CW 1071 - Interest Rates vs Cap Rate with Mike Zlotnik
7 Dec 2025 · 43 min
Jason Hartman and Mike Zlotnik break down how rising interest rates compress cap rates and squeeze property values. When rates jump fast, refinancing maturing loans becomes risky and rents lag behind. Defensive moves: lock in long-term fixed rates, cut leverage, build cash reserves, and focus on cash flow.
Questions this episode answers
1071
October 17, 2018
Asset value $10,000,000; mortgage $7,500,000; NOI $750,000 (gross revenue $1,000,000; expenses $250,000).
Price would drop to approximately $9,270,000 (a 7.3% decline).
As interest rates rise by 1%, the cap rate adjusts by roughly 0.6% in the presented example.
Chapters
I started researching on real estate investing about three or four years ago. Two years ago, I was lucky enough to stumble upon the podcast when I was doing a search. I listened to you for probably three or four months, but I was hooked after the first episode. Just everything from the real estate information, politics, the philosophy, the economics. And after about three or four months, I decided, you know, I'm going to put my information in and see what Platinum comes back with. So I plugged my information in on the website. Oliver contacted me a couple of days later and by the way, he has been a tremendous resource for me, just pointing me in the right direction, especially as somebody with no prior experience to real estate investing. But he definitely pointed me in the right direction, helped to educate me and help to show me different sources of information where I can better myself as a real estate investor.
We are now on Alexa, so if you have an Alexa device, you can get my real estate update on Alexa.
As part of your daily Flash briefing.
So be sure to check it out in the Alexa store and add the.
Skill for Jason Hartman's Real Estate minute.
Welcome to the Creating wealth show with Jason Hartman. You're about to learn a new slant on investing, some exciting techniques and fresh new approaches to the world's most historically proven asset class that will enable you to create more wealth and freedom than you ever thought possible. Jason is a genuine seller made multimillionaire who's actually been there and done it. He's a successful investor, lender, developer and entrepreneur who's owned properties in 11 states, had hundreds of tenants, and been involved in thousands of real estate transactions. This program will help you follow in Jason's footsteps on the road to your financial Independence Day. You really can do it. And now, here's your host, Jason Hartman, with the complete solution for real estate investors.
Hey, welcome, welcome, welcome. This is your host, Jason hartman, episode number 1071. 1071. Thank you so much for joining me today and greetings from Tampa, Florida. Again, no, I have not moved since the last episode. But I tell you, this digital nomad life, it's kind of fun, adventurous, but it's a little bit of a hassle. It's getting a little old, I must admit. Sometimes, I don't know, it depends what day you ask me. Some days I absolutely love it. I am making more connections and seeing more friends. You know, it feels like I'm on a political tour or something, like I'm touring the country. I had to get a big one of those big political buses and, you know, paint my name on the side and say, hey, Jason Hartman, for reason and sanity, maybe my big campaign promise will be that I will end a few of these really annoying things like noise. Noise is the scourge of modern society. What is that noise? Well, you know the chief among them. Leaf blowers. Yes. End leaf blowers. We will outlaw leaf blowers. We will outlaw secondhand smoke.
We.
We will outlaw people who play their music too loud. Well, unless it's really good music, like the music I would choose. Or we'll outlaw all these annoyances. You know, I tell you, air conditioning abuse. That's one. Air conditioning abuse. Yes. You know, everybody's worried about the environment. Well, why don't you put the air conditioning at a reasonable temperature? You know, you don't need to chill us. We're not at the ice hotel here in Sweden like we were in the venture alliance trip where you're abusing us with air conditioning. Okay, enough of that. Enough of that. No, I'm not running for office because I'm not crazy. Anyway, today we are going to talk about the seeds that are being sown for the market downturn. It is coming, I tell you as I am. Yes. Oh, and I have to tell you something. I have to tell you something. I bought a house. Yep. A house in which to live. Not another rental property. I own so many darn rental properties. But it looks like our client and partner in one of those properties, the big apartment complex we own, we also have got a mobile home park together.
He wants to sell.
Now, I don't really want to sell. I would like to just hold. But he's kind of antsy to sell the property and I might just agree to it. But I am going to need to come out of that 1031 exchange. This real estate investing thing, it's awesome. It's the most historically proven asset class in the entire world. But I must admit, it's a bit of a trap.
Why?
Because you got such great tax benefits that if you don't keep exchanging or keep the property, you, you're gonna pay some capital gain. And who wants to pay taxes? Certainly not me. It's one of my least favorite things to pay for. I just wrote another big check to the IRS yesterday. Yuck, yuck, yuck, yuck. Anyway, yeah, I bought a house for myself though. Now I decided to buy the house. You know me, I really believe in renting high end properties for oneself and then buying lots of low priced rental properties that you rent to other people. But here's what I did. I did the same thing.
All of you do. Yes.
I'm just human, just like everybody else. I made my decision emotionally and then I proceeded immediately to rationalize it with logic.
Yes.
Now this wasn't that emotional of a decision and, and the leap in logic to rationalize it was pretty minor. Okay, so it was pretty minor. Yes, this property cost way more than a rental property, but it didn't cost that much. It wasn't that bad. And guess what I think, I think.
If I decide to rent it at.
Some point, it would probably rent for 0.65 to 0.7 RV ratio. And you know, that ain't that bad. It ain't that bad. Do you like my grammar Ain't? Yeah. Well, sometimes ain't is just, you know, that slang kind of sounds good.
I know it's not a proper word.
Just like arsn't that arson's the proper word either. Okay. So yeah, that's what I did. And my house is under construction. So I will be able to move hopefully into my beautiful new home in about 35 days right after our Hawaii trip. Well, a little bit after our Hawaii trip. So anyway, join us in Hawaii for the awesome two trips we have planned. We're putting the final touches on them now for our profits in paradise and our Venture alliance triple. And they're going to be phenomenal. Phenomenal. Phenomenal. By the way, we decided against the I think we decided against. Now it's not totally formal. We decided against the luau in favor of something better for Saturday evening. So if you are attending, look forward to more on that. By the way, a few of you have asked me about the time for the event. Saturday morning we start at 9am Sunday morning we start at 9am Both days will go to about 6pm Both days. Maybe Sunday we'll kind of wrap it up at about 5pm so join us for that Jason hartman.com for more on the Hawaii event and then of course the Venture alliance event immediately following in Kauai, just a short little $70 plane flight away and that's going to be awesome. My first time in Kauai. Yes, I've been to 81 countries but I've never been to Kauai, so can't wait to go there. Can't wait to go. The pictures look spectacular. We were choosing the restaurants for Adventure alliance dinners.
Oh my gosh, these restaurants look phenomenal.
The views, the sunsets, that spectacular vistas.
Are just going to be awesome.
So anyway, back to today's guest. Now I have to apologize in advance. I know the Sound quality isn't that great of this intro even, but the sound quality for the guest is not awesome either. It's okay, it's passable, but it's not.
Up to my high standards.
Bear with us on that.
I mean, it's not bad.
It's just a little bit less than it should be. We're talking with our Venture alliance member Mike, who is going to talk about cap rate compression a lot and generally what is happening to the marketplace with rising interest rates. So it's an important topic. Let's just get over to our guest and let's dive into the show. We're going to get a little wonky here for you today. We don't always do that. Sometimes we get a little wonky. Sometimes we talk more practical matters, sometimes we talk about the future, the economy.
You know what we do here.
You've been listening for 1071 episodes.
Of course, you know what we do? A lot of variety. A lot of variety.
Anyway, without further ado, let's get to our guest today and talk about the changes in the market and some of them a little bit ominous. I wouldn't worry too much, but we are definitely seeing signs of a shift in the marketplace.
What that means for us.
Not much.
It doesn't mean much for us at.
All because we followed commandment number five and we bought properties that made sense the day we bought them. So these changes in the market, they really just mean for us more inflation and increased rents. By the way, a huge inflection point has occurred in the national debt picture in terms of debt service cost being about the same as productivity cost and how that fills the tax coffers of the government. And when that inflection point happens, and we always knew this day would come and it is basically upon us, that means that, that the government has no choice, no choice but to simply inflate. And if you're a follower of mine, and hopefully you are, you believe in my teachings about inflation induced debt destruction.
And you are going to get so darn rich following my philosophy.
Yay. Okay, without further ado, let's get to our guest today.
Here we go and our Venture alliance member, Mike.
I'm Jason Hartman and I'd like to invite you to our very first two day conference in beautiful Hawaii.
Many of our attendees are making a vacation out of this event. You will learn the most innovative strategies for real estate investing available today.
We have helped thousands of people invest.
In properties around the US and we can help you do it too.
So I hope you'll Join us and happy investing.
It's my pleasure to welcome Mike Zlotnick. He is one of our Venture Alliance Mastermind members. I have known Mike for several years and he does quite a lot in the hard money lending space. He runs a couple of different funds in that world as well. And he has a very analytical mind. He's a math pro. Really has some interesting ideas on what these increased interest rates mean to investments, cap rates and a whole host of other things in the economy. Mike, welcome. How are you?
Hey, Jason, how are you? Thank you for having me.
Appreciate you.
It's good to have you back on your returning guest.
So we see interest rates rising.
That is having an effect or it's going to have a significant effect on the market ultimately. The Fed has been very transparent about the fact that it will continue to increase rates maybe up to five more times in the next year. So this is pretty significant. This is maybe the most transparent Federal Reserve certainly of my adult life. You probably agree with me on that. But what does it all mean to investors and to investments?
So let me move forward. I'm going to move a couple of slides forward. This is presentations for educational purposes only. So that's my first disclaimer. So, interest rates. This chart covers 30 plus years of interest rates, Federal Reserve target rate, and we are certainly in the period of abnormally low interest rates. You could see after the crash of 2008, we've been essentially near zero for almost eight years. And I believe that Fed has made a significant error by not raising interest rates earlier. So they woke up towards the end of 2015, early 2016, and they started to increase interest rates and they're increasing.
Them at a pretty rapid pace, in my opinion.
The impact of that.
So you're saying they were behind the eight ball, they were behind the clock. Is your thesis now that they've moved too quickly because they waited so long that now they're overreacting?
Exactly. What they have done is they kept the rate so low that the economy starts heating up and it overheated unemployment. They have dual mandate, as you know, fight inflation and to keep the employment full. They missed the curveball or the eight ball on the inflation big time. And the inflation is actually reasonable. But the employment is the problem right now. The employment is full. We are facing lower historic interest rates.
Since the man went on the moon.
Yeah, yeah. So what's interesting about what you say there is that that's a problem.
That's a.
Because Fed has to raise rates and raise it fast, they need to fight.
That basically.
This is the issue of the Phillips Curve, that relationship between employment and interest rates and GDP and everything else, but it's really employment and inflation is the most core aspect of this discussion, I guess. Ok, go ahead with what you're saying.
So the Fed is raising rates, as you mentioned. They have stated they will do five.
More increases, one more in 20.
Three.
More in 2019 and one in 2020.
This is the current projections. They might wind up actually doing even.
Worse, doing more increases if employment continues.
To be where it is right now.
Or continues to improve.
So the consequence of that is that the rates are rising fast. And my point is of this whole presentation, the rising interest rates, they cause grief on everything out there, including stock market, commercial real estate, some residential real estate. The cost of financing goes up. Look at the stock market. Literally today it's having a fit. The stock market is not collapsing, but it's having a pretty bad day. And it's been having a bad day for quite a number of sessions recently since the Fed increased the rates by just a quarter, it's the expectation of continuous increases.
The current economy is heavily over leveraged.
With cheap debt, corporations relying on cheap.
Debt to deliver great results and great profits.
And it's going to come to an end. And it's going to come to an end very, very fast.
The other problem that will happen is corporate debt.
And some of the real estate notes will come to maturity in 2019, 2020, and that paper needs to be refinanced. And the rates are now a couple hundred basis points higher than what they were a few years ago. That's alone a problem. It's going to cause all kinds of.
We've certainly been spoiled by artificially low interest rates for far too long. And I couldn't agree with you more. This is causing or has caused significant financial repression where savers can't earn any decent interest rates on their savings. You know, they've done the right thing all their life and they're forced into risky investments that they shouldn't be investing in. Usually older people. Of course, because of this financial repression, the interest rates are too low. And so now you're getting this position where they've got to overreact. And this is the problem, Mike. The feedback loop takes so much time to work its way through the system. And this is another argument against why we shouldn't have a managed economy, why we shouldn't have a Federal Reserve. We shouldn't have central planning because they can't get the feedback as fast as the market can. Get the feedback. It's like the feedback happens. Maybe they do something. Today, you start to see it in six months, you start to see it more in a year. And you're always looking in the rear view mirror. And then they got to have a meeting and talk about it. And there's all these political interests and nothing's aligned. And yeah, it's something else. It really is.
That's so true. You're letting bureaucrats and politicians make the decisions when it comes to the economy, and that's terrible. I'm in agreement with you 100%. What has happened is that the governing.
Body, and we know what Federal Reserve.
It'S not necessarily acting in the interest of the public. It's acting in the interest of the bank cartel. It was founded many years ago. They may still have good intent.
The problem is they don't react in a timely manner. And again, it's regulation and manipulation by.
A bunch of folks with data markets could do a whole lot better. So my point here is that the velocity of the increases is the problem. It's not the fact that the interest rates are rising, it's how fast they're rising.
Okay, so talk to us about what this does to a real estate deal.
And the thing that drives me crazy.
Mike, and it's an ongoing thing, I've said this for 15 years, easily, is that nobody really segments the marketplace. They don't talk about the marketplace. You know, they talk about the real estate market as though 400 markets in this huge country are all the same. Right. They don't segment into linear, cyclical, and hybrid markets. You know, they talk about, quote, unquote, housing, and you know, what price range housing, you know what market. There's so many things. But we have to make some sweeping generalizations here, which we're going to do, and even talk about it from the commercial real estate standpoint, too, something that we've talked about many times over the years, which is cap rate compression or yield compression, right?
Yep. So cap rates are used in commercial real estate. They can also be used in residential real estate, simply computed as net operating income divided by the current price and market value.
It's just the definition.
I'm going to skip the example. I'm going to assume the audience knows how to compute a cap rate. Again, it's an income divided by the cost of a given asset. Many applications, all types of commercial deals. And investment real estate is a good use case. So now let's talk a little bit about the inverse relationship between cap rates and prices. I Wanted to cover this point. So as cap rates get worse, essentially the cap rates increase and the cap rates will increase, inevitably with rising interest rates. We'll talk about this in a minute. But as cap rates get higher, the prices get lower. That's as simple as that. There's an inverse relationship. As cap rates go down, the prices go up. And the reverse happens. As cap rates go up, the prices go down. So this is just for clarification how this works mathematically. Now, let's chat about what happens with interest rates and cap rates. Now, the relationship is not strictly mathematical because it varies by type of asset, it varies by the amount of leverage, it varies on many factors, but they move in tandem. When the interest rates go up, cap rates generally will go up. To what degree? It depends. It's very possible that the global economy.
Will say cap rates will go up or down.
As interest rates go up, cap rates.
Go up, cap rates go up. Why? Because prices, because of two reasons.
One is cost of financing goes up. So let's say you bet you're buying a property with a cap rate of 6 and you're getting interest rate at 4.5. That spread between the cap rate and the interest rate you're paying on a mortgage is your positive leverage between the income and the debt service rate, right? That's your margin debt service coverage ratio banks require. In other words, you got to have more income than the mortgage payments.
But the problem is it takes time for that equation to equalize. Right? You don't get to equilibrium right away. At first you have interest rates go up and cap rates are the same because the prices haven't fallen or the noi, the net operating income hasn't increased. Right now these things do all come together and there are like these equilibrium points in the market. But it takes some time for that to happen, right?
That's exactly correct. So initially what happens is Fed starts rising rates. The rates go up fast. And when they go up fast, the cost of financing goes up just very, very quickly. And anytime a maturing loan has to come for refinancing, that already happens. If there's a sale of a property, the cap rate theoretically is still the good old rate. But when they compute that service coverage ratio, that's going to get worse. In the long run with inflation, the revenues and net operating income will go.
Up and will keep up and that will sustain the prices in the long run.
But in the short run, that balance.
Is out of whack.
In other words, the short term impacts of interest rate increases. They felt Much faster than the adjustment of the cap rates. And the cap rates, by the way, have not been getting worse even though the interest rates have been increasing.
Right.
That was my point of asking you that question before it.
Yes, that's what I'm saying. That's a great point. The cap rates have been stubborn. They have not increased. What I am saying is, well, every time interest rates go up, there's more and more pressure on cap rates to go up as well. Over time they will move in the same direction and they'll move there sooner or later. So this is historic chart of what has happened since 2001 until end of 2016. Directionally, the interest rates have been dropping. The cap rates have been not necessarily moving in exactly in tandem, but directionally they've moved in the same direction. The market doesn't move perfectly. It goes up and down. It's supply demand of the money. If there's inflow of capital from China running into the United States looking for assets that could cause the cap rates to come down, who knows? I mean, there's a lot of money from outside of the United States that's looking for safety of the US Markets. Those things influence obviously prices, but overall the substitution effect, obviously savers get more on their money in the bank instead of making the investments in deals that generate less cash flow. And then the cost of financing the debt service coverage ratio itself is what's causing pressure on cap rates. So look at this. This is an example of what higher interest rates do to cash flow, cap rates and asset prices. So this is an example. I'm talking about an asset that is worth $10 million with $7.5 million mortgage and a $2.5 million equity. To make a long story short, let's look at the gross revenues of a million dollars a year with expenses of $250,000 and net operating income of $750,000. So in the scenario of interest rates being 6%, just for the sake of this discussion, the cap rate is 7.5%, the interest rate is 6. There's a pretty decent positive leverage. And the cash on cash return in this case to investors is about 8.4%. So that's a decent scenario, but that is based on 6% interest rates as interest rates go up. Now, if you look at the same sort of scenario when the interest rate goes up to 7%, and again, this doesn't happen overnight, but a couple of quarterly increases might get us there, what will happen is if investors want the same level of cash on cash return of around 8.4%. They will be now demanding the cap rate no longer 7.5, but more like 8.1%. And what would it do to the price? What it would do to the price is effectively they will be willing to pay only 9,270,000 instead of 10 million. So the price that they're willing to pay drops 7.3% because the cost of financing is higher. And if they need to maintain the cash on cash return, the only way it can happen is either net operating income has to go up. But that takes time. And certain times there are factors that the investor can't control. They can't control how fast the rent.
Roll will go up.
They can't control a number of other things. The expenses can go up. But all other things being equal, for the sake of the argument, right now we're saying the property is run to the best of the management ability today. So the NOI and the property still sell $150,000 a year. But if the interest rates have gone up to 7%, the investors will no longer pay $10 million. They'll pay 9.2 would change.
This problem is multifaceted. Obviously, what happens in these cycles is you see the seller and the buyer, but the seller is using the past comps saying that this property down the street sold at a 7 cap, then that means I should get a 7 cap. Right? And they're saying that to the buyer, and they're trying to come to an agreement. But since the capital structure has changed in the fact that these interest rates are higher, you know, the buyer is not going to be willing to pay that. But again, this is a very slow process of the way this works its way through the system. And that's why real estate is so much less volatile than stocks, because it's slow to trade. It has fairly high transactional friction. And I look at this as a benefit. I think this is a good thing. Most people say, well, the stock market people say, oh, it's a bad thing. You know, I love stocks. I can trade it with a click of a mouse and very little cost. But that liquidity creates volatility. As I always say, when there's less liquidity, there's less volatility, contrary to what some people believe. Some people might argue with me on that, but they're wrong and I'm right.
Jason, it's hard to ever prove you wrong.
I know.
I'm pretty good at debating.
You're always right.
Yeah. No, I'm not always right.
Hey, listen, I'll tell You something I've.
Been infamously wrong about, and that is interest rates, what we're talking about now. I mean, years ago, I was predicting we'd have much higher rates all along the way. And we should have. I mean, you know, I'm sure you'll agree that we should have. Logically speaking, rates should have been higher. They were artificially low. But we live in a world where the Federal Reserve and the treasury, they can defy gravity. It doesn't have to make sense. It's government and central bank fiat.
It's called socialism.
Yeah, yeah, well, I ran away from socialism. But yes, I know this is a subsidy.
This is a government manipulation of the private sector coming in and providing cheap interest rates to the public.
That's what they've done for years.
Yeah, and low interest rates are not necessarily good. That's another contrarian thinking, right, Mike? Like, you know, rates should be where they need to be based on the supply and demand of money in the marketplace. Okay? They shouldn't be artificially suppressed because on one side you think, well, hey, I got a bunch of cheap debt. That's good. But on the other side, you can't earn a return on your money safely, and they cause inflation and have lots of ripple effects throughout the economy.
That's right. So I'm going to continue here. When I said you always right, I meant it a little bit sarcastically. I'm not trying to pick on you, but from time to time, you don't.
Always get it right.
Yeah, no, I didn't get the interest rate thing right many years ago, and I freely admit I was fabulously wrong about interest rates. Rates.
You couldn't predict what the government's going to do. That's one thing that's really difficult to do. But again, let's go back to the key subject here. So the key subject is that directional in this example, as interest rates go up by 1% per year, the cap rate adjusts by roughly 0.6%. And then the price of an asset drops by 7.3%. And then if you look all the way to the right on the last column of a table, the rates go up by 2%. Much worse picture happens in this particular example. The cap rate goes up twice 0.6 or 1.2%, and the price of Vanessa drops to 8.6 million from 10 million. Directionally, this is inevitable. It may not happen in the same proportion. And as you said, it might take time for the market to absorb the interest rate increases. It is not liquid and it's not Fast. But the market forces will do that to assets over time.
Let's continue.
So the whole point of this discussion was when people invest today, they have to prepare for higher interest rates and for higher cap rates in these projects. I've seen a lot of these offering memorandums, a lot of gurus out there doing syndications and they put these deals forward on the table today and then they're offering great returns on paper. But the reality is their assumptions are wrong on the back end. So these assets are not going to be worth what they think they're going.
To be worth on the back end.
So this particular slide, all it says is if you've gotten into a project at a good price and you have built in equity, just focus on the cash flow. Because the appreciation on the back end may or may not happen depending on what happens with interest rates. That's the key point here. So as even a strong project today, if you have underwritten it aggressively and interest rates will go up, the back end value of the asset may not be the same as you hope to achieve initially.
Well, Mike, this is the beauty of residential real estate investments versus commercial real estate investments. You can get those highly desirable three decade long fixed rate loans at still artificially low interest rates on commercial properties. You typically will get a shorter run. You'll get a five year fixed and then it'll become adjustable rate, maybe seven years, maybe even 10. But rarely do you see that 30 year fixed rate loan on a commercial property. And you definitely don't get as much leverage as you do on a residential property. So the residential investment market, I like it the best for that reason and it would be an interesting thought experiment. You know, do you think interest rates.
I mean, I doubt you think interest.
Rates are at the market rate yet, but what is the market rate? Will we ever really know the market interest rates because we have so much manipulation and distortion in the market?
Well, that's a brilliant question, Jason. I don't know because we don't have.
A legitimate market here. So what we have is we have.
A heavily manipulated market by Federal Reserve.
Also in the residential housing and some multifamily, there's the GSO, the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, USDA, VA. All these loans have artificially lower rates. They act as a subsidy. So what would be a real market if those organizations were out of business? It would certainly be higher.
I don't know how much higher.
It's harder to determine. I almost can't speculate on what the.
Rates would be if we didn't have.
Manipulation by the various parts of the government keeping the rates artificially low. The point is this. We will continue to live in this environment. We're not going anywhere, anywhere, fast. The Fed has to exist. The United States government needs to print.
Money and we live in the age.
Of no gold standard. So the Fed is absolutely a part of the system and it's there for good. And they'll continue to manipulate interest rates.
What I think will happen, and you've.
Heard me before, as much as interest rates should be higher, they will go up somewhat for a brief period of time, a few years. But I do believe in the grand conspiracy theory. I'm sure you've heard of this grand conspiracy theory. There's many theories, but the theory is that the United States government just can't afford high interest rates, the debt service.
On national debt and over time unfunded liabilities.
So they'll manipulate rates back down. The quantitative easing, we'll still have inflation, but we'll have low interest rates, as strange as it sounds, because the US government just can't afford to pay high interest rate on its debt in the long run.
Yeah, well, it's pretty cool in a way, I guess to have the world's biggest debtor, the US control the global interest rates to the largest extent of any party out there. So I guess that means we will never have them as high as they should be in a free market.
That's right.
All major economies trying to manipulate, they all want to devalue their currency.
They all, I mean, I think it's your term, inflation induced debt destruction.
So I'm in agreement. But one point I wanted to convey.
So here's the question.
Is it possible that the asset prices will not fall even with rising interest rates? And the answer is, we've had this discussion offline. Interest rate increases typically means rent increases, but that takes a while to kick in. So yes, it's possible, but the rents have to go up. And as the rents go up, net operating income goes up and that adjusts for higher interest rates.
The one thing that does happen though.
Is when you get higher interest rates.
And yes, rents slowly work themselves up, right? The rents go up along with interest rates. Those are correlating indicators. But what happens is that the supply contracts because there are fewer investors buying investment properties in higher rate environments because it's harder for them to make the numbers work because it takes a while to get back to that equilibrium point. And this is why you could argue this is really just the business cycle that Austrian school Business cycle concept because we're not talking about inventories here like we talk about in the rest of the business cycle. We're talking about. Well, we are talking about inventories, housing, inventory, but we're talking about strike prices because investors won't make decisions when things don't make sense. They're always going to look for the best alternative for their capital. And so the supply of rental housing will constrict because not as many investors are buying or developing rental housing inventory. But also, also you have the situation where current renters cannot afford to buy and move out of the renter pool because they can't afford the higher interest rates. So they're stuck in the renter pool. So demand actually increases or at least is sustained. Well, inventory contracts. Yeah, it's a whole interesting thing. There's one more component though on the homeowner side. Okay. There are homeowners out there with these terrific, very low, artificially low interest rate mortgages.
And even if they want to move.
If their family's expanding or they want to move to another area, they won't make that move because they can't give up their cheap mortgage because they can't afford the next one. Right?
Yeah, yeah, exactly. Affordability.
It's like living in, look, you live in New York. It's like living in a rent controlled apartment. That rent controlled apartment is such a good deal that even if I want to move, if I need to move because of the families expanded, I'm not going to give it up easily. I'm going to make an artificial decision to stay in that rent controlled apartment. And a cheap mortgage is like a rent controlled apartment in a way.
That's exactly correct. I'm in 100% agreement with you that the long term interest rate, the assets.
That you have leveraged with fixed rate.
Debt and that rate is low.
That's a phenomenal asset. It's a liability on your balance sheet. But the fact the rate is low is sort of a, it's sort of an asset.
So I would agree with you that.
People don't move away from great mortgages unless they absolutely have to.
Mortgages are a terrific asset. Absolutely. That's a big part.
Yeah, I agree.
Everything you said is good.
Absolutely good. Let me continue to. So the whole life cycle of this supposed to be, this was supposed to see inflation. Right. Ultimately, why is Fed raising rates? Well, because they expect inflation to be higher. The 10 year treasury moving up.
Why?
Because 10 year treasury is reflecting expectation of inflation. So the inflation expectation goes up. Hopefully the real Inflation will go up. And typically inflation means higher gross rents.
Higher noi that enables a higher debt.
Service and better cash flows. And overall that's what forces sort of appreciation based on income approach. Obviously residential properties don't just trade on income, they trade also on market forces, on competitive properties and the pricing.
But the investment math in commercial or.
Investment real estate is very similar from the math perspective. My question is maybe interest rates are good for the real estate and in the long run, yes, I would agree that the interest rates are generally pretty good. Real estate is a great hedge against inflation. So if interest rates are reflecting inflation, then real estate holdings over time should work as a hedge. But the problem is that the quickly raising interest rates could cause that crisis. So it's not again the increases themselves, but it's the velocity of the increases that could cause problems. I mentioned this a little earlier in this discussion, but if there's a rate reset on variable rate mortgages or fixed for five years and then they reset, or there are assets that need to be purchased or sold, that's where the rate reset could cause all kinds of grief, requiring additional capital contributions, inability to refinance and whatnot. So it could cause debt crisis. And real estate is not the only sector. The whole economy is overleveraged. By the way, one of the reasons why stock market is reacting very nervously right now to rising interest rates is because the corporate balance sheets are heavily over leveraged with cheap financing.
The moment that debt rolls over, much.
Higher cost of financing, much worse earnings. So what we're seeing in the stock market right now is a fear that the earnings are peaking temporarily or in.
The long run they'll go up again.
When inflation catches up. But for now that's the problem is that the PE is at the peak level and that's where the stock market is right now is in a nervous breakdown. Again, I mentioned this. The major risk is the fact that the Fed is raising rates too fast. It'll slow down many sectors of the economy.
As I mentioned, refinancing costs will go up and they can cause just major, major crisis on refinancing.
This also may cause psychological issues. The moment corporations earnings go down.
What do corporations do? They cut spending.
They have responsibility to investors. So a significant part of this is consumer sentiment, the fact that the consumers are spending money. But the moment corporations start cutting jobs.
The whole thing might go into a.
Vicious recession cycle faster than you think. How to prepare for rising interest rates? Well, number one, refinance today, lock in long term fixed rates. Today they're still good on a long term basis. So if you can do this, do this. The other point that I'm making is reduce leverage, especially if you have variable rates. Don't get over leveraged. If you can get 75% loan to cost mortgage, maybe you should do 70 or even 65. Put a little bit more cash in. It'll create safety, it'll reduce your leverage. You may not feel you're getting as great a return on equity if the prices were climbing up. But what if there's a recession? My point is having lower leverage will help you during a recession. And now we're not looking at a great appreciation period of time. We're looking at potentially some level of correction and recession. The other point to keep in mind is at times it's good to have partners. So instead of taking on more debt, maybe take on a partner, have somebody chip in some capital and reduce borrowing. The next point is cash is the king. Increase cash reserves as much as you can. First of all, the cash in the bank today starts earning interest. That's the good news. That's what Jason, you said. The savers are making return on their money. So having cash, having some interest on cash helps.
Second, well, I would say a little bit of cash, but not too much because cash is a money losing deal after taxes and inflation.
Yeah, I agree, I agree.
So what I was saying is you want enough cash to get yourself through the storm, you need reserves. It should be called reserves, not cash.
Look at my slide. What does it say? It says increase cash reserves. I did not say go to 50% in cash.
Fair enough.
5% in cash, go to 10%. That's all I'm saying.
Okay.
A little bit more cash maybe for the downturn. Got it.
Exactly.
And when the market cracks and opportunities come to table, having cash is always handy to take advantage of those opportunities. Diversify. So that goes without saying. As much as you can. Keep diversifying between different markets, types of assets, location, and as you mentioned, various parts of the country will behave very differently. So coastal markets can go up and down like a yo yo. While steady ending markets may do much better from that perspective, diversification is a great play and focus on cash flow. Just focus on good solid cash flow generating assets and fixed long term interest rates.
Good stuff. Mike. Thank you for joining us. Appreciate it. Give out your website.
The easy way to remember is bigmikefund.com.
So this is, this is my podcast, bigmikefund.com and I did grab a site called bigmicfund.com as well, but the primary website is tempofunding.com the word temporary investments.
T e m p o tempofunding.com and.
Appreciate you having me on the podcast.
Big Mike, thanks for joining us. Good to talk to you.
Good to talk to you, Jason.
Thank you.
Thank you so much for listening. Please be sure to subscribe so that you don't miss any episodes. Be sure to check out the show's specific website and our general website, hartmanmedia.com for appropriate disclaimers and terms of service. Remember that guest opinions are their own and if you require specific legal or tax advice or advice in any other specialized area, please consult an appropriate professional. And we also very much appreciate you reviewing the show. Please go to itunes or stitch your radio or whatever platform you're using and write a review for the show. We would very much appreciate that and be sure to make it official and subscribe so you do not miss any episodes. We look forward to seeing you on the next episode.
More from Jason


2482: AI Labor Displacement and the K-Shaped Housing Affordability: High-End Housing and the New Economic Divide with Adam Taggart


2482: AI Labor Displacement and the K-Shaped Housing Affordability: High-End Housing and the New Economic Divide with Adam Taggart


2480 FBF: Investor Mindset & DuckDuckGo Founder, Super Thinking Mental Models & Traction, How Any Startup Explosive Growth by Gabriel Weinberg


2480 FBF: Investor Mindset & DuckDuckGo Founder, Super Thinking Mental Models & Traction, How Any Startup Explosive Growth by Gabriel Weinberg


2478 FBF: Jim Rickards on The Death of Money, Aftermath, Currency Wars & The New Great Depression


2478 FBF: Jim Rickards on The Death of Money, Aftermath, Currency Wars & The New Great Depression


2477: Builder Profit Margins Hit 26-Year Lows and Solving the American Housing Crisis

