0:53
Two speakers debate hiring law firms that use AI for legal briefs. They'd accept it from reputable firms with human oversight, but worry about accuracy and have heard horror stories. One supplies AI tools to in-house counsel for efficiency.
Two speakers debate hiring law firms that use AI for legal briefs. They'd accept it from reputable firms with human oversight, but worry about accuracy and have heard horror stories. One supplies AI tools to in-house counsel for efficiency.
Would you use a law firm that's using AI for their briefs and stuff? I would use a law firm that's reputable, and as long as they have a human in the loop, I'm okay with it. I'm similar. I want a human in the loop. I do not care if they're using AI or not to save money. All I care about is the end result. For our in-house counsel, I would of course give 'em all these tools so they can be more efficient. But when we pay external firms to help us with our legal matters, 'cause there's only so much your in-house team can do, I'm going and hiring that person who's going to get things done and is going to win. And I look at the return. I don't care what they're costing per hour. I care for the end result and them achieving it. Yep. You care for the outcome. Exactly. And my fear with AI in some of these scenarios like legal, I've seen and heard horror stories. And you and I have both used it in marketing and we know it's nowhere near perfect. Yep. And it's off a lot. You and I know there's no way it's 100% accurate and there's probably a lot of issues with it.
