Who Should Eat Keto and Why? with Gary Taubes
This is a podcast episode titled "Who Should Eat Keto and Why? with Gary Taubes," recorded in April 2021. It features a detailed conversation between Dr. Mark Hyman (also referred to as Ask AI Mark) and award-winning journalist Gary Taubes. The discussion centers on the science and practice of ketogenic and low-carbohydrate diets, obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic health. They explore historical and contemporary perspectives on diet, weight control, and the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis, providing insights into why ketogenic diets may benefit certain populations. The episode also includes promotional segments by Dr. Hyman for health-related products. The content is an in-depth, expert-level dialogue on nutrition and metabolic disease.
Coming up on this episode of the Doctor's Pharmacy. The obese and overweight, the 90, 88% of Americans who are metabolically unhealthy are not sitting in lines at McDonald's right now and they're oversized, you know, SUVs with the specially wide seats waiting to get, you know, their triple cheeseburgers and super-sized fries and huge cones. I mean, some of them are, but some of them are eating very healthy. and doing their best to eat in moderation, they're still overweight because they're getting the wrong advice.
Hey everyone, it's Dr. Hyman here. Now, so many of my patients ask me how I manage to work multiple jobs, travel frequently, well, not so much anymore, and spend time with my family and still focus on my health. I know it can seem hard to eat well when you got a lot going on, but the trick is to never let yourself get into a food emergency and to stay stocked up with the right things to support your goals. So recently I discovered Paleo Valley Beef Sticks. I keep these beef sticks at home and at the office so I know that whenever I'm in a food emergency, I have a healthy and delicious option to keep me on track. It's no secret that I have high standards when it comes to what I put in my body and Paleo Valley Beef Sticks checks all the boxes. They're gluten-free, grain-free, dairy-free, soy-free and non-GMO. Plus, they use 100% grass-fed and grass finished beef, which not only adds to the flavorful taste, but it also means they're free of any harmful antibiotics or hormones that you'll find in most meat. With grass-fed beef, you'll get more nutrients than you would with beef fed with grains, things like higher levels of omega-3 fats that help reduce inflammation and more B vitamins and other antioxidants to support your body's converting food into energy. and also more of the fat soluble vitamins that are beneficial for a healthy heart. Plus, instead of being processed with chemicals and other questionable ingredients, these beef sticks are naturally fermented so you get gut friendly probiotics with every bite. How cool is that? Right now, Paleo Valley is offering my listeners 15% off your entire first order. Just go to paleovalley.com/steak forward slash hyman to check out all their clean paleo products and take advantage of this deal. That's paleovalley.com/hyman. I definitely recommend stocking up on the grass-fed beef sticks to keep in your house, in your car, and in your office. It's one of my favorite tricks to staying healthy while on the go. Whole body wellness is obviously a huge part of my life, and I'm always looking for new ways to make feeling great easier. One of my non-negotiables is getting a daily dose of healthy light. For years now, I've been using JOOV Light Therapy devices to easily do that all year long, and I especially love it during these shorter, cold winter days. You've probably heard me talk about JOOV before. That's J-O-O-V-B. I use my JOOV Light Therapy device every day, and I've experienced many benefits, from firmer, more radiant skin, to improved sleep quality, and faster recovery from my toughest workouts. It works on a cellular level, which is why it has so many benefits for the whole body. Joov pioneered light therapy technology by being the first to isolate red and near infrared light and make it accessible and affordable for in-home use. And now Joov has a new line of devices that takes light therapy to the next level. Joov's new devices are sleeker and lighter with all the same power. The new Joovs include some really cool new features like Recovery Plus mode which uses pulsed near infrared light technology to give your cells an extra healing boost that optimizes the recovery process. Joov's devices also feature ambient mode which uses lower intensity light to support your sleep and circadian rhythms and helps counteract all the artificial blue light that keeps you up at night. Joov upgraded the setup for the new devices with quick easy mounting options so your new Joov can fit to just about any space in your home and move around your home easily. I definitely recommend trying Joov out for yourself and right now is the perfect time. Just go to joov.com/joov forward slash pharmacy. That's F-A-R-M-A-C-Y and use the code pharmacy F-A-R-M-A-C-Y. That's J-O-O-V-V.com/pharmacy. For a limited time, you'll get an exclusive discount on Joovv's Generation 3.0 devices and some exclusions do apply. All right, now let's get back to this week's episode of the Doctor's Pharmacy. Welcome to the Doctor's Pharmacy. I'm Dr. Mark Hyman, that's Pharmacy with an F-A-R-M-A-C-Y, a place for conversations that matter. And if you've heard the buzz about keto and are wondering what it is, if it works, if you should do it, or if it's going to kill you, this is the podcast you should want to listen to because it's with my good friend, incredible award-winning journalist, Gary Taubes. He is one of my heroes. In fact, it is one of his original articles that got me thinking about the whole idea of is a calorie a calorie and is sugar actually worse than fat? Back in 2002, when he wrote the New York Times magazine article, which was called Big Fat Lie, right? Wasn't it called Big Fat Lie?
What if it's all been a big fat lie? Yes.
Yeah. Hi Gary. Gary was the co-founder and director of the Nutrition Science Initiative or NuSI. He's the author of many books which are really deep dives into issues that we all care about. The Case Against Sugar, which I'm a huge fan of, why We Get Fat, which is a very concise little book that explains exactly why we gain weight, and Good Calories, Bad Calories. Again, these are just in my mind some of the top books in the nutrition health field, have been most investigative books I've seen about the truth of the science without any filters or any sort of obfuscation through the ways that we usually get our data. He is also a contributing article writer for Discover, staff writer. He's written many articles and cover articles for Nutrition Health, New York Times Magazine. He's written for the Atlantic Esquire and has been in many best of anthologies, including the Best of American Science Writing. And he's received lots of awards, three Science and Society Journalism Awards and National Association of Science Writers. the recipient of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Award in Health Policy Research, which is pretty damn good for a journalist. He lives in Oakland, California, and he.
Is one of the smartest guys I know. Welcome to the Doctor's Pharmacy. Mark, thank you. And thank you for that great introduction. Okay. Even me, you know, even I'm willing.
To listen to what I have to say now. Yeah, exactly. Well, you know, we're in an interesting moment in, in society where we're fatter than ever. We keep talking about it for decades. I have been, you have been, and it just keeps getting worse and worse and worse. Our government recommendations and policies don't seem to be solving the problem. And certainly the advice we're getting from our doctors and nutritionists often is not effective either, which is eat less and exercise more. It's just calories in calories out. And you've written a lot about this in the past. And, and recently there's been a real movement to look at radical different ways of solving some of the biggest problems we have, which is diabetes and obesity, using a ketogenic diet. And for those who are listening, a ketogenic diet, essentially a 70% fat diet, cuts out almost all carbohydrates and has, you know, moderate amounts of protein. It's definitely not exactly an Atkins diet. It's a little bit different than that. And it's been around for a long time in medicine, but it's recently being used for all sorts of conditions from cancer, to diabetes, to Alzheimer's, and it's been used for decades for epilepsy by neurologists. So you really become an expert on these issues as a non-doctor scientist. You probably have read more of the scientific papers and more of the data on this than most doctors or scientists. And you've been busting a lot of the big myths that really we are facing in the world of food. And the first myth that you really took on back in 2002 with that article, what if it's all been a big lie was that we should all be eating a low fat diet to lose weight because fat has more calories than carbs. So if we all eat snack well cookies, we lose weight except for one thing, the opposite happened. So what led you in that whole trajectory of this sort of examination of low fat movement to swing so far? The other way to read to write a book called the Case for Keto, Rethinking Weight Control and the Science and Practice of Low Carb high fat eating. What made you go, I need to write a book about this? Okay.
Well, when I first- By the way.
This is the book. Everybody should get it. It's really, really awesome. It's got a nice red cover. You can't miss it. And it's beautifully written. It's great prose. It's just awesome.
And again, thank you again. So yeah, so that New York Times Magazine article was a third of my investigative reports on nutrition. So I started off just by chance writing about salt and blood pressure for the journal Science. And I had no idea that there was an enormous, very vitriolic controversy in the field, the basis of which was that there's surprisingly little evidence to advise us all to eat less salt. And while I was doing that work, I realized that one of the worst scientists I'd ever interviewed, and I had written a book called Bad Science, had taken credit not just for the low salt diet we were all eating in the 1990s, but the low fat diet as well. So then I did a investigative piece for science. It took me a year published. It was called the soft science of dietary fat. And it just turned out that again, the evidence, the idea that dietary fat causes heart disease was an interesting hypothesis that was launched kind of in the beginning of the 20th century and then took hold in the 1950s and never panned out. The experiment after experiment to try and test it. And the experiments, you know, sometimes they showed that people ate less fat, lived a little longer. Sometimes they show that they died a little more prematurely. And scientists fell in love with the hypotheses that scientists often do. The public health, the move, establishment in this country started promoting, and we believed it ever since. So in 2002, when I did this New York Times magazine article, initially the idea was that I just wanted to find out what started the obesity epidemic. it was relative, our awareness of it was relatively new. Obesity rates shoot up in this country roughly in the 1980s, and it coincides with some shifts to nutritional advice. Well, we go from eating sugar to eating high fructose corn syrup. So that was one hypothesis. Michael Pollan bought into that idea and was promoting it. And the other was just that we started promoting this idea that a low-fat diet was a healthy diet and that carbohydrates are heart-healthy diet foods. When carbohydrates had always been perceived as kind of uniquely fattening, you know, starches, breads, and sugars, the kind of thing that, you know, people would say they go right to my hips or right to my gut. So I was reporting that story for the New York Times Magazine, and while I was doing it, it turned out I stumbled on five clinical trials, really the first five that had ever been done comparing an Atkins ketogenic diet to a low-fat diet, the kind the American Heart Association was telling us to eat. And none of these studies had been published yet, but they'd all been discussed in conferences. And they all found the same thing, that if you tell someone to eat a high-fat diet rich in saturated fat and animal products, but don't eat carbohydrates, and you could eat as much as you want. So, you know, the eggs and bacon for breakfast and you know, T-bone steak with salad for lunch and a half a roast chicken with salad, their green vegetables for dinner and you smother in butter and oil and, you know, all the things we were supposed to not do. And if you tell someone to do that, not only do they lose weight, but their heart disease risk factors improve. And all five studies showed the same thing. And they were, you know, from clinical trials, up and down the East Coast, basically. And it suggested, you know, this is the joke. It suggested that everything we know about or everything we're being told about diet and health was wrong. Because, you know, the Atkins diet, again, basically was a ketogenic diet. It was a ketogenic diet. That's why Atkins was crucified for promoting it. He got very wealthy, but the medical establishment didn't appreciate him promoting a radical idea like ketosis. and so anyway, I, I wrote that article. I argued that, you know, maybe dietary fat wasn't the problem. Maybe carbs were. And I've been following that ever since. And I actually didn't want to call my book the case for keto because I didn't want to distract from the major points. That was sort of the, originally the book was called how to think about how to eat. And then our mutual friend, Mark Bittman, came out with a book called how to eat six weeks before mine was originally scheduled to be published. Theirs came out in mid-March ship 2020. So they got swallowed up by covet. And mine was not scheduled until late April, so we could delay it. And when we delayed it, we changed the title to so they wouldn't compete. That's the case for keto. I didn't fight it because I've basically been making the case for ketogenic diet since that original 2002 article.
It's a pretty profound idea. Go ahead.
Yeah, I wanted to, I just wanted to put all this in context. And the context is, you know, if carbohydrates are fattening, those of us who get fat easily can't eat them. And then the extreme version of carb restriction is a ketogenic diet. But for, you know, 90 years, people have been insisting we get fat because we eat too much. And you know, you and I and others have been arguing when you get fat because of the carbohydrate content of the diet. And some of us just, you know, if we want to reverse that process, we basically have to restrict or abstain from them entirely. And then you replace the calories with fat. Now you're doing a keto diet and you're fatter. Yeah. But it's the same thing that you would have been told 195 years ago. Yeah.
Well, it's true. I mean, this has been around for a while. In fact, you know, our good friend David Ludwig was a, Harvard professor who's a clinical trialist in obesity and insulin resistance, you know, he says we don't get fat because we overeat. We overeat because we're fat. And what he means by that is that when you start eating carbohydrates, you get hungry fat growing in your abdomen. And it's not just fat there holding up your pants. It's actually hungry fat that makes you hungry and eat more carbohydrates. So it's a vicious cycle and it causes fat storage, slows your metabolism, increases hunger and locks the fat in the fat cells. It's literally a one-way turnstile. Once the fat gets in, which comes from the sugar, it's turned into fat, it can't get out. So it's kind of a disaster. And he said something to me once which just blew my mind and made it all make sense to me. He says, you know, remember your training about type 1 diabetics, type 1 diabetics and autoimmune disease where the pancreas is damaged and you cannot make insulin. these people have, we call it polydipsia, polyphagia, and polyuria, right? So they're constantly thirsty because they're peeing out all the sugar and salt and everything, but they're hungry, they're starving all the time, which is polyphagia. And that means that they can eat 10 or 20,000 calories a day and they will not gain a pound. In fact, they will lose weight. So why is that? It's because they have no insulin and you need insulin to gain weight. And the cold keto keto, is that it shuts off that insulin. And so, you know, one of the whole issues here is that it's a whole calorie myth, which you dissected in your book, Good Calories, Bad Calories. Can you take us down a little bit of why we're still so stuck on this? In fact, David Ludwig sent me a paper from the American, I think, Endocrinological Society that was relatively recent by a whole panel of experts on obesity, very renowned people. And they all came down and said, it's all about the calories. And I was like, oh, I thought we were over that one.
So that's just all about the calories because they're willing to accept that counting calories doesn't really help anyone anymore. It's this idea that it's all about energy balance. Right. So what David Ludwig is saying, the idea is, you have the different foods have different effects on our hormonal status, and whether or not we accumulate fat is determined primarily by hormones, insulin and glucagon. So insulin is a dominant one and glucagon is a sort of a counter hormone. So if some foods stimulate insulin, carbohydrate-rich foods and protein to a lesser extent, carbohydrates only stimulate insulin. Protein stimulates glucagon, which works against insulin, the fat tissue. So it's sort of, the argument is obesity is a hormonal thing. You cause your fat cells to accumulate excess fat, and that in turn steals calories from the rest of your body that you would use for fuel, and so you're constantly hungry. And when insulin's elevated, the only calories you could burn for fuel are carbohydrates, so you're constantly hungry. So that's part of the vicious cycle. Back at the turn of the 20th century, when nutritionists and doctors first started thinking about what the cause of obesity is. Yeah, it's funny in science and my interest even more than nutrition is how science progresses and scientific thinking. And in science, the tools you have available determine what you can learn, right? Yeah, so in physics, you get a bigger accelerator, you can learn more about the universe and astronomy. You get telescopes that look in different wavelengths. You could learn different things about the universe, whatever you could see in that wavelength. and in nutrition, the only tool they had that seemed relevant to obesity was a device called a calorimeter, which could measure the energy expended by a human being or could measure the energy contained in a food that the human ate. So they created this theory that obesity is caused by energy in being more than energy out. It seemed intuitively obvious because that's all they could measure. They couldn't measure- It's a math problem.
I mean, weight loss is a math problem.
As basically weight loss is a math problem. So, you know, there are other people arguing, look, it's, it's clearly a hormonal issue. It's like you look at men and women fat differently. That's hormones, you know, like boys go through puberty, they gain muscle and lose fat. That's hormones. Girls go through puberty, they gain fat in specific places. That's hormones. It's all hormones, you know, and it's just some people, they're going to get fat no matter how much they or the only way they're going to stop themselves from getting fat if they starve themselves. Yeah. And this was the German and Austrian clinicians who were doing the best medical science in the world at the time argued this. And it didn't matter. An American came along, a guy named Louis Newberg, University of Michigan, and claimed he had done the first experiment ever. This was 1930. And in this experiment, he proved once and for all was all about calories. It's about how much you weigh. and it was always about how much you ate. And no matter what the excuse, like, you know, women, when they go through menopause, they gain fat. Now, animals, when they go through menopause, are the, if you remove the ovaries from animals, they'll gain fat. And that was well known even in the 1920s. So it seemed to be a hormonal thing related to estrogen. But with women, it was about eating too much. They sat down with their lady friends and played bridge and ate bonbons. I mean, incredibly sexist. explanations for why it's never hormones.
And it just, it caught on.
It's, it caught on in part because World War II came along and the, the German and Austrian researchers arguing the opposite vanished. They evaporated with the war.
So the Germans were the ones pushing that it's not energy balance. And because they were saying it's the Nazis, we got rid of that theory.
We got rid of that. And it sounds like we're joking, but it's you. you know, nowadays, I, I mean, it's very easy to demonstrate in the history. It's people cited Newberg. They didn't cite the germ. Actually, the prime guy was an Austrian. He was a Jew named Julius Bauer. He fled to the U.S. in 1938, but the only job he could end up getting was at the, I mean, he was the, one of the founders of the, the sort of endocrinology research in Europe. very well known pioneer in the field, flees the Nazis in '38 when they attack, they move into Austria. He ends up going to Baton Rouge, Louisiana. He works at LSU for a year and then he goes to LA and gets a job at the hospital of medical evangelists. And he publishes papers like Julius Bauer, Hollywood, California. And nobody pays attention. Yeah, yeah. You know, he's not at Harvard, he's not at Yale, he's not at Columbia. He's like, who is this?
We've had decades of him. the research since then. I mean, there's been really well designed, well executed clinical trials by David Ludwig and others looking at this whole hypothesis of the carbohydrate insulin hypothesis of weight loss, which is a hormonal one. And what it really leads to in our thinking, and this is sort of striking to me, you know, I researching some of my books, I discovered that if you're a kid and you're overweight, it's more of a stigma than if you're a kid and you're in a wheelchair and a quadriplegic. and we basically blame the person who's overweight for being fat. It's your fault you're fat. Just eat less and exercise more. And otherwise, if you don't, it's just because you're lazy and a glutton. And that, and that fat shaming and that, that, that underlying approach is based on this idea of the calorie myth and that weight loss is just a matter of willpower. So why is willpower, not the issue here.
Well, again, it's based on this energy balance idea. The obese child, maybe he's 40 pounds overweight at age 12. That means his fat, he's been storing 50 extra calories of fat a year in his fat cells. So why can't they fix that? Why can't they just, Eat a little less, store a little less, or exercise a little more, store a little less. And it's the answer that lean people come to is, well, they must not care enough. If it's about energy balance, and I make this point in the case for keto, if it's about energy balance, that absolutely, that creates the concept of fat shaming in effect, because the assumption is always, if it's about intake and expenditure, then you should be able to take in a little bit less or expend a little bit more. It doesn't take a world of effort. We're talking about tiny numbers every day. So why can't people do it? And then you end up assuming it's because they don't want to. Yeah. Or they don't have willpower. You come open. And it's interesting. By the 1960s, you know, obesity research in the US was dominated by psychologists and psychiatrists who were trying to figure out how to get those fat people to eat less. I mean, they didn't care. The idea that they just have a fat storage disorder. They, we have a fat storage disorder. Just like if you saw somebody walking down the street who was eight feet tall, you wouldn't think about how much they eat and exercise. You would think he's got some kind of growth hormone dysfunction. Even if you weighed 400 pounds, which often, if somebody's eight feet tall, they're likely to weigh 300 or 400 pounds. You don't care about how much they're eating and exercising. care about the growth hormone issue and growth hormone receptor. But here they just didn't think like that. And once they didn't, and this is a danger in any sort of medical scientific process, once you assume something to be true based on an assumption, then it's going to infiltrate everything you do and it's going to affect everything you do. So David Ludwig does these terrific, you know, very well-designed experiments to suss out whether or not obesity is a carbohydrate insulin problem or a calorie problem.
Yes.
And for the most part, his work has sided with his, you know, his own preferred hypothesis, carbohydrate insulin. But there are other people who think the opposite, who claim that their experiments are just as well designed. And then you end up getting- They're nameless. Yeah, they will remain. And the problem is all we can do, like you as a physician and me as a journalist, is say, look, this works. you know?
Well, I'm a practicing doctor and I'm just humbled by seeing real patients in real time and not just looking at theory or scientific articles or textbooks, but actually seeing what works and what doesn't work depending on the person. And this is really an important piece here. And you say in your introduction to your book, you say, I'm not writing this book for the lean and healthy of the world. I'm writing it for those who fatten all too easily. And I think that's the key line in the book. There are some people who can eat whatever they want and they're fine because they're highly insulin sensitive. But when you look back, for example, at the Native Americans in this country, there was no obesity, there was no diabetes, there was no heart disease. And now second to Samoans, they're the fattest population in the world. Why? Because their diet changed from what they were adapted to, to a extremely high carbohydrate diet. They were great at starvation. They were magnificent at managing scarcity, which 100,000s do that. Although I don't think the genes do that.
I don't think the Native Americans dealt with a lot of scarcity in this country.
Well, I mean, they might have had to deal with some scarcity. A hundred gatherers, you know, they could get food, but there was food, but it was tough, right?
It wasn't like- It wasn't that tough. When Lewis and Clark, I hate to say it, when Lewis and Clark, you know, crossed the country in 1805, They had to push the buffalo out of the way on the Great Plains, literally.
You've got these herds of millions of buffalo.
But historically, we've gone through periods where.
It wasn't always easy to go to the grocery store and get food. So we are really well adapted to starvation. And then there's a whole class of people that really this book is for, the Case for Keto, Rethinking Weight Control and the Science and Practice of Low-Carb, High-Fat Eating. Everybody should get a copy. You go into explaining why there's a subset of people, which turns out to be probably the majority of people in America.
Probably the majority.
All right, there's 75% are overweight, 88% are metabolically unhealthy. So maybe there's like, you know, one out of 10 that's a lean, healthy person and they got lucky. But for the rest of us, carbohydrates make a difference. Hey everyone, it's Dr. Mark. Decades ago, I read a book about how light dramatically influences our health because of its impact on our circadian rhythms. Ever since, I've been fascinated with the research around light exposure and how we can use light to optimize our health. But our modern always-on culture means we're now surrounded by LED and fluorescent bulbs and digital devices with bright lit screens that emit junk light around the clock. My friend Dave Asprey actually coined the phrase junk light to describe the excess of blue light as well as green and violet light that disrupt our circadian rhythms. Junk light reduces our ability to produce melatonin, which is a key hormone for regulating our internal clocks, sleeping well, and even aging well. Lack of quality sleep has been linked to everything from weight gain and diabetes to heart disease, mood disorders, and even cancer. So when I heard about TrueDark glasses, I knew I had to try them. TrueDark's Twilight Line are the strongest sleep hacking glasses on the market. They use proprietary technology to block up to 100% of blue, green, and violet light at night. The TrueDark Twilights essentially signal to your brain that it's dark outside, putting your brain into alpha or meditative state so you can fall asleep quickly and rest more deeply. After using them myself, I can say they really do help me get deeper, more restful sleep. Right now, you can improve your own sleep and get 15% off at truedark.com with the code DRHYMAN15. That's truedark.com with the code DRHYMAN15. Now let's get back to this week's episode of the Doctor's Pharmacy. what does it mean to fatten easily and why is this book so important for people who are overweight to really get understand and read?
Well, and this is, you know, we all, we get it. If you're one of these people who struggles with their weight, you know, again, the conventional wisdom, the assumption, the advice we get from everyone when it's a calorie problem and you gotta eat less and exercise more, the idea is if you're still struggling with your weight, you're not trying hard enough. Whereas the rest of us want to say, look, I tried that. I did need less exercise more. I spent the decade of the 1990s hungry. Okay? I gained weight anyway. This is what it means to, you know, it's like I restricted my calories. I ate in moderation. You know, Michael Pollan, I tried my best to eat not too much, and I got fat anyway. so we're different from the lean people. So a lean person comes along and they think, okay, I eat in moderation. This is my issue with David Katz. And I hope David Katz someday reads the, you know, Yale Affiliated doctor who has become a major spokesman for the sort of mostly plant movement. And the world is full of these, you know, healthy, lean, buff physical trainers and marathoners, and they think I eat moderation, I'm lean, I eat moderation and I exercise. Therefore, if everyone else ate moderation exercise, they would be lean too, which is not true. And if they don't eat moderation and exercise, or if they're not lean, it means they're not eating in moderation and they're not exercising enough. So I have to tell them, eat moderation, don't eat too much. Eat a healthy diet, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, And the point is we all did that. We're not the obese and overweight, the 90, 88% of Americans who are metabolically unhealthy are not sitting in lines at McDonald's right now. And they're oversized, you know, SUVs with the specialty wide seats waiting to get, you know, their triple cheeseburgers and super sized fries and huge cones. I mean, some of them are, but some of them are eating very healthy. and doing their best to eat in moderation, they're still overweight because they're getting the wrong advice. And that's what I'm trying to communicate. We've been getting lean person's diet advice for the past century. This is what I eat, therefore this is what you should eat. What I'm arguing is that those of us who fatten easily, if we eat what they eat, we're going to be either fat or hungry. Those are our two choices. and possibly both. Yeah, that's right.
As a practicing doctor, I see this in real time by looking at people's hormones and their metabolism and their insulin levels and their lipids and their inflammation. I can tell often just by looking at somebody because I had so much experience, but just looking at their lab test, which type of metabolism they have. And the truth is, and often I feel bad and I apologize to my patients because I say, listen, I didn't design this. I'm not the I'm not the creator of your biology. I'm just the interpreter. But I'm telling you, if you really want to stay healthy and avert all the disease of aging, because they're all connected to this mechanism of high insulin, right? Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, dementia, depression. I mean, I could go on and on. If you don't pay attention to this, you are going to be in trouble. And the truth is, like you were saying, what do these lean people have in common? They're insulin sensitive. I don't know if you know Jorge Pletskey. He's a cardiologist at Harvard, a preventive cardiologist. if you were to take a group of 100-year-old people who had absolutely clean arteries, they'd have one thing in common. I said, what's that? He said, They'd be insulin sensitive, meaning they are very good at producing very low levels of insulin that are extremely effective in the body that don't require them to produce more and more to get the same benefit. And sort of like that's what insulin resistance is. Essentially, when your cells become resistant to the effects of insulin, so you produce more and more and more and more to keep your blood sugar normal, But eventually, you know, that burns out and you get diabetes. But even before you get diabetes, it just causes the weight to pile on.
And all the metabolic issues. Yeah. And this is, you know, those people who, I mean, you could guess if you've got a weight problem. This is right though, the first symptom a doctor is supposed to look for to diagnose metabolic syndrome, which is we could call insulin resistance or hyperinsulinemia syndrome. And the first symptom you're supposed to look for is your waist size is increasing, you're getting fatter. and then it's high blood pressure and low HDL cholesterol and high triglycerides and glucose intolerant. You're becoming diabetic. All those things are happening. And then the way you fix it is remove the cause of it. The cause is the first the highly refined grains and sugars. But then for many of us, and this is where you start going into sort of keto diet land, for many of us it's all carbs. All carb rich foods other than green leafy vegetables, grains, beans, starches. Yeah. 'cause our bodies can't tolerate it. And this is just not the message we get. And it's a strange time we live in because often I feel like, you know, we were making a lot of progress getting the nutrition community to pay attention, but now we live in the age of fake news. So it's easy to write off alternative perspectives as fake news. And I wander around thinking, wait, am I a purveyor? Are you a fake news purveyor?
Am I a fake news because I.
Disagree with the establishment. But again, the argument we're making and what you're telling your patients, what I'm telling readers is, look, try this. The one thing we know for sure, right, is low carb diets are safe and benign. When I first wrote that New York Times magazine article 18 years ago, the assumption was that these 19 years ago, the assumption was these diets would kill you, right? I mean, I described sitting, I had tried Atkins as an experiment. I described sitting in my diner in New York, having my morning eggs and bacon and waiting for my heart to blow up because that was, you know, it's high in saturated fat, Christ, it's high in bacon. I should have died of colon cancer decades ago. Knock on wood. We know they're safe now. We know they're benign. We know for sure now people can try them without being afraid. that they're going to somehow blow up their hearts and they can see the benefits.
Yeah. And I think that what happens is that in medicine, we tend to be lumpers, not splitters. We lump everybody into one group saying, all you humans are the same, you're all metabolically identical, you all need to follow this same monotonous advice, and you'll all be fine. And, and it's absolute nonsense because as we're learning, there's a large heterogeneity or variation of the population according to their genes, their metabolic issues, their family histories and so forth, and their need for different types of diets and foods. There's no one size fits all diet. So for me and for you, maybe we are relatively lean guys and maybe it's just because we follow this advice.
But in my case, it's because I follow this advice, right or wrong.
I may be killing myself. well, I've gained 15 pounds by eating more carbohydrates. I went through that period and I'm now, you know, down. And I, and I think that, that, but, but this isn't, keto isn't, I think, universally effective for everybody because I think some people, and I've seen this in my practice, if you're wanting, for example, optimize your health and people are trying keto as a health kick and you're one of those people, for example, like me, who, when you eat excess fat, it actually can screw up your metabolism in the sense that it can cause really worse lipid profiles and all sorts of abnormalities that you wouldn't necessarily see. So, I think there's still a lot to learn about who's the right person for this and I think we'll be able to sort of discern this through.
Both hormonal metabolic testing and also genetic testing. Yeah, and I agree with you. The question would be though, if you've got a patient, obese diabetic patient, someone who struggled with their weight their whole life, there's no doubt. We're going to agree that we have.
To get their insulin down. Yes, 100%.
100%. And so then the question is how do you do that in a way that maximizes their benefits and in a way that they can maintain it for the rest of their lives? And those are sort of different questions. So for the most part, we talk about in every, because even though again, this book is called the Case for Keto, but the book is about the subtitle. You know, it's rethinking weight control and the science practice of low carb, high fat eating. And throughout the book, I refer, I use the term low carbs, high fat slash keto or ketogenic eating. I admit that this is, there's nothing catchy about it. Nobody's gonna say I'm doing tabs as LCHF slash keto, but I'm trying to be inclusive. You know, at some level, we, I just trying and a hammering on this, and people say, well, tabs keeps running. the same thing over and over again. It's because we have to get more and more people to accept that this is a carbohydrate problem. It's not a fat problem. It's not a, you know, it's funny, even what you just said, so my next book is on diabetes and specifically diabetes and I'm obsessed with the history and I'm going to apologize to you. Wasn't that the case for sugar?
That was sort of talking a lot about that.
Well, that was also, that was sugar, that was diabetes on a population-wide base. This is sort of on a individual, what's the dietary treatment of diabetes? How we got into this world where the ADA is prescribing high carb diets.
Well, it used to be, I mean, the treatment for diabetes used to be back in the 1920s, a 70 to 75% fat diet and low, very, very, very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet. That was the treatment before we developed insulin.
Yes, no, that was from the 1780s.
Till 1914. this is Harvard's Joslin Diabetes Center. This is not some radical.
Yeah, no, I know, I know. So that's the, anyway, the point is, once you restrict carbs, once you restrict carbs, then you've got, and you still have problems, and people start talking about, what else should I restrict? Do I have to restrict fat also? Do I have to, you know, and we're saying on some level, How do you fix these people? Everyone's going to be different lipid profiles. I'm a little less sanguine about what we really know about the connection between lipid profiles and long-term health. There's so much confusion there and so few diet-related clinical trials that would actually tell you once you've sort of fixed your metabolic syndrome, once you've lowered insulin and got your weight under control, what do the other lipid markers mean? Because we decide, you know, based on people eat a standard American diet, that's how we decide what these, you know, the association between these risk factors and disease are. But we're not, you're not advocating a standard American diet to your patient, and I'm not advocating it. So once you fix your obesity and your, your blood sugar levels issues with carb restriction of some form from, you know, moderate to severe from, you know, improving the quality of the carbs might be enough for people. Yeah. But even then, it's sort of, yeah, everyone's different. Everyone's going to be able to tolerate a different level of carbohydrates, but on.
Some level, that's when you're saying it's so important, Gary, I just want to stop there because I, I think what I've learned is that there's a Continuum, right? There are some people who, you know, can't even look at a bagel, because if they do, they'll have a cephalic insulin phase response, meaning they'll think about the bagel. It'll make their insulin go up and they'll gain weight without even doing anything. That's the one extreme. And those people, I would say they're like celiac disease. They really need to, they need to be considering themselves carbohydrate intolerant. and then there's the continuum of people who are sort of somewhere along that spectrum. And the question is, what is right? And you need to be full keto. Can you just be lower starch and sugar, more higher fat without being keto? Because keto is a very specific type of metabolic framework. And I, I think maybe we should take a little time to dissect what happens when you eat keto and what the, the benefits and slash potential risks are and, and particularly how keto can be monitored in a way that makes sure you're doing it. So tell us about what is actually keto and how do you know your keto and how do you do that?
Yeah, and again, remember, despite the title of my book, which is the case for keto, it's not actually about keto. It's about, so keto to me is the extreme carbohydrate restriction where you replace the carbs with fat. And Atkins was keto. The way I refer to it is like back when I was young, that's what we called a ketogenic diet was Atkins. And Atkins got in trouble because he was advocating a ketogenic diet. So we can talk about, I mean, there are different definitions for how much carbohydrates people can tolerate without, in order to get into ketosis. But one of these things I did in this book is I interviewed 120 odd physicians from around the world who had converted to our way of thinking. And I wanted to know how they, what they were trying to communicate to their patients and what the challenges were. And, you know, it was surprisingly, I don't think there was a single one of them that actually checked, had the patients check for ketones. they just wanted to get their patients off carbs. It's like, if I can get them off carbs, I can get them to accept that dietary fat is benign, that it's not going to kill them, then we're going to be fine. And that's what they're gonna eat. As soon as you start thinking of it as a specific diet, you know, I am doing keto. And I've had people say to me, well, I don't know if I'm doing keto because I don't have a Bulletproof coffee more than twice a week. And, and then the Ted name. Ted name. got a new book out called the, the, I think, PE diet, probably protein energy ratio. And this Ted think of his diet as a keto diet because it's, he's advocating for higher protein and lower fat. And I'm saying, you know, on some profound level, again, individual variation is going to play a huge role, but we don't know the answers to what the level of protein should be to maximize this. And there's probably not one level of protein for any, you know, because everyone's a little bit different. Some people are going to run into trouble because they, they can't tolerate the amount of fat they're eating. Some people are going to run into trouble because they can't tolerate the amount of protein they're eating. Some people are going to do fine and never have measurable Ketone levels. And some people may be in a brain fog because they don't have measurable Ketone levels. You know, I've discussed this endlessly with, Steve Finney, who's done as much work on ketosis as any human alive. And Steve thinks if you're not, I mean, Steve's a guy to really talk to about, how does he, what's the, well-formulated ketogenic diet, if you're cutting carbs, but you're not cutting them enough and you're not being enough and your ketone synthesis isn't high enough, then you'll never feel good. You'll never feel, have energy, that there's a, he talks about like an island you have to hit in the ocean. And that could be true, but I don't, most people don't think so. I think most people benefit from these diets without ever measuring ketones.
They just, yeah, I think that's right. I mean, I, I, as a physician, learned to sort of pick the right person.
Right.
I think, you know, diet's a diet. Well, put food is medicine.
Right.
So if food is medicine, then what is the right medicine for each person within food? Right? And I think it's different. And I wish we could all say we're all the same, but there's tremendous variation in the population. We're learning more and more about personalized nutrition, precision nutrition, personalized medicine. That's what I do. That's what functional medicine is. And it's very humbling when you start having these grand theories. Everybody should be vegan, everybody should be.
Keto, everybody should be blah, blah, blah. And all of a sudden it's like, wait a minute, you know? Yeah, but remember, we're still saying we're still saying, if you struggle with your weight and you struggle with your blood sugar, you gotta cut back. Everybody should, who does that, should cut back on carbs.
Well, here's the thing. Yeah, I agree. Here's the thing. Everybody is going to get in trouble when they eat sugar and starch, whether you gain weight or not, because it creates metabolic changes that might not make you fat, but make you sick. And that is important to remember. Yeah.
And that's, so that's the you know, and I, again, the reason I wrote this book is to try and clarify some of this and put it into context, because people hear the everybody's different. It's funny. I have an interview. I'm gonna talk to a woman this Saturday. Well, by the time this airs, it will have been several Saturdays ago, who's, you know, an advocate of plant-based diets and think it's very important for her to get her patients on plant-based diets. And she herself consumes, I think, a vegan diet. And I want to understand what her conversion experience is. So again, one of the points, one of the advantages of being a journalist when you can interview so many people. Back in 1998, Malcolm Gladwell, one of the first pieces he ever wrote for the New Yorker was called the Pima Paradox, and it was about obesity and fad diets. And Malcolm kind of made fun of how diet books are written. So he made fun of diet book authors. He said, it's always the same, right? There's a formula, they're getting fatter, or they're getting disease X, and they try the conventional wisdom and it doesn't work. And then they get frustrated and they go into the bowels of the medical school library, and in some dusty tome of medical knowledge, they find something they try and it works for them, and then they try it on their patients, and their patients get healthier. and then they write a book about it and try to cash in. And so the idea is that this is something, its implication is this is all part of the job of being a snake oil salesman. You have to come up with a story, a pattern that you could sell, and part of the pattern is look what happened to me. But the truth is, if you're lean and healthy and you're eating a conventional diet, there's nothing you can learn from your experience. and there's no reason to change what you're doing, right? Because what you're doing seems to be working for you. And if your patients are lean and healthy, and you're telling them to eat the conventional wisdom, what David Katz and Mark Bittman promoted in their last book, then, and their patients stay healthy, you don't learn anything. It's only those of us who are getting fatter who can have what Gladwell called this conversion experience. Yeah. If you're getting fatter yourself or your blood sugar is out of control, like Sammy Inkinen, the founder of Virta Health, You know, a world class, literally, a world champion triathlete.
I mean, he would row his boat from California to Hawaii. That's the kind of guy.
Hawaii, with his wife. Yeah, that's the kind of guy.
He was rowing the boat.
And yet he was pre-diabetic. You know, Mark Coggiella.
Why?
Why? So what's going on? So that's, once you have a problem.
He was eating all the goos, all the sports goos, the gels, which are pure sugar.
So despite the incredible physical activity, poisoning his bodies. I'm not so sure medicine is food is medicine. It could be. I prefer to use the word benign a lot.
It's like harmless.
But I do think food can be poison. And our job is to identify what the poison is. But the problem is if you're not being poisoned, if you're not getting fatter or getting diabetic, then you can't learn from your experience. There's nothing you can do that will tell you that the conventional wisdom is wrong. So again, it's people like us. go through this. All these Physicians went through this conversion experience. Every last one of them. Yeah.
And I always say the smartest doctor in the room is your own body. Like, you have to see what affects you, which foods make you feel good, make you feel bad, which foods actually make you gain weight or lose weight. And, and pay attention, because smarter than any lab test or doctor is your own body's response to the food you're eating. And I think if it's not working, then you have to say, well, why is it not working and what do I do? And I think your book really outlines a different way of thinking that is really at the key to not just solving weight and obesity, Gary, it's at the key to solving most of our global issues because food and the food we're eating is 60% ultra processed food, mostly refined starchy carbohydrates. It's driving this pandemic of obesity. It's also driving the pandemic of chronic disease, heart disease, cancer, diabetes, dementia, more. It's literally killing 11 million people a year around the world. And we think COVID is bad, but there's far more people that die every day from eating the wrong food than from COVID or any other disease combined. And it's all related to this underlying mechanism of high levels of insulin sustained over a lifetime that drives aging. It's really the fundamental mechanism of aging and reversing it is the fundamental strategy to longevity, well-being, weight loss to all solving of all of our chronic problems and all their downstream consequences of the economic impact, of climate change, of social injustice, so many things are connected to this. And I think, you know, if you hit on this key idea that we need to get rid of these starchy, refined calories that are causing high insulin, we literally pull the thread that's connecting everything that will literally unravel our current metabolic, economic, and environmental Catastrophe.
Yeah, and that's, I mean, again, it's, it's, I mean, there are huge issues to doing this because, again, what does the food industry produce, which are exactly the foods that we're going after and saying people can't, I had to go to the, I dropped my son off school bus, thank God, this morning at seven in the morning, and I stopped off at Safeway to, to pick up some butter. And I'm walking down this aisle and I want to call it the diabetes aisle, right? It starts with this, not the sports drink, it starts with the, you know, the high caffeine, high sugar drinks on the left, and it's got the chips going on the right and the chips on the left. And then I move down to the sodas, and then I go to the sports drinks and the chips go to.
The, you know, from potato chips. I love it. I mean, you can have a cancer aisle, a heart disease aisle, a dementia.
Aisle, a diabetes aisle. That would be great. Seriously, it was like, I love that. And that's the thing. The world doesn't have to go keto. One of the things that runs in that the keto the low-carb movement has run into lately is the idea that livestock is bad for the environment. Livestock, the significant producer of greenhouse gases, and I don't know enough about this science to comment. So I'm willing to assume that it's, for sake of argument, that this is true and it's a problem and it's got to be dealt with. But the underlying assumption is that if we all go plant-based, we'll all be healthier. The phrase used by this EAT Lancet Commission that was headed by Walter Willett at Harvard and has made such inroads into pushing this plant-based movement for everyone is it's a win-win situation. We know that if we eat a plant-based diet, we will be healthier. We know if we eat a plant-based diet, the climate, the world will be healthier. And again, the point is we don't know that. You know, the, the lean people, the world, they can eat a plant-based diet. They're fine. All of us can improve our diet and be healthier by getting rid of, you know, the refined sugar and the, that stuff in the diabetes aisle, the supermarket. All of us will be healthier, but some of us have to go further. We just have to, we have to cut out carbs and, and plant-based foods come with carbs attached. that's the name with the exception of olives and avocados.
That's, you know, and if anybody wants to dig into the whole meat, no meat, you know, climate change, health, so four issues, I, we've done a lot of podcasts on this, but the short answer is it's not the cow, it's the how. And if you grow factory farmed animals, yes, they're an abomination. They should be outlawed and they're devastating human health, environmental health, animal. welfare and destroying our soils and polluting our waters and poisoning us with chemicals. So that there's no doubt about that or disagreement. However, there's a movement of regenerative agriculture which has the hypothesis that you can actually raise animals in an integrated ecosystem of a farm that builds soil, that conserves water, that eliminates the need for chemicals, it produces healthier food, more food, more profitable for farmers and actually may be healthy. In fact, some guys like Fred Provenza, I don't know if you've heard this research, Gary, but Fred Provenza is a rangeland scientist from University of Utah or Utah State who is now working with folks at Duke and finding that animals that are allowed to forage on a wide variety of plant foods actually uptake all these phytochemicals and have much different nutrient profiles, much different metabolic profiles when you eat them. the one favorite study I always quote is the kangaroo study in Australia, because you can get kangaroo meat there. And they fed them, you know, gram per gram protein, the same amount of feedlot beef or kangaroo meat. And the feedlot group had increased inflammatory biomarkers, and the kangaroo eaters actually got better. They were healthier. They had lower inflammation as a result. And this is, you know, taking a chunk of meat exactly the same amount and feeding them based on where, what they ate. So I think, I think, that's a different topic, but, and I don't think a ketogenic diet is a high meat diet either. It's not necessarily a high meat diet.
It doesn't have to be. Yeah.
Yeah. And I think some people can tolerate some level of whole grains or beans. Some people can't. And some, you know, and often the argument is, well, you know, when I, when I switched to vegan, I lost weight, I got healthy. And I think if you're eating the standard American diet, the absolute answer is yes, you will be much better off if you switch to a lot of plants and whole foods and get off all the crap. And it may not be the vegan diet, it may be just getting off the crap. And then the question is long term what happens to these people? And if you start looking at a lot of these situations, you see this increasing creeping insulin. Even if you're eating whole grains and beans, some people are just that carbohydrate intolerant. So I think there's a continuum we have to understand. And I think that's what you're saying with your book. It's not just one size fits all. Everybody in the world should be keto because I don't think that's true. You're talking about The spectrum of eating styles, depending on your metabolic type and, and your response to the food you're eating.
Right. And that's it. So we're, we're cutting carbs and we're, we're adding fat at some level. And if you prefer animal protein and animal fat, you can make it work. My favorite part of the book. So the end of the book, I have, lessons that I've learned from the Physicians I've interviewed. And I think, you know, I sort of encapsulated the key lessons in how to think about progressing to a a low carb, high fat, ketogenic diet. And so Carrie Doulas, I'm sure you know Carrie, because she's Cleveland and formerly Cleveland Clinic. So Carrie's a spine surgeon formerly at the Cleveland Clinic now private practice in Ohio and she comes from a family history of obesity. She had a weight problem.
She was 300 pounds.
She was 300 pounds. Yeah, that also has type one diabetes, and she can't tolerate animal products. She just can't do it. Her body can't do it. So she has moved to eating a vegan ketogenic diet. And she said to me, and this is the quote that I lead off the section with, it's not a religion, it's just about how I feel. Right. And that's a thing we're all doing. It's about how we feel. And that's, again, it's part of learning the learning process and learning how to do these experiments. I mean, you and I probably do it naturally. It's like some issue comes up in your life. My wife always gets, she's been living with this for far too long, but I'll make some comment about how I feel and I go, I can't understand it. And she says, you always said that. I go, well, what I can't understand is why I feel like this today. So I'm trying to understand it in terms of what I ate yesterday or the day before that because I think it's related and can I change my diet in such a way that I don't feel like I do today? in the future. And what do I have to do? And over the course of among the vices we talked about before we got started, all the vices we've given up, part of the reason we've given up these vices is because they don't make us feel good. I no longer drink alcohol, not because I have any moral ethical issues with alcohol, but quite the contrary, it's just the next day I tend to feel like crying all day long.
I'll give you a hug, don't worry.
Yeah. There we go. So, you know, a hangover you could fix with aspirin. Depression, you can't. Yeah. So eventually, slowly over the years, it's become no. But because I'm paying attention to how I feel the next day, and in my case, it's so it's, it doesn't need a lot of attention to be paid to notice it, but these are the kind of things you can do with all issues of your diet.
Well, you're right.
If I start adding beans back to my diet and I gain 10 pounds. And I find that I'm craving beans, black beans doesn't matter, healthy beans, just like they might eat in the blue zone. But when I add it back to my diet, I gain weight and I don't like the weight and I don't like the fact that I'm now craving the beans. Maybe it's better than I don't eat them. Yeah. They're bad for me. They might be fine for David Katz or Mark Bittman. That's right. But they're not fine for me.
That's right. that's right.
We're all, we're all trying. Yeah. Yeah.
And I think, I think we, we have this amazing opportunity now to start to teach people about personalized nutrition and, and food is medicine. I think one of the things that, that people don't understand, and you, you sort of highlighted this with what you said, I think it's important for people to really get this. Most people don't connect what they eat with how they feel. And, and food is the single biggest modifier of your biology every day. There is nothing that influences your biology in terms of hormones, the microbiome, your immune system, your detoxification system, your brain chemistry, your metabolism. I mean, there's nothing besides food that has that impact. And, when you, the underlying subtext of what you're saying and that we talked about in functional is that food isn't just calories, it's information. It's instructions that regulate your biology with every bite and can turn on or off hormones, genes, and immune function literally in minutes. And, I think most people, if they started to pay attention like you did, when I drink alcohol, I cry the next day, or when I eat a bagel, I don't feel good, or I take a nap, I mean, I went to visit some friends over on Maui, and I went to visit some friends on the island who were pretty much vegetarian vegan, and they had lunch and I'll eat anything. I'm not religious, and I normally don't eat a lot of beans or grains. I don't have a thing against them, I just feel better without them. And she had a big bowl of grains and beans for lunch. And then I literally, that afternoon we went down to the ocean, there was this place where the river comes to the ocean, there's really rocky beach. and I literally was in a food coma. I literally laid down on my stomach. It was like on a bed of nails, like on this really uncomfortable, like rocky thing with like rocks sticking everywhere in my body. And I literally fell asleep with these rocks sticking in me because I was in this coma from what I had for lunch. Now, that's not true for everybody, but for me that was true. And I think it just- well, this.
Is part of my conversion experience, right? As I used to say back you know, prior to 2000, I didn't take naps. Naps took me. So I'm a science journalist. I would be interviewing some Nobel Prize winner over the phone at two in the afternoon, at lunch, and I would have to get off the phone before I fell asleep. I would have to think up some excuse. I have, I used to have notebooks back in the days when we would take notes on the notebooks. And then they were like, I'd go back to look at them and my, my pen would just fall off the page because I'd have fallen asleep while I was taking notes. Yeah, I gave up carbs that stopped. Actually, one of the things that triggered this is I was doing the first piece I ever did on dietary fat for science. I was interviewing a guy at Yale who's an authority on carbohydrate metabolism. And I said to him, why is it I fall asleep every afternoon after lunch, you know, religiously? And, and he said, but we don't It's like, how could you not know that? I mean, it's such a profound phenomenon. There's whole cultures that have siestas in the afternoons because they have carb-rich lunches and then they go to sleep. Anyway, and then you give up the carbs, it just stops happening. I often wondered, you know, we get a message nowadays, we should all sleep eight hours at night. It's vitally important. We'll control our weight better if we do it. Will control our blood sugar better if we do it. But one of the things that happened when I cut out sugar, starches and grains, I stopped needing to sleep as much. I can get by on five, six hours of sleep and I constantly have the struggle that I should be sleeping more. And then if I sleep more, I'm actually less alert. So it's sort of, again, individual variation and being aware of your body because we don't need a clinical trial. And this is the point I make in the book. We're taught, well, you don't know if these, and again, people, we don't have enough clinical trials to know if this.
Is good for you.
Well, you don't have, we do have the 100 plus completed clinical trials of ketogenic diets, and it's undeniably, you know, beneficial over the course of at least a couple years. And then it's hard to imagine that somehow it all goes bad the longer you do. people who don't like this message can imagine anything, so I'm not gonna. But you don't need a clinical trial to tell you if this will change your ability to control your weight and blood sugar.
Yeah, particularly the weight.
It's just do it. Yeah. But do it right.
Well, that's the thing. I mean, I think how I'd love you to sort of share some of the clinical trials that have been recently done around diabetes, because I think the data is so striking that it's really worth talking about because we are now facing a pandemic of obesity and diabetes. In fact, one out of two Americans is pre-diabetic or type two diabetic. It's the number one driver of our economic costs within Medicare, which is, you know, if Medicare was a company, it would be the biggest corporation in the world with a budget of over $1.3 trillion a year. And it's, it's a good third of that and probably more if you include pre-diabetes so talk about what we've learned from these rigorous clinical trials using ketogenic diets on type 2 diabetics who are actually on insulin, on medications, severely overweight, and how it compares to sort of other trials and treatments for diabetes.
Well, the story with diabetes has always been the same. Is it the carbs or is it the calories? Okay, this is the recurring theme going back to 1920s. 13. So today you do a clinical trial. So the conventional wisdom, the ADA tells their doctors just tell the patients to keep eating however many carbohydrates they're eating. We don't want to disturb them. We don't want to give them any advice they can't follow. And then we can cover that with insulin. And the insulins we have are so fancy and so exotic these days, so high tech that this won't be a problem. Except then when they look at you know, population-wide insulin control, you find out that it's actually worse than it's ever been. So both type 1 and type 2 diabetics are doing bad jobs at controlling their insulin, controlling their blood sugar. So now you put them on a ketogenic diet, and the best study we have is Virta, and it's criticized because it's not a randomized controlled trial, but you don't actually need a randomized controlled trial for chronic degenerative condition that never gets better because people serve as their own controls. So they have smartphones and telemedicine and they prescribe well-formulated nutritional ketosis ketogenic diets. And over the course of five years, they have, I think their five-year data is now available in abstract. form. They have tremendous maintenance of the diet and virtually all of the people who are on insulin get off insulin and most of the people get off their oral medications and they lose weight even when they're not trying to lose weight. This isn't prescribed as a weight loss diet and they get healthier and they sustain it because they're sustaining their health. On the flip side, you've got a trial in England that got a lot of attention where you put people on, I think it was 600 calorie a day, semi-starvation diets. They're all, it's even more than semi-starvation. That also will lower insulin levels and will put the diabetes into remission. But now you have a problem with what do you do when the people go back to eating the way they used to?
Yeah, because you can't eat 600 calories your whole life.
You can't stay on 600 calories. So, and one of my issues with the nutrition, diabetes and obesity research community to begin with, as they just keep reiterating the same thing. Like a sign that a science is pathological is they keep saying the same thing over and over again, doing the same experiments over and over again, and they never make progress. And so what we know from these trials is you advocate abstinence from sugars, grains, and starches, and beans, and people get healthy. They'll get off the type 2 diabetes are going for mission, and they knew that pre-insulin, as you said, pre-insulin, it was known as the animal diet and type 2 diabetics. We didn't use that terminology back then, but the Physicians in the 19th century knew that the older people got their diabetes older and heavier had a more less acute chronic form of the disease, and they could put it into remission and basically live, you know, perfectly healthy lives so long as they didn't eat carbohydrates.
Yeah.
Don't eat the foods that you can't tolerate.
It's.
How difficult is that?
I mean, what struck me was the virtue trials, which essentially is a, as an online digital disruptive Healthcare delivery system using coaches and high touch points with pretty Advanced diabetics. And, and our friend Sarah Halberg and others, and this is just some of the data you're talking about, were able to see within a year or two years, a 60 reversal, not just not just improvement, but reversal of diabetes with normalization of glucose, lipids, A1C without medication, a 90 plus percent reduction in insulin, 100 elimination of some of the key diabetes medications, and a 12% weight loss, which may not sound like a lot to people, but if we see a 5% weight loss in a weight loss trial, that's dramatic. The results seem to be sustained at two and even longer now years. And they did a follow-up study looking at all the biomarkers around heart disease, which was fascinating. So the concern that people have is, oh my God, if I eat fat, what about my cholesterol? Cholesterol is causing heart disease, it's gonna get bad. Can you talk about how you would address these concerns about eating a high fat diet and lipids and heart disease and what this trial showed that was the impact on lipid profiles?
Well, and this is, the issue with LDL cholesterol has always been the problem with these low carb high fat diets. Even when I was doing my first piece for Science, One of the researchers I interviewed was a guy named Pete Aaron at the Rockefeller Institute in New York. And Aaron was the, probably the best scientist in the field in the 1950s, 1960s. And he told me the story of a, a young woman, a Broadway actress who came to see him. She had gone on Atkins to keep her weight under control. And, you know, her cholesterol went up to 600. Right. You have to get her off the diet because the diet's going to kill her. That's the idea. So you, there are a lot of people, we eat this high fat, high saturated fat diet. They're the phrase now thrown around the communities that they're hyper responders and their LDL cholesterol goes up or their LDL particle number goes up. The good news is it used to be that would happen. The doctor would, you know, say you're going to kill yourself. You can't eat this way anymore. Now an improvement, they'll say, well, look, since you've dropped 50 pounds and your A1C is coming down from like 10 to 6 and we've gotten you off your medications, maybe you should continue to eat this way. But let's monitor the cholesterol, or let's put you on some low dose statin to try and control the cholesterol. And everyone feels differently about statins and I don't know what to think because I have friends I respect on all sides of this. For the most part, the Virta study showed us, and these are in people who really are metabolically disturbed and that they have type 2 diabetes. They looked at 26 risk factors for heart disease. 26 of them, 22 of them improved on the nutritional protocol. 22 got better. Three stayed the same. And LDL cholesterol occasionally got worse. And of course, you know, sometimes it.
Can get better, too.
Sometimes it can get better. And the cosmic joke, right, is that LDL is the only thing that conventional medical establishment cardiology community has paid attention to. but then when they look at overall risk factor, you could do an overall risk factor assessment from these numbers, and it clearly got better. And that's with these people getting off drugs. So the comparison are, you know, diabetics who are getting standard of care diabetic therapy in Indiana. And so, you know, I talk about in the book, I just talk about my own experience. My LDL was fine for about a decade on this diet. And then the last time it was measured, it, well, It got higher the one time it got measured, not just LDL cholesterol, but LDL particle number, which is a much better predictor of risk. Still not as good as HDL over triglycerides, which always improves on this diet or total cholesterol over HDL, which always improves when you eat this way. Yeah, but there almost always nothing is universal. well, it's powerful.
It's powerful.
When you.
And again, it's really like, I. I just recall a patient who I had, who was a woman struggling with weight loss for years. Her total cholesterol was over 300. Her triglycerides were well over 300. Her HDL was terrible, like 30 something. Her blood sugar was higher. Insulin was high. She had small particle. I mean, she had the worst metabolic profile. And I said, listen, eat coconut oil and butter and get off of all the starch. and let's see what happens. Just, I don't know. Let's try it. Six months, six weeks, two months. There's no harm in a short-term trial. And then I, you know, then I, I measure. Right. Trust but verify.
Right.
As Reagan said.
Right.
And then I checked her lab tests. Her cholesterol dropped 100 points. Her LDL dropped, like, almost that. Her HDL went up 25 points. Her triglycerides dropped 200 points.
I was like.
And she lost 20 pounds. Another guy was a a skinny little biker who wanted to try keto for performance and athleticism. And, you know, he was in his 50s, and he just, you know, was biking four hours a day and just doing all this. And his numbers just went through the roof.
So it just cell deal, though, I assume.
No, not the whole particle number, his small particles. I mean, everything went Haywire. And I noticed the same thing for me. I'm, I'm one of those lean mass. of responders, I probably shouldn't announce that because people will send me all kinds of hate mail or hate messages on social media. But, you know, if I don't eat a little bit of carbohydrate like a sweet potato or winter squash, I will tend to lose too much weight. But also my lipids will go crazy if I'm eating just too much saturated fat. So, I can modify it. I can eat more avocados and more olive oil. more nuts and seeds and other different fats.
You know, even then the assumption is always that what you're doing is going to make a significant difference in your long-term health. And this is the issue that, you know, again, I discuss in the book, we've been taught to whenever you're doing preventive medicine, right, your, your, your, it's hypothesis based medicine. If I get you to do this or I add the, this little bit of sweet potato winter squash back and I get my LDL down, I'm going to minimize my of heart disease, I'm going to live longer. And this is a probabilistic assessment. Doesn't mean you're not going to have a heart attack, you're just going to lower the chance of having a heart attack. And the flip side is, if I get you to eat the coconut oil and the butter and get rid of the carbs, I can watch you get healthier. So not only will your lipid profiles get better, but I could literally watch you get healthier. I could watch your weight come down and your sleep disturbances improve and your mood improve and your energy will improve. And, you know, you'll walk in the office three months from now. This is why people like us can sound a little quackish and you'll be a different person. Yeah, absolutely.
You know, your book, your book is such a brilliant analysis of the science, but it's also got a lot of practical aspects that you call the plan where you go through a number of principles of how to think about doing this, how to work with a doctor and how to get started. So, it's not just an abstract theoretical historical analysis is actually very practical. And I really encourage people to get a copy of the Case for Keto, Rethinking Weight Control and the Science and Practice of Low Carb, High Fat Eating because if you are one of those people who are metabolically unhealthy, the 88% of us, it's now more important than ever to really get this right and get your insulin down because COVID-19 disproportionately affects those who have poor metabolic health, including obesity, overweight, prediabetes, diabetes, and chronic disease, which is all connected to insulin. And Gary, what's exciting is your book focuses on weight, but keto is being researched for cancer, for improving, for example, responses to chemo and radiation, for obviously reversing diabetes, for heart disease, for dementia. It's now becoming a standard recommendation. I know this was at Stanford and they were like, yeah, I've got Alzheimer's.
And they told me to be on a keto diet.
Or epilepsy, other conditions.
This is what's so amazing, because the conflict we're up against, we've got US News and World Report, every year they give their diet ratings, and every year they tell us the Mediterranean diet's the healthiest, and then the dash diet, which is supposed to lower your blood pressure, and they'll look at 35-40 diets, and the worst are always low-carb, high-fat ketogenic diets. Always, the least healthy and yet if you go to clinicaltrials.gov, which is the website that the government has to register clinical trials, and just stick in ketogenic as a keyword, you'll pull up as of last week about 250 different trials, 100 of them have been completed, the others are still in the works, and it's basically you name a medical condition, somebody is testing a ketogenic diet somewhere in the world to see if that will make it better.
Yeah, I use it for heart failure patients and the results are amazing because it improves mitochondrial function and we didn't really talk about it but your body has two, it's like ACDC, it's like an electric hybrid Prius, right? It can run on carbs or run on fat or run on both but if you actually switch to just running on fat, it seems to burn cleaner, it seems to have all these downstream metabolic effects and something that we really didn't talk about was aging and insulin aging. and when you look at the, whether it's a ketogenic diet or a high fat, low carb diet, or whether it's a, a diet that's intermittent fasting or time restricted eating or any of these kind of approaches, they all do the same thing. They all reduce inflammation, they reduce belly fat, they increase muscle mass, they increase bone density, they improve cognitive function, they improve stem cell production. I mean, they have all these downstream effects that are promoting aging and healthy aging. So this is really the key to everything.
Yeah. Or another way to put it is they're removing the thing that increase, that accelerates aging. Because remember, even diabetes is a kind of accelerated aging. All these symptoms of aging are basically driven by glucose oxidation. The cells, you raise blood sugar, your body kicks in into overdrive, the attempt to like burn it off. And you do that, you generate reactive of oxygen species, you generate, I mean, it's just all the major manifestations of health, of aging, are accelerated by the same foods we're telling people not to eat on these diets. So it's sort of, but again, you know, the issue, we're a minority.
Well, it's getting out there. I think it's getting out there.
Well, that's here, the idea that We're.
Talking about it here on the Doctor's Pharmacy. And again, I want everybody right now to go out and get a copy of the Case for Keto, Rethinking Weight Control and the Science and Practice of Low Carb High Fat Eating, not just for weight loss, but for longevity, for well-being. To understand these concepts is so key to overall health and it is probably the single biggest thing I do every day in my practice is help people understand this, implement it, and the results are profound. Gary, you are a tireless investigative journalist. You are a rare breed. there are not many left who are willing to do the hard work and look at the data and talk to hundreds of people and really be an investigative journalist. We now have sound bites and just short form memes that actually are confusing the heck out of most of us. And I'm just so glad you wrote this book and I want everybody to go to get a copy and get it right now. It's out. And again, Gary, thank you so much for being again a guest on the Doctor's Pharmacy Podcast. If you all listen in and you love this podcast and you want to know more, about how this affects you, get the book, and also leave a comment about how your diet has affected you and subscribe wherever you get your podcast and make sure you share this with everybody you know on social media because they need to hear it too because we are a metabolically unhealthy country and we'll see you next time on the Doctor's Pharmacy.
Thank you.
Hey everybody, it's Dr. Hyman. Thanks for tuning into to the Doctor's Pharmacy. I hope you're loving this podcast. It's one of my favorite things to do and introducing you all the experts that I know and I love and that I've learned so much from. And I want to tell you about something else I'm doing, which is called Mark's Picks. It's my weekly newsletter. And in it, I share my favorite stuff from foods to supplements to gadgets to tools to enhance your health. It's all the cool stuff that I use and that my team uses to optimize and enhance our health. And I'd love you to sign up for the weekly newsletter. I'll only send it to you once a week on Fridays. Nothing else, I promise. And all you have to do is go to drhyman.com/picks to sign up. That's drhyman.com/picks, P-I-C-K-S, and sign up for the newsletter and I'll share with you my favorite stuff that I use to enhance my health and get healthier and better and live younger longer.
Hi everyone, I hope you enjoyed this week's episode. Just a reminder that this podcast is for educational purposes only. This podcast is not a substitute for professional care by a doctor or other qualified medical professional. This podcast is provided on the understanding that it does not constitute medical or other professional advice or services. If you're looking for help in your journey, seek out a qualified medical practitioner. If you're looking for a functional medicine practitioner, you can visit ifm.org, and search their Find a Practitioner database. It's important that you have someone in your corner who's trained, who's a licensed healthcare practitioner, and can help you make.
Changes, especially when it comes to your health. Don't forget, there's a way to listen completely ad-free. With Hyman Plus on Apple Podcasts, you can enjoy every episode without any breaks. Just open Apple Podcasts and tap Try Free to start your seven-day free trial.
More from AI
Fix Your Brain by Fixing Your Body: Metabolic Psychiatry Explained by Dr. Shebani Sethi
One Dose That Heals Addiction, PTSD, and Brain Injury? Dr. Nolan Williams on The Science of Ibogaine