Is the US Dollar Losing Its Safe-Haven Status?

The euro surged 460 pips against the dollar after Europe announced an €800 billion defence-spending package, while Deutsche Bank claims the dollar is losing safe-haven status as its share of global reserves fell from 70% in 2000 to 58% today. JP Morgan's recession probability for 2025 jumped from 17% to 31% following weak labor data, and the Nasdaq has dropped 9% in three weeks.
Chapters
Hello and happy Friday if you're listening. End of the week, so time to summarize all the action that's been going on in global markets. And you're going to love some of the headlines I'm going to throw at you, Piers, in this conversation, because I know you like a little bit of Friday sensationalism. But before I begin, quick shout out to Lena Malaine, who messaged me this morning. And I love this because she's a mathematics and statistics student decided to come along to a Finance Accelerator, which is the market simulation we do in partnership with Morgan Stanley and UBS. She absolutely loved it, strengthened her interest in finance. So she's— remember, she's a non-finance student. She says she's a huge fan of the pod. The reasons why is because it makes learning about the industry very accessible.
Cool. Perfect.
That's, that's how you make, in my mind, not being too grandiose on a Friday because the sun is shining, but if you want to make the industry a more equitable, inclusive place, that's how you do it. You've got to make it accessible, interesting, fun, engaging, and then other people— the economics people will always find finance, for example— but if you want a broader subset a more inclusive industry. I'm so happy to hear that people like Lena are getting involved.
That's, I love that, that comment. That's fuel, fuel for our, for our mission. And, uh, yeah. All right. Well, let's carry on doing this podcast then, I guess.
No pressure on your breakdowns then of these various headlines I have for you where we're going to cover why is the euro trading at its highest levels for this year. I know we're, you know, kind of into the end of Q1, so still pretty early, but we were only a few weeks ago talking about the euro going south in euro parity. Um, and the, you know, the tide has changed pretty quickly, and now the euro has hit its 2025 high versus the dollar on European defense spending predominantly. So I know you're going to bring break that down for me. And then as a consequence, then Deutsche Bank came out with a pretty spicy comment, um, midweek talking about the risk of the US dollar losing— that's losing its safe haven status. And that's a pretty bold, punchy call. So we'll also take a look at that as well in the context of the euro move. And then a good segue will be into how just generally the market is performing at the moment, US stocks still pretty soft. Wall Street banks have been sounding the alarms, or I should say flashing rising recession risk signals, Piers, is what Bloomberg were reporting. And then to top it all off, China have come out and blasted Trump, uh, talking about two-faced acts and evil tariffs. Uh, and we were talking again, just it feels like a week or two ago, about how kind of calm what the Chinese response had been. They've been retaliating, but in a fairly coordinated and a lighter touch perhaps than many might have thought. But that seems to have shifted as well in the last few days. So perhaps we can start with the euro, please.
Yeah, I mean, there's a hell of a lot to kind of unpack here, but quite an extraordinary week, I would say. And actually, I mean, just an extraordinary year probably. And, you know, Trump You could blame Trump for a lot of this, but not all of it. But certainly he's obviously come in, shaken things up. He, you know, his style means uncertainty has spiked, and this is fueling some of this— well, it's fueling a lot of this market action. It's also gone as far as now fueling proper, you know, hard change in fiscal policy in other parts of the world, which actually is the underlying driving force of this euro spike. And it is a spike. You go, you know, go and look at a euro-dollar chart and it's quite extraordinary. We've gone from 1.04, 1.04 to 1.0865 as we speak. That's a, that's a 460-pip move to the upside. That's just this week. I mean, that, that's an extraordinary move, and everything's kind of flipped on its head when we think about the euro. Pretty much every bank on the street coming into the start of this year had the euro-dollar exchange rate trending down, continuing to trend down, to breach parity and to continue to head lower. And to kind of, for context, to breach parity. I mean, look, the euro-dollar hasn't been at parity. Well, we briefly dipped under the 1 handle for a couple of weeks back in 2022. Okay, but other than that, it basically hasn't happened, right? So what's happened? Well, look, why did all the banks think that at the start of the year? Well, look, we were off the back of it, back end of 2024, and it was the, you know, US exceptionalism trend, which, you know, got a little bump because of Trump expectations. This is after Trump won the election but before he hit the White House, right? So here, you know, tax cuts are coming, you know, decreasing regulations, you know, fueling this, you know, extension of the MAG-7-driven rally. Okay, now at the same time, you had a weak Europe, recession risk in Europe, you know, ECB, Bank of England cutting rates, expectations that there'd be a lot more rate cuts in 2025 in Europe than there would be in the US. Okay, so this was all fueling US strength, Europe weakness, if you like. But it's kind of all— a lot of it's pivoted on its head here. So, you know, you take the US firstly, you know, that US exceptionalism idea, well, that's being chipped away at, right? And certainly the Mag Seven— we talked about this last week, I won't repeat— but Mag Seven have really come off. That, that they're no longer They're not leading the rally more so, they're actually leading the sell-off now. And actually, you look at the S&P, by the way, and the NASDAQ, they're about to notch their third down week in a row today. As in today being the end of week 3, right, of this sell-off. The NASDAQ's down over 9% here. 3 weeks down in a row. This week, the third one being the biggest down week of the lot, right? And we haven't had 3 down weeks in a row for— well, I'd have to check, but certainly into the middle of last year at least. We haven't had 3 down weeks in a row for 6 months. And so look, what's happening is this, I guess, signs of US recession. We talked about this last week. Economic data starting to take a turn, sentiment starting to shift lower. We had more evidence of that on Wednesday with the labor market report, the ADP employment report coming in weaker than expected. We've got key US data this afternoon on non-farm payrolls Let's see what that brings. But look, it's been a bad run over the last 2 weeks from a US economic data point of view. So that recession risk thing is inching higher. And look, this, this Trump, the Trump show, I mean, it just hasn't been a good look, I would say, externally from, from a non-US person looking in, you know, it just hasn't been a great look with the whole Zelensky thing in the Oval Office. And so, and you know, China are willing to be a little bit more brave in the negotiations and the retaliations. And Germany even, you know, we'll talk about Deutsche Bank's view on that dollar safe haven status in a minute. But, you know, there's pushback now against Trump. And I think this is all wound up into this, this kind of flip in sentiment. Now, to be specific on the euro then, obviously Trump's way about, you know, trying to bring an end to the Russia-Ukraine war. Has forced Europe's hand. Now, I won't go into the politics— is this a good thing, bad thing? Park that, right? It's forced Europe's hand to increase all of a sudden, quite sharply, and in rapid time from a European kind of political speed point of view. It's forced their hand to dramatically increase their defense spending, right? And actually, the Eurozone Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, she announced that they're gonna— well, they're intending— this was earlier this week on Tuesday— that they're gonna fund an $800 billion defence spending budget across the continent. Okay, because the idea is the US are pulling out their funding of this Ukraine defence and Europe are going to step in, in place. Now, what does that all mean economically? Well, €800 billion, that is a massive fiscal stimulus package. Now, I know it's geared towards one sector, but €800 billion, that's, that's like, bang, that's like, hang on, emergency recession fiscal policy stimulus package, right? And so it's kind of flipped things here. You can evidence this by looking at the European defense companies and their share prices. I've got a few here. You might not have heard of any of these. In fact, I'd be surprised if listeners have heard of any of the 3 I'm about to mention. Um, one's called Leonardo. It's an Italian defense stock that's doubled. Share price has doubled in the last 6 weeks. Um, you've got Thales in France. That's up 75% in the last 4 weeks. You got Rheinmetall. That's a German one. That's up 93%, you know, year to date. These stocks are through the roof right now. What does this tie into, this euro move? Because the euro has spiked for a few reasons, right? Number one, it's just the money flow. Cash is coming into Europe, and this started, you know, back in the beginning of the year when the idea was that Europe's going to— you know, that divergence between the US and that US exceptionalism trade and Europe being so weak That divergence, a lot of analysts were saying, has got to its widest point and it will now revert. So the trade there was, well, look, I'm going to sell my Nvidia stock, book profit, and I'm going to swing that cash and buy European stocks. Now that requires an FX transaction first. You take your dollars that you've got from your Nvidia share sale, you're selling dollars and buying euros so that then you can buy European stocks denominated in euros, right? So that FX transaction ahead of that equity rotation in your portfolio drives up the euro-dollar exchange rate. Okay, but look, it's more than that. It's not just, it's not just cash flowing into Europe. It's also then, well, look, this fiscal stimulus package via the defense sector, well, is that not going to trigger, you know, an uptick in GDP growth expectations in Europe? Is this not going to drive maybe Inflationary pressures then, if we get an economic recovery. So if economic performance is going to be better than was previously expected in the eurozone, then actually, can the ECB cut rates as we were expecting them to throughout the entirety of this year? So you've got, you've got a wall of cash coming into Europe, you've got quite all of a sudden step up in economic growth expectations and a step down in expectations of Europe being able to cut rates. So all of these three together have flipped this trade, and it's such a crowded trade. Everyone was short euro-dollar, this is going through parity, and all of a sudden they've had to adjust their positions. And this is why it's flipped this massive rally, um, just over the space of literally 7 trading days and we've gone up 460 pips.
Two questions I have then. So that was really well explained, so thanks for breaking that down. But one of the things is, I know von der Leyen, you said, has said that, but everyone knows that Europe moves at a snail's pace because of the way of the composition of Europe being Europe. It's many countries acting as one. So obviously markets move on the first whisker of like the first whisper of something happening. Is there a threat though of when does that actually materialize? Does it materialize in its current form? So it's not like, oh, I should rush to buy these defense stocks, like that's done now.
Yeah, so that's right. Markets will react immediately to price in the future. So that's that. I mean, are defense stocks in Europe, is that the rally over? Is it, has it spiked too high? Is there more to go on the upside? That's a hard question to answer now. If you go back to the start of the year or even 4 weeks ago, that was when you should be buying European defense stocks, right? When all of this stuff was happening, you know, with Trump and Zelensky, you know, this is weeks old, right? So you needed to have been buying them back then. I don't know if there's now more upside, you know, if that Italian company's doubled in share price, I don't know if it's going to go higher again or not. That's now, that's a real tricky trade. If you've missed this first rally, I wouldn't now kind of jump in. But look, Trump's— the unintended consequences of Trump's actions are actually to drive European politicians closer together. Europe's, if you like, a bit more unified now with this kind of stit— singular, um, defense, for want of a better word, against Trump and his actions. My point being, it's likely to speed up political movement in Europe. Historically, Europe is, it's just a nightmare to get things done politically unless everyone's unified and something's forcing their hand. We saw it in the eurozone debt crisis, right, back in whatever, 2010. So this is a bit like that. So I would say this is going to move faster than would normally be the case for this type of policy, but it's still going to take months. So you are right. And this is markets pricing in this stuff happening in the months to come.
So, so at the moment you can think of two lines and they were diverging in terms of like European fundamentals economically and the US, US being strong, Europe being weak. This is a few months back. Now they're converging given what you've described. So you might see as this fiscal stimulus comes in, better growth, as you were saying, that would be stimulative. So I'm guessing increased demand, so inflation. However, one other consequence of this is that if there is a peace deal, and it's looking like, you know, again, politics aside, but Ukraine doesn't have much leverage here in terms of they're going to probably have to cut this minerals deal with the Americans, which is going to appease them whether or not it's in the form of a deal that they want is probably gonna— it can't happen without US military support. European natural gas prices then have continued falling. So just like your defense stocks are going up, almost in parallel, complete mirror, gas prices are falling on the premise that there's a deal coming, so therefore the flow of gas can come back, uh, and the supply-demand equilibrium, if you like, kind of recalibrates again. Um, the other thing here, you've got weather forecasting, which is obviously super important when you talk about a lot of these commodity products. Uh, obviously how warm is it going to be? How cold is it going to be as a pre-indicator of how much demand there will be for something like gas? And we're starting to get forecasting of more milder temperature in Europe. And then Asia, just generally China isn't exactly booming at the moment and demand's been still. The pulse of that is relatively lackluster for a lot of these, these kind of types of energy products. So if energy comes down as a byproduct of a deal getting done, does that counterbalance then? We've had this big shift, like you said, everyone was kind of short euro, caught in this position. You've had this big bump, like you said, you've gone from 1.04 to 1.08 in the euro-dollar pair. Is that kind of exacerbated by that positioning? And now we kind of almost potentially you've got to counterbalance this economic stimulus with a bit of inflationary or deflationary forces.
Yeah, uh, 100%. And I think that it's interesting, a lot of these banks, um, had, you know, price targets for this currency pair below parity like this year. They've now changed those price targets given the reasons I've said, but it's not like they're not now saying the euro is gonna strengthen against the dollar, you know, for the rest of this year. They're basically— look, we're at 108 at the moment. I think— I can't remember which bank it was now, but they basically lifted their exchange rate target to 102. So they've gone from below parity, right? And now they're saying, look, it's not going to go below parity, but it's not going to go up either. So, but the point being that this spike might be short-term, and as you're saying quite rightly, there's deflationary pressures that might come through to counterbalance that, and you might get the euro coming down again. It's not like we're going to rally above to 1.20 or something crazy like that, right? And don't forget the dollar. Like, whenever you're trading currencies, you've got to remember there's another currency here. And don't forget the whole thesis around dollar strength was linked to Trump's tariffs. You know, the theory was that his— well, not only his tariff policy but also his tax cuts and his deregulation stance, they were all— they're all on paper inflationary, right? So we're at peak— I, I would probably say, I'll go out on a limb, we're at peak Trump uncertainty right now. This is that point in time where he's waded into office, he's got his baseball bat out, and he's gone out swinging. And I reckon we're now at the kind of peak of that uncertainty. Negotiations are happening, stuff's going to start to get agreed. And that's like on the Ukraine side, that's like on the tariff side, you know, in 1 month's time, 2 months' time, there's going to be agreements done and signed, right? And that uncertainty factor will reduce, in my opinion. So you might get back to this idea, well, okay, well, tariffs are going up, you know, Trump's trying to get this stimulative tax cut package through Congress, you know, is— are we going to see inflationary pressures in the US preventing the Fed from cutting. Worst case scenario, they might even have to hike. So that'll support the dollar, right? So I think this is most likely a short-term blip up as all of this Trump uncertainty, you know, and European unity and their fiscal package, you know, kind of hits all the headlines.
Yeah, no, I agree. And I think also the other part of this is the— again, we've talked about it before— the optics of 3 down weeks in the, in the world's most powerful stock market. And as you said, as we go into peak and probably until some of these things do come through, come to fruition, these deals, then we're probably gonna— it could remain even softer at this point. And that again forces the hand to kind of rein it back a bit because you don't want it to soften too much. And on that note then, probably further fueling that uncertainty at the moment. A lot of US banks have come out updating their recession models. So what are some of the latest figures on Wall Street?
Yeah, I mean, JP Morgan, um, look, they all kind of run these models. Everyone's trying to— obviously these analysts, they're macro, the macro analysts, their job is to, you know, monitor economic conditions and they'll have various different ways of reporting on their current thinking. And one is like a model that basically computes the probability of things like a recession. And so all of these models, the probability of a recession in the US, their models have suddenly jumped, right? And actually, so JP Morgan's, back in December, their model was printing there's only a 17% chance of a recession in 2025. Remember, a recession, that's two quarters in a row of negative GDP growth. Right, um, now all the data we've been receiving, right? So sorry, their model, it's gone from 17% chance and it's jumped to a 31% chance now. By the way, that's a sharp increase, but they're still saying the most likely scenario is no recession, right? There's a, there's a 69% chance of no recession, but it's the direction of travel of this model's probability that's fuelling some of this negative sentiment, you know, out there in markets. Um, and so yeah, look, we're like, I'm looking at the NASDAQ chart here. It set an all-time high on the 19th of February. Okay. But in that last 3 weeks, it sold off 9%. So actually we're back to levels we haven't really seen since kind of October, November last year. And actually it's the same. We had a little spike last summer. So actually you could say that The NASDAQ is trading the same price today as it was at the end of June last year. Right. So really this market hasn't gone anywhere for like 8, 8, 9 months.
Right. So that is, that was a really good look though for the administration, right? Going into the backend of last year, it was like, I'm in full control, Congress, guns blazing. It's all happening. And at the time it was like. Super robust economy. And here we are, 3 months later.
So it'll be interesting. I think so far Trump's been, look, there was going to be a bit of short-term pain because of my actions. Now, how much— what's his pain threshold from the point of view of stocks selling off? The NASDAQ's just hovering above 20,000, very important kind of psychological level. If it were to break that, I mean, it could even break that today if the payrolls number is like really weak or something, but— or maybe it breaks it next week. You could get another kind of leg lower on this, this trend. We could be talking 4 weeks down in a row, 5 weeks down in a row. Then, you know, that might even force Trump's hand to kind of rein his neck in a bit and be a bit more conciliatory to kind of some of these aggressive tactics he's got. But we'll see. But one thing, like sticking on the political theme Deutsche Bank came out to sort of question, uh, well, the kind of headline was, is basically, is this the end of the US dollar's status as being the reserve currency? You know, is it the end of it being that kind of safe, global safe haven currency? Now obviously I would say, reading between the lines, that's a bit of a political jab, retaliation.
Do you think on the analyst desk at Deutsche there's like a It's like a red phone with a glass case on it with a direct line from like the Treasury or the government. The Chancellor's there. You're on, you're good. Oh no, it's gone off. Pick it up.
Hello? Yeah, write this word for word. Yeah, this is going to be in your next report. Obviously JD Vance was in Germany, well, that was like a couple of weeks ago now, but delivered a speech that was pretty ruffled feathers, to say the very least. And actually, the Germans came out swinging and blaming. And so it's quite fractious, that relationship, right? So I think this headline's a function of that. But it's worth kind of stepping back and exploring this a bit more broadly. Yes, the dollar's weakened, and we've— a function of the euro going higher. But like, the dollar is the undisputed, you know, global reserve currency. All right, let's not— it's not gonna— that status is not going to change for years. Now, there is a trend though, which is that its position as the global reserve currency is weakening. It's still dominant, and these things, it takes like literally decades, right, for a global reserve currency to go from its peak strength to it being officially no longer the reserve currency. We've seen it in supercycles, you know, going back over the centuries, right? It can take sometimes like 50 years, I think, is actually, uh, the kind of average time period for this to happen, right? But the transition is in play and has been really since— I would say there's one good stat— since the year 2000, right? So if you look at, um, if you look at global reserves and trade. What's the percentage of global reserves and the percentage of global trade that's in US dollars, right? It actually peaked in the year 2000 at 70%. So all reserves— so percentage of global reserves, and a lot of these reserves are at central banks, so governments' reserves at central banks. So it's at 70%. Today it's 58%. So that's your direction of travel. That will continue to trend lower, okay? But it is still 58%. Right, what's happening? A lot of these, you know, why is that trending lower? So a few reasons, right? You know, the US also peaked as its percentage of the, you know, its economy and the percentage of the global economy that it makes up has been reducing as you've had the emergence of China and the BRICS. So again, it was basically the year 2000 that the US peaked in terms of its percentage of global economy, right? So what's happening is you're seeing, I'd say, two core things. Those— so mentioning China, so there's a category of countries we call the BRICS, which were those really, you know, emerging economies, um, you know, in the noughties. So China, Russia, India, South Africa, okay? And these economies have been growing and growing and growing, and historically they've been trading with each other, right? But as they're growing, the volume of trade between these countries is increasing and increasing. Historically, all of this trade has been dollar-denominated, you know. So when, whatever, Brazil sells pigs to China, well, right, it's in dollars, right, that deal. But the BRICS have been having meetings and getting together, and bilateral trade agreements are getting done. And actually, they're now exploring a new currency for them to use for their trade with, you know, within their countries, right? So That's threatening, obviously, the status of the dollar. The second thing is actually goes back to the Russia-Ukraine thing again, to be honest. When the Russia-Ukraine war kicked off, the first approach was sanctions, right, in terms of the US's stance on it. And they kind of weaponized the dollar and they basically made— they like, you know, blocking Russian banks from using SWIFT, which is like the global payment system. For example, right? And so all of a sudden, Russia and other countries, let's say China for example, were looking at that and going, wow, okay, that's a pretty powerful weapon that the US have. So actually, we should maybe change our strategy here and wean ourselves off dollar dependence to weaken that as a weapon that the US have in their arsenal, right? So all these— all these countries, their global reserves that they've been holding in dollars, they've been starting to draw that down. So they're selling dollars and they're buying stuff like gold. You know, one of the reasons gold is rallying and gold's at an all-time high— one of the reasons, there's a few— one of them is because of that, right? It's that it's almost like the composition of your portfolio as a government in terms of what you're holding as your reserves, they've been pivoting out of the dollar. Okay, so that's another reason why I'd say the speed at which the dollar is losing its reserve currency status has accelerated. And look, all the stuff that's happened since Trump's come in is only kind of just accelerating that, you know, a bit further. Then you've got the US debt situation, which some would say is not sustainable. They've got $34 trillion of debt, and you know, so that causes some, some kind of issues as well. Then finally, look, we're in a new age. Bitcoin, you know, blockchain, you know, you've got other currencies coming in, digital currencies, to kind of shake up the whole currency world anyway. So again, that's another thing that's kind of drawing volumes, if you like, away from that kind of pure US dollar play. So it's all wrapped up, right? But Germany put a little stab in this week from Deutsche Bank's headline, but really it's just a story that's been ongoing for 25 years already and will continue to carry on for the next 25 years.
Yeah, it's so interesting as you described it, the kind of history lesson and the stepping out of the noise, taking a bigger picture view and looking at how history and the concept of change economically then starts to lead to political disruptions and the intersection of geopolitics and economics. It's exactly as you described. You can go back in time. This isn't the first time this type of situation has happened. Um, us humans are very bad at, uh, continuing to put ourselves through the wringer and repeat the same mistakes again. But my final thing was I did read the Deutsche report, and in the context of what you described, one thing I thought was quite interesting that they said was this. They said that two pillars of America's role in the world are being fundamentally challenged. Number 1, the US's security backstop for Europe, and number 2, the respect of rules-based free trade. Hmm. As part of their rationale of the concept of why they were talking about what they were.
Yep. And that's, that's good old Donald for you. I mean, he's ripped up the rulebook. And, but as I said, I think we're basically at peak Trump kind of chaos, I would say, is probably around about now. And Europe feel threatened, right? That's the thing. Trump does hold a lot of ace cards. You know, they are the biggest economy. Everyone is very dependent on trading with the US. And so Trump sat in the Oval Office thinking he's pretty— he's got a pretty good hand to play here. Right? And so everyone's threatened by that. And so it causes this chaos and noise and that definite uncertainty always, you know, if we just get it back to markets here, this isn't a politics podcast.
Can I just add one more bit though? I was just thinking, and I know I always sound massively pro-China when I come out with this view, but China must be loving this when they think about the long term, because all that's going to happen here is actually that the US can behave like the US does a lot because of global trade, because of that backstop of military might. But if Europe start then ramping up military capability as well, then it's almost like now there's lesser dependence on the US for any security on major trade routes. That softens the trade strength of the dominance that America has, that accelerates the further long-term decline of the American strength. But again, the Western setup, as we've talked about before, isn't designed to think long-term. But China must be, yeah, thinking, okay, yes, we'll play it out.
There are tipping points, right? These are multi-decade transitions, but there are tipping points and short-term things that happen to accelerate it. But look, you've got to think from the US's point of view as well though. They got $34 trillion of debt. They can't afford to— or in Trump's view, and the country's backed it— they can't afford to backstop Europe's, you know, military defense anymore. So it's kind of, it's happening. And yeah, there's then, you know, there's second dimension, third dimension ramifications to all of that. And, um, for now, yeah, Europe's defense budget I mean, they've turned on the tap, right? And you're getting great moves in markets. You know, this is so interesting from a kind of markets behavioral point of view.
So to convert this then back to, as you said, back to trying to get it back to the show on hand, I apologize to all the listeners. So I'm assuming then that sell-side banks will be loving some of the activity which it doesn't— any activity is good activity, right? In terms of how they earn income.
That's right. For sell-side banks, equity, fixed income, commodity, FX trading desks, volumes are up. And this is great for their revenue streams, you know, on the market side. So this is great for sell-side banks. It's great for hedge funds, right? Who are a bit more nimble, especially like macro hedge funds. This is great. Right, where you're getting macro-driven, you know, really rapid accelerated big moves. This is, this is great stuff, right? It's not good for your more steady eddy, you know, long-only, you know, more kind of long-term asset manager where you're kind of in your equity, you know, you're in your US, or let's say your global equity portfolio where you're overweight the US, or maybe even if you've trimmed that and you're now underweight. Look, stocks are selling off. They're long only. They have to be invested in this stuff, you know. So BlackRock's assets under management will be going down, right? And that's not a good look for them. So look, there's winners and losers in all of this chaos. But I'd say, look, today, non-farm payrolls, 1:30 PM. This recording, this on a Friday, of course. You want to look out for the 20,000 handle in the NASDAQ. Because if that gets broken and breached, then I think we're going to have a bad end to a bad week, and that could accelerate lower. Now, it might not break that handle. The numbers might be surprisingly good later, in which case, fine, we might just kind of have a little bump into the end of the week. But this is definitely third week down in a row, no matter what happens today. It can't rebound all of these losses in one day. So Yeah, where this negative sentiment, you know, reversal of US exceptionalism trade is very much still ongoing.
We started the show full of positivity, sun was shining, big shoutouts, much love, and we've ended, uh, a bit away from that. But look, as always, fascinating to chat with you, Piers. Um, any questions or comments at all, feel free to drop us a comment. I know you can do that on Spotify and remember to like, subscribe wherever you're consuming this, this show and appreciate it if you could share it, if you enjoy it with a friend or a peer or a colleague. Otherwise, enjoy your weekend and we'll see you next week.
Have a great weekend.
More from Anthony

Inside the Biggest Banking Stories You Need to Know This Week (Anthropic, Diageo, Private Credit)

Inside the Biggest M&A Deals You Need to Know This Week (UniCredit, GameStop, eBay, Eli Lilly)

AI Breakthrough or Hype? Anthropic’s Claude Mythos, Tim Cook Steps Down & LIV Golf Collapse







