2364 FBF: Barrack Obama – A Financial Terrorist with Bill Tatro

Welcome to this week's edition of Flashback Friday. Your opportunity to get some good review by listening to episodes from the past that Jason has hand picked to help you today in the present and propel you into the future. Enjoy.

This show is produced by the Hartman Media Company. For more information and links to all our great podcasts, visit hartmanmedia.com.

Welcome to Creating wealth with Jason Hartman. During this program, Jason is going to tell you some really exciting things that you probably haven't thought of before and a new slant on investing fresh new approaches to America's best investment that will enable you to create more wealth and happiness than you ever thought possible. Jason is a genuine, self made multimillionaire who not only talks the talk, but walks the walk. He's been a successful investor for 20 years and currently owns properties in 11 states and 17 cities. This program will help you follow in Jason's footsteps on the road to financial freedom. You really can do it. And now, here's your host, Jason Hartman with the complete solution for real estate investors.

Hey, welcome to the Creating wealth show. This is your host, Jason Hartman. This is episode number 526. 526 already. And I am officially moved into my new place in La Jolla, California. I never thought I would become a resident of the Socialist Republic of California again, but here I am sticking it to the man. Yes, I moved to California to actually take advantage of a tax break. I wonder if that is a Guinness world record. I may be the first person in history to move to California to save on taxes. I know it's crazy, weird things happen. But here we are. So anyway, getting settled, dealing with Internet service providers, trying to get my Internet set up. The handyman is here. He agrees with me about all this California stuff that I was just ranting about. Anyway, you know what amazes me is that as technologically advanced as our world is and as convenient as so many things are nowadays, whether it be shopping it on Amazon, etc. Etc. How is it so difficult to deal with these companies that provide cable and Internet services? Oh wait, I know. They staff the call centers with incompetent people and they have near monopolies and they just like the Wall street banksters and the other crooks on Wall Street. Guess what? They have lobbyists so they're in bed with all the regulators so they can maintain their semi monopolies and give terrible service. Okay, there's my rant for today. You always get one from me. You know that. Our guest today will be Bill Tatro and he' on the show he was on, oh, I don't know, maybe four or five dozen episodes ago. I think it's about maybe 40, 50 episodes ago, something like that. He's back on to talk about the economy today and some interesting stuff. He's a very interesting guy. So without further ado, let's get to him. But oh, wait a sec, there's one more thing. Venture alliance people, by the way, a bunch of you have recently signed up. We're gonna have an awesome weekend. We start Friday evening, 7 o', clock, hotel Palomar in San Die. And it's a super swanky hotel. And yes, we took care of your hotel for you. It's our first event for the Venture alliance. So your hotel is on us. We're just gonna have an awesome time. So we'll see you Friday evening. As far as what to bring and what to wear, you know, business casual and then casual clothing. Bring a jacket, maybe a sweatshirt, that kind of stuff. We're gonna be doing some amazing things. We're going out on a big 54 foot yacht. We are going to do some paragliding. It's going to be an awesome weekend. But most importantly, we're going to look at great investment opportunities. I'm really excited about some. We've got a couple of guest speakers too. So it's just going to be an awesome weekend. So we will see a Friday. Venture alliance members and guests. I know we've got several people that came as a guest as well. The response has just been terrific. Better than I thought it would. This is our inaugural event so we'll look forward to seeing you Friday. Let's get to our guest, Bill Tetro. We'll see you on Wednesday's episode, but here's Bill. It's my pleasure to welcome Bill Tetro back to the show. He's an economist, he's a columnist for Townhall.com and he is the author of the It's All About Money newsletter, Publisher of White papers, former radio show host for over 30 years and numerous media appearances. So it's just great to have him back on to talk about the economy, we where things are going and how they impact us as investors. Bill, welcome back. How are you?

Well, Jason, thank you for having me. It's always a pleasure. You didn't put one thing in the bio. Trying to work on a very bad golf game.

Well, there you go. You know, it's interesting, by the way, I don't know if you've noticed this or read any of the articles about it, but golf is really sliding. In fact, it's a pretty amazing slide in popularity. So you ought to be getting a lot lower prices on your greens fees out there. Because one article cited, it was talking about how generation Y, the millennial generation, which is the largest generation in American history, the largest demographic cohort, slightly larger than the baby boomers, they're just not taking up the game. And in the last 10 years, golf as they measured in, not greens fees, but number of games played, I guess it's down over 35% in the last 10 years. That's a pretty significant thing for all those golf course owners with all that real estate and all that overhead. You know, maybe you have a commentary on that, by the way.

Well, I think you've really hit on something that is very significant. And golf is just one of the. We'll call it a sidebar. Yes, from, from a golf stand standpoint, the days of the old fashioned, oh, I don't know, remember Caddyshack, Bushwood, and, you know, get the shoes and all the rest of that stuff. In a sense, those days are gone. And because when you look at this millennial generation, and this is what's interesting, because I think this is a good topic for today's show, because when you look at this millennial generation, they're kind of breaking the mold for a lot of things, and not just in golf, because when you say golf. All right, so golf was designed to flow a particular way, okay? Big golf course, big clubhouse.

Lots of real estate, lots of overhead.

Yeah, a lot of real estate and all the rest of this. But now let's take it a little further. The whole structure in most communities has been built on this particular premise. Kid goes to high school, he goes to college, he gets out of college, he gets a job, he comes to the community, he gets married, he buys his first house, he has a kid, then he buys another house, he has a couple more kids. He's ingrained in the community. And the tax foundation, the base of the community is predicated on that. I've seen many, many models in various communities, not only towns and villages, but cities around the United States where they based their income stream, their tax flow predicated on this increasing tax base. And it's not the 80 year old guy who's now buying another house. It's the 25, 30, 35 year old. You ask a millennial today, first of all, if he has a job because he graduated, the 25 year old graduated from college, doesn't have the job. Secondly, where do you live? Well, he might Live in an apartment, or as we've seen, many of them are living in mom and Dad's house. What about buying a home?

Welcome to this week's edition of Flashback Friday. Your opportunity to get some good review by listening to episodes from the past that Jason has hand picked to help you today in the present and propel you into the future. Enjoy.

Well, buying a home that was asked about 65%, I don't really think that's going to be in my. In my plans in the future. So basically, what does that do to the model that a town has built on this tax base? It just kills it because not only is you got income coming in for the services of that community, but also income coming in to pay for, for the pensions of the people who work in that community. Now all of a sudden, the income's not there, the pensions are underfunded, and now all of a sudden, social services aren't there. Cops, health, whatever. And so the whole thing, so I lay it, I'm not saying that this is right, wrong, or indifferent. It's just what it is. That's the way it is right now.

It's really quite a change. And one of the things these articles, and I've seen a few articles about it, they've been citing, is that, of course, the game is very expensive, but, you know, people don't have five and a half hours to play anymore. You know, the world is just moving so quickly nowadays. I would love to see a resurgence in tennis, actually. I'm kind of wondering why that game ever lost its popularity. I don't know, maybe I just love the tennis outfits of the girls, but, you know, that was a great game.

Well, you know, as we get older, we don't want to spend 5, 6 hours on the golf course, and maybe we want to spend a little time on the, on the, the tennis courts, and we'll see. But I mean, you know, to my other point, when you're looking at this world that we're looking at, there are just a tremendous amount of changes, the dynamics and the models. This is where Keynesian comes in. And as an economist, I always have to throw this in because we live in a Keynesian world.

Oh, very Keynesian. It's all Keynesian. You know, Bill, it strikes me. Keep your thought there. But it just strikes me that whenever the big G, whatever, G8, G7, G20, whatever it is at the moment, whenever they meet, and whenever other world leaders and central bankers meet in Davos and all around the world at these summits, they only have one bullet in the gun. It's qe, man. It's just increase the money supply. That's about all they've got. You know, it's Keynesianism baked in the system. It's just through and through. Right.

Oh, there's. There's no question about that. Let's. Let's keep it then, in your context of golf to tennis.

Sure.

All right. So in the. In the Keynesian world, if a golf course is failing. Well, in the. In the normal capitalistic world, okay, free market capitalism, the golf course fails. We don't. It goes under. Maybe somebody buys a real estate, put some house. But there's a change. There's the evolution. If you fail, you fail. But in the Keynesian world, And then tennis takes over. Let's say in the Keynesian world, it says, no, we believe that the business cycle cannot operate in its own. It has to be aided continually by the federal government or a government in general. All right, Whether it's European government, whatever it is, and the government has to aid in there. And so that's why in 08, we didn't see GM go under. We didn't see Goldman Sachs go under, or Merrill or some of these others. What we saw was government riding to the rescue. So if we were to say, okay, let's let free market capitalism go, then those things would have gone under. We would have been much better on the road to recovery.

Oh, of course. Yeah, yeah. All we've done is make it worse by kicking the can down the road. No question.

That's right. So here you have in the Gulf, okay, so you and I'll agree, so golf fades, and maybe tennis comes back or something else comes back and takes its place. But in the Keynesian world, the owner of the golf course would go to the government, say, oh, no, wait a minute, I think I need a QE for my golf course. I need an infusion of 4, 5, 6 million dollars to keep me going, thank you very much. So when you look at it that way, that's what's happened. That's where we are. And then you look at, well, who gets that benefit? Well, the guy who wrote the check to keep the politician in power. And so now we see how the money flows. Very interesting dynamic we live in today, Jason.

Yeah, it's really interesting. And there's all these deals, and it's just too complicated. You know, the free market can't do its thing because you got all these side deals and all of this. Oh, God, it's just absurd, you know, and none of it ever really works. It really just doesn't. You've got a blog post about the millennial strength. And, you know, there's been so much talk about this generation. It's so important, and maybe people listening, think, Jason and Bill, why are you talking about this? You know, I'm a baby boomer. I'm 53 years old. What does this mean to me? Well, it means a lot to you. This is very significant because as these millennials, 80 million or so of them, slightly larger than the baby boomer generation, move through, you know, the things that they're going to do, household formation and stuff, it affects the real estate market. They're saddled with huge student loan debt, about 1.2 trillion, with a T dollars not dischargeable in bankruptcy. You never get a second chance on that student loan debt. I think they're going to be renters for a long time, I'll tell you that much. I'm not sure. I have well developed thoughts on how they interplay with the stock market and the other financial markets. But, boy, you know, delaying household formation, delaying marriage, wanting to be mobile, go where the jobs are, etc. Bill, any more thoughts since we're kind of talking about the millennials?

Oh, yeah. I wrote a piece and it came out in town hall today. And I said, you know, I did my poll of millennials, and I said, you know, there's an organization that came out and they look at the students, and they do. The students from about 15 up to 25, all over the world. And our students have continually are sliding, and we're lucky if we're in the top third of anything. And that was from the last pol came out in 2012. I'm anxious to see what's going to come out for 2015. It'll be in early 2016. But I said in my piece, I said, you know, the one thing you have to understand is the millennials understand finance. They really do. They understand that well. And then I did the poll and I asked questions and I talked to about 50 different millennials. I said, tell me what you think about college. Well, it's a place to go if I can stay there as long as I can stay where mom and dad pays for it or the government pays for it. Next question. What about your student debt? Well, it's something that I probably will never have to pay back because the taxpayers are going to end up paying it. What about jobs? Jobs? There's no jobs for me because in my particular field, I'm an anthropologist or I'M a this or I'm that. And as long as I live in mom and Dad's basement, I don't need a job anyway. And on and on and on.

Hey, Bill, I got to, I got to share one more of your poll questions with the audience here. What about the stock market answer? A gambler's game played by suckers where only the 1% wins. That's. That's according to your poll. I love that answer.

Yeah, and that's it. And when you look at it, then they're not gonna buy houses because they've seen how housing can be overpriced. Ben Bernanke says it never went down.

What's interesting about their psychology is, look at the stereotypical American dream was that, you know, you would, you would buy a house and set down roots. But we live in the most mobile country in the world. Our population is more mobile than any other population, or at least, you know, barring some nomadic tribe. Okay, but, and also, a lot of these millennials, their formative years were at a time when they saw their parents lose their house. They saw their parents over leveraged, over encumbered, and, you know, they're kind of shy about that thing. I don't think that dream lives for them anymore like it did for the baby boomers and, and even my generation, the Gen Xers.

No, I think you're absolutely right. And I put in there, and I did it facetiously because I asked students and I asked people who, right up into the 30s, I said, okay, tell me about your portfolio. And invariably, 99% of them would all laugh. And I remember one girl, she says, there was a group about four of them who were sitting around, and I was talking to them, and she says, well, I got an iPad. And the other one goes, oh, I got the iPhone. And one of the guys goes, well, I got a six pack Coors Light. That's our portfolio.

Yeah. Yeah, it is. It is interesting.

No, but it's, it's also. And again, I come back to the point. If you're basing, if you're a Keynesian, you operate on models, and your models, you never change your model. One wonders. There will be, I believe, a QE4 that will be in our, in our, in our future. Because when the model doesn't work, an Austrian economist like I am will go back and change the way you do things. But the Keynesian says, well, if it's not working, it's because we haven't done enough of it. If we're not out of Debt, it's because we haven't gone into debt enough.

Here, let me give you another metaphor for that. It's if the fire is burning, let's throw a little gasoline on it, and if it doesn't put it out, let's throw some more on it. And it just makes it worse and worse. But, you know, it's just that you gotta pay the piper someday, right?

Well, that's, that's correct. And that's, that's one of the issues. And I know, you know, in your program and you talk a lot finance and how to make people wealthier and protect their wealth, they have to realize that there is no solution to this problem. When you have the same philosophy, and whether it's a new Congress, a new House, a new Senate, a new president, when the philosophy stays the same, it's irrelevant who's in there, quite honestly.

Yeah, it really is, because they're all Keynesians, even Reagan, you know, it's just all of them operate in the context of the Keynesian, the Keynesian myth. It's unbelievable how revered this guy is still. I mean, it's just amazing, you know, whatever doesn't work, let's just keep doing some more of it.

Yeah, and he's gone through cycles, I mean, since this book came out in the, in the 30s, and, and you know, he's come through various cycles and sometimes. And right now he's revered until he won't be. And what won't be is ultimately, Keynesianism ends in some really bad things, not the least of which is war. And we're starting to see that internationally.

As Tell us why it ends in war. Put that together for the listeners, if you would. Bill.

Well, because what happens is that Keynesianism as a philosophy worldwide, will separate the haves from the have nots. And so what you've got is you've got the 1% becoming more and more wealthy and more and more in power, and you have people, the middle class, getting less and less and less and less around the world. What happens then is there is this ferment in different countries. And what we see is out of this. Well, in Europe right now, in Italy and Greece and like that, we have Youth unemployment over 50%. What they should be afraid of is somebody emerging from that youth group as a leader that says to them, we need to take our country over, we need to take our country back. We need to be, to do these different things. And the only way we can do that is seize control not at the ballot box, but through the bullets. Classic case of that was Adolf Hitler in the 1930s. And so you see these people who rise and then all of a sudden it's the haves don't want the have nots that have what the haves have. It sounds like a little gibberish there, but basically it ends up in that type of conflagration. I can see it, I'm watching it now, whether it is in the Ukraine, whether it's in the activities in the South China Sea with Russia and China having naval operations for the first time in history, our kind of hooking in with Japan and a little tighter in that area. But these things are happening. Keynesian always ends in some type of conflagration.

Yep, very interesting. And you know, socialism, communism, which are basically part of that same set of ingredients, if you will. They always end in oppression and death. You know, it's just mind boggling that the human race hasn't figured this stuff out yet. But I don't know.

Well, and not everybody just goes, you know, solves their problems by going to the mall.

Exactly. Good hand. Yeah. George Bush number two saying, you know, oh, with nine, 11 happened, go out and shop some more. This is sickening. It really is. It's amazing. What is your thought on where we're going? And I just want to first ask you generally, and you're really good at, you know, nailing down some really interesting, very specific issues on this. But just generally, as I look at the economic landscape, I think there are three basic scenarios. There's inflation, deflation and stagnation. And of course there are some varieties of all of those. Where does Bill Tetro think we're going?

Well, Bill Tetro has been a deflationist for a long time. And back in the beginning of 2014, when 68 different economists, of course I wasn't one of them that was polled by both Reuters and Bloomberg, they all said interest rates would be a 4% by the end of the year. There's only one way interest rates can go and that is up because we're down around the 2% range. Strangely, we see the. Now we've seen a bump up and we get these, you know, I call them dead cat bounces. But I've seen interest rates plummet to areas that people just couldn't conceive. Switzerland having the first negative 10 year interest rate on their, on their sovereign debt. Nobody's there. Then all of a sudden you see Germany. That's, I mean, as you know, the same thing. They're down to what point? 28% something along those lines. Deflation is the thing.

So you're still saying that, right? You haven't changed your thinking yet.

I'm absolutely still saying that, Jason, because the money, short of doing a helicopter bend, of dropping money, the money that was printed, or we'll call it created, because it wasn't printed, it was created, never got to the public. It stayed in the balance sheets of the banks, it stayed on the 1% side in the major corporations, and it stayed overseas.

I just want make sure you address some things before I forget. So, first of all, won't that money ever trickle down? I mean, the 1% they invest, they spend. It's not like they can. Nobody can really live in a vacuum unless you put your money under your mattress. Your money is doing something always. It's either spending, it's investing, it's saving, which is capital formation, increasing someone's balance sheet somewhere, or liability, if it's a bank, because they. A bank looks at it in reverse. But, you know, that isn't in isolation. If somebody's getting richer, that has to trickle down, doesn't it?

No, no.

How come? Okay, so Arthur Laffer be damned, right? Is that what you're saying?

Let me just tell you why I take this position very quickly, okay? Because when Jason Hartman goes to this grocery store and he buys a loaf of bread, When Warren Buffett goes to the grocery store in Omaha and buys a loaf of bread, your net worth and his net, well, maybe is the same as his.

I'm not sure, not quite.

Okay, but Jason Hartman and his net worth, he's making a billion dollars every two weeks or three weeks, but he still only buys the one loaf of bread.

I see that. On the consumption side. And there's a, There's a TED speech, a TED Talk of a guy who seems like a capitalist who's apologizing for the sins of capitalism, right? I can't remember the guy's name, but he says that the rich don't help the economy is his whole thesis. And I think that that's BS because, you know, even though Warren Buffett only pays the same and buys the same loaf of bread as I do, in your example, his money's still doing something. It's either growing a company, which is growing employment. I mean, money can't do nothing, can it?

Well, let's look at Apple. Where's most of Apple's money? Is it creating jobs here in the United States, or is it sitting over in overseas where it's not being taxed? And the money they make you would think that Apple could be one of the biggest, biggest employers in this country. Ge, a lot of them. And so there's money coming in there. And yes. I mean, if you take the guy who's just made his, got his million dollar bonus, and don't get me wrong, I am a great capitalist. I want people to make as much money as possible and go out and spend it, but we're not seeing that. And how do I know this? Because just take a look at the amount of money and the money that's flowing through the system, okay? And you look at that and you look at the volatility index, the volatility of money, right? And all of a sudden we're back to where we were in the 30s. It's just sitting there, it's not moving. That's the problem.

But does it eventually have to move? I mean, money gets impatient, it burns a hole in people's pocket. They want to do something with it.

Ah, but remember, Jason, a lot of that wealth is tied up in various so called assets. Whether it's that $10 million home that was worth 5 million, whether it's that stock, maybe you owned LinkedIn and you have much of your wealth in the LinkedIn stock and you woke up the next morning and it's down 27%, lot of assets are not in actual cash. That is sitting there. That's why I tell people. One of my biggest things to tell people is make sure you have cash in your house. Actual cash, because that is in a deflationary environment can be very, very powerful.

Okay, so cash in a deflationary environment, that's interesting. Now I got to ask you this though. Don't you think it's a good business plan for governments and central banks to have inflation? Isn't that their way out? I mean, when you've got all these governments, especially the US that controls the reserve currency, of course, with so much massive debt, don't they want to debase their own debt through inflation?

Oh, there's no question about that. That's the only way out, is inflation. Problem is, let's look at Japan, been trying to inflate for almost three decades now, can't get to 2%. Look at Mario Draghi, the head of the European Central bank, who is trying to now create his own quantitative easing over there to raise inflation. It's not happening. The main reason, Jason, because of that, is that you cannot, and this is where Keynesians falter, you cannot create, you cannot force demand. If I give Jason Hartman five more credit cards If I give you, then the ability of debt, are you going to go out and spend it?

Well, maybe or maybe not. It depends on who you're giving it to. Of course, we saw that during the last financial crisis. But if you increase the supply of money, okay, and wages trickle up a bit, if everybody's got that wealth effect, if the price of their real estate goes up, if their stock portfolio goes up, you have that wealth effect. People just feel like they've got more money to spend, so they spend. So they increase the velocity of money. I'm not saying it's a good plan. I'm just saying it is a good plan for governments and central banks. I'm not saying it's like, don't get me wrong, Bill. I'm not saying this is rational or logical or prudent. I'm just saying it's a good deal for governments and central banks.

Jason, you're absolutely right in what you're saying. The unfortunately, that we're into a time period with people that they're not doing that. We can look back when Gasoline went from $4 a gallon to here in Phoenix, paying less than 2 bucks. The thinking was, oh, look at all this money that's being saved from the middle of last year to the end of the year. Look at all this money that the consumer is not putting in the tank. He's got in his pocket. Boy, is he going to spend at Christmas time. But he didn't. It was a disaster. And so consequently, they're saying, well, why aren't the people spending? Why aren't they going in and spending? And what you've got is, now you come back, we kind of doing this round circle. Come back to the millennials, they don't have jobs. Come back to the guy who's a retiree. He's got money, but he's being forced, if he wants a return, to go into the market because he's getting zero interest. Interest rate policy is getting nothing there.

Right, right, right. And so that's the big scam that they've taken all these people, these millions of people who did the right thing all their life. They saved money, they delayed gratification, they created capital formation, which is the key to wealth in any society. And they did all that. And they thought they could live off their savings and, you know, invest very conservatively. They could buy bonds, they could have CDs, they could ladder their CDs in banks and live off that money, and they've got no return. So they're being forced to do Alternative things, many of them more risky.

Absolutely right. And one could look back if you're an advisor on Wall street, and you could say, yeah, but look at the stock market over the last few years. Boy, if you'd been in there, you'd made yourself a fortune, et cetera. And you say, okay, now wait a minute, I'm living off this money I need to create an income stream, and most of them aren't paying. I'm going to have to sell assets to create my income stream. Now, it becomes a very sticky issue here. And if all of a sudden this market does fall apart, are you, Mr. Advisor, going to say to me, oh, normally the reaction is, don't worry, it'll come back. Except that I'm 70, 75 years old, Mr. Advisor, and I don't have 10 years for it to come back. That's one of the problems.

Exactly. Well, and the other thing, though, with what's going on, I mean, some amazing things going on in the field of longevity sciences. Maybe they do have a lot longer. Maybe this is a huge, sweeping socioeconomic problem or opportunity. I mean, of course, I don't think many people would mind living longer, but, you know, too much life at the end of the money. It's a good problem to have, but it's still a problem, right?

Well, you know the old adage, I want to die when my last check bounces.

There you go. Yeah, that's it. That's good. But, you know, in terms of that deflation inflation discussion, if you agree that this is a good plan for governments and central banks, the deflationists say things flippantly, and I think this is silly that they say this. They say things like, well, there are so many deflationary forces that you can't print enough money. You can't create enough money to create inflation. Whoa. The amount that you can create or print is unlimited. So that seems like a really specious thing to say. You know, of course you can create inflation, can't you? I mean, is it, Is, is there some point when you have. I mean, this is not Japan. When you have the reserve currency of the world, can't you inflate it if you want to? I mean, if you want too bad enough, maybe the Hayek people and the Austrians will complain like us. We'll complain like crazy. But I think you can create inflation if you want to.

Well, the problem here, Jason, is that the Federal Reserve under both Ben Bernanke and now under Janet Yellen, want to create inflation. And so they will lead you to believe that, well, we're going to raise those interest rates as we get closer and closer to the 2% inflation. And of course, the problem is, is that you can print all you want. You can, you can do that. And unless you want to then distribute it to people. The problem with that is the only one that, the only ones that have access to that kind of, I'm talking about true access to that money is we'll say the so called 1 percenters or the 1/10 of 1 percenters that can actually go in and utilize and take advantage of those low interest rates.

But can't you, if you want to create inflation, can't the government just say, look, we'll increase your section 8 housing allowance by 20%, we'll increase your Social Security check by 20% and boom. Aren't you going to just see something in the neighborhood of 20% inflation if.

They do that could very well, yes. I mean, you could turn around and you could just say, okay, so now and what they're trying to do. All right, let's take a look at minimum wage. We see that, that in the city in New York and Blasio wants to go to a $15 minimum wage in the city of New York. And so why don't we just raise it to, I don't know, $50 an hour? Let's, let's do that. Let's take, let's, because I get Social Security, let's triple my Social Security. I'd be all for that. Of course, I now know I'm going to have to take and probably buy my dollar. McDonald's is not going to be $10. And sure, it's all going to level. It's all going to level up. And that's where your battle comes in. They're not going to do that because they don't. Okay, now we get into another, another three hour conversation about what people want. If you're looking at getting and in essence destroying your middle class. This is why I gave Barack Obama an A plus. People say, well, how do you rate the president? And I said, I think the guy's done a fabulous job in. Okay, I just heard a big deep breath on your.

I'm surprised. Yeah.

No, and I, the emails that I got were unbelievable. Now let me just say, if you set out to try to say I'm going to burn down my neighbor's house, all right, and you publicly say it, or you write a little column about it, or you do, and all of a sudden you succeed and you burn down your neighbor's House, did you accomplish your goal? Yes. You must give the guy an A. You don't agree with what he's doing, but he accomplished his goal. It is my contention from day one. If you look at the guy's history, if you read his writings, if you listen to Michelle Obama, who, when she first came in and said, our goal is to take your piece of the pie away and give it to somebody else, not to increase the size of the piece, they've done that. I'm the first guy who called this guy a financial terrorist. He has accomplished what his goals are, and his goals were to destroy the middle class and to kind of bring everything into one level. And so when you've accomplished that, your goal is to get everybody, in a sense, dependent upon the government. Look at the number of people who are on food stamps today. The number of people in my community who are standing on a street corner with their cardboard sign saying anything helps is increasing exponentially. And so when we look at it, there are sometimes philosophies and actions that are being done that may be contrary to what you want to have happen or Bill Tatro wants to have happen. And so I know that's a totally different conversation, but it has to enter into the mix.

Right? Yeah, Very interesting. So, Bill, where do you think the market is going when I, when I say that I'm talking about the stock market. I just wanted to make sure our listeners heard that from you before you go.

Okay. You have to understand that I have been consistent all along and I'm kind of well ultimately now. Harry, Dennis, come into my school. I think the ultimate, over the next probably 12 to 24 months is a major collapse in the market. I think that we get down to somewhere around 3,500. That's about a 15,000 point drop.

Wow.

Yeah. Much like Japan did back in the early 90s when it went from 40,000 to 10,000, actually around 8,500. Nobody thought that that could ever happen. And they were talking 100,000 on the Nikkei and it dropped 75%. I think the very same thing could happen. They're going to fight it. I mean, the Fed and everybody's going.

To fight it and they're going to fight it by more qe, right?

Yeah.

They're going to fight it by more money creation.

Yeah, but we don't live in a vacu. And I think that there's going to be. The economies are going to take it in the chin, not just here, but all over the world. Be very interesting to see today. And.

On this Thursday that the United Kingdom is having an election that'll be very interesting to see. And as we watch all this play out, I just think, as I said at the end of the Keynesians, Keynesian philosophy always comes to an end. And I think we're approaching that sooner rather than later.

Very interesting, Bill. Give out your website. Tell people where they can find you.

It's Bill Tetro. That's T as in Tom A T as in Tom R O. Billtatro.com and it talks about I have a company called GPS for Life. You can take a look at that. It's all there. My book is there. My writings are there. Former radio stuff is there. So it's all there in one spot. Billtatro.com awesome.

Bill. Thanks so much for joining us. It's always interesting to talk to you.

And it's always a pleasure being on your show. Jason, thank you once again.

What's great about the shows you'll find on jasonhartman.com is that if you want to learn how to finance your next big real estate deal, there's a show for that. If you want to learn more about food storage and the best way to keep those onions from smelling up everything else, there's a show for that. If you honestly want to know more about business ethics, there's a show for that. And if you just want to get away from it all and need to know something about world travel, there's even a show for that. Yep, there's a show for just about anything. Only from jasonhartman.com or type in Jason Hartman in the iTunes store.

This show is produced by the Hartman Media Company already rights reserved. For distribution or publication rights and media interviews, please visit www.hartmanmedia.com or email mediaartmanmedia.com Nothing on this show should be considered specific personal or professional advice. Please consult an appropriate tax, legal, real estate or business professional for individualized advice.