In this instructional video, presentation coach TJ Walker critiques the costly, traditional focus‑group model for testing whether a message resonates and offers a low‑cost, DIY alternative he calls “resonance testing.” He explains that presenters should move beyond a single, imagined friendly audience and instead create three distinct, realistic audience personas—including at least one skeptic such as a numbers‑driven CFO, an enthusiastic field team member, and a workload‑concerned middle manager. For each persona, the presenter runs the core message through, anticipates objections, and gauges whether the message lands. Walker then extends the method by having the presenter craft two different opening styles (e.g., bold claim vs. specific story) and conduct a head‑to‑head A/B test with the same personas to determine which opening captures attention. He emphasizes that this rehearsal against plausible fictional stand‑ins mimics a focus‑group’s insight without the expense, and warns against rehearsing only for a warm, imaginary crowd that never challenges the presenter. The video concludes with a concrete assignment: build three genuine personas for an upcoming presentation, test the main message with each, and optionally A/B test two openings, thereby surfacing objections and refining the narrative before the real meeting.
Chapters
Ultimize. Big companies pay enormous money to find out whether a message lands before they send it into the world. They run focus groups. They hire consultants who hire other consultants. They rent a room with a 2-way mirror and feed strangers lukewarm sandwiches to watch them react to a slogan. It's a whole industry, and it exists for one reason: guessing whether your message resonates is expensive, when you guess wrong. You've never had access to any of that. You just wrote your presentation, hoped the framing worked, and found out live. Well, now you've got a version of the two-way mirror in your pocket, minus the sandwiches, and you'd be a little foolish not to use it. Here's the technique, and it builds on everything we've done. You've already been describing your audience to test recall and conclusions. Now we go further. You build actual personas and test your message against each one separately. Real audiences aren't one person. They're a mix, and the same message hits each slice differently. Say you're presenting a new initiative to a room that includes a numbers-driven CFO who's heard 15 game-changing pitches this year and believes none of them. A field team that's genuinely excited and wants to be told it'll work. And a middle manager whose only real question is, how much extra work does this dump on me? One message, 3 completely different people. And if you write only for the person in your head, usually a flattering imaginary listener who already agrees with you, you'll land one of them and lose the other 2. So build them as separate stand-ins. Describe each persona in detail, then Run your key message past each and ask, as this specific person, does this land? What's your first objection? What would make you lean in and what would make you check out? They'll react differently. The CFO stand-in pokes at your numbers. The field team stand-in gets excited and then asks when. The middle manager smells added workload from 3 paragraphs away. That's not noise. That's your actual room rehearsing its reactions for you in advance. You can take it one step further, and this is where it gets genuinely useful. Test 2 versions head-to-head. Write 2 openings, one that starts with a bold claim, one that starts with a specific story, and ask each persona which makes them want to keep paying attention and why. You just ran an A/B test on your first 30 seconds, the single most important 30 seconds you've got, and you've done it for free before anyone real experienced either version. The big-budget focus group crowd would weep. Now, the same honesty I owe you every time. Now again, I want to be honest with you and I want you to get honest feedback. These personas are plausible fiction, not your actual colleagues. A stand-in won't perfectly predict the human being who's distracted because his kid's home sick, or the one who decided to oppose you in the parking lot for reasons that have nothing to do with your slides. It's a rehearsal against believable characters, not a crystal ball. But rehearsing against 3 sharp, distinct reactions beats what most people do, which is rehearse against a warm imaginary crowd that nods at everything. And objects to nothing. And that's the trap this rescues you from. Left alone, we all write for the friendliest possible audience, the one that already gets it, already agrees, already likes us. It feels great and prepares you for nothing. Building a skeptical CFO who pushes back is uncomfortable precisely because it's useful. You want to meet that objection here in rehearsal. Not for the first time when it's said out loud in front of everyone. So here's your assignment. Take a real presentation and build 3 genuinely different personas from your actual audience, including at least one skeptic who isn't inclined to love you. Run your main message past each. Then, if you're feeling bold, test 2 openings head-to-head and see which one wins. Find out who you're really talking to— all of them— before you're talking to them for real.