Will Richardson argues large businesses must address Scope 3 emissions, which average 26 times higher than direct emissions, before regulatory deadlines hit in 2027. UK and EU rules now require climate disclosure; talent markets reward ESG credibility. His three-step plan: map regulatory exposure, analyze supply-chain emissions, assign a named owner with board reporting.
Chapters
Hey, thanks so much for listening. I would love to be able to help you more on what it is that you are listening to and why you're listening to, to me. If you could click on the link in the show notes, that would be awesome because it will help me define what it is that we should be talking about on this podcast. What every large business owes the next Here's an honest number to start with. Your supply chain emissions are on average 26 times higher than everything you control directly. Most boards have never seen that number. And the generation you're trying to hire right now already knows it. Let's be honest about what owing the next generation actually means for large business. It's not a slogan on a careers page. It's 3 very specific things landing at once: a regulatory deadline, a talent market that's already voting with its feet, and a supply chain most businesses haven't been honest with themselves about. Over the next 8 minutes, we'll go through what's genuinely owed, why it's less frightening than it sounds, And what to do with this quarter. The regulatory clock is the real O. Start with the UK. The government published its final sustainability reporting standards, UK SRS, on the 25th of February 2026. The FCA has proposed mandatory climate disclosure under UK SRS S2 for roughly 515 listed companies. Starting with accounting periods from 1st of January 2027. Scope 3 gets comply or explain treatment from 2028, and the wider UK SRS S1 disclosures follow the same way from 2029. That phasing looks generous. Here's the honest bit: a reporting year can't be retrofitted. If you're still gathering baseline data when the FCA's Autumn 2026 policy statement lands, the next generation of your own graduate intake will be reading a report you didn't have time to get right. In the EU, the Omnibus 1 Directive came into force on the 18th of March 2026 and narrowed CSRD to companies above 1,000 employees and €450 million in turnover, taking an estimated 80% of previously in-scope companies out of mandatory reporting. That sounds like a relief. The companies still caught face penalties of up to 3% of global turnover for getting it wrong, and a simplified ESRS standard that's still 320 data points deep. And SBTi now has over 10,000 companies with validated targets. If your 5-year triggers— review triggers this year, you've got 6 months to complete it and 12 to resubmit. None of that is a suggestion. It's the baseline the next generation of employees, customers, and regulators will judge you against. Whether you're ready or not. So the talent angle. So this is where next generation stops being abstract. LinkedIn's 2025 green skills data shows hiring rates for workers with green skills growing at roughly twice the pace of the workforce acquiring them, a gap that's widened every year since 2023. That's not just entry-level sustainability roles. Finance, operations, and legal hires increasingly need at least one green skill just to do their jobs under the new reporting regimes, which means the next generation entering your business will expect this already to be sorted, not something they're going to fix. And it's not only the young. Economist Impact's 2025 research found senior executives actively screening employers on ESG credibility, some willing to take a pay cut to work somewhere they trust. Here's the honest part again: a vague sustainability page doesn't survive that scrutiny at any level. What survives is a credible, data-backed story including honesty about the gaps that are still open. Businesses that can't tell that story are quietly losing the exact people, junior and senior, who'd help them close it. The supply chain inheritance. Back to that 26 times figure. CDP finds a company's supply chain emissions run on average 26 times higher than its own direct operations. Inheritance is the right word here. That's the bulk of what your business is passing down the chain, and passing on to whoever inherits the balance sheet next, sitting outside your own 4 walls, from suppliers you may have never properly audited. Sphaera's 2025 Scope 3 report shows the honest state of play, 79% of companies now report across all 3 scopes, and that's real progress. But 79% of those same companies still cite supplier data availability as their top barrier, and 62% flag internal data quality as a major issue too. So the honest headline is this: most businesses are reporting confidently on a fraction of what they actually owe, and quietly leaving the rest for someone else— often someone younger— to sort out later. What owing looks like in practice. So what does honest look like, done properly? We built our advisory model around exactly this. Clients working with us through Climate Unlimited achieve 100% audit pass rates. Our platform delivers up to 42% resource savings against traditional consultancy approaches and twice the speed on data collection. Our clients see a 73% boost in transition success rates and 100% SBTi validation success rate backed by a supply chain intelligence database covering 1.5 million suppliers and over 40,000 emission factors. So Scope 3 estimates get replaced with primary data rather than average standing in for the truth. That's the real difference between owing as something left for the next generation to inherit and owing as something this generation of leadership actually settled. The regulatory clock is the same for everyone. The supply chain exposure is the same for everyone. What changes is whether you hand over a business that's audit ready or one that's still catching up. Business action this quarter. 3 moves, honestly sequenced. First, map your CSRD and UK SRS exposure now under the new thresholds. Don't assume last year's scoping still applies after Omnibus and CP 25/26. The businesses most exposed today are the ones still working from an outdated assessment. Second, run a Scope 3 hotspot analysis across your top suppliers by spend, not by convenience, so the baseline reflects where the real emissions and the real risk actually sit, rather than where the data was easiest to find. Third, put a named owner and a board-level reporting cadence behind all of it before your next SBTi review or 5-year trigger lands. Settling what's owed shouldn't be something that happens to your business under deadline pressure. It should be something you've already done by the deadline arrives. So nobody younger inherits the job of doing it properly. Do these 3 things in the next 90 days and you hand over a business with a credible, audit-ready baseline already built. Skip them and someone younger inherits the gap, along with the audit pressure that comes with it, while competitors who moved first use their data to win the contract and the hire. Here's the honest close. Owing the next generation isn't a debt you pay off with good intentions. It's a specific set of numbers, deadlines, and decisions that either get settled by this generation of leadership or handed down unresolved. The businesses getting ahead right now aren't the ones with the biggest budgets. They're the ones who decided to be honest about what's owed and started settling it this quarter. If you want to talk honestly about where your business stands against these deadlines, get in touch with me. And if you know an enterprise leader who should be having this conversation, please do get them in touch with me now. Thank you. Thanks for listening.
Grab free access to Will's Substack while it lasts. Every week we pull together the top sustainability stories from dozens of trusted sources. Then he breaks down the big issues facing business right now in plain, practical terms. Link in the description.
