WCI #303: A Random Walk Down Wall Street with Burton Malkiel

This is the White Coat Investor Podcast where we help those who wear the white coat get a fair shake on Wall Street. We've been helping doctors and other high income professionals stop doing dumb things with their money since 2011.

This is White Coat Investor podcast number 303. Love what you hear on the podcast.

Looking for more great White Coat Investor content? Head over to our YouTube channel where you can watch video recordings of our podcast, short snippets of financial tips explained succinctly by me and others, and deep dives into topics for more in depth learning. You can even learn all about real estate with webinars from our real estate partners. Check out all this and more@YouTube.com thewhitecoatinvestor you can do this and the White Coat Investor can help.

All right, welcome back to the podcast. This is the first one we've recorded.

In the New year. You were not hearing this till February, but slowly the first one we recorded after the New Year. And so it's exciting to be, you.

Know, New Year new you thinking about.

New Year's resolutions and those sorts of things. We'll see how well I've done on them come February 23rd. I just got off the phone last night with my climbing partner and we're making big plans to go to the Valley this summer. We're going to go try to climb the face of Half Dome. So my resolution is to get in good enough shape to be able to do that. Wish me luck with that.

All right, our quote of the day.

Today comes from Carlos Slimhelu who said.

Courage taught me no matter how bad.

A crisis gets, any sound investment will eventually pay off. There's a lot of truth to that. If you just pick good investments and hold onto them long enough, it's going to work out.

Thanks for all of you out there.

Doing what you do. It's been a wild winter in the emergency department for me. Our volumes are way up. We're seeing the triple pandemic with flu and RSV and Covid all combined, but not too bad. Doesn't feel like the depths of the pandemic by any means, but certainly very, very busy in the department. And so I know those of you out there, whatever you do, whether you're a doc or not, it's the middle of winter, works hard, and you're not always very appreciated. So nobody said thanks. Let me be the first. By the way, we have surveys that you can use to make money. If you go to the WCI recommended page, White Coat Investor go to recommended scroll down paid surveys is what it's labeled.

You can make money there.

You can make money while watching TV.

In the evening and vegging.

You can make money while you're on your commute. As long as you're not driving, you can get a little bit of side income so that you can have business income and open up a solo 401k. Most of us can use a little bit of extra income and this is one way that you can do it. In some specialties, this can be very lucrative. If you prescribe expensive drugs, you're probably in one of those specialties, so keep that in mind. They'll take anybody, but they particularly want those specialties. If you go through the links on the WCI recommended page, there are some special deals available there, so check that out.

We have a really special guest that.

I'm thrilled to have on the podcast. It is somebody that I've known about for a long, long time. Read his book a long, long time ago, one of the first really good investing books I read back in, I don't know, 2005 maybe. And I heard him again recently at the Bogleheads Conference and was so impressed at this 90 year old's ability to communicate complicated ideas and to be sharp as a tack, and invited him to come on to the White Coat Investor Podcast. He also happens to have the newest edition of his book out. Let's bring him on the podcast and let you get to know him as I have.

Our guest today on the White Coat Investor podcast is Dr. Burton Malkiel. Now, you may not have heard of Bert before, but if not, you're really missing out. He has had a long and distinguished career and is well known in the investing community, particularly among advocates of index fund investing. He is a veteran. He is a professor in his seventh decade, I believe, at Princeton. As a professor there he has been the Director of the Vanguard Group, spent 28 years doing that. He is also the Chief Investment Officer at Wealthfront. He has had a long and distinguished career, but perhaps he is most well known for a book that we're going to be talking about today called A Random Walk Down Wall Street. Bert, welcome to the White Coat Investor Podcast.

I'm delighted to be here. Thank you.

Amazingly, I'm sure there are a few in our audience who don't know much about you. So can we start just having you tell us a little bit about your upbringing and maybe how it influenced your views on money?

Sure. I grew up in a tenement house as a poor kid in the Roxbury section of Boston, Massachusetts. As I said, I was a poor kid, no real interest in investing because I had no money to invest. But I like numbers and I was kind of fascinated with the stock pages of the newspaper and how the prices fluctuated each day. And as a 10 year old I could tell you the price of General Motors stock as well as Ted Williams batting average. So it was something that for some reason as a numbers guy interested me and in going through high school in Boston and then into college. I majored in economics. And economics was perfect for me because there were lots of numbers and diagrams and a little bit of math at the time. So that was kind of my upbringing. I was a pretty good economics student. And my advisors in college said you must go to graduate school, study economics and become an economist. And at the time I would hear nothing of it because as I said, I grew up a poor kid, never had my own clothes, they were all.

Hand me downs from older cousins.

And I didn't want to be poor. And I thought since I was sort of interested in financial things, what I would do would be to go to Wall Street. And at the time I, I actually went to business school, had a period as a finance officer in the United States Army Finance Corps and went to work on Wall street as an investment banker for a period of time.

Was fascinated by the world of finance. But as someone who is always a little bit skeptical of almost everything, I.

Was very friendly with the research department of firm which was one of the.

Leading firms in Wall Street. And I wondered if the if. Does the emperor really have clothes that, you know. I looked at the research recommendations and yep, they would go up for a while, but then they would go back to where they were. And you know, I thought to myself, is this really helping people? And fortunately I did make some money on Wall street. And the old thought that I ought to do a PhD in economics was always on the back of my mind. I started to try to do it part time at New York University, working in Wall street, but I'd be traveling all over the country. There was no way I was missing three quarters of my classes. And by the time I had actually made enough money on Wall street to think that, well, at least I wasn't going to be poor all my life. I took a leave of absence to study economics at Princeton, New Jersey, which is where I got my PhD. Much to my surprise, they offered me a job teaching. And at the same time I was offered a job as a director of.

Prudential Insurance Company, One of the biggest.

Insurance companies in the world.

And I thought, hey, you know what?

I can have my cake and eat it too. I can be an academic, teach, which I enjoyed doing, study markets, and at the same time make enough money so that I knew I would not be.

Poor for the rest of my life.

So that was kind of how I.

Ended up in this world of academic life and business life. I then served as a director and chairman of the finance committees for many.

Different corporations and financial institutions and had this kind of dual life that suited.

Me very, very well for the rest of my life and not sorry about any of the decisions that I've made.

Now, the 13th edition of your best selling A Random Walk Down Wall street was just released on January 3rd. I mean, we're recording this on January 9th. So it was just last week I bought it, I think the second day it was out. But this is one of the first classic investing books I ever read. It must have been close to two decades ago that I read it the first time. I don't know what edition it was, but even back then the book had already been a classic for decades. This is the 50th anniversary edition of, of this book. Now, these days, index investing is well understood gospel among investors. But 50 years ago, that was not even close to the case. Bogle's 500 index fund had not even been started yet. Can you tell us about the reception to the first edition of this book?

Well, as you said, it recommended index funds in the first edition and suggested that they would do even better than all the actively managed funds that were heavily advertised. And the reception was pretty good in the academic community, but in the financial community it was thought of as naive at best and just dead wrong for the most part that who would want to be mediocre, which is what you were going to do if you ever had an index fund that you could buy. So the initial reaction was not good. My book was reviewed in Business Week, I remember, and the review was terrible. And interestingly enough, you mentioned the first index fund that also had a terrible first reception. Vanguard introduced the first index fund three years later after my book was published, and they were going to have an initial public offering which they hoped would have $250 million of sales. The underwriters said, well, that's too optimistic. You better cut it back to 150 million. The underwriters then tried to sell it, and in fact they sold only $11 million of the first index fund. It was called Bogle's Folly. It was called a horrendous mistake And I used to joke with Jack Bogle, the CEO of Vanguard, that he and I were probably the only investors in the index fund that there were. So the initial reaction was simply terrible to the idea in the book and to the actual index fund. But what's interesting is as the evidence accumulated, it's just absolutely amazing how well it's worked. Standard and Poor's does a study each year where they compare the results of an index fund with the results of active managers. And every year 2/3 of active managers are outperformed by an index fund. One third do better, but 2/3 do worse.

But the problem is the 1/3 who do better in one year aren't the.

Same as the 1/3 who do better in the next year.

So that what happens is when you compound this over 10 or 20 years, you find that 90% of the professional.

Active managers underperform a simple broad based index fund.

It's not that nobody can outperform. There are 10% that over the long poll do outperform. But if you try to go active, you're much more likely to be in the 90% category to underperform. And on average, the average professionally managed active mutual fund or exchange traded fund underperforms a low cost index fund by about 1 percentage point a year. So it's not mediocre performance. You know, people say, who wants average performance? It's not average performance, it's above average performance. And it's been consistently shown year after year. And frankly, you know, I believe in the thesis that was in the initial edition of the book even more strongly 50 years later than I did at.

The beginning when it was thought of being heterodox. It was absolutely silly.

Well, it's not silly.

It actually works. And it is above average performance. And I believe even more strongly today that the core of everybody's investment portfolio ought to consist of low cost, broad based index funds.

You know, it's interesting, the data is what it is and it's very convincing. But it's also usually pre tax when you look at it. After tax it's even better, particularly for those who have most of their investments inside of a taxable brokerage account, simply because the index funds have such low turnover and are so tax efficient.

That's absolutely right. And after tax, the advantage is even more when you have an actively managed fund and you have it on a taxable account, you will get a 1099 form at the end of the year. And they have recognized a lot of capital gains because they change, you know, they're professionals, they go into one stock and if it does go up, they sell it. And since there's a long run uptrend for the stock market, they are recognizing capital gains.

The capital gains that they recognize are.

Typically short term capital gains that are taxed at regular income tax rates. Whereas for broad based index funds there are essentially no capital gains that are realized. And so you even get something that is more tax efficient than an actively managed fund. So after tax the difference is even more than 1 percentage point per year.

You know, in the book and elsewhere you've written that you know with regards to index fund investing that being an above average investor is extremely simple. It is not often in life that the easy thing to do is, is the smart thing to do. Yet it's so hard to convince people of that truth. Why do you think it's so hard?

Well, I think it was hard because.

Remember you have got a financial community with lots of resources who is advertising.

And telling you you can't do it yourself.

You need our professional help to do it. So you know, you've got the whole financial community working on the other side to convince you that you can't do it. But the message is getting through in that today more than half of mutual funds are indexed.

Now that we have mutual funds that.

Are indexed and so called exchange traded funds, funds that sell on the exchanges and that you can buy through your broker, these are typically index funds.

So it was hard to get the message across but it is getting across. And now some people are saying there's.

Too much indexing and they're worried about that.

So eventually it does get across despite.

All the advertisements on the other side. And as you said, it is the right advice. It is the advice that has helped people.

And you know, in one sense I.

Think one of the things that's, you know, so wonderful about being a doctor, when you can feel that someone has come to you with a disease or an illness and you have been able to help them. I am sure it's a marvelous feeling.

And for me in writing this book.

I think the greatest joy is when I get letters from people who say, you know, I bought the fourth edition of your book or something a long time ago. I did exactly what you said. I've never had a lot of money, but I consistently put some money into a broad based index fund and I now look at my retirement fund and while I never earned a lot of money as a worker, I find I now can have a comfortable retirement. I think it's that gives me the kind of pleasure that I'm sure doctors have when they have been able to really help people.

Do you get more pleasure from that or do you get more pleasure from the fact that fortune calls you the man mutual fund managers hate?

Well, I guess with a little smile I can say that that does please me. But I really do get more pleasure out of the fact that thinking that to really what time has shown is that it is the right advice and that people have actually been helped by it.

Yeah.

Thirteen editions now. Why has it been so important to you to keep this book updated every few years? And what can readers who might have read the 6th or 7th or 8th edition expect to find new in this 50th anniversary edition?

Sure, in one sense it hasn't changed at all in that it believes in index funds as the core of a portfolio.

But what has changed is the way that you can do it. This is an investment guide. And remember, as we just discussed, there.

Were no index funds when the book first came out.

In fact, so much of what we are able to do today didn't exist.

At the time the first edition came out.

There were no money market funds, there were no bond funds, there were no bond index funds. There were no tax exempt funds for people who hold some assets outside of their retirement plans. The whole idea of what you can do with your retirement plans is to different. There were no Roth IRAs, there were no 529 college savings plans where you could help your children with college expenses or your grandchildren. So all of the instruments that are available are now available. And when you look at the practical advice of exactly what what it is that you should buy, these things have changed enormously. And each new edition talks about what are the optimal ones today. Incidentally, the other thing that's happened is that competition has driven the cost of these index funds down to essentially zero. So that has been a big change. The other thing that's changed is the following that with investing, you're right, the simple thing is the best thing. But one of the problems with investing is that we are sometimes our own worst enemies. And one of the new things, for.

Example in the book is a whole.

New chapter on behavioral finance. And what are the errors? How are the ways we shoot ourselves in the foot?

You know, if I can make an.

Analogy to medicine, the doctor might say, look, having this double cheeseburger and fries for lunch every day probably isn't the healthiest thing that you ought to do for your long run health. But some of the things that we do do as Individuals, we get over optimistic. We then go and say we're going to follow some trend, we're going to follow something that's new. We're going to get into Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the currency of the future. And there's this speculative craze and it goes to $70,000 and we get hooked into this and we say, my God, I'm going to sell my index fund and buy into, buy into Bitcoin. Or we've recently had so called meme stocks.

This stock Gamestop is doubling and then doubling again.

Or we've got the Ark Innovation Fund. And a couple of years ago people were saying, what are you talking about? Why should you be in a simple index fund? This fund just made 150% in the last year by buying new technology stocks, by buying, let's put everything into Tesla because this is the way all automobiles.

Are going to be in the future.

Well, those are the mistakes that can kill an investment portfolio. And so a lot of what's in new additions is the warnings about these kinds of things.

And incidentally, this ARC Innovation fund, which a year and a half ago sold at 150 is now selling at 30.

So avoiding mistakes is the second most important thing.

And there's a lot of that material that I've covered.

The other thing is people have been fascinated with so called ESG investing.

Is there a way of doing good.

For humanity and doing well financially? That's what the advertisements say.

Does it in fact work?

So what we've done in new editions is talk about what people are talking about in investing now and does it work or doesn't it work? Factor investing a whole bunch of things that are very popular in the financial community. Getting people up to date with what finance advisors are talking about and separating the wheat from the chaff.

What you might listen to and what you shouldn't.

Yeah, definitely. Things have certainly changed in the last 50 years. And I don't know if people would keep reading the first edition and get the important message out of it if it hadn't been updated and discuss some of those things. You know, one of the concepts that I believe was in the first edition, I never read the first edition, but I believe it was in the first edition and has subsequently become very famous is the concept of the blindfolded chimpanzee. And most of us have heard this idea that a blindfolded chimpanzee throwing darts at a page of the Wall Street Journal can pick stocks better than an active fund manager. And interestingly enough The Wall Street Journal actually ran a series for a while demonstrating that that was actually true. But most people may not realize that concept, I believe, came from the first edition of your book. Where did that idea come from of the blindfolded Chimpanzee?

Well, what you want to do, as someone who writes about economics is so many people tell me that, well, they studied economics for a while in college and found it so boring that they never continued with it.

And so one of the things I've.

Always tried to do as a teacher is, is to try to make it as interesting as possible using the right analogy, using the story that people can relate to that makes the point. So I had done this with the chimpanzee throwing darts at the Wall Street Journal.

The Wall Street Journal did run the contest. They let me throw out the first darts. Now, I wasn't really serious about the.

Fact that you ought to select your portfolio by throwing darts. You know, the right analogy is probably to throw a towel over the stock pages because I want you to buy and hold everything. But the chimpanzee was something that people could relate to. It was interesting, and that was in the first edition, and it helped cement the point. So it's really the thing I've tried to do in the book is always to make it interesting. There are little stories throughout that I hope people will find interesting. And if you thought that finance or economics was born boring, I hope the people who look at the book will say, you know, it's actually fun to read.

Let's talk for a minute about the efficient markets hypothesis. Why do people assume that because markets are not perfectly efficient, that we should not act as if they were?

Well, you know, the analogy that I would use is the following. If you were talking about an engine, you were an engineer talking about an engine, would you ever say an engine was perfectly efficient? No. You'd say relative to some ideal, the engine is 90% efficient or 85% efficient. The market's not perfectly efficient. The market makes mistakes, and sometimes it makes doozies of mistakes. For example, the.

There are bubbles in the market.

In January of 2000, all the high tech stocks were selling for more than 100 times earnings.

You know, a normal earnings multiple is 15 or 17. And there was clearly a bubble. And some people would say, well, that.

Proves to you that markets are inefficient. And you should never believe in the.

Efficient market hypothesis as it was called.

And I write about this. There's no question the market went absolutely crazy. But here's the thing. The Difficulty is there was no way to know in advance when the market had hit bubble levels and how much the bubble was going to inflate. Now people forget it was Alan Greenspan.

Who at the time was the head of the central bank, the Federal Reserve.

Who coined the expression irrational exuberance.

In talking about that it was called the Internet bubble or the dot com bubble.

And stocks that added dot com to.

Their name would go up a lot because this was the way that you ought to invest. You don't want a broad based index fund, you want to just be in the.com stocks.

So Alan Greenspan was the one who coined that expression. But what people forget is that he coined that expression in 1996. And if you had simply bought a broad based index fund in 1996, held it through the bubble and then held it later, you did extremely well making about 10% a year. And if in fact you had instead of bought these.com stocks at the time, you would have been really killed financially. I mean the darling of the market at the time was a stock called Cisco Systems still exists. It makes the switches and it's called the backbone of the Internet. Well even today Cisco Systems is selling for only about half of of what it sold for in January of 2000. So yes, there are bubbles, but trying to go and being smart and I will then be able to avoid them, I'll just be out of the market at that time. It doesn't work because you got to know what you can know and what you can't know. There was no way that anybody could do this with any kind of accuracy. And recently I had mentioned GameStop, there was this bubble in so called meme stocks where particularly with the Internet, everyone thought that this was the way to get wealthy. And the stock doubled and then doubled again. So you could think, well look, smart people would know better and they would be able to sell the stock short. There was a hedge fund called Melbourne Capital that sold Gamestop short and the hedge fund went bankrupt because they sold it short too soon. So yes, these crazy things happen. But you're better off acting as if you will never know what when you have a bubble and when it's going to pop and how much it's going to inflate. You're still much better off assuming you can't do better than simply buying and holding a broad based low cost index fund.

Now we know how you feel about individual stocks. Do you think there is a place in an intelligent portfolio for digital assets of any kind, whether they're cryptocurrency or some other type of crypto asset or an nft. Is there a place for that in an intelligent portfolio?

Look, anybody who has studied the stock market for his entire life obviously has some bit of a gambling instinct. And I don't mind if you buy some individual stocks. If the core of your retirement portfolio is indexed. You want to take a flyer on an individual stock, I think that's absolutely fine.

Go do it.

So do it only as an add on to your retirement fund being in a good broad based index fund. Now having said that, no, I would not buy a crypto, any cryptocurrency. I wouldn't buy Bitcoin, I wouldn't buy Dogecoin, I wouldn't buy Ethereum, I wouldn't buy any of those. No, I would not buy an nft. I would not bid on the.

People.

The artist who sold for almost $100,000, his art NFT.

I think this is all absolutely crazy.

So yes, if you buy some individual assets, buy individual assets in real companies.

I don't think these digital assets are ever going to work.

And let me just talk about that for a moment because people think now that Bitcoin has gone down to $16,000.

This is what you ought to buy.

It's going to go back up and.

It could, it could go back up.

And is Bitcoin useful as a currency? Well, I don't think if I want to go to Starbucks and get my coffee that a currency that can be up or down 10% in a day is very useful. Would it be useful for something?

Yup.

I think if I wanted to do something illicit, if I wanted to buy, if I wanted to buy some drugs.

Maybe I would love to have Bitcoin.

And that of course is the reason why it can never last for a long time. Governments aren't going to to the extent that it is useful. It's useful for doing sketchy things, it's useful for doing illegal things. And governments are undoubtedly in the future going to clamp down on it. Now I'm not a Luddite. The international payment system will improve over time. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if we have a digital dollar at some point. So it's not that there won't be improvements, but Bitcoin itself I think will never be it, nor will the other digital currencies.

And I say avoid them and avoid.

All of these things that are going to be the wave of the future.

Because those are often the things that will lead you to disaster as an.

Investor turning the page to a different subject. I enjoyed the section of the book on new portfolio construction techniques. It talks about factor investing and risk parity and ESG investing. And a lot of times when these new ideas come out every few years, there's good academic evidence for them. A lot of it's just back testing, but there's good evidence. How can we determine when to listen to an academic on topics like these and when not to? How can we know if it really is different this time?

Well, it's a very good, it's a very good question. And one of the difficulties with a lot of the academic studies that I've pointed out in the book is these things work brilliantly in a back test. But do they work in an X sample period? That is, did they work well in a period after the back test? And very often they don't. And this is what I have tried.

To show now, probably the most popular.

Right now because there's a big company, BlackRock, that has been suggesting this, that you can do good and do well financially at the same time. And I'm particularly skeptical about this and.

Skeptical because I'm not even sure that the companies that are in these so called ESG funds are really, are they really good? There are rating agencies who rate companies.

As to whether they're good for humanity, whether they have good governance and so.

Forth, and they disagree completely. In fact, the correlation between the raters is as low as 0.4. And just to put that in perspective, the correlation between Moody's and Standard and.

Poor's on Bond ratings is 0.995.

So there's almost no agreement. And there's good reason why there's no agreement. Take a Midwest utility called Xcel Energy and it gets a terrible ESG rating from some of the raiders because they burn coal. But this is a utility that has promised by a date certain to be completely carbon free. This is a utility that's doing more investing in wind and solar power than any other one. So is it good because of its investments or bad because it's burning coal? Now let's take another example. A natural gas company. Is natural gas a bad company because it's carbon? Or is it a good company because in going toward a carbon free world that we all would love to see, natural gas is the cleanest burning carbon and we're going to need natural gas over this period. So what worries me about ESG is when I look at the companies in an ESG portfolio, I wonder whether the companies that are in there are really as Pure as they are supposed to be.

Are they really good companies?

Should I really feel good about owning Facebook or now it's called Meta or Visa. These are the companies that are often.

In these ESG portfolios because they don't do any polluting. But is our social media an unambiguously.

Good thing for society? I'm not so sure. Is Visa that charges exorbitant price rates.

Like 20% to poor people who've gone.

Over the limit on their credit cards.

Is this a good company?

You know, when you start to think about it, and this is all I want people to do is to think about. People will advertise this is the best.

Thing to do and be very, very careful about it because in fact you don't outperform an index fund. In fact, you do worse than an index fund. So you may neither do good for society or well financially.

Now look, I've got a lot of people would like to feel good about their investments and I said before, I don't mind you buying some individual stocks. So buy an index fund for the core of your portfolio and then you want to go and buy a wind, a company that makes wind tower, fine, good, go do it. You want to buy a solar panel company, fine, go do it. But buy it as an add on to your portfolio, not as your whole portfolio.

Because if you do that, I'm convinced.

You will certainly not do well financially. And on some of these ESG funds.

I'm not even sure that you're doing wonderful things for society either.

You know, the main ideas in your book, although they are controversial when they're first published, no longer really are. So I'm going to turn to a few of your ideas that perhaps are a little more controversial and ask you to defend them. The first is using dividend paying stocks as a bond substitute for part of a bond portfolio. The appeal is that stock dividend yields may be just as high as bond yields when interest rates are low and you may get appreciation too. The downside is that you're still taking on equity risk with what is supposed to be the safe portion of your portfolio. What are your current thoughts on the topic?

And again, it's a very good question.

And how thoughts can change as markets change.

We've had a remarkable change in our bond markets over really over the last 18 months.

When I had suggested bond substitutes, we basically had zero interest rates.

And when you have zero interest rates, bonds are particularly risky, as has been shown, because bond portfolios have gone down during 2022, which was a Terrible year for all financial assets. But the bonds didn't protect you. So I think that in fact dividend paying stocks were at least as good and probably even a little better. So did I believe in it then? Absolutely.

Do I believe it as much today? And the answer is no. And I believe in it less today because today I can buy a one year treasury bill at over 4%.

I can buy a two year treasury for over 4%.

So what I would say today is that bonds are a much better investment than they were.

And the clear message about the stock.

Alternatives was to do this during a period when interest rates were extraordinarily low.

When interest rates have then risen, as they have remarkably over the last year, then you don't have to do that.

The advice was to do it only.

When interest rates were essentially zero.

The second idea I want to push back a little bit on is the idea of overweighting emerging markets, frontier markets, China in particular. You seem to have been a fan of the last few years. Do you think investors should overweight emerging markets? In China in particular, the idea was.

Not really to necessarily overweight them, but for people who generally had zero in these emerging markets, they should make sure that they have some of their assets in them. And I definitely think they should continue to do that.

Partly because of the demography, we in the west are aging rapidly.

The work age population is not increasing and our growth rates are going to be a lot lower.

The places in the world where the growth rates are high and where the workforce is increasing so that growth can.

Continue are the emerging markets of the world. The fastest growing economy in the world today is India. And India is the fastest growing economy in the world, in part because the population is young and the population is growing quickly. Vietnam, Indonesia, these are the places where you have young populations and the populations are growing rapidly.

So yes, I think you ought to have some parts of your portfolio in these emerging markets. By overweighting, I don't really mean overweighting relative to, you know, I don't want.

You to put your whole portfolio into these areas, but I certainly want you to have part of it.

Now, let's talk about China though. China I am somewhat less enthusiastic about.

Than I was in earlier editions of the book. And I'm less enthusiastic because Xi Jinping.

The leader of China, is much more.

Like Mao the dictator than like Deng Xiaoping, who was the one who reintroduced capitalism into China and was responsible for the big growth rate. So I'm less enthusiastic about China because I am not particularly happy with the way government policy has changed. Would I avoid China completely? No, because it's very, very cheap. But clearly I would have to agree.

With you that I am not going to beat the drums for China. And if you decided you didn't want.

To be in China because you really didn't like Xi Jinping, I would say fine. But don't avoid India, don't avoid Indonesia, because you're going to have much more growth there because the demography is so much better.

As much as half of investment dollars are now in indexed investments. What percentage of the market do you think can be indexed before it becomes a problem?

I don't think we have enough indexing.

Not that we have too much.

If we had 95% of the market.

Indexed, there would still be enough active people to make sure that information gets reflected in prices. And the paradox of the so called efficient market hypothesis is you obviously do need some actively managed participants to make.

Sure that when the drug company finds.

This new drug for cancer and is now worth double what it was before, that the price adjusts. Well, I think if you had even 1% of the market, there'd be enough people like that.

But just think, also as a thought experiment, suppose we were 100% indexed and.

There was nobody who was going and doing that.

The drug company has the cure for.

Cancer, it's going to be worth double.

What it was and it doesn't move in our free capitalist society. I can't believe that somebody isn't going to go. There's some hedge fund guy who's not going to go into the market and.

Go and buy up that drug company.

And buy up that drug company until.

Its price reflects the new information.

So I am not worried, as some.

People are, that we have too much indexing. I don't think we have enough.

And I will never be worried that in our capitalist economy where there are.

There'S freedom to enter the market, that.

There won't be somebody who comes in to make sure that information gets reasonably.

Reflected in the price of stocks.

Our time is now short, but this is going to be listened to eventually by 45 or 50,000 plus high earners, mostly doctors. What have we not yet talked about today that you think they should know?

Well, I think again, I think we touched on this.

But I would say the lessons that I hope people take from this is that even if you agreed with my hypothesis about index funds, where the evidence I believe is overwhelming, that at least make sure that the core of your portfolio is indexed and look at the lessons that have been spelled out of.

The bubbles that we have and seem.

To consistently have and how easy it is to be swept up in these.

Bubbles to read about them and be very, very careful. Because good investing is first of all to do the right thing, but perhaps even more important to realize that we're like Pogo. We sometimes are our own worst enemy.

To avoid the really stupid things that we do that can ruin any investment plan.

Awesome. It has been wonderful talking with you Bert. It is great to have you on the podcast. Those who would like to talk to read some more of Bert's writings, get to know him a little more. I recommend the 50th anniversary edition of A Random Walk Down Wall Street. It just came out in January. It's completely updated. Talks about all kinds of newfangled stuff, ESG investing, the meme stock, mini bubble, cryptocurrency, mini bubble, those sorts of things. All in the book. It's a great personal finance book, but with a heavy focus on investing to reach your goals in an easy, reproducible way, as he mentioned by putting the bulk of your portfolio into broad based, low cost index funds. Thank you so much for coming on the White Coat Investor podcast.

Thank you. I've really enjoyed it. I really appreciate it. Bye bye.

All right, that was great. Burton Malkiel, A random walk down Wall Street. The man was born in 1932. He talks about not wanting to be poor at the beginning of the interview.

1932, everybody was poor, right?

I mean, he was in high school going through World War II, right?

He served in the army in the 50s.

He's been a professor at Princeton since 1958. This is his seventh decade as an economic professor and still sharp as a tack. I hope my career goes that well, that I'm as excited about what I'm doing at 90 as I am now, and that my mind is as sharp as his is still at that age. Pretty incredible, really.

Love what you hear on the podcast.

Looking for more great White Coat Investor content? Head over to our YouTube channel where you can watch video recordings of our.

Podcast, show short snippets of financial tips.

Explained succinctly by me and others, and deep dives into topics for more in depth learning. You can even learn all about real estate with webinars from our real estate partners. Check out all this and more@YouTube.com thewhitecodeinvestor you can do this and the White Coat Investor can help. Don't forget, if you're interested in those paid surveys, you can find those under the paid Surveys tab on the recommended tab@whitecoatinvestor.com a little extra cash is never a bad thing. I think one of our columnists makes $30,000 a year doing these surveys and feels like it's, you know, it doesn't take very much time or effort at all for him, so check it out and it may help you boost your income as well.

Thanks.

For those of you leaving us five star reviews and telling your friends about the podcast, a recent one came in from greenmed051 who said terrific. No hype resource.

The podcast is great for commutes, but.

Make sure you combine it with the fantastic WCI webpage. They've got concise, clear articles on nearly any question you have. This is one of the single best financial literacy sources I've found in years. Five stars. Thank you so much for that review.

For the rest of you, keep your head up, shoulders back.

You've got this and we can help. We'll see you next time on the White Coat Investor Podcast.

The hosts of the White Coat Investor Podcast are not licensed accountants, attorneys or financial advisors. This podcast is free entertainment and information only. It should not be considered professional or personalized financial advice. You should consult the appropriate professional for specific advice relating to your situation.