In this monologue, the speaker denounces Kamala Harris for admitting mortgage fraud while claiming she helped women, arguing that under Harris' tenure women who sued banks were crushed by a corrupt California judicial system. The speaker details personal losses of $350,000 from a foreclosed Santa Cruz home, alleging judicial fraud by Judge Philip Gutierrez and Judge Dolly Gee, who dismissed or mischaracterized the plaintiff’s causes of action. The narrative cites statistics that 91% of homeowner mortgage lawsuits in California were dismissed at the pleading stage in 2012, and describes how banks such as IndyMac, Wells Fargo, and Countrywide used predatory loans and illegal foreclosures. The speaker accuses political figures—Kamala Harris, Dianne Feinstein, and their spouses—of profiting from these foreclosures through no‑bid contracts and settlements that favored bank attorneys. Personal background is provided (engineer, law degree, single mother) to illustrate the speaker’s claim of being a “middle‑class white woman” targeted by the system. The monologue concludes with a call for court reform and announces a forthcoming republished book on the foreclosure crisis of single women.
Chapters
Kamala Harris admits that mortgage fraud existed, and this is a really good thing. But then she lies about how she helped women. The reality is that under her rule, women's lives were destroyed for suing banksters. Here in California, the females that run this town not only did not hold one bankster to any consequence, They beat the pulp out of women for fighting non-mortgage fraud, the kind of mortgage fraud Kamala admits existed. The courts called our cases against this non-mortgage fraud frivolous. The ladies in power claimed that the only reason us middle-class white women sued banksters was because we wanted to harass those poor corrupt banksters. Women from Save Our Homes who produced evidence to prove the massive fraud were prosecuted, while not one bankster was held to any consequence for ruining our lives. Our legal cases were called frivolous and ignored as the judges in California protected the bankster at all costs. It was absolutely breathtaking to watch. And I am one of those women who sustained an amazing amount of damage for trying to protect my property from mortgage fraud. The kind that Kamala Harris admits existed. I lost $350,000 when Hispanic Judge Philip Gutierrez lied, and I can prove it, to allow IndyMac to foreclose on my Santa Cruz home while he fights for the rights of people to break our immigration law. This judge allowed IndyMac to break every California law, and IndyMac didn't even own my home. Here's a transfer deed. Here's a transfer deed that shows that my Santa Cruz home was owned by a Blackman Trust, not IndyMac. Therefore, IndyMac's foreclosure was in violation of Barbara Boxer's 2012 legislation that required banksters to identify real party of interest before According to the Federal Judicial Center in 2012, 91% of mortgage lawsuits filed by homeowners in California were dismissed at the pleading stage. If you were a middle-class homeowner here who couldn't afford the absurd costs of attorneys at $300+ an hour, your case was dismissed 99% of the time. It was basically like a factory line in our courts during the foreclosure crisis, where judges dismissed all of our cases without even looking at them and are lying profusely to allow the banksters to profit at our expense. Here, check this out. I filed a case in 2012 against Wells Fargo Bank regarding my Santa Cruz— Santa Barbara home. For not honoring a loan modification I received from Countrywide in 2009. I received that when I took them to task for giving me a predatory loan in 2006. Here, check it out. I had 6 causes of action. Not one was for unlawful foreclosure. Yet female Judge Dolly Gee ruled I had 9 causes of action where one was for unlawful foreclosure. All you have to do is look at the front page of my complaint to see her judicial fraud. I wasn't behind in payments and there had not even been a notice of default. Even the corrupt Bankster attorneys conceded that. This is the type of female, the ladies of privilege in positions of power in California, who are willing to protect the wealthy at all costs. The truth is, distribution of Kamala's bank settlement was given to the bankster attorneys, which then mostly went back to the banksters, because in order to distribute money to women like me, the government would have to admit the fraud of our judges. During this time, Dianne Feinstein's husband Richard Blum received 3 no-bid contracts, one to get our foreclosed homes, In other words, instead of Feinstein and Kamala Harris helping us middle-class women like she claims, they profited from our loss through their husbands. Kamala's husband is a rich Jewish attorney like Feinstein. Harris admits that mortgage fraud existed. And this is a really good thing. But then she lies about how she helped women. The reality is that under her rule, women's lives were destroyed for suing banksters. Here in California, the females that run this town not only did not hold one bankster to any consequence, they beat the pulp out of women for fighting their mortgage fraud. The kind of mortgage fraud Kamala admits existed. The courts called our cases against us known mortgage fraud frivolous. The ladies in power claimed that the only reason us middle-class white women sued banksters was because we wanted to harass those poor corrupt banksters. Women from Save Our Homes who produced evidence to prove the massive fraud were prosecuted. While not one bankster was held to any consequence for ruining our lives. Our legal cases were called frivolous and ignored as the judges in California protected the bankster at all costs. It was absolutely breathtaking to watch. And I am one of those women who sustained an amazing amount of damage for trying to protect my property from mortgage fraud. The kind that Kamala Harris admits existed. I lost $350,000 when Hispanic Judge Philip Gutierrez lied, and I can prove it, to allow IndyMac to foreclose on my Santa Cruz home while he fights for the rights of people to break our immigration law. This judge allowed IndyMac to break every California law, and IndyMac didn't even own my home. Here's a transfer deed. Here's a transfer deed that shows that my Santa Cruz home was owned by a Blackman Trust, not IndyMac. Therefore, IndyMac's foreclosure was in violation of Barbara Boxer's 2012 legislation that required banksters to identify real party of interest before According to the Federal Judicial Center in 2012, 91% of mortgage lawsuits filed by homeowners in California were dismissed at the pleading stage. If you were a middle-class homeowner here who couldn't afford the absurd costs of attorneys at $300+ an hour, your case was dismissed 99% of the time. It was basically like a factory line in our courts during the foreclosure crisis, where judges dismissed all of our cases without even looking at them and are lying profusely to allow the banksters to profit at our expense. Here, check this out. I filed a case in 2012 against Wells Fargo Bank regarding my Santa Cruz— Santa Barbara home. For not honoring a loan modification I received from Countrywide in 2009. I received that when I took them to task for giving me a predatory loan in 2006. Here, check it out. I had 6 causes of action. Not one was for unlawful foreclosure. Yet female Judge Dolly Gee ruled I had 9 causes of action where one was for unlawful foreclosure. All you have to do is look at the front page of my complaint to see her judicial fraud. I wasn't behind in payments and there had not even been a notice of default. Even the corrupt Bankster attorneys conceded that. This is a type of female, the ladies of privilege in positions of power in California, who are willing to protect the wealthy at all costs. The truth is, distribution of Kamala's bank settlement was given to the bankster attorneys, which then mostly went back to the banksters, because in order to distribute money to women like me, the government would have to admit the fraud of our judges. During this time, Dianne Feinstein's husband Richard Blum received 3 no-bid contracts: one to get our foreclosed homes, In other words, instead of Feinstein and Kamala Harris helping us middle-class women like she claims, they profited from our loss through their husbands. Kamala's husband is a rich Jewish attorney like Feinstein. You know, I grew up in Detroit, Michigan. On the poor side of life. I was raised by a single mother in subsidized housing, and as a high school dropout, I went back to college and earned two engineering degrees from Western Michigan University, being voted the outstanding student for the entire engineering college. When I moved to California decades ago, I earned a master's degree in engineering from the University of California in Santa Barbara. And then a law degree. Society told me that if I worked hard, I would receive payoffs for my family. This is the rhetoric I believed when deciding to bring my son into the world by myself. I chose not to abort. But in California, the fact that I worked so hard to own a home in a desirable place like the Mesa meant that instead of receiving support and recognition for my hard work, as I was always led to believe, my life was instead targeted by banksters and corrupt attorneys. I feel like I'm just a raw piece of meat. If you're a class person, you do not want Kamala Harris and Joe Biden to destroy the Electoral College. If they do, California politics will rule our nation. Do you know that California has the highest inequality in the nation? And inequality here is by design. There's a story available on Amazon called The Foreclosure Crisis of Single Women. Read it. It's very valuable information if you're truly interested in the truth about Kamala Harris's allegation or, or claim to fame that she helped women during the foreclosure crisis in the middle class. No, she didn't. I wrote the judge's oath. Do you know the judge's oath is to give equal right to the poor and to the rich? Isn't that hilarious? When I heard that, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. So watch for my book to be republished early next year. It is my call for badly needed court reform.
