You don't want the cheapest lead cost.

24 Oct 2026 · 2 min
1:49

In this YouTube video, Eric Deeran argues that pursuing the cheapest lead cost is counter‑productive because low‑cost leads tend to be low‑quality. Drawing on experience with around 800 clients, he explains that the key performance indicators to evaluate leads are lead cost, cost per qualified call, show rate, close rate, and average order value (AOV). He consistently observes that leads with higher cost per lead book at higher rates, show up more often (about 80‑82% show rate), and close at higher rates (35‑40% close rate), resulting in higher AOV. Consequently, Eric prefers to pay more for leads that generate booked calls and higher conversions, allowing him to maintain a smaller, higher‑performing sales team that earns more, stays longer, and delivers better quality work, rather than a bloated team with many low‑producing reps.

Chapters

More from Eric

1:05
youtube.com

Don't be afraid of this.

16h ago
0:35
youtube.com

Bad Leads Are A Trust Problem

19h ago
2:32
youtube.com

Stop testing so much.

22h ago
0:37
youtube.com

Get Paid Up Front, Get Zero Churn

1d ago
1:09
youtube.com

You shouldn't care about learning limited on Meta ads.

1d ago
0:47
youtube.com

We Tested Cheap Leads vs Gated Forms

1d ago
1:30
youtube.com

Here's what we put on our pre-call page

1d ago
1:10
youtube.com

Should you optimize for leads or calls?

2d ago
0:35
youtube.com

Why Monthly Billing Backfires

2d ago
1:07
youtube.com

You probably don't suck at sales

2d ago
0:37
youtube.com

Stop Educating On Your Sales Calls

2d ago
See all content