CW 34: How to Profit From Inflation & A Real-World Portfolio Makeover with Lynda Mulley & Daniel Amerman
7 Dec 2025 · 48 min
Podcast episode (Creating Wealth #34) hosted by Jason Hartman. Includes: a portfolio-makeover example where a $2.5M Southern California property (4% RV) could be exchanged into ~34 diversified properties (target 7% RV) raising rent from ~$9.5K to ~$40.6K monthly; guidance for a smaller 10-property plan requiring ~$322K total cash (10% down + 4% reserves). Lynda Mulley answers FAQs on out-of-state property management—use local area managers, interview multiple property managers, leverage network referrals and oversight. Extended interview with Daniel Amerman explaining how fixed-rate mortgages can act as an 'offensive' left hook against inflation, historical examples from 1972–1982, and his book 'The Secret Power within your Mortgage' (MortgageSecretPower.com). Episode includes event/offer announcements and standard disclaimers.
Chapters
Please note disclaimers at end of show.
Welcome to Creating wealth with Jason Hartman. During this program, Jason is going to tell you some really exciting things that you probably haven't thought of before. And a new slant on investing. Fresh, new approaches to America's best investment that will enable you to create more wealth and happiness than you ever thought possible. Jason is a genuine, self made multimillionaire who not only talks the talk, but walks the walk. He's been a successful investor for 20 years and currently owns properties in 11 states and 17 cities. This program will help you follow in Jason's footsteps on the road to financial freedom. You really can do it. And now, here's your host, Jason Hartman, with the complete solution for real estate investors.
Welcome to the Creating wealth podcast. Happy Thanksgiving to our American listeners. It is Thanksgiving Day tomorrow, so we want to wish you and your families a very happy Thanksgiving. And today we want to talk about several things, but we're going to start off with one of the commandments. We have a prior podcast on the ten Commandments of successful investing, which kind of sums up our core philosophy of investing. And why don't we just start with number one today? And that is what we're doing today. And that is what we do in all our podcasts and our seminars. And that is thou shalt become educated. It is so important to become educated so that you, the investor, can be your own best advisor, not relying on anybody else, not even relying on us. Okay, to some extent, be your own best advisor and know the market. I did a radio interview the other night and it is amazing to me how many people still are so unaware of what is going on in the market. People that are still wanting to invest in crazy places like Las Vegas and Miami, overvalued markets, California, many of them. So we will keep you educated. That's our commitment to you here. And make sure that you have the latest and greatest and most innovative new thinking on real estate investing in America's most prudent investment. At one of our recent seminars, we had a successful investor in the front of the room. Her name was Evelyn. Hi, Evelyn, if you're listening. I know you're a podcast listener, so it's good to have you with us. And she shared her what we call portfolio makeover with us. And this is an exercise that any of our investment counselors here at the office would be happy to do for you. And we also do it as just a quick sample in our seminars. So I thought I'd share this one with you. She has a Property in Southern California that's valued at about $2.5 million. And this is so amazing how much money people have that is not working for them. And we want to put this money to work. And Evelyn, being very sharp, saw this right away and wanted to jump on this and make it work for her. So the property worth $2.5 million rents for about a 4 RV ratio. And if you've listened to us talk about RV or rent to value ratios on other podcasts, what that's about, our ideal target is a 7% RV ratio. So the before and after picture here is really wonderful, really exciting and really awakening. Because if she were to sell or refinance this $2.5 million property and do it on a tax free event, a 1031 tax deferred exchange with 20% down on the new properties she could buy, assuming she could qualify for all of the loans, which won't be easy because this is a big number, about 34 properties in diversified markets around the country. I mean, think about that one property, non diversified, all your eggs in one basket in Southern California, which is a declining market with bad cash flow at the current time, or 34 properties in basically a kingdom, an empire of real estate spread all around the US in diversified markets. Now, the portfolio value would go from about $2.5 million. And by the way, this client we're talking about has other assets, but this is just one asset. And we want to put each asset to work at its highest and best use. So the before picture is one $2.5 million property, 334 diversified properties around the country would be a value of about $5.8 million. And look at the difference in the rental income. Currently it's $9,500 a month. But in the diversified markets, with all of these properties, assuming our target of the 0.7% RV ratio is achieved, the rental income here would be $40,600 a month, $40,000 a month versus $9,500 a month. And there'd be a whole lot more tax benefits and of course, a whole lot more diversification. Now, that's our basic idea on the portfolio makeover. Let me just give you a suggested portfolio. And this is much smaller than this particular client could do. She could do a lot more than this and put a lot more money to work. And I'm sure she is working on that now because I know she was very excited after attending our last two seminars. But if you wanted to buy 10 properties and you wanted to buy those properties, assuming you could qualify for all the loans. It's always subject to qualifying based on 10% down. It would only take $248,000. Now, we always suggest that our clients keep at least 4% of the value of all the properties in reserves, cash reserves of 4%. So down payment and closing cost $248,000. Cash reserves of just under $74,000 for the total cash needed to have a little mini real estate empire here. Donald Trump would probably be eventually worried here that you'd be catching up to him. Of 10 properties in diversified markets is only $322,000. Do you know our typical client comes to us with about $300,000 or so equity sitting in their home, not working for them. That equity is earning exactly 0% interest and there is no FDIC insurance. That is sleepy money. It is lazy money. Put it to work at its highest and best use. That's just a little taste of the portfolio makeover. Again, there's more to it than that. Our investment counselors here would be happy to help you with it. And of course you can call us at any time to have your own portfolio makeover done. And make sure you're using your assets, whether it be stocks, bonds, mutual funds, a savings account, equity in a rental property, equity in your own home. Make sure it's working as hard as it can. You work hard in your career. You want your kids to work hard. If your spouse is working, maybe you want your spouse to work hard too. Make your money work for you. It's really easy to do you and a very prudent thing to do. So that's a taste of the portfolio makeover. Alright, I want to do something kind of different today for the podcast. I have one of our investment counselors and area managers here, Linda Mulley, and we are going to be on the Future podcast constantly answering a lot of the frequently asked questions we get from our clients. So Linda, what is your question?
The question I've been getting a lot lately and I think it's a recurring one and a good one from our investors, is the concern about buying real estate out of state. And that is the question on what do we do for property management when we purchase a property and we're buying it out of state, where we may not necessarily go look at it or even see it in the first year that we own it?
Absolutely, Linda, that's a great question. I have never seen most of my properties. I kind of think about my other investments too. I think about my stocks that I own and you know, I've never visited any of those companies either. In fact, I'm not a customer of most of those companies. I have no idea how they run their business. Now, I don't think this is a good way to invest. Okay. Because we believe in direct investing. So what we do is we help people diversify and build national real estate portfolios so that they are in many markets. A long time ago, I remember reading back in the early 80s in my first real estate book, it was a Robert Allen book where he said, try to have all your rental properties within one hour of your house. And you know what? That would be reasonably good advice. It doesn't work today, but it would be reasonably good advice if I lived in a market that made sense to invest in. But I don't. I live in a very expensive, overvalued market here in Orange County, California, and it doesn't work here. Investing doesn't work here. So what do I do? What are my choices? Do I either not invest in real estate at all, or do I invest only in other things like stocks and bonds and we know the lousy performance of those investments, or do I decide I'm going to be a sophisticated national investor? Now, what we do here at Platinum Properties Investor Network is we, of course, provide the complete solution for real estate investors so we have a national perspective where we look at properties all over the country. We're not attached to any one market. When a market stops making sense, we don't recommend it. We just go somewhere else. And then we make it very easy for our clients to coordinate national portfolios of real estate. So you're an area manager, and I know what you do, and I know what our other area managers do. You go to markets, you visit the markets. You get your shoes dirty. You look through the tracks of homes as they're under construction or the tracks of commercial properties when a commercial property is under construction. And then you interview, at least in each area, at least three property managers. You try to meet with them all face to face, and you ask them tough questions about the rental market. What is going on with the rental market? Are properties renting easily or are landlords being forced to give concessions? And one of the nice things about talking to property managers versus real estate agents and developers is that the property managers like us here at Platinum Properties Investor Network, they have to live with the investment. They have to live with a client on the ongoing basis. And so they are much more likely to. To give you the real picture of what's going on out there versus the Pollyanna picture of, hey, we just want to sell you a property. So our area managers research markets and that's what they do. And they're not attached to any one market. So if a market doesn't work, they just go somewhere else. We're completely disloyal to markets. We only want to be in working markets. And then the other thing we do is we of course provide a lot of leverage over that property manager to make sure our clients get good service. So the example is we tell you as a client, diversify, be in several markets. The problem with diversification, it's good advice, but there is one downside to it, is that when you're diversified, you might have one or two properties in each city, so you don't represent a large account to any one property manager. And I always say that property management is a thankless, low paying job. So a property manager might have two or 300 accounts under management, and if they lose one client because the client gets upset or the property is not rented and they're not receiving income, it's no big deal to them. But we, on the other hand, have referred maybe two, three, four dozen, over 100 clients to that one property manager. And so if our client has trouble getting good service from the property manager, email or call your investment counselor here at Platinum Properties and we will call them and see what's going on for you. And you know, we've only fired three property managers since we started our nationwide network about three years ago. But I tell you, if they lose our account, they lose a lot of business. So it is valuable to them. And so if they get a call or an email from us, they are responsive. So does that answer the question or was there more to it than that?
That's exactly what we do. And I think we also have a rent coordinator here that works with us and we can supplement.
Thank you.
I forgot to mention what the property manager is doing and as an area manager and I know the other area managers that we have here also are talking to these people on a weekly basis.
Weekly or sometimes daily basis.
Sometimes daily basis. We're always watching the balance of what's out there to be rented and how the rental market is going. So hopefully that makes people comfortable that we have this under control.
Yeah, it is. So we look at the absorption rates, the amounts of incentives we have to give and all that kind of stuff. So. Great question. Now let's listen into the continuation of my interview with Dan Ammerman. And this was the second part. Dan is really one of the most insightful people on inflation and the benefits of debt versus inflation. It's really the best way to win and beat the inflation gain with your mortgage. So there are particular ways to use this and listen in to the rest of this interview and then we'll be back for more. Dan, welcome to the show.
Thank you so much, Jason.
It's great to have you. Something else you talk about is boxing with inflation. Can you explain how someone can box with inflation?
Well, what I'm talking about in boxing with inflation is looking really in constant dollar economics. But there's a problem with constant dollar economics. It's so boring. It's very difficult to follow.
Okay, so what is cost in dollar economics?
It says that you look at what the dollars are and you strip out the inflation.
Okay.
When you compare them across time.
So that's really just adjusting dollars for inflation. Yeah. Okay.
Which is easier said than done.
All right.
And what I'm doing with boxing with inflation is to make it easier for people to follow the concepts that are involved. Instead of talking about economics, I'm taking three different boxers and I'm putting them in the ring with inflation. And the first one has a glass jaw. And by a glass jaw, I mean they own dollar denominated investments.
Yeah. So they're going to be very delicate when someone hits them.
It takes one hit to the jaw and down they go. The only question is how hard the hit is and their assets are going to be wiped out. And unfortunately, that's going to be true of an awful lot of people.
I know. It's just so sad. And I hope our work and your work helps correct this and many people will take action. I feel so bad for the unfortunate that don't take action on this topic. Okay. So the first boxer with a glass jaw, he gets a punch to the jaw and it breaks. And so he's wiped out because he's living his life in dollar denominated assets.
What he's doing in the boxing ring essentially is he's kind of standing there with his eyes shut and his hands by his side and kind of leaning forward with his jaw out.
Okay. So we don't want to be the boxer with a glass jaw. Who's the second boxer?
The second boxer is our control because he shows the difference between tangible assets like real estate and tangible assets plus debt. So our second boxer is someone who, let's say, owns a million dollar property, but he owns it debt free. And what this boxer has is he has a right jab and he can use that right Jab to keep inflation at bay.
How does he do that though? Because he didn't borrow, unfortunately. He didn't borrow on his property. Right.
Well, his million dollar property, property, let's say that dollar becomes worth a quarter if he's fortunate and really doesn't work that way, probably won't do quite as well in inflationary times. His million dollar property will become a four million dollar property. Okay, so you divide by four then to account for the inflation and he's still got a million dollar property in real dollar terms.
In real dollars, yes.
In fact, if we go into an inflationary environment, high interest rates tend to drop the price beneath that. So he probably wouldn't quite stay there, but he's pretty much keeping inflation at bay. So it looks like if you look at it in nominal dollars, he turned a million into 4 million and he's doing really well.
Explain for the listeners if you would, nominal dollars, because we use that term quite a bit and I know what it means. But what does it mean? You're the expert.
A nominal dollar means a dollar is a dollar. It means that a dollar is worth the same right now as a dollar was worth, let's say in 1970 when the average price of a house was $17,000. Now when we look at a difference that great, it's easy to see that a dollar is not a dollar. In fact, there hasn't been any year in our lives where a dollar has been a dollar between years. It shifts every single year, but we tend to lose track of that. So anytime you talk about dollars, but you don't adjust for a, for inflation, you're using nominal dollars. And then when you adjust for inflation, you're using real dollars.
Got it.
So our boxer with the right jab is pretty much keeping inflation at bay, but his turning 1 million to 4 million is an illusion. It didn't happen in real dollars, it just happened in nominal dollars.
Okay, so now that begs the question before we go onto the third boxer, Dan is we've seen such radical real estate appreciation prices in the past few years, especially the post 9.
Where the Greenspan interest rate cuts, which were, they were too much, that he pumped way too much liquidity in the system, in my opinion. And so we saw this huge real estate inflation. But here's the trick is that real inflation hasn't really been as much as the real estate inflation, although real inflation's been, in my opinion, higher than what the government tells us by at least double, maybe three times what the government says. But the real estate inflation has been far above that. Now, of course, if you live in Southern California like I do, your most expensive part of life is your house. And it's not necessarily true. All over for sure, but what are your comments on that? It seems like the people in this market have won because they got that radical appreciation that is above inflation. So they can go out and buy cars, watches, home theater systems, et cetera, et cetera, go on vacations that haven't gone up as much as the gains they've made from their real estate.
Yeah, you're talking about almost a matter of economic philosophy and what we call inflation because inflation is an artificial construct. There's no such thing really. The way people usually do it is they look at changes in the consumer price index, which is itself an artificial construct. I would argue, as would many other people with economics inclinations, that asset inflation is every bit as much inflation as inflation in the cost of a hamburger. That if a house doubles in cost, that's inflation, it costs you twice as much to buy. But we don't include that in our official government inflation measures.
I know, that's completely ridiculous.
What we do from a government perspective, and it looks really good for winning elections and so forth, is that we say if a house costs twice as much as it did five years ago, that we take that all into income, but we ignore the expense.
That's. So it distorts the system. Yeah. Okay, so who's the third boxer?
The third boxer has a right jab just like the second boxer. Okay, let's say they owe a. They own a million dollar property, but they have a left hook too.
Okay, so the third boxer is the best equipped. He's got a good right jab and a good left hook.
So he's got the defense in terms of the right jab and what his left hook is. It's his mortgage.
Ah, so his mortgage is an asset, Is that what you're saying?
His mortgage is how he goes on the offense against inflation. Alright, how does he turn inflation into wealth? Okay, well here's what happens. And you can look at it in nominal dollar terms. You can look at it in real dollar terms. If he had an $800,000 mortgage against that million dollar property and then a dollar's worth a quarter, he pays the mortgage back with dollars that are worth a quarter each.
Okay, so let's put it in maybe a perspective the listeners can understand a little better. So you have an $800,000 mortgage and it's now worth $200,000 and it's now worth 200,000. But like how many years went by? How much time has elapsed?
Oh, that's a really good question. If you're talking about history in terms of recent years, it may be a number of years. If we're talking about when the crunch is really hitting with the baby boom retiring over the next 10 years, that could happen in a fairly short period of time. The problem is once substantial inflation really gets out of the box, it's tough to put it back in.
Okay, so comment on that before we move on because this is really, really important. Dan, what is your projection? What is your outlook for inflation?
My outlook for inflation is that I think it is highly likely that the dollar is going to be severely damaged within the next five to 10 years.
But it's already so low. I mean, the dollar is at one of its lowest value points compared to other currencies since it's been in like 76 or something like that. I mean, it's really low right now.
Yeah, but what you have to remember about what we're seeing with the dollar and interest rates right now is they have nothing to do with the free market. They have to do with manipulations on both the long end and the short end. Right now what we're seeing with the dollar and with interest rates is we're seeing, in my opinion, fairly frantic attack attempts by the Fed to contain the damage from the subprime mortgage debacle by pumping more liquidity in the system to keep interest rates artificially low. Now, if you look at the long end, and this is something that's really changed in the last 10 years from classic economics, from people who took it in college, even from the mid-90s or before, is that our long term interest rates are kind of driven by our trade deficits. I don't know if you're familiar with that approach, but effectively, because we are buying much more goods from China and Japan and other seas nations than we can pay for, they have excess dollars. And to keep this trade going for their own reasons, they prop up our dollar. They prop up our dollar.
And this is a very dangerous thing, by the way, in my opinion, because this is an artificial deal, China could pull the rug out from under us at any time. And when they don't need us as customers so much, when they create their own 1.3 billion customers by creating more wealth in their country, that's a scary scenario. It really is.
It is. So we have this kind of artificial island of stability is how I look at it, and whether that could last Three months or three years, I don't know. I don't think anyone else knows either. But the problem is the longer we keep things at this artificial level, the more severe the adjustment is going to be when things finally break loose. Which makes me think there's a very good chance it's going to come fast and hard.
I have another theory about that, and I don't think I've even said this on a podcast before, but I think that the reason there is a lot of inflation coming at us in the future is because so much wealth is being created outside of the US You've got this giant growing middle class in China, India, many other countries. I leave for Ukraine on Wednesday and just reading an article as I'm researching the real estate market there about how everybody's got so much money now. It's just amazing that all of these economies around the world are moving up. And I mean, that's a good thing for people certainly. But what that means is that people in other countries, we can't find the cheap labor pools to keep outsourcing to forever. I think those are going to go away. And as they go away and people demand more pay, then what happens to the shelves of Target and Walmart and Costco and all of our stores here where we're getting the benefit now of, in my opinion, artificially or at least temporarily cheap consumer goods. Do you agree with that?
Oh, absolutely. I mean, that's the long term, bigger picture is depending on the source you go with, we in the United States have been fortunate enough to ask 4.5% of the world's population to be consuming about, depending on who you believe, about 25 to 33% of the world's resources. That's been very lucky for you and I growing up and the lifestyles we've enjoyed so far. But the rest of the world doesn't really want that situation to continue.
Why don't they want it to continue?
Because they want to enjoy the same benefits.
Well, yeah, no, I understand that. I didn't mean it in that sense, but so they enjoy the same benefits, they become more wealthy. There are studies that say over 200 million Chinese have been lifted out of poverty due to globalization and many more to come. So as they become more wealthy, they will start being more expensive, they will start demanding more from their employers. They may form unions and everything that happened in the US 80 years ago, 100 years ago, 120 years ago even. I think we're going to start seeing that happen around the world. And as it occurs. It's going to drive up the cost of all of these cheap consumer goods.
Exactly. Plus the cost of the resources, it's going to drive up the cost of the food, it's going to drive up the cost of oil, it's going to drive up the cost of natural gas. As there are more and more middle class people around the world who are able to bid against the American consumer for the rights to those goods.
Absolutely. So they're consuming more and more. And it's just a simple supply and demand equation. You look at China now, 10 years ago people were driving bicycles, now they're driving cars. And what happened to the price of oil and what happened to all the building materials due to all this construction that's going on all around the world? So it's just getting more and more expensive everywhere.
And what we risk is something that economists call, and I apologize for using the term, a supply side shock.
What does that mean?
That was what really got inflation going in the 1970s, where the dollar lost 57% of its value in a 10 year period. And that is, if the cost of buying supplies, in this case it was because of an oil embargo, rises sharply, that sends a shock into the system and prices start rising all around. And then as that happens, it becomes built into people's expectations and then more prices rise and then you're in a cycle where it becomes very difficult to get out of it. And we're risking that with commodities kind of across the board.
Yeah. So that has definitely happened in other countries too where we've seen this rampant inflation. Argentina, Zimbabwe, these countries have just experienced massive debilitating rates of inflation. But if people owed money, did they benefit there?
Well, let's go back to our example with a person that had a million dollars in property and they had an $800,000 mortgage. If you look at it in just a dollar being a dollar, what happens is the property is now worth 4 million. The mortgage is still 800,000. So instead of having $200,000 in equity, they have $3.2 million.
Boy, do I love real estate. At least so far.
Yeah. In my opinion, if you want to understand why that statistics get thrown around that 7 out of 10 or 8 out of 10 millionaires in the US made their money in real estate. It has more to do with what we're talking about right now than it does the property itself.
Yeah, that's a good point. That might on its face bode poorly for real estate investors, but the question is, what else can you do with your money.
Well, it's an arbitrage opportunity. And that's why I've ended up getting into looking at this turning inflation into wealth business. Is that right now, because of governmental policy, we have not only the danger of very high inflation in the future, but we have artificially pressed interest rate levels. So you can't go out and buy a bond or buy a mortgage that's going to incorporate the risk of future inflation. So when you take an arbitrage perspective, instead of saying, well, that's a real problem, I can't invest at the right rate, you say, what an opportunity. What a perfect opportunity to lock in long term low cost tax advantage funds.
You know what I say, Dan? My podcast and at my seminars, I say, here is the opportunity that really may never come again in our life. These low, low interest rates. So here's the opportunity to lock in your cost of borrowing for three decades. And not just your cost of borrowing is locked in for three decades. But if you ask yourself a question, well, if you invest in a house, for example, just a simple single family home, how long does a house last? And the numbers are all over the board. But I say a house lasts about 50 years before you want to do an extensive remodel to it. But think about what happens there. You've locked in your cost of construction, your cost of those commodities that make the house for five decades, your cost of borrowing for three. Interest rates go up, inflation does its thing, and the cost of those commodities that form the house. I call this packaged or assembled commodities investing. So when you buy a house, what do you buy? You buy a bunch of concrete, lumber, maybe some steel, glass, copper wire, petroleum products, et cetera. And it seems like you just win from every perspective there, right?
Yeah, I would put that as a right jab and a left hook. Your right jab is the commodities in the house that are maintaining their value. The left hook is the value of the debt that gets destroyed by inflation. And what happens then is that your real wealth leaps upward to cover the difference.
Yeah, it's incredible. So are you finished on that example, the $800,000 mortgage, million dollar property. You have inflation that basically causes the house to quadruple in value. So it's worth 4 million. The debt, you're only paying back 25% of it. So it's only 200,000, is that what you're saying?
Well, I'm saying that what you need to do is ignore the million going to 4 million.
All right?
That's what everybody focuses on. So they Think that you made your $3 million off the property. You didn't. It's like we saw with the right jab only investor, all you did with the property was maintain where you made real dollars.
Yes, yes. Okay, okay.
Where you made your money was in real dollars. What was an $800,000 mortgage is now really only $200,000 in purchasing power terms. So you went from owning 20% of a million dollar property in real terms for 200,000 to owning 80% of a million dollar property. That's where the real money is. It's in the debt.
You know, Dan, that is a great way that you say that the real money is in the debt because now you own so much more of that same property in essence. Right? Yes.
It was the left hook that did it. And that's why I use that analogy, people. Everyone looks at the right jab and they say that's where you made your money. But when you run the numbers and you look at it, the right jab, all it does is defensive move. The real money with inflation is made with that left hook.
Okay, so there's the three boxers. Yeah, excellent, excellent point. This all sounds good in theory, but is there any real historical, historical hard evidence, Dan, that this works in practice?
Oh, tremendous, tremendous. And it forms a good part of probably the background of most people in this country today. And if you recall, I talked about working with savings and loans in the aftermath of the last big bout of inflation.
Sure.
That was a previous financial crisis in this country. And what happened there, that I think is not generally rational recognized, is that when the savings and loans lost about $2 trillion, you're talking about the late.
80S, early 90s, Charles Keating era, Lincoln Savings SNL crisis.
Yes, but what that was really reflecting was the delayed effects of the 70s and early 80s inflation. Because what happened was that the old rule with the savings and loans was 5, 4 and 3. You lent out money at 5, you bought at 4% and you were at the golf course by 3 o'. Clock. It wasn't rocket science.
That was when we had bankers hours.
Yes, exactly. And then the inflation hit in the 1970s and all of a sudden they were paying 10% for funds.
And that really destroyed the banks is what you're saying.
It destroyed the industry. It absolutely destroyed the industry. But what people miss is that for every dollar of loss that the savings and loans were taking, there was a family on the other side that was benefiting because you had tens of millions of households across the country. And this is something I track in Exact terms for exactly average households with exactly average homes with exactly average mortgages and real historic inflation rates during the 10 year period at the height of the inflation from 1972 to 1982, an average family that had bought an average home with say, 20% equity, where their equity would have then been equal to about 25% of their mortgage amount, would have seen their equity climb to 500% of their mortgage amount.
Isn't that amazing?
So it was the very same decade that the dollar lost 57% of its value. The Dow Jones Industrial Average. If you look at an inflation adjustment, adjusted terms, which most stock firms prefer not to.
Yes, because it would show how much money they're losing or how little people are gaining.
The Dow Jones went down 62% in inflation adjusted terms in one decade. And the very same economic conditions that made that happen boosted the average homeowner's wealth in terms of their equity in their home from about 25% of their mortgage to 500%. It was one of the greatest transfers of real wealth we've ever seen in this country.
That's amazing. And so what really happened there, though, is that the people that won were the people that owned real estate, number one, but number two, borrowed money to own real estate.
Exactly. If you track. And something else. Again, I use a control much like our right jab only boxer.
Yeah. So the people that didn't borrow only had the right jab. They weren't the boxer with the right jab and the left took.
Correct. The average home went from about 17,000 to a little over $41,000 over that time. But when you adjust for inflation, someone who didn't own a mortgage would have lost about 3% of the value of their home. Yeah, they wouldn't have made a dime, but if they had the mortgage, it would have been one of the best investments they made in their life.
So the people with no debt, no mortgage on the property are basically treading water. At least they're not being destroyed by inflation. But they're not making the gains in essence. Right.
They're not even really doing that well. Although there's some exemptions with homes when you consider taxes, which we can talk about a little more in a bit.
Okay, so they're doing a little less than treading water, but they're not getting completely wiped out like the others.
Exactly. Yes. They're kind of maintaining their position with that right jab.
Okay. You've been talking about changes in property values and loan values. What about making the mortgage payments? Don't they pull down the benefits to the owner.
The mortgage payments are really the best part. The best part, where you do the best is not when you sell your house. Okay, let's take an example, and let's look in, say, 1982, someone who'd been in the inflationary situation for 10 years.
And I don't know if you remember the real estate market at that time, but the last thing most people wanted to do was to sell their house and recognize that big profit they had in it. And the reason why was they still had loans at 6 or 7%.
Yeah. And they wanted to keep that asset, those cheap loans, Right? Yeah.
Instead of going out and getting a new mortgage at 12, 13, 14%, there was a tremendous value to them in keeping for year after year a loan that was at a well below market interest rate. And the other thing that happened is that if you're looking at the amount of income they're putting in their mortgage, maybe on average, they would have started off putting in 28% of their income, which is a good mortgage underwriting figure. Inflation had devastated the value of the dollar. After 10 years, on average, they were putting in about 10% of their income. So they had just freedom freed up 18% of their income for other purposes. And that's huge.
So you're saying if the mortgage was a fixed rate mortgage and 10 years go by in this example, then you're paying much less every month later than when you started in real dollars.
Exactly.
Because the dollars have depreciated in value. And you know, Dan, I can actually share a very specific example about my own mother. In 1976, she purchased her first home in West Los Angeles. And I remember it well. And it was $62,500 in 1976 for this little house in West Los Angeles. And I remember her being stressed that the mortgage payment was $416 per month. Now, it turns out that she moved out of that property later and kept it for many years as a rental property. And over the years, five years later, 10 years later, you know, she kept it for a long time. And over the years, that $416 mortgage payment seemed like nothing. Like, why would I be concerned about such a tiny little payment? But at the time in 1976, it seemed like a high payment.
And that's exactly where the big benefit comes in. If you had bought, say, an average house nationally in 1972, just four years before that, but inflation had already really kicked in, and getting that payment up to where it was, the average mortgage payment was only $101. This is for a three bedroom house in the suburbs. And if you look at the amount of money that was costing, particularly with even being able to deduct part of that as an interest rate deduction, there are millions of families all across the country where that's how their kids went to summer camp, that's how their kids went to college, that's how they paid for those European vacations, because they were making $100 a month payments at the same time that everyone around them was paying $500 a month, $1,000 a month. Whatever the case may be, the benefits.
Of inflation are just wonderful. There are numerous benefits. You know what's even better though, Dan, is we're just talking about the typical homeowner living in the house that they're paying this mortgage on. But what happens when you invest and you buy a rental property is twice as good, if not even more, because the tenant makes the mortgage payment for you, and so the tenant is paying the bank back in depreciating dollars on your behalf, and you're getting the benefit of a loan balance that is being reduced through inflation and a property that is appreciating in value through inflation. So it's just a win, win, win, win, win everywhere you look. Right.
I love commercial property. For inflation. It's really hard to come up with a better investment.
Oh, well, you say commercial property, but residential rental property is even better because you can borrow more and the rates are lower and they're longer term fixed rates.
You're exactly right. I was using commercial generically.
Yeah.
In the sense that anything you're doing for money, as opposed to your personal residence.
Absolutely.
But the benefits are tremendous. And as you say, you're getting them simultaneously, you're getting them on the asset appreciation side and you're getting them on the cash flow side. If you start off with, let's go back to that example. With a million dollars, it's not just that you're going to go from, let's say 200,000 in equity to 3.2 million in equity, it's that you're going to have a tremendous amount of cash flow freed up on a monthly basis because your rental payments will more or less rise with inflation, your mortgage payments will stay down, and that means that you're going to get a rapid increase in real cash flow. And the stronger inflation is, the more powerful your increase in real cash flow.
Excellent. Yeah. That's just a very powerful, powerful tool. Well, Dan, we've been talking for a while here about these inflation principles. And I'd like to get into the subject of taxes on a future podcast with you, if that's okay. But in closing on this part of the subject, I mean, it sounds like the rule is buy real estate and appreciating asset, borrow as much money as you can to do it. And would you recommend borrowing that money as a fixed rate? See, I think the fixed rate is.
I absolutely believe in fixed rate. And I also would not recommend necessarily borrowing as much as you possibly can.
How much would you recommend borrowing?
I think the key here is to borrow prudently, because the other thing that you need to keep in mind is that I think there's a good chance we're going to be hitting a period of economic turmoil coming up over the next several years. It may be starting right now. So the thing about debt is I think of debt as it's a tool, whereas many people think it's a moral judgment, it's a tool. And you want to carefully select the right amount of that tool so that if you do hit an adverse year or three or something like that, your debt doesn't take you down.
Yeah, that's a really good point. I'm glad you said it that way, because the game of real estate investing is always a game of staying power. And when you acquire a good asset, like a good property, you want to be able to keep it through a storm, through some rough weather. But also when you acquire that property, like if you're acquiring it today, another good asset you're going to acquire with it is a good mortgage. Because the mortgages even now are just historically excellent, even though it's become a little bit harder to borrow, fortunately, due to the mortgage situation going on. But you want to keep that mortgage asset too. So you've got to manage debt prudently and according to what you can afford afford and what the really the property can support or the property can afford, but also have a little bit of depreciating cash in reserve to pay for vacancies and so forth.
If I can kind of reinforce that from another perspective, then I think when people look at real estate, they're concentrating for the most part on their right jab. They want the best possible property. And many people don't really look at their left hook other than borrowing as much money as possible. But if you want the best long term strategy for fighting inflation and winning, you really need to be looking at your left hook every bit as carefully as you're looking at your right jab.
Very good advice that's Dan Ammerman. And Dan, where can people learn more about your principles and your book? Tell us about your book.
The book is the Secret Power within your Mortgage.
What a great title.
It's about a 200 page book that starts off by spending about three chapters talking about how things have worked in the past. So we're not just talking theory here, we're talking how things have actually worked out. And then it spends the next 12 chapters kind of talking in detail about how people can take these principles and today apply them to making the best decisions.
Excellent. Where can they order the book from.
The website MortgageSecretPower.com Excellent.
Excellent. Dan, any words in closing? And we'd like to have you back for a future interview on taxes and some other subjects as well.
Well, I sure appreciate that. I guess my only closing words would be to concentrate on that left hook.
All right, thank you, Dan Ammerman. Such great advice and we look forward to having you back on a future podcast.
Thank you so much, Jason. Hey, so we've been Platinum members for a couple of years now and we're just real pleased with the way things are working out.
We couldn't be happier and it's really changed our lives for the better.
Are you ready to take the next step? Then join us at Platinum Properties Investor Network in Costa Mesa, California for our next Creating wealth seminar on Saturday, September 20th. As millions have discovered, you can become very wealthy by investing in prudent income properties. Jason Hartman and the rest of the Platinum Properties team will show you how to select the very best markets, earn returns in excess of 30%, and protect yourself from a loss of equity. In this full day educational event, you will learn all about Jason's unique conservative investment philosophy that works in real life with no hype. Seats are limited, so visit jasonhartman.com today to register. That's Jason hartman.com on October 25th and 26th, join us at the Masters Weekend, a gathering of experts. This special event only happens twice a year. With our panel of 16 experts, we're putting enough real estate brain power in one room to make Donald Trump flinch. The Masters Weekend is a powerhouse education that can revolutionize how you think about money and wealth. Our speakers come armed with the latest in shrewd real estate investing techniques and will address such issues. The smart way to choose your properties, how to grab every tax benefit the law allows, how to put together the most creative financing package possible, the hidden power of the 1031 exchange, and how to easily invest in dynamic growth markets outside of California Order your ticket before October 1st and you'll receive our early bird discount. Space is limited. Reserve your seat now. Head to jasonhartman.com and click on Events. That's jasonhartman.com the Masters Weekend beginning October 25th have you heard about the GoZone? What might be the greatest tax benefit in history? If not, you must attend our GoZone tax benefit seminar on Tuesday, September 16th right here in Costa Mesa, California. Act now to start slashing taxes from the past two years and set up your ironclad tax annihilation plan for next year. Sure, you could spend months picking through tedious legal jargon yourself, but our real estate specialists already understand it. And for less than the price of a good steak with all the trimmings, you can be front row center at the GoZone seminar. Ask questions, take notes, bring your tax advisor. Leave with a solid understanding of how to save on taxes like no other time in history. To register for this very special event on September 16th, head to jasonhartman.com and click on Events.
Jason hartman.com Attention agents, brokers and mortgage people. Do you know that we cooperate? Do you know that our network is an open system that you can refer clients and outsource your investor clients to us and receive passive income? It's a really great opportunity. All you have to do is register your clients@jasonhartman.com and tell them to attend one of our live events, our live educational seminars, listen to our podcast, go to the website and request our free CD@JasonHartman.com and if they invest with us, per the terms listed on the website, you will get a referral fee. We have lots of agents, brokers and mortgage people that receive surprise referral fees that they weren't even expecting expecting. They get a check in the mail and they are just happily, happily surprised. It's a nice extra supplement to your income. So be sure to take advantage of our broker cooperation. Agents are welcome, we cooperate with outside people and we'd love to help you with your investor clients.
Hey, I just wanted to announce a couple of quick things for you. If you are able to come to one of our live events, we would love to see you and meet you in person. We've had people fly in from all over the US for them, so hopefully you can join us for some of those events. I wanted to mention to you that we have a new offering, a free cd, a free audio CD that you will really, really like. We've had so many people that have given us really good comments about them and you can go to our website@jasonhartman.com and just fill out a little quick web form and you can either download it or you can have the physical CD mailed to you in the postal mail. But get the free cd. Especially if you are a new listener, you need this. And if you are a regular listener and you've listened to all the other old shows, you don't need the CD so much. But it will be a nice review for you either way. But if you're a new listener, you definitely want to go to jasonhartman.com and request the free CD. Remember that Platinum Properties Investor Network has moved. We are in our beautiful new office in Costa Mesa, California 555 Anton, Suite 150 in Costa Mesa, California 92626 and we're right by world famous South Coast Plaza so come in for a visit and a little shopping. Also, we just uploaded another video podcast and I highly recommend that you subscribe to that. There's some stuff that just lends itself better to video than audio. If you want to see what's on that, subscribe to it. You can go to jasonhartman.com if you use itunes or an ipod and you're an Apple person, then you can go to the itunes store. Type in Jason Hartman and two podcasts will come up, the video podcast and the audio podcast. And you're probably already if you're listening a subscriber to the audio podcast. So make sure you get yourself a free subscription to the video podcast as well. And this particular one that we just loaded in, the video podcast is about naked short sales and what goes on with this short sale and manipulation of the stock market. It's a very interesting report from Bloomberg News and I think you'll really learn a lot from that, so be sure to tune in and watch that. Be sure to see appropriate disclaimers and disclosures on our website@jasonhartman.com remember that we are not tax or legal advisors. Anyway, we'll talk to you next week. Thanks for listening.
Copyright The Hartman Media Company for publication, rights and interviews, please email mediaasenhartman.com this show offers very general information concerning real estate for investment purposes. Opinions of guests are their own. Jason Hartman is acting as President of Platinum Properties Investor Network exclusively. Nothing contained herein should be considered personalized personal, financial, investment, legal or tax advice. Every investor's strategy and goals are unique. You should consult with a licensed real estate broker or agent or other licensed investment tax and or legal advisor before relying on any information contained herein. Information is not guaranteed. Please call 714-820-4200 and visit www.jasonhartman.com for additional disclaimers, disclosures and questions.
More from Jason


2482: AI Labor Displacement and the K-Shaped Housing Affordability: High-End Housing and the New Economic Divide with Adam Taggart


2482: AI Labor Displacement and the K-Shaped Housing Affordability: High-End Housing and the New Economic Divide with Adam Taggart


2480 FBF: Investor Mindset & DuckDuckGo Founder, Super Thinking Mental Models & Traction, How Any Startup Explosive Growth by Gabriel Weinberg


2480 FBF: Investor Mindset & DuckDuckGo Founder, Super Thinking Mental Models & Traction, How Any Startup Explosive Growth by Gabriel Weinberg


2478 FBF: Jim Rickards on The Death of Money, Aftermath, Currency Wars & The New Great Depression


2478 FBF: Jim Rickards on The Death of Money, Aftermath, Currency Wars & The New Great Depression


2477: Builder Profit Margins Hit 26-Year Lows and Solving the American Housing Crisis

