Bryan Johnson uses the egg debate—healthy, then unhealthy, then unclear—to show why people can't figure out what actually works for health. He built Blueprint, a data-driven regimen tracking 100+ biomarkers, and claims a measured aging rate of 0.76 and 5.1 years of age reversal across epigenetic clocks.
Typically when a layperson gets engaged in health or anti aging, they will cite first they say eggs are bad for you, then they say eggs are good for you. And then they say no one knows. Nikki Bug there's this general perception among a lot of people. I think we all experience this in life. It's difficult to put your finger on what things work and why and how to keep it stable and how it interacts. It's very hard. So blueprint was an attempt. Here's a version which may do something that is useful. Here's all the data we can acquire from every possible measurement source on how it's doing. For me, the data that I find convincing. My biomarkers 50 plus perfect biomarkers in optical clinical outcome range. I have 100 biomarkers less than my chronological age. My rate of aging is 0.76. I did 5.1 years of age reversal using six epigenetic clocks. Take my fitness tests of what I do like VO2 max and you take my stretch and my good strength and all the other things. It's generally a picture of good health. It's meant to say to somebody, here's the entirety of what I'm doing. Here's a stable place for you to start and then you can make your own version of it.
