The article introduces the construct of status acuity—the individual ability to accurately perceive informal status hierarchies within groups—and demonstrates its theoretical and practical significance. Across three studies, the authors develop a video‑based assessment (Studies 1a/1b) that reliably captures status acuity and shows it is distinct from related abilities such as emotional intelligence and cognitive ability. Study 2 examines group‑level effects, revealing that higher average status acuity within a team reduces intra‑group status conflict, which in turn improves collective performance; the minimum status acuity in a team also serves as a protective buffer against conflict. Study 3 replicates these findings in real‑world organizational teams and extends the model to show that reduced status conflict mediates the relationship between status acuity and team outcomes. The paper discusses implications for selection, training, and team design, and provides an appendix with a sample test interface for practical administration. Overall, the work establishes status acuity as a novel, measurable individual difference with clear benefits for group dynamics and performance.

Topics

Defining and Measuring Status Acuity: Construct, Video‑Based Assessment, and Discriminant Validity

Introduces status acuity as the individual ability to accurately perceive informal status hierarchies, details the development of a video‑stimulus assessment (Studies 1a/1b), reports its reliability and item‑selection process, and provides evidence that the construct is empirically distinct from emotional intelligence, cognitive ability, and other social‑perception measures.

Team‑Level Effects of Status Acuity on Intra‑Group Status Conflict

Study 2 shows that teams with higher average status acuity experience less status‑based conflict, and that the lowest‑scoring member’s acuity functions as a protective buffer (a weak‑link effect), highlighting how collective perceptual accuracy shapes hierarchical tension.

Status Conflict Mediates the Relationship Between Status Acuity and Team Performance

Mediation analyses reveal that reduced status conflict explains why higher mean or minimum status acuity translates into superior collective performance, linking perceptual accuracy, relational dynamics, and outcome metrics.

Implications for Selection, Training, and Team Design

Discusses how organizations can assess status acuity in hiring, develop training interventions to improve hierarchical perception, and design teams (e.g., ensuring a minimum level of acuity) to mitigate status conflict and boost performance.

Appendix: Sample Status Acuity Test Interface and Administration Guidelines

Provides a concrete example of the video‑based test, response format, scoring algorithm, and step‑by‑step administration instructions for researchers and practitioners.

More from Tessa

PDF

tessawsjpub.pdf

2d ago
PDF

2026_Phlegar_TeamsPerformWorseNewcomers.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2023_West_AffectContagion.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2022_Dumitru_InvestigatingGenderDifferencesTutors.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2021_Thorson_InfluencingPhysiologyDecisionsGroups.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2021_Thorson_PhysiologicalLinkageSuccessfulHighstatus.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2020_Thorson_ControllingUncontrolled.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2019_Thorson_UnderThreatButEngaged.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2018_Stern_AssessingAccuracyCloseRelationships.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2017_West_ContagiousAnxiety.pdf

1w ago
PDF

2014_West_LittleSimilarityGoesLong.pdf

1w ago
See all content