topics in overly saturated, “hot” fields. Finally, he explains how to articulate a gap clearly—citing existing work, specifying the missing element (e.g., different sample, method, context), and justifying its importance—before encouraging persistence and offering a free Dissertation Help community for further support.

Chapters

More from Steve

0:44
youtube.com

You Need to Stop Doing This

3d ago
0:50
youtube.com

This Keeps PhDs Stuck

4d ago
0:38
youtube.com

How PhDs Get Past a Writing Block

5d ago
0:50
youtube.com

The Mindset Shift Every PhD Needs

6d ago
0:52
youtube.com

Most PhDs Learn This The Hard Way

1w ago
0:57
youtube.com

PhDs Who Finish Know This

1w ago
1:01
youtube.com

Most PhDs Never Learn This

1w ago
0:59
youtube.com

This is Important for Your Dissertation

1w ago
0:56
youtube.com

Learn This to Make Your Dissertation Easier

1w ago
0:43
youtube.com

A PhD Won't Fix This

1w ago
0:53
youtube.com

Many PhDs Fall Into This Cycle

1w ago
See all content