A PhD candidate spirals over their literature review, worrying it won't identify a clear gap in scholarship or satisfy their committee. They fear they'll need to keep rewriting it, but acknowledge they'll finish anyway.
Literature review, literature review, literature review, literature review, literature review. Is it enough? Is it enough? Is it enough? Has it shown the gap in the literature? Is it enough for my committee to allow me to move forward? And do I have to keep looking at it? And do I have to keep updating it? And the answer to that is probably yes, but it will be over and you'll make it to the end.
