Jared Isaacman discusses the government's latest UAP reports, noting that some are credible while others lack it. He suggests many unexplained phenomena could be weather balloons or foreign drones, and that discovering alien spacecraft would dramatically accelerate technological timelines.
The Department of War recently dropped their fourth release under the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP encounters. So I have to ask you the biggest question: what is your position, speaking either as an individual or as administrator of NASA, on all of these allegations?
My, my position on this is that, uh, I, I— look, I don't want to comment, uh, as to the, the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say, this is really insightful. And some of it I say is that, that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it, if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was an Iranian one-way attack drone or something.
It would be great. If we had alien spacecraft, I mean, that would definitely move the timeline forward by a couple of decades, if nothing else.
I will tell you, I, I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge. I take a lie detector test on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this. But for sure, we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon, and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts.
