556: Presidential Candidate Mark Whitney, TheLaw.net & Bank Fraud
4 Jul 2020 · 22 min
In this Holistic Survival podcast episode, host Jason Hartman interviews Mark Whitney, a 2020 Libertarian presidential candidate and former felon who taught himself law. Whitney recounts his early entrepreneurial venture with Ben & Jerry's franchises, the 1988 bank fraud and tax‑return falsification that led to a three‑year federal sentence, and how he successfully represented himself, resulting in an unconstitutional sentence reduction after 452 days—an order written by future Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. He critiques the private‑prison industry, arguing it creates modern slavery and violates the 13th Amendment by forcing undocumented migrants to work for free. Whitney explains the mechanics of the Libertarian Party’s nomination process, the challenges third‑party candidates face, and his view that the presidential debate commission is a private cartel that limits political speech. He describes his legal‑research platform TheLaw.net, emphasizing its affordability for pro se litigants and its extensive database of judicial opinions. The conversation shifts to the COVID‑19 pandemic’s impact: remote work, the home becoming the central hub of life, potential universal basic income, and a predicted societal restructuring that places the internet at the core of future infrastructure. Whitney shares his personal philosophy of learning law through self‑study, his admiration for historic cases that expanded prisoners’ rights, and his plans to focus on writing in his 60s. The episode concludes with Whitney promoting his website and projects.
Chapters
This show is produced by the Hartman Media Company. For more information and links to all our great podcasts, visit hartmanmedia.com.
Welcome to the Holistic Survival show with Jason Hartman. The economic storm brewing around the world is set to spill into all aspects of our lives. Are you prepared? Where are you going to turn for the critical life skills necessary to survive and prosper? The Holistic Survival show is your family's insurance for a better life. Jason will teach you to think independently, to understand threats, and how to create the ultimate action plan. Sudden change or worst case scenario, you'll be ready. Welcome to Holistic Survival, your key resource for protecting the people, places and profits you care about in uncertain times. Ladies and gentlemen, your host, Jason Hartman.
It's my pleasure to welcome Mark Whitney. He is a 2020 Libertarian presidential candidate, a former felon who taught himself law and won his own freedom by representing himself and went on to become a millionaire. He's quite an entrepreneur. Amazing story. He's the founder and CEO of TheLaw.net and has two grown sons, one who is autistic and both of his sons, our self made millionaires. He's the former host and producer of Late Night Last Week podcast. And Mark, welcome. How are you?
Thanks, Jason. I should just stop right here. Wish everyone to drive safely and go home after an introduction.
They're already home. So yeah, that's true. Everybody is home nowadays. Everybody's already at home with the lockdowns. But hey, let's start off with your backstory a little bit, Mark. So during the heyday of mortgage fraud, you were one of many, many millions of people who, you know, who filed some bogus documents or gave bogus documents to your lender and you got nailed for it, right?
Actually, I was way ahead of my time. It was 1988, not 2008. I was in my 20s. I lived in Vermont. Ben and Jerry's had just gone public. They started franchising. I was a pretty successful entrepreneur. I started an advertising agency when I was 20. But when Ben and Jerry's came along, I just put everything I had into Ben and Jerry's. I bought the franchise rights for New Hampshire. I borrowed a bunch of money, millions of dollars to build stores all over the place. And there were a couple of years that I didn't pay my taxes. So I gave banks tax returns that reported what I'd actually made, but I hadn't filed them with irs. And when the banks got in trouble with the feds, I got in trouble with the Feds and the judge gave me a Timeout.
So how long was that stay in Hotel Graybar? Tell us about that. A little bit.
The timeout was for three years. But I represented myself at trial because at that time I was prosecutor in New Hampshire. New Hampshire, they only prosecuted about 50 federal cases a year. And they didn't have a federal public defender's office. They gave me a real estate lawyer. So I decided to represent myself at trial. I got convicted on some things. And then when I finally ended up at the Allenwood Federal Prison Camp in Pennsylvania, I went right to work in the law library for about nine months and ended up having my term of imprisonment declared unconstitutional. Ended up winning order for immediate release after 452 days. And the guy that wrote that order is Stephen Breyer, who is now on the U.S. supreme Court.
Oh, how interesting. That's fascinating. So how was it considered unconstitutional? I mean, you know, there's bank fraud. You know, assuming the prosecution proved that, how did the prison time become unconstitutional? What happened there? Tell us about that.
Yeah, bank fraud in the United States. Just because a lot of your listeners actually may be interested to know it's a strict liability crime like what Ed Snowden is charged with. So with Ed Snowden, what the feds have to show is that he took some stuff he's not allowed to turn to the jury and defend himself and say, yes, but I took an oath to support the Fourth Amendment and privacy and so forth. So in my case, all the government had to show was that the tax return I gave the bank didn't match what I gave irs. And that's actually the crime infecting the files so that when the FDIC auditors come through, they presume those files are accurate if they're materially false, that in the United States, as a Class B felony, get up to 30 years for that. The reason I was able to have my sentence declared unconstitutional was that the judge used a law to send me to prison that was not on the books at the time. I lied to the bank. So I'm still a convicted felon, but I was able to do myself a lot of good and shorten my prison term dramatically and get back to my family, who was on welfare. And we'd lost everything. We'd already gone through bankruptcy and everything. And ever since then, it's been a good day.
You know, I'll tell you something. I've done some shows about it, interviewed some people. I had the founder of Families for Mandatory Minimums or Families Against Mandatory Minimums. Sorry, I should fam on the show. I Donated some money to them. And you know what, listen, I'm a law and order guy, okay? But number one, there are so many laws that everybody, everybody is ignorant of a zillion laws because there's just too many, nobody can possibly know them. Number one, I interviewed the author of four Felonies a Day on the show. And then I've done some shows about the privatized prison system. And you know, if you have, I mean, I'm all for being a libertarian, right? And it's when I first heard of, well, maybe we should outsource the prisons to a more efficient, you know, private sector. Sounded good to me, but I don't think that's worked very well at all. I think that, you know, you can't incentivize people to, you know, declare war against other countries or take away someone's freedom. That just doesn't work in my eyes. I mean, you're a libertarian candidate, so you tell me, could that work?
I think when the government has a constitutional duty, when the Bill of Rights is implicated heavily as it is when a citizen is in the custody of the government, that that duty should be performed by government actors. The additional layer of having it done by the private sector create all sorts of civil liberties issues and as you say, it provides an economic incentive for some really bad stuff. Something that we're all aware of is, you know, refugees and asylum seekers who present themselves at the southern border. We're all aware of the children being kidnapped and thrown into all Walmarts. But what people don't think about is the very resourceful people that manage to get themselves to the border fleeing places like Guatemala to get away from the drug cartels that are war on drug incubates. They actually get kidnapped by border patrol and thrown into private prisons where they're forced to work for free. And that is straight up a 13th amendment violation. It's human trafficking. Because the 13th amendment says that we shall not have slavery and indentured servitude in the United States, but comma, unless you are duly convicted. And these people have been convicted of nothing but the for profit prisons. Core Civic and Geo group rely on these kidnapped refugees to do all the maintenance and all the work in the prisons in violation of our 13th amendment.
Yeah, well, it really is a way to get a whole bunch of like, it's a modern form of slavery, right? You can, you can basically force these people to work for pathetic wages. You know, there's just too much incentive to have a large portion of the population incarcerated. It's just the incentives are all messed up now, you know, sadly. So. Okay, well, hey, let's move on and let's talk about some other things. You ran for president for four months, and then the pandemic hit. And as you say, that the trail went out of the campaign, Took the.
Trail out of campaign trail. Made it kind of tough. I think it was Shakespeare said all the world's a stage, but today, all the world is a screen. And if you're doing anything that involves a stage, I was running from behind. And if you have 10 campaign arrows in your quiver and a virus comes along, it takes away nine, leaving you only with zoom. Even Joe Biden is having a hard time getting traction right now, and politics has been suspended. They haven't announced it officially, but as a practical matter, that's really what's happened.
Yeah, it's going to be interesting to see if the election's postponed. That might be. I don't know, is that going to.
Be the first time in our history that's not permitted. There has to be an election under our Constitution. And there will be a new president on January 20th. It'll either be, well, there'll be an inauguration on January 20th for our constitution. And I suspect Donald Trump will win in a landslide because it's going to be a great year for incumbents. Incumbents love viruses.
Well, look at whose competition is Joe Biden. Are you kidding me? Seriously?
Yeah. I think that the Democratic National Committee, I think, made a choice to tacitly endorse the reelection of Donald Trump when they circle the wagons around Biden because the alternative was Bernie Sanders. And that would mean they'd be labeled a socialist party. And it's not a socialist party. It's a corporately owned party. It's owned by Wall Street. We all know that, just like the Republican National Committee is. And so they made a choice for four more years of Trump.
Well, we shall see. And I think you're going to be right about that. I think we are going to have four more years of Trump, but we'll see. So tell us what you learned by representing yourself in court.
Oh, well, I learned that I love the law. All the best stories I came to learn are in the law books. And I learned a lot like Abe Lincoln did and like everybody did before there were bar associations by just reading it. So one of the great blessings of the First Amendment was there's this case called Bounds versus Smith where a prisoner brought a lawsuit and said, hey, we have access to the courts pursuant to the First Amendment. But we don't have legal materials. And Supreme Court said, yeah, you're right. If you're going to have access, that access should be meaningful. So as a result of that case brought many years ago, federal prisons are required to have a basic law library. So every week a new book of case law would arrive. That's five or six hundred pages. And these are opinions written by judges. And these opinions tell the craziest stories in the world that you can't make up. And then somehow it comes to a conclusion. And that's how you learn the law. And you read and read and you read to learn what the law says. But as you get deeper into it, you get to get to where you can read between the lines and you get to know these judges so well, you get to go, well, wait a minute, Dave, that's not what you said last month in the case of U.S. v. Smith. Most lawyers never have the opportunity to spend thousands of hours studying the law the way I did. And I just love it. I've loved it ever since. And I became good enough at it that 40,000 lawyers for the last 20 years have been paying to use my software to do their own legal research.
So your software, does it help pro se parties like you at all, or is it. I mean, I know lawyers use it just like they use Westlaw or LexisNexis, but is there some, I mean, is there some, like, unique spin on your software that we should.
Well, what makes our software helpful to pro se litigants is that it's affordable. There are around, you know, 7 million judicial opinions that have been written since the beginning of the republic, federal and state. So they're all in there. So, you know, we do have pro se litigants that use our software, so. And they don't. They're not necessarily pro se. They may be using it in to work on their own case together with their attorney who's helping them with their bankruptcy, their divorce, or their criminal case or whatever's going on in their life or their civil lawsuit. But it's, you know, it's 50 bucks a month, so anybody can afford it. And it puts a really good set of power tools on your desktop. The equivalent database from our competitors would run 2,000 or $2,500 a month as opposed to 500 bucks a year.
So I can't remember the number, so don't quote me on this. But I looked at it, I think, last year sometime, and it was like there were 5,000 people or something running for president. I'm Going back to your presidential bid and tell us what that's like. You had an interesting four months with that. Give us some insight into this little known area of.
Yeah, so the number is about 900. There are always several hundred people who run for president. This year, about 500 Democrats, maybe 250 Republicans. In my party, the Libertarian Party, around about three dozen people. And of those, a dozen or so actively running. So in the Libertarian Party you actually go out and you go to state conventions and each at the state conventions you debate your opponents. It's non binding, it's a way for the states to raise money. But the nominee, the presidential, vice presidential nominee are selected separately at a national convention involving about 1100 delegates. And that vote is going to happen digitally. It's going to happen online this year at the end of May and I suspect that Congressman Justin Amash will be the nominee and then that will be the end of that.
But how does someone do it? I mean, why is it that we can't get more parties and more candidates in these elections? Why is it that the corporate media seems to control the debate stages? It's just silly. Like our system for such an advanced country, our system is terrible.
Yeah, well, bipartisanship is alive at. Well, and this happens at the state level. So the idea of having a third warm body on the presidential debate stage is that polls at about 85%. But the presidential Commission on Debates is a privately owned organization and it was set up as a private organization so that we can't cite the Constitution as a way of saying our political speech is being censored. So because they're a private organization, they get to privately decide who's going to be on stage and it's the Democrats or Republicans working together. The Presidential Commission on Debate is always staffed by former presidents, former vice presidents, orthodox Democrats or Republicans. It's really a single mafia that controls our system under the guise of being two separate entities. But that's not really the case.
Yeah. So is there any hope for any more choices or any change or can you teach someone listening how to run so that they can make an impact?
Yeah, sure. It's super easy to run as a Democrat or Republican. You just fill out. If you want to run for a House or Senate, you fill out a form@the fec.gov, it takes about five minutes and you're running. It's the same running for president. I ran for president as a Libertarian because I am Libertarian. In some ways it would be easier to run as a Democrat or Republican. I would have, I think, maybe more success, but just because they are, you know, because of the treatment they receive from the media. But I'm not Democrat or Republican, I'm libertarian. And so that is the party that I ran with. And it's an uphill battle because, you know, this is a bad time to be a freedom salesman. My governor here in California, Gavin Newsom, this is a state where the beaches are closed and the 711 is open. And you can't have 6ft of distance at a 7 11, but you can at the beach. But he's polling at 83% approval. And we're going through a period of time where I don't think there's a debate as to whether there's going to be universal basic income. The debate is how much will it be. So that's a fundamental shift in our society and it's kind of making my head spin a little bit to figure out what the new normal is going to look like in terms of the attitude that we should have as citizens when we wake up in the morning. I have two sons who are successful entrepreneurs and I'm trying to imagine having a couple of sons now who are 14 and 16 and saying to them, maybe you ought to get a part time job or something to kind of see how the world works. And then they go, well, you know, why should I do that? In two years the government's going to be sending me $2,000 a month and I'm going to be all set.
So tell us what you think about what's coming next. How are we going to come out of this situation? And I mean, you know, the government printing press is running like crazy, but it's not just the us, it's every country. Are we looking at an inflationary future? What do you think?
Well, I just think at a macro level, our society, the infrastructure and architecture of our society, even though the Internet's been around for 20 years, the architecture is really 1950s. It really hasn't changed since then. So I think we're long overdue. Right. So I think if you can easily reimagine the future by just erasing everything on the whiteboard and put the Internet at the core and build out from there in an ever increasing spiral. And over the course of the next 20 years, that's what life is going to look like.
Well, is that your wishful thinking or is that your prediction?
No, that's a prediction. I think it's a really good bet because the people who really run our society, the political class, are the people who have. It's not the top 1%. I think it's the people who were in the top 10%. The people who are well educated, they're professionals, they're engineers, doctors, lawyers. They are politically active. They're politically tuned in. And what they say goes. And I think a lot of these folks are going to. Well, yesterday intel said they're going to be closed for the. Their offices will be closed for the rest of 2020. The same day Jack Dorsey said Twitter employees can work at home forever. So there are going to be more choices, I think, in whether you go to the office or not. There are going to be more choices on whether you send your kids to a school building or not. I think there are incredible efficiencies there. Economic efficiencies that people won't be able to ignore, and also lifestyle efficiencies that people are going to embrace. So I think the opportunities for drastically improved society where we're not wasting time, we don't. Nobody should ever have to get into a car to sit at a computer, ever. That's crazy, right? That's crazy. And college is something that, like Bernie Sanders has tried to institutionalize college and sort of freeze it in place by making it free. But college is good for disruption and rethinking. Everything is. Everything is ripe for it. And I think this virus is going to expedite all of that.
Yeah, well, you know, it's one of my favorite economists, Joseph Schumpeter. It's creative destruction. And all this does is make it happen faster, which is great. So there's a lot of good things that'll come out of this. I think the housing market, the home is going to become the center of the universe. Office space and, you know, obviously retail is just going to continue tanking, and so those types of properties are in pretty bad shape. Another question is, how are we going to interact as people? What's going to happen to social life? And, you know, if everybody's at home sitting on a computer, I mean, that's already, like, bad enough. Anybody walking down the street is. Everybody's in their own little world. They've got their earbuds in, can't even say hello to anybody anymore. It's just a. I don't know, it's a very isolating. Technology has got a lot of very isolating elements. If you go anywhere, people are just looking at their phones all the time.
Yeah, it's amazing. So as someone who's been a spoken word artist, I'm a competitive public speaker. In Toastmasters. I've toured the North American UK with one person shows. I'm a very accomplished speaker where I'm very much an introvert. So I'm okay with, you know, being locked down. I've kind of decided that the next three or four years I'm going to, I'm going to do the writing that I expected. So I'm 61, so I expected to spend my 70s writing. But the quiet really invites writing. So I've decided to sort of shift those priorities and sort of spend the next three or four years doing a lot of writing projects that, you know, taking stock of my creative life, my entrepreneurial life, trying to pay attention to what's going on. And like you say, I look, I think nobody knows how this is going to land. It all depends on how anxious people are. And I don't think it has anything to do with government. I think the government could say everything's open tomorrow and airline traffic would still be 75% down. No one would go to Disney, no one would go to restaurants. And I don't know how long that will take to play out. And there is going to be, I believe, a movement among the political class to pandemic proof everything. So in anticipation of the next pandemic and I don't know what that's going to look like from a civil liberties standpoint in particular, you know, I can easily imagine a scenario where government testers are knocking on the door, you know, giving us permission about whether we can go outside or not and people cheering for that. And that makes me sad.
Yeah, it's pretty weird. I mean, the First Amendment says we have the right to peaceably assemble, but you can't do that today, so it's pretty intense. It sure is. Hey, give out your website or tell people where they can find out about your work.
Yeah. Markwhitney.com, mark with a K markwhitney.com and you can see generally some of the stuff that I, that I've done. It's a newmarkwhitney.com I've got my show full for a client there, which is my award winning political dramedy about the bad old days of fighting the government. You can watch it for free. You don't have to even put an email address in or anything. You can see a link to the law.net, stuff like that and check out what I'm working on.
Good stuff. Well, Mark Whitney, thanks so much for joining us.
Okay, thank you. I appreciate the time. Take care.
Thank you. So much for listening. Please be sure to subscribe so that you don't miss any episodes. Be sure to check out the show's specific website and our general website, hartmanmedia.com for appropriate disclaimers and terms of service. Remember that guest opinions are their own, and if you require special legal or tax advice or advice in any other specialized area, please consult an appropriate professional. And we also very much appreciate you reviewing the show. Please go to iTunes or Stitcher Radio or whatever platform you're using and write a review for the show. We would very much appreciate that, and be sure to make it official and subscribe so you do not miss any episodes. We look forward to seeing you on the next episode.
More from Jason


2482: AI Labor Displacement and the K-Shaped Housing Affordability: High-End Housing and the New Economic Divide with Adam Taggart


2482: AI Labor Displacement and the K-Shaped Housing Affordability: High-End Housing and the New Economic Divide with Adam Taggart


2480 FBF: Investor Mindset & DuckDuckGo Founder, Super Thinking Mental Models & Traction, How Any Startup Explosive Growth by Gabriel Weinberg


2480 FBF: Investor Mindset & DuckDuckGo Founder, Super Thinking Mental Models & Traction, How Any Startup Explosive Growth by Gabriel Weinberg


2478 FBF: Jim Rickards on The Death of Money, Aftermath, Currency Wars & The New Great Depression


2478 FBF: Jim Rickards on The Death of Money, Aftermath, Currency Wars & The New Great Depression


2477: Builder Profit Margins Hit 26-Year Lows and Solving the American Housing Crisis

