Eric Siu reviews four short videos against three criteria: does the transcript support the title, is the thought complete with a resolved ending, and is essential context missing. A video must pass all three to advance. One supported title wasn't enough.
So what it did was it evaluated text criteria across 4 shorts, 36 judgments, okay? So it's just saying, hey, what Jeff evaluated. So this is for— these are for videos that we're putting out here. So each one of these columns over here is a video, right? So these are the evals down here, right? So did the transcript support the title? Okay, supported. Is the thought complete with the resolved ending? Incomplete, uncertain, right? Is essential context missing? No, no, no, no. If it does, like it doesn't pass. It doesn't get to pass go. It doesn't get to go to the next level, right?
