Smart glasses are already causing havoc in India

Welcome to MIT Technology Review Narrated. My name is Matt Honan. I'm our editor-in-chief. Every week, we'll bring you a fascinating, new, in-depth story from the leading edge of science and technology, covering topics like AI, biotech, climate, energy, robotics, and more. Here's this week's story. I hope you enjoy it.

Narrated by NOAH. Listen to more of the best articles from the world's biggest publishers on the NOAH app. Or at newsoveraudio.com.

Anuj Bahal writes, smart glasses are already causing havoc in India. Shubnam was packing boxes for a move into a new home when their friend sent them an Instagram video. The footage had only been up for a few hours, but it was days old, recorded at a Delhi protest in spring 2026 against a bill that would have narrowed the legal recognition for transgender people in India. There, a content creator known for ragebait videos had approached Shubnam, a 38-year-old transfeminine graphic designer and educator. Shubnam, who uses a single chosen name, was dressed in a green sari with a shaved head, and the creator asked why they were wearing female clothing. Shubnam told him to back off. Only when the video arrived did they realise he had recorded the exchange on Meta smart glasses, styled to look like ordinary Wayfarers. Edited into a mocking reel, the footage drew millions of views, along with transphobic abuse, reaction videos, and AI-generated memes. It spread from Instagram to X and YouTube. Copies remain online today. For Shubnam, the video has caused huge harm. All it took was one unconsented video to rewind 2 decades of progress that I made all on my own, they told MIT Technology Review. For a moment, it felt like this entire adult life I have lived was just a long lucid dream, and I was going to wake up as that clueless queer child again. They haven't worn a sari outside their neighborhood since. Experts warn that many others will experience similar ordeals as smart glasses go mainstream, and they say privacy problems are becoming especially acute in India, where covert recording and the circulation of images without consent are are already pervasive. Cases of cyberstalking, sextortion, deepfakes, and other forms of online abuse are growing in the country. And the chances of a crackdown on technology such as smart glasses are slim, given that Indian law enforcement authorities are themselves increasingly adopting AI-powered surveillance tools, including facial recognition systems and their own AI-enabled smart glasses. Smart glasses are among the fastest-growing devices in India's wearables market, according to the International Data Corporation, a research firm. And Reliance Jio, one of the country's largest telecommunications companies, says that later in 2026 it's set to launch a sub-$105 rival to Meta's glasses, the latest model of which have a $420 price tag in India. The core privacy issue is that these cameras don't look like cameras, so targets may not notice they're being recorded. Yet Meta rejects the idea that it's responsible for protecting people from intrusions, says Janusz Swierczynski, an Oxford Saïd Business School researcher who studies privacy and emerging technology. More and more the expectation is being placed on bystanders to look out for themselves, he says. That means it's up to them to spot a small LED in the glasses' frames that activates when recording is in progress. Meta also relies on wearers to behave responsibly, says Sviatchinsky. Reliance Jio did not respond to our request for comment on privacy issues related to its upcoming glasses. Creators have already demonstrated ways to circumvent the recording light on Meta's glasses. Tutorials show users how to cover or otherwise obscure the LED while continuing to record. Back in March 2026, Wired documented a market for stealth mode modifications that physically disable the light or remove it entirely. All that makes covert recording easier, and the risks are not borne equally. Zwierczynski says women and other marginalized groups face greater harm when inconspicuous devices capture and circulate footage without consent. consent, as happened to Shubnam. The bigger problem, however, is that in India, smart glasses aren't just being used to turn ordinary people into targets of viral pranks. They're also being adopted as a tool of police surveillance. In June 2026, when thousands of young demonstrators gathered to protest problems with the country's education system, Delhi police used Meta smart glasses to record them. In fact, a petition filed by former Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union president Ayesha Ghosh before the Delhi High Court alleged that police had filmed protesters continuously for weeks, including while they were eating and resting. It also alleged that the police had threatened to send footage of student demonstrators to their parents and colleges. In July 2026, India's Solicitor General dismissed the case in court as luxury litigation, Instead of investigating the students' complaints, police turned on the students themselves, opening 10 criminal investigations for offences including rioting, assault on public servants, and damage to public property. Some of the protesters who spoke to MIT Technology Review, on condition of anonymity, say they never saw the LED on the Meta AI glasses police wore during the demonstrations. Meta maintains that its safeguard works. The company told MIT Technology Review, every pair has a capture LED that blinks when you take a photo or video that you can save or share. It can't be turned off, and if someone covers or damages the LED, the camera is disabled. The company also says users are responsible for complying with the law and respecting people's privacy. That approach is risky, especially in India, where norms around filming and consent are still highly disputed, and digital literacy is still uneven, says Sameer Palmer, a counsellor at Mari Trustline, a safety partner working with Meta and YouTube to support people harmed by online content. The hardware is improving, but the country's weak understanding of consent gives an invisible camera far more room to cause harm, he says. Simply being in a public place is often treated as implicit consent to be photographed or filmed. He says the helpline has been seeing an uptick in cases involving covert recording and non-consensual footage. Violations of this access have increased significantly and are expected to rise further in India, he says. People are recorded in medical settings, during private encounters, and in public spaces. Those with less power to object are particularly vulnerable, he adds. It's either trolling or it's playing pranks on them, and then recording them, he says. Abusers do target people who are a little more unaware or susceptible to how this technology-facilitated harm works. The law in India has not caught up with this new kind of harm, says Apar Gupta, a lawyer and founder-director of the Internet Freedom Foundation. India's laws against voyeurism and the sharing of intimate images were designed largely around more recognisable forms of abuse, he says, citing offences such as secretly filming someone undressing, using a toilet, or engaged in a sexual act. The laws offer limited protection when someone is secretly filmed in an ordinary public setting and the footage is then used to humiliate them, he says. Social media platforms' rules do offer another route to removing harmful content filmed with smart glasses, but it's not an immediate remedy. Under India's current rules, platforms can have up to 36 hours to act on certain complaints— a window that can be long enough for a video to be downloaded, copied, and circulated elsewhere, he says. The problem of filming without consent seems set to grow. According to the Financial Times, some internal prototypes of new Meta glasses include AI features that continuously photograph and listen to the wearer's surroundings, enabling the glasses to later recall what they saw or heard. These functions wouldn't activate the external recording indicator, making it impossible for bystanders to know when information about them is being collected. Meta told us it intends to keep the LED for active capture, such as taking photos or recording video, but not for AI features that interpret the wearer's surroundings. Its argument is that a constantly blinking light could eventually become so commonplace that people stop noticing it. But that logic risks putting society in a perpetual game of catch-up, says Woodrow Hartsock, a professor of law at Boston University. Tech companies have an incredible ability to push these tools out faster than society can meaningfully acclimate to the threat, he says. By the time society catches up, there's already a degree of normalisation. For Schubinam, the danger is not just that people may become accustomed to being recorded. It is that they will become accustomed to seeing versions of themselves that they never chose to put out into the world. Being comprehended along the lines of a narrative that I didn't compose or consent to— that imposed recognition makes you feel like you're powerless in how people know you, they say. You were listening to MIT Technology Review, where Anuj Bahal writes, Smart Glasses Are Already Causing Havoc in India. This article was published on 23 September 2026, and was read by Jane Wing for NOAH.