Is Klaus Schwab The Most Dangerous Man In The World? (RESPONSE TO JP SEARS)

Oh, great. Another video where I'm defending the World Economic Forum. This is what I wanted to do with my life. My dear friend JP Sears, one of my best friends in the whole world, has been doing a lot of content about Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum lately. And he personally invited me to do a response to some of his videos. Specifically his video titled, is Klaus Schwab the Most Dangerous man in the World? Now, credit to jp. He said to me that if he has a worldview that was incorrect or based on false information, he would like to know that. And I take that stance too. If there is ever an opinion that I hold or a belief that I have that is incorrect, I want to know about it. And that's what causes me to keep questioning my assumptions and keep pursuing truth. Now, if you follow my work, you know that my primary content is speaking to entrepreneurs. The reason why content like this matters for entrepreneurs is because there's a lot of fear in the marketplace right now, and there's especially a lot of fear among Internet marketers right now. So if the conclusions about the fear in the world and the reasons to be scared were untrue, wouldn't you wanna know? And it's my opinion that a lot of opinions that my peers have about how bad the world is about to get is based in false information. And that's what I think you're gonna see as we analyze JP's video about Klaus Schwab being the most dangerous man in the world.

You might remember Klaus Schwab as the puddle of liquefied feces who said, by 2030, you'll own nothing and be happy about it.

Gotta give it to jp. The man's hilarious. One of the things I noticed about JP when I first met him was I wasn't always sure when he was joking and when he was being serious. That puts me in a weird spot because I'm not sure if JP actually believes what he's talking about or if he's pulling my leg. But I'm just gonna go on the notion that he actually believes this stuff because the 16,000 comments in this video are all like, yeah, thank you for watching, for exposing the truth. But is it the truth? JP starts this video by talking about Klaus Schwab, the person who says that you will own nothing and be happy. Now, I've done an entire video about this quote, own nothing and be happy. And I would like to invite anyone who's watching this video to send me a link or show me a quote from any of his Books in which Klaus Schwab says, you will own nothing and be happy. After hours and hours and hours of digging, I'm pretty sure he's never said it. The only time that this has ever been said was in a 2016 Facebook video in which the World Economic Forum compiled some of the predictions of some of their members. And one of the predictions that was sourced was a prediction made by member of the Danish Parliament Ida Auchen, who said that in 2030, people will own nothing and they'll be happy. But this same Facebook video included predictions like 3D printing of organs, going to Mars, climate change affecting us and eating less meat. These were just predictions gathered by different members of the World Economic Forum. They weren't said by Klaus Schwab. And I'm pretty sure he's never said, you'll own nothing and be happy. I mean, the man is 84 years old. By the time 2030 hits, he would be 90. Do you think he just, like, wants to be in a hospital bed being like, I owe everything, he'll be dead?

Klaus and the World Economic Forum want a worldwide digital ID system that determines your access to goods and services. It would monitor your online behavior, purchases, and biometrics. It kind of seems like he just wants to do away with the whole democratic process and give all the power to the state and whoever runs the state, the deep state. But that's based on both his words and actions, so it's probably an inaccurate observation.

Okay, well, let's talk about this one. Now, JP's right about one thing. The World Economic Forum has talked about a digital id. And the infographic that he shared on his screen was produced by the World Economic Forum. But the headline that JP just shared, where's that from? Well, let's look it up. Turns out this headline is taken from the credible website reclaimthenet.org. i'm just gonna go ahead and let you look that one up. Now, it should also be noted that the World Economic Forum has also said that there are dangers and downsides to digital IDs as well. In fact, the World Forum published this article in which they were criticizing how the Kenyan government rolled out a digital id, or at least attempted to. They talked about how there wasn't enough privacy in the rollout. They talked about how the structure was too centralized and could be abused by government powers. The World Economic Forum has said that in order to roll out a digital ID, in order to essentially replace physical IDs, that there needs to be a focus in privacy and decentralization so that no One controls the access to all that information. I still have mixed feelings about a digital id. I need more information about this. I'm not fully reconciled in one way or another, but the World Economic Forum has not been trying to force people to get digital IDs. They've actually been much more cautious than JP suggests in this video.

This all just sounds like conspiracy, doesn't it? The World Economic Forum are good guys. And haven't you seen the headlines? They pay for Go Green. Right?

Right.

That's probably right. They truly are good guys. Accordingly, you'll be excited to hear that the lineup of World Economic Forum speakers at their annual gathering of elites and Davos included such benevolent humanitarians like Xi Jinping, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, who's currently committing genocide. Anthony Fauci, who's arguably currently involved in crimes against humanity. And Bill Gates, who's arguably currently involved in crimes against humanity. And Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who's arguably currently involved in crimes against humanity. What a great lineup.

Actually, Prime Minister Morrison and Dr. Anthony Fauci have never spoken at a Davos annual event. Bill Gates has spoken at an annual event. Once in 2009 and once in 2022, three months after JP released this video. How did you know Bill Gates was going to be there? What do you know, jp? Now, all these individuals did participate in a digital summit that was held in January of 2022, which is what I think JP is referencing. These facts matter when JP says that they all spoke at the Davos annual event. The truth is that at the time of JP's video, the world Economic Forum hadn't even held Adabos annual event in almost two years. And I'm pretty sure that JP just looked at the people who were speaking at this digital summit, handpicked the ones that he didn't like, and then spoke about it in order to create a narrative that it was a bunch of bad actors. A good example of this is in January of 2020 at the last Davos annual event. The keynote speaker was Donald Trump. Yes, Donald Trump has spoken at the World Economic Forum twice. In fact. Here's a clip of old Donnie shaking hands with the person that you say is the most dangerous man in the world, the man that you've accused of starting the COVID 19 pandemic. They look pretty chummy, and if you listen to the interactions between these two men, they're actually very respectful of one another. Klaus Schwab is very fair in his introduction of Donald Trump. And Donald Trump has very nice things to say about The World Economic Forum. Mr. President, the role of the United States and your personal leadership is absolutely essential. For this reason, your message here has tremendous relevance. Of course, I'm aware that your strong leadership is open to misconceptions and biased interpretations. Therefore, it is so essential for us in the room to listen directly to.

Thank you, Klaus, very much. It's a privilege to be here at this forum where leaders in business, science, art, diplomacy and world affairs have gathered for many, many years to discuss how we can advance prosperity, security and peace.

It's important to show that this isn't just the elites that you don't like, it's the elites that you hang out with. Jp, is Trump in on it or did you make some assumptions about the World Economic Forum that were based in false information? This would be a good time to evaluate that. But wait, there's more.

But my favorite Economic Forum speaker of all time is this reptile, Klaus schwab's top advisor, Dr. Yuval Noah Harari. Let's see what he has to say.

Data might enable human elites to do something even more radical than just build digital dictatorships. By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to re engineer the future of life itself. Because once you can hack something, you can usually also engineer it.

Elites hacking organisms and re engineering life itself. Well, he's not talking about doing that to people, is he?

But soon at least some corporations and governments will be able to systematically hack all the people.

Well, I guess he was talking about doing that to people.

Jp, did you even go back and watch Yuval's speech? Or did you just hand select the clips that sounded dangerous and put them into a video? Actually, I know that's what you did because you sent me the reference material that you used for this video, and it was a video clip that just took the scariest parts of his speech. Well, I went back and watched his talk, the whole thing, and guess what? The entire speech is a warning about where we're going and how much power we might be giving to governments if we don't slow down this trend. In fact, here's a clip of him talking about how democracy needs to be defended and how we need to get control of how we share our data in order to defend democracy and not lead to a digital dictatorship.

Democracy generally outperformed dictatorship because democracy was better at processing data and making decisions. Now, given the technological conditions of the 20th century, distributed data processing worked better than centralized data processing, which is one of the main reasons why democracy outperformed dictatorship and why, for example, the US economy outperformed the Soviet economy.

And here's a clip of Yuval Harari saying, I don't know who should control this data, but I don't think that we should give it to dictators because we don't need to give the government more power or control.

Now, I don't think we should give these musicians most sophisticated instruments to play on, and I certainly don't think they are ready to be entrusted with the future of life in the universe, especially as many politicians and governments seem incapable of producing meaningful visions for the future.

And if you don't believe me that this entire speech was a warning, here's a clip of the host of the event saying, the future that you cast is sounding quite scary.

You paint this picture of a future that's quite scary.

How soon do you expect that future to be?

Here?

Are we talking about 2 years? 20 years? 200 years?

Literally the entire speech that JP is referencing is him standing up in front of some of the world's most influential people and saying, guys, I got some bad news. We may be headed for a digital dictatorship if we don't get control of this now, and we should probably do something about this. Jp, the dude agrees with you. You are making him sound like he's saying something that he isn't. He's literally on your side, but you have a story in your mind that he's Klaus Schwab's top advisor. And since Klaus Schwab is evil, he must be evil too.

Sponsoring partners of the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders program have been the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation and Google. I wonder why Google censors and shapes information to be in exact support of the World Economic Forum's narrative. Hmm. Just.

Just as a side note, don't you find it ironic that JP is doing a video criticizing the World Economic forum that has 2.1 million views? That is based in misinformation. And it's on a Google platform. And he's saying that Google censors all the material about the World Economic Forum. Isn't that just a little ironic?

It's probably nothing, but consider this. BlackRock is an investment firm with $9 trillion under management, which is a higher GDP than every country on earth aside from the US and China. Therefore, it turns out BlackRock has more political and financial influence than the Federal Reserve and most governments. Sounds cool, but what's the connection with a World Economic Forum? Well, again, and it's probably nothing, but BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is also just a board member of the World Economic Forum and one of Joe Biden's first appointees. Once he took office, he. He named Brian Deese to be the director of National Economic Council. Brian Deese came from blackrock where he was a global head of sustainable investing and now he's Biden's main advisor for economic policy.

Now, JP is right that there are executives from BlackRock who are now economic advisers to the Biden administration. But this is nothing new. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink sat on an advisory panel for the Trump administration that also included Jack Welch, Jamie Dimon, and Disney CEO at the time, Bob Iger.

Aha.

See, this is where it starts. This is where Disney starts making all our kids gay. It is very commonplace for presidents to have a board of advisors from a variety of different large organizations and even private equity groups. This is where people on the right and the left get all up in arms about Goldman Sachs creating policy or Merrill lynch or any of the other top financial firms having advisory positions in government. Now we can debate whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. But to simply say that there are a few advisors in the Biden administration that come from blackrock and therefore blackrock is running the show, is a huge stretch of the truth. But wait. This is my favorite part. He's coming. This is my favorite part of the whole video.

Oh, fun fact. BlackRock is buying up single family homes at an alarming rate, oftentimes paying 20 to 50% above asking price. So normal people like you and I can't own the homes.

Back up the tape. Let's read this headline that JP just shared on screen. BlackRock. Other investment firms quote, killing the dream of homeownership. Journalist says. Did you catch that? The news headline is about what some journalists said. It's not that it's true. It's not that there's any data here. It's that a journalist says that BlackRock and other investment firms are killing the dream of homeownership. So who is this mysterious journalist that they're quoting? It's this guy, Pedro Gonzalez of the Chronicles magazine. The Chronicles magazine? It's a right wing magazine. Is this a real estate magazine? Nope. Is this an economics magazine? No. Is this a financial newsletter? Ixnay, it's just a right wing magazine. Is this guy particularly knowledgeable about the real estate market or economic Trends or even BlackRock as an organization? Nope. But he has been on Tucker Carlson. Now, the best part about all of this is that BlackRock doesn't buy single family homes at all. Not even a little blackrock is the biggest private equity group in the world. World. And they're a publicly traded company, which means that they need to disclose all of their investments in order to avoid government intervention. If they're caught lying about their investments, that spells bad news for the organization. And so they have to publicly release all the things that they're investing in. And they don't invest in single family homes. Now, they do have a large amount of real estate assets. This includes apartment buildings, and they buy a lot of mortgages. They also fund construction projects that are often used to then be rented out to people. But buying up single family homes and paying 20 to 50% above asking is simply not true.

Now, there is an interesting pattern to all this. You know how you hear about ancient tyrannical rulers who would rule over their dumb people by saying things like, yeah, if you don't do all of this slave labor and let me sleep with with your wives, then God's gonna make you all perish in a deadly storm. Good old fear mongering. A predictable pattern as old as time itself. But with Klaus in the World Economic Forum, it's climate change is gonna kill you, disease is gonna kill you, and a cyber attack's gonna get you, so you better do as we say or you're gonna die.

So that's an interesting point. There is indeed a lot of fear mongering happening in the media. But just to make sure that we're talking about the same thing, let's define our terms. Fear mongering, as defined by the Oxford Dictionary, is the action of deliberately arousing public fear or alarm about a particular issue. Oh, that's interesting. The act of deliberately arousing fear about a particular issue, maybe making up things about a group of people in order to paint a picture of conspiracy that isn't real. Jp, you and I are both against fear mongering. Which is why I think me reviewing this video is so important. Because your analysis of Klaus Schwab being the most dangerous man in the world is, by definition, fear mongering.

Here's how Schwab and his friends who sociopathically never smile, fail at their great reset, and you succeed at remaining a free, sovereign individual. Be guided by your own critical thinking and what your heart and soul knows is right. And choose bravery over obedience. Obedience or bravery? Outsource your perspectives or do your own critical thinking. We are in the process of either the Great Reset or the Great Awakening. And the choice isn't Klaus Schwab's. The choice is yours.

Jp, you are absolutely Right. I know that you think that you're raising awareness about a topic and that you are inviting them to use their own critical thinking. Let's define critical thinking. Critical thinking is defined as the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment. So I will ask you, is your video an objective analysis? Did you already believe that Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum were evil and then you found confirmation for it and put it into one video? Or did you objectively look at all these pieces of information, analyze them in their own context, and then come to a conclusion? I think we've established in this video that you misquoted Klaus Schwab as saying things that he didn't say. You misquoted Yuval Harari into saying things that he didn't say. You misrepresented who's been at the World Economic Forum. You've misrepresented their policies on digital IDs, you've completely misrepresented what BlackRock actually invests in. And you've ignored the fact that people that you agree with, people that represent ideas that think fly in the face of the World Economic Forum, are still invited to speak there in order to create balance and an idea of a shared conversation on important topics. That, to me, is not an objective analysis. That was based on a bias that you already had. And you piece together clips that confirmed that bias and you put them into a narrative. That was this video that then got seen by over 2 million people. Those 2 million people who are now afraid of an organization that you made up facts about. We all have confirmation bias to some extent, and that's often why we feel so divided and afraid. When we feel afraid and we see headlines coming from Fox News or from the JP Sears Channel that confirm our fear, it makes us point fingers at other people. And when that fear is based in misinformation, that's not freedom. We're actually slaves to false information. So since you and I agree that it's so important to cultivate freedom, especially in times like now, I'd like to invite you to admit to your audience that you based this video on information that you now know was not true. Or if you decide to dive deeper into this and you confirm the bias that you have, feel free to send me those resources because I'm open to changing my mind. J.P. you're one of my best friends. I respect the absolute hell out of you. And that's why this video needed to happen. I just want to take a moment to thank our sponsor for this video Klaus Schwab and his new book, the Great Narrative, which is in stores now on Amazon or your favorite retailer. Since so many people think that the only way that I would come to these objective conclusions is if I'm sponsored by the World Economic Forum, why not own it? Klaus, you wrote a great book that I haven't read yet called the Great Narrative. Buy it at bookstores today.