To get cited in AI overviews, publish concrete facts and proprietary data with your own analysis. Andreessen Horowitz got featured in a TechCrunch AI article by using SimilarWeb data, footnoted to the source but branded as theirs. Survey your audience, partner with other firms, and publish data-driven content consistently.
What we found is the number one way to get cited in like these AI overviews is having facts, stats, and data and unique research. If you start pushing that in to whatever way, you can survey people, you can partner with other companies. Like if you looked at a16z, Andreessen Horowitz, I believe it was on TechCrunch, they had this whole article about AI and they had all these charts. A lot of the data was from SimilarWeb and they put like footnote, chart from SimilarWeb, but it looked like a16z with their brand on there. The point I'm getting at, and you should of course cite your sources and ideally use multiple sources so you can, and try to add in your own opinion or own proprietary data, but something's better than nothing. And then when you cite a lot of, or when you're creating a lot of stats and putting it out there, I'm telling you, that is what's really getting corporations cited a lot.
